The Single Epic Rogan/Pool Moment That Exposed Twitter's Jack & Vijaya

There’s been a LOT of talk about Joe Rogan’s second podcast with Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey. This time Dorsey invited Vijah Gadde who serves as the global lead for legal, policy, and trust and safety at Twitter and Joe Rogan invited independent Journalist Tim Pool.

Much has been said about this including that Tim Pool basically wiped the floor with Dorsey and Gadde.

But this whole 3 hour and 25 minute podcast can be summed up and Twitter’s warped sense of reality clarified with these very telling clips where Tim Pool brought up the case of noted Femanist Megan Murphy and the reason she was banned from Twitter’s platform. The context of this discussion is Twitter’s claim of coming down on and suspending or terminating the accounts of those who use their platform to engage in what they call “targetted harassment.”

(clip)

This is simply an observable fact…no matter what justification Vijah tries to summon here.

(clip)

BTW, “Context on the platform” is a constant phrase and theme brought up by both Gadde and Dorsey. But what it ends up meaning is their own interpretation of the context they want to read into or take out of certain posts.

(clip)

Several times in this podcast, you get the idea that Gadde takes great comfort in the fact that Twitter policies amen certain legislative actions as though that’s some sort of legitimate justification to stiffle the free flow of thought and dissenting opinions on the twitter platform.

(clip)

Pool cuts through the BS here and goes right for the jugular. This is exactly what happened with Megan Murphy.

(clip)

Notice that she did not say ACTUAL instances of abuse or harassment…but what We’ve perceived to be abuse or harassment. In other words, you may not have even come close to violating our policies, but if we PERCIEVED that you have…then you have. You’d think the subjective standard for applying their “RULES” couldn’t be more clear….just wait…cause it’s gonna get WAY more clear.

(clip)

Actually, there is no debate if the issue is demonstrable, observable biology vs what a person wishes to be true.

(clip)

In other words, participate in their delusion.

(clip)

Yes we do…we have a very clear divide. It’s the division of what’s real and what isn’t. What someone wants people to think is true and reality itself saying shut the hell up you don’t know what you’re talking about.

(clip)

By her agreeing with Rogan here, She has unwittingly set herself up to publicly expose her and her company to the real reason for who they ban and who they don’t on twitter. Their own internal ideologies and their strong bias toward those ideologies.

(clip) Red Elephants

Here’s one example: Vince James of the Red Elephants was banned from Twitter for “engaging in hateful conduct” you can clearly see that his post was merely the stating of statistical fact. Not personal opinion. He said, “the majority of mass shooters come from fatherless homes. Fatherless homes have had a dramatic increase since 1990. School shootings have had a dramatic increase since 1990. And yet kathy griffin is still on twitter…gimme a break.

(clip)

Which Vince James and many others have not…they just happened to hold an ideological view point that was in opposition to twitter

(clip)

So, if you say that a biological man who claims to be a woman is a biological man, you get a strike which, according to Vijah is a clear case of targetted harassment. In other words, if you speak that kind of truth on our platform, you’re not welcome here. But neither pool nor rogan let this slide.

(clip)

Nope…in the context she was calling a biological man a man.

Here are some of those tweets. And I’ll leave those links in the description if you wanna read ‘em.

(clip)

Vijah does know…she constantly lies during this podcast. She knows it was a public figure.

(clip)

And that’s exactly right…but more specifically they’ve banned the ideology that stands with the truth. For twitter…truth is the new hate speech.

(clip)

Rogan makes a very good point here. Twitter’s rules are ideologically based. They are not based on what’s right and what’s wrong, they’re geared to make truth look like hate speech when it’s not. They treat truth as a bannable offense.

These two people Gadde and Dorsey are enemies of truth and friends of this new group think, news speak. Their rules are geared, not to foster the life-giving light of truth, but to promote society destroying lies.

Leave your thoughts about his for the world, the google thought police and the twitter gatekeepers in the comments section below.