Unbelievable Admission by Leftists the World Needs to See!

This is just a follow up to my last video where top-shelf, authoritative networks like CBS feel it’s okay for them to promote the initiation of violence on people with whom you disagree.

This isn’t an isolated perspective from many who claim to land on the left side of the political spectrum.

Remember teacher Evet Falarka? The one who thought it was okay to hit a guy who was expressing his opinions at a campus protest? (clip)

Listen guys…no sane, rational, logical, respectable human being would violently attack or watch an attack of another human being on the grounds of mere disagreement of a message. This is mental retardation of the highest order. None of these people attacking this guy would want others attacking them simply because they wanted to stand on a street corner an voice their opinion.

(clip)

okay….you say…Falarka is just one of those rare leftists exhibiting mental deficiencies. Stifling speech with people you don’t agree with is not a commonly held belief. And these physical attacks on people, because their saying things you don’t agree with, is not something people on the left generally espouse. They don’t want violence.

Let’s take a look at this Real time with Bill Maher which aired in september 2017 Where panelists musician Tom Morello, writer and author John Heilemann and CNN political analyst April Ryan, –discuss whether punching neo-Nazis is a legitimate form of resistance. (clip)

Maher’s right. Principle should be your guide for your actions an your words. And the greatest, most powerful and effective principle I can think of is doing to other people what you would want done to you and not doing to others what you wouldn’t want done to you.

(clip)

If you saw this guy on the bus…how would you feel. Would you wanna just walk up to him and start verbally or physically assaulting him because he was wearing a swastika? Would you enter into a conversation with him and ask him what he believes? Would you want to ignore him or start mocking him?

(clip)

At this point it’s not about a first amendment. It’s about acting like a normal human being as you interact with other human beings. If the only reason you don’t punch an innocent person out is because a group of people wrote something down on a piece of parchment centuries ago…you have some serious issues.

(clip)

Notice what Maher just did there? They ole us vs them. He reenforced the left vs right paradigm that mainstream media and the government want you to continually be distracted and divided by.

(clip)

This is about as ignorant as you can get. By that same logic…he would want to do the same for anyone who had a democrat button because they were the party of the KKK. But Tom Morello here decides to stay in the camp of those who are only selectively outraged….and so, he chooses to be okay with the initiation of violence on someone who hasn’t harmed another person.

(clip)

And of course some unthinking lemmings in the audience who would NOT want Tom or his uncle to physically assaulting them because they disagreed with a symbol they had on a shirt, applaud like brianless, spineless dopes.

(clip)

And now the hypocritical words of CNN political analyst April Ryan. Listen closely to her words.

(clip)

I don’t believe in violence but….but what April

(clip)

First she said “I don’t believe in violence” and then she said he should have been taken to jail. So she advocates police violence. She is saying that because he’s wearing something other people may not like, he should be Taken against his will, that would be kidnapping and thrown into a cage. April is okay with the initiation of violence on a guy who’s not harming anybody simply because she disagrees with wearing a certain insignia. What if he was wearing a Young Turks shirt which symbolizes the gruesome Armenian Genocide April? Still take him to jail?

(clip)

So…now we need the first amendment and the supreme court to tell us that its wrong to initiate violence on another person. This is ludicrous. How about its just plain wrong because you wouldn’t want violent actions to come upon you for no good reason.

(clip)

Maher is correlating principle with the first amendment and supreme court ruling. This is not principle. What if they change the 1^st amendment or the supreme court ruling? Would it then be open season to violently abuse people because others said it’s okay now? The principle has to be based on the immutable fact that you would not want violence to come on you for no reason. And those who violate that principle are subject to just action by the society.

(clip)

This is a violent immoral man. That’s the bottom line.

(clip)

Did you hear what Bill just said, “we all want them to be punched, but we live in a nation of laws.” IN other words…I have violence in my heart and the only thing that’s stopping me are the external man-made written laws. This is pathetic and really reveals where people are. Can you imagine being on a bus full of people like these people and the only reason they’re not punching your lights out is because there are laws out there that say you can’t just punch people’s lights out. This is the shallow level these people are operating on guys.

(clip)

And John Heilmann Reiterated it again. According to Bill’s principle’s the first amendment, the constitution…all the things we believe. These people are far far gone. What if someone punched April Ryan out or wanted her arrested because she is a part of the CNN crowd that lied to us about WMD’s and led us into a long, costly and deadly war of aggression? Of course she wouldn’t want that violence to come upon her.

Leave your thoughts about this for the world, the google thought police and all the violent aggressors who wanna punch other people they don’t agree with in the comments section below.