Challenging our public school district’s obedience to county ‘health’ ‘orders’: Catching up on flood of January communications: Principal refuses questions on ‘testing’ hypocrisy, Asst. Principal sees evidence of district lies and refuses to stand

“But he hasn’t got anything on,” a little child said.

“Did you ever hear such innocent prattle?” said the child’s father. And one person whispered to another what the child had said, “He hasn’t anything on. A child says he hasn’t anything on.”

“But he hasn’t got anything on!” the whole town cried out at last.

The Emperor shivered, for he suspected they were right. But he thought, “This procession has got to go on.” So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn’t there at all.

~ The Emperor’s New Clothes, Hans Christian Anderson, 1837 (how Patriots avoided censorship 200 years ago: place truth in children’s stories)

Perhaps the most helpful format for communication:
Summary of events from September 2020 to the most recent article,
Specific updates as they occur, and
Preview of coming events.
History: (articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41).

My best “shot” to explain, document, and prove the “Covid” + “vaccine” narrative are Crimes Against Humanity: a 4,700-word essay I sent to ~100 teacher colleagues in September, 2021 (received with silence to the facts, with ~20 eventual responses to be removed from such communications).

Summary (links = full documentation): The California “lockdown orders” necessary to “flatten the curve and keep hospitals running” have lasted since March 3, 2020. The California Emergency Services Act (ESA) is derived from California Government Code 8558 (b) requiring “beyond control” hospitals to authorize emergency dictatorial orders. Because Californians never received comprehensive hospital data, our government and corporate media “leaders” are lying in omission. Because problematic “positive cases” (and here, here) were substituted for “beyond control” hospitals, our leaders lie in commission. All testimony I’ve received from ~20 medical professionals here in NorCal report all hospitals they know of have been fully within their control throughout the “pandemic.”

As a NorCal public school teacher, at the start of our school year in September 2020, I questioned our district’s leadership and teachers’ union how their negotiated policy to “obey” county “health” “orders” is legal given the above reasonable limits to dictatorial authority. I cited our mutual Oath to “support and defend” the US and CA Constitutions within their limited governing authorities. I reminded the district I merely ask them as educated professional adults to perform what we expect from all our Californian Middle School students in our State teaching standards: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).

After two requests, the district contact person responded by ignoring my questions, and stating employees are required to obey “California mandates” “to protect you” (disobedient staff are placed on unpaid leave up to a year). I emailed our district superintendent, school board members, my school principal and two interested teachers that we teach all high school students in US History class that the district’s position of “just following orders” is an illegal defense, and asked again how ESA limits are being honored.

After continued district silence, I filed three legal complaints: federal, state, and a grievance for district violation of worker safety by issuing apparent dictatorial and illegal policy under direct threat of employment termination, $1,000 fines per violation, and one year imprisonment under Cal. Penal Code §§ 69, 148(a)(1).

Our union (HEA) responded with support to ask the district, and communicated privately they wouldn’t pursue the grievance to arbitration because working conditions were negotiated in good faith with high approval of union members. The grievance process finished with district and union agreement that the complaint didn’t qualify as a grievance because all district policies were in conformance to law.

I appealed the district’s answer to our community school board for what the district redefined as a “written complaint.” From October 2 to December 18 2020 the district was silent, despite policy promising a response within 30 days of the board’s receipt. After this December 13 reminder they were out of compliance for a response, the superintendent answered that the school board upheld the district response without comment.

I received a “non-response” after nearly 5 months from my complaint to the US Department of Justice regarding unlimited government. My complaint to the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing complaint was fielded by a phone call response in December, their promise to follow-up, and silence since.

In March 2021, our NorCal public school superintendent sent all staff an email citing county deaths from COVID nearing 1,300 with 80,000 “cases.” He also asked for our professional responses to an upcoming survey. I responded with three basic questions: how many of our staff and students have died of (not with) Covid, what is the data for overall county deaths given controversy over causes of deaths, and how many staff and students have been injured by vaccines. He ignored my questions twice, which I then shared with our school’s ~100 teachers as Chair of a school Professional Learning Community (PLC) on broad educational topics directly affecting our school’s teaching and learning. A few teachers have communicated support, but our Social Science Department found no interest in this topic when I emailed them in inquiry.

Our district superintendent then answered my questions, and concluded with: “If you do not agree with the state and county guidelines or if you believe we are not following them, please pursue your questions and concerns with the appropriate agency.” I responded I would do so, and report my findings.

I followed up with 14 CA government agencies over 6 weeks, with all ignoring the question of how the limit of “beyond control” hospitals was being honored for “emergency” dictatorial authority, and CA Senator Glazer’s office stating the 60-day limit applied only to “non-safety” related orders. I hadn’t considered an American legislature would surrender forever dictatorial powers to a governor or elected officials without a time limit, as public recourse would be limited to recall (as happened with Governor Newsom) or electing other legislators.

Therefore, school district, teachers’ union, and CA government “answers” are at this point demonstrated as intentional lies of omission to claim they answered a question about ESA to “justify” dictatorial government while leaving out any consideration of crystal-clear letter and intent requiring that our hospitals are “beyond control.” The 14 CA government agencies claim dictatorial power to close businesses, stop social gatherings, force masking, force humans to forever remain no closer than six feet from each other, and with forever dictatorial power until legislators or governor say otherwise, and while lying in commission that “emergency powers” are authorized by unreliable “positive” “cases.”

At the end of April 2021, I wrote a lengthy and fully documented report of those 14 CA government agencies’ responses, and emailed it with a cover letter to district leadership, school board members, teachers’ union leadership, our PLC members, and school teachers. The district’s Assistant Superintendent of Human Resources immediately responded with threats of disciplinary action for unspecified violations of district policies, as did my school principal. The district never responded to my repeated requests and Grievance to cite anything I wrote to substantiate their complaints. The district has never rescinded their first of four steps for employment termination.

Stop and appreciate the irony of public school district leadership refusing to cite factual claims while requiring it of all middle school students. Again: “Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of primary and secondary sources.” (page 81).

I appealed to our teachers’ union for relief (and here, here). After 4 emails and 15 days of silence from our union President and VP, I sent this email to 14 of the Board of Directors of our teachers’ union. Our President and VP then responded for a next step “to gain clarification regarding matters within our scope and discuss next steps, if any,” followed by a Zoom meeting. Our union President raised the topic at her regular weekly meeting with the district’s Assistant Superintendent of HR on May 25, 2021. The district then emailed me claiming my PLC report “harasses or disparages” my colleagues “based on their political beliefs,” yet failed again to provide any documentation or explanation despite the union and my requests.

I responded with three employee grievances for apparent contract violations.

On July 8, I spoke by phone with our teachers’ union president, who reported that the district would again consider my Grievances as employee complaints outside their contractual obligations, with the HR Assistant Superintendent admitting failure to address my requests for the district to document and explain their complaints.

On July 9, 2021 our teachers’ union held a Zoom conference with ~100 teachers to explain the tentative agreement for work conditions for the 2021 – ‘22 school year to obey “the most restrictive health measures” “ordered” by state, county or federal government. I asked the first question for our union to explain how the state has ordering authority given the strict limits of “beyond control” hospitals, with union president, VP, and another union board member responding they are still representing my question, but all legal information they’ve received is that there is no requirement to oppose ordering authority until proven in court.

My school district’s final answer to my three employee grievances came on July 21, 2021:
Teachers, staff, students and families will follow “health” “orders” because they are ordered.
“Health” “orders” are whatever is ordered. The district will not respond to requests for documentation of “ordering” authority, nor even acknowledge the question was asked despite legal obligation to explain how all policies are within the limits of the law.
If teachers ask further questions how “health” “orders” are lawful or healthy, they will be disciplined up to termination under the “reason” that such questions “harass and/or disparage other’ political beliefs.”

On July 24 I responded to the district’s formal initiation of “disciplinary action steps” that lead to termination for unprofessional conduct by offering the district choice to finally cite their unsubstantiated complaints against me, withdraw the complaints and censorship, or face my attorney. On July 26, the district’s Assistant Superintendent for Human Resources responded in refusal to substantiate their claims of my unprofessional work; claiming “The District has provided you with the appropriate documentation that has sufficiently responded to your requests. At this time, there is no additional information that can be provided to you that has not already been provided.” Our teachers union President called me with analysis from her conversations with district leadership that the district is unwilling to look beyond their legal orders, and must be forced by court or legislative orders.

I had a productive first conversation with an America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) connected attorney, who promised to converse with her team to evaluate my case for possible lawsuit support. A second conversation affirmed the strength of this case from its abundant documentation, and that the network of lawyers are filing lawsuits based on their judgment of the best cases to help the most amount of people. I promised my willingness to serve as a plaintiff, and to keep them informed of unfolding events.

On September 4, 2021, I reported to my ~100 teacher colleagues my best “shot” to “red pill” them about dozens of game-changing facts corporate media never report (my published research on corporate media “reporting” lies known to be false as they were told for the many variants of the Wars on Terror). This report to teachers (at “Update 3”) makes a great essay to share with comprehensive facts of our big picture condition (and here).

On Friday September 17, our district superintendent announced the school board would address mandatory student “vaccines” on Wednesday, September 22. I responded to district and teachers’ union leadership with legal notice of their prima facie-crimes to require experimental medical products, and initiated another employee Grievance for contract violation guaranteeing policies in conformance to law.

On Wednesday September 22, the school board voted 5-0 to “mandate” full student “vaccination” for “Covid” (again, please see my essay to ~100 teachers for absolute proofs for quotation marks). The public comment session for 1-minute remarks were ~15 against and ~25 for. Four parents and two employees contacted me to begin ongoing conversations. My three employee Grievances (at that point) also gave our teachers’ union an ultimatum to honor our contract that all district policies be “in conformance with law” by standing with me against the district’s illegal “mandates” that violate US Codes 21 and 18, and California Government Code 8558 (b) that “emergency orders” authority requires “beyond control” local resources (hospitals in this case). CDC’s latest data seem definitive proof that California and national hospitals are well within control, just as each and every one of the ~20 local doctors, nurses, and other professionals I’ve asked have told me since March 2020.

On October 2, I sent a second email to our teachers’ union President, VP, and district Board Members arguing for their legal and Oath-sworn obligation to stand with me to force the district to explain the legality of their “health” “orders” given the above crystal-clear in letter and intent legal limits (the district’s stated position is “we just follow orders, and so will you”).

On October 17, 2021 I sent another Professional Learning Committee (PLC) report to district and union leaderships + Boards, and ~100 teacher colleagues with two central topics. First: HUSD refuses to address limits to state/county/district “health orders” regarding required student and teacher use of Emergency Use Authorized medical products (EUAs), despite :
Federal law Title 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requiring EUAs be administered only and always with “option to refuse” experimental medicine.
Article 6 of the US Constitution is explicit that federal law is superior to state law/“mandates”/“orders.”
California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 uphold federal law that every individual: “Be given the opportunity to decide to consent or not to consent to a medical experiment without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.”
The second topic of the October 17 PLC report is that our teachers’ union shared their position why “health orders” to “require” EUAs is lawful: the government is not kidnapping and forcibly injecting teachers. Yes, seriously; that’s their “legal” “justification.” I was glad to force an answer, and didn’t pursue further as I’d rather keep the union as a partner to force reasonable district answers.

On October 21, 2021, our teachers’ union president emailed me to declare my employee grievance void that requested the district to either cite their legal authority for EUA work requirements given the limits of three definitive laws, or to downgrade “requirements for employment” to “advice.” The “reason” given was the union claims that the district doesn’t have to cite legal authority for policy because any proofs of illegal policies “do not concern violations of the CBA (Collective Bargaining Agreement)” despite the CBA stating all district policies must be “in conformance with law.” Both HEA and HUSD claim that state dictatorial “orders” are sufficient legal authority to compel obedience, and both have never addressed our mutual STATE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE for We the People to serve as a check on exactly this problem of illegal dictatorial government orders. My three subsequent communications to union President, VP, and Board were unanswered.

On October 28, 2021, HUSD responded to my last employee Grievance of policy violating California Health and Safety Codes § 24171 to § 24176 by unilaterally declaring it “an email request” of an “employee complaint” “against the legality of EUAs” that they then dismissed because we all must “follow orders.” I challenged that stand, as well as challenging district refusal to answer basic questions about “official” exemptions to EUAs.

On November 14, after a week of “official silence” from district and teachers’ union, I poked them again with questions, request to meet, and predictions of dire consequences to HUSD for their official silence beyond “just follow orders.” I also admonished HEA’s tragic-comic consent to CTA’s position that “option to refuse” experimental medical treatments allows employee termination without future ability of re-hire in public education. Both embrace Orwellian-violations of definitive CA and federal laws that “option to refuse” means the individual is free to accept or decline experimental medical products “without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, coercion, or undue influence on the subject’s decision.”

On November 15, our school principal sent an “URGENT” email “ordering” ~200 students to the quad: “All unvaccinated students will be sent home, all vaccinated student (sic) will return to class with a pass.” I discovered I was also “health ordered” home for 10 days, until I demanded documentation of definitions that proved “district error” (but 14 of my students were not provided this documentation for discovery of error, nor another teacher). This week also had our teachers’ union request to HUSD accepted for a December 1 “Level III” Grievance meeting with the superintendent to discuss district censorship of my PLC and taking the first step to terminate my employment due to district claims of complaints HUSD refuse to cite. HUSD continued their 6th week of failure to provide me legal definitions of the medical/religious exemption process, but agreed to meet for discussion on Dec. 3. Both of these meetings would be attended by our teachers’ union President and me. Ten students voiced interest in a “Truth Club,” and submitted paperwork to our Associated Student Body (ASB) with me as their club sponsor to address “the pandemic” and other game-changing areas of truth (here, here, here).

On December 1 and 3 I had Zoom meetings with district leadership and our teachers’ union President regarding the previous paragraph topics.

On December 3rd, my principal sent another “friendly reminder” for weekly Covid testing required for my continued employment. For the second time, he mistakenly revealed all email recipients who are not vaccinated. I responded with another “reply to all” to challenge my principal to explain how the “health orders” he signs are legal, or to join those of us asking questions about how these “orders” are anything other than Orwellian-illegal.

For the week of December 6, I followed-up with our school principal’s silence to our questions, and my briefed classroom students requested a Zoom meeting with the district to receive answers. Students were especially motivated to receive an explanation how the district can violate their own health “protocols” by “health ordering” unvaccinated students to “quarantine” for 10 days without evidence of “exposure” to a “positive” “tested” student by being within 6 feet for 15 minutes or more.

On Friday December 10, I received the district’s reply to our Dec. 3 meeting: the district claimed that their policy requiring employee use of EUAs or being put on unpaid leave was a “broader right” of Title 21’s right of full and fail choice to accept or decline EUAs without coercion. I responded in detail with request for another meeting for HUSD to explain their Orwellian-inversion of legal terms.

On December 14, I invited the district to surrender if they wanted to avoid an upcoming meeting with ~50 students with pointed questions. HUSD announced the following day they wouldn’t enforce student “vaccine requirements.” Because of the district’s refusal to address my questions in their December 10 response, I escalated those questions into Employee Grievances and/or District Complaints. On Dec. 18, I updated ~100 teacher colleagues on breaking events. This paragraph’s details are here.

Also on December 14, the district superintendent officially responded to placing my PLC on two months of censorship under threat of my employment termination if I continued reporting to teachers about concern(s) they claimed since April, but repeatedly refused to cite from anything I wrote, said, or did. They withdrew the censorship under claim that the censorship was valid due to district confusion that my addressing a doubled student failure rate was not “focused on standards based instruction, and/or school goals, and/or
district goals.” HUSD made this claim despite the PLC report in question stating in the first paragraph that the purpose of the report is to address our doubled student failure rate (the reading level in the paragraph averaged at the 10th Grade level among 5 tests). HUSD claimed they needed “clarification,” and chose censorship rather than asking clarifying questions citing any concern. HUSD also chose silence over my two months of questioning to cite their concerns and alleged policy violations, including silence to two levels of my employee Grievance. My “clarification” was sufficient to remove district censorship, but not sufficient to remove district threat of my employment termination.

After the Winter break until January 3, 2022, our principal reported another claimed “positive” “case” of “Covid,” and “health” “ordered” 18 of my students into “separate but equal” medical segregation for 10 days of “isolated-public education.” Two students asked for my help to stand for their rights that HUSD has zero evidence they had “close contact” within 6 feet for 15 minutes to the “positive” student, as the district claimed was the rule for unvaxxed students. On Thursday Jan. 6 at 6:30 AM, I emailed the leaderships of HUSD, our teachers’ union, and our high school’s teachers (minus 12 who requested exclusion from such communications) of the facts, then one of the students and I met with the principal and assistant principal before school. The student, an 11th Grade female with spark and courage, further met with the AP after I left to teach classes, with the AP calling a school nurse then an assistant superintendent for help answering a question he couldn’t answer. Nobody had an answer of the district’s authority to QU-segregate students without proof of close contact. That assistant superintendent met with that student and a second segregated student (11th Grade male with quiet intelligence and strength), who promised to call the county health department because she also could not answer their question, yet maintained the district’s “health” “order.” The assistant superintendent reneged on her promise to respond no later than Monday Jan. 10, so I emailed the leaderships of HUSD, our teachers’ union, and our high school’s teachers on Jan. 11, and again on Jan. 12 upon no district response.

The week of Jan. 10 to 14 was distance learning via computer because the district sent home too many healthy unvaxxed staff to keep the schools open.

There is much more from January that is likely 5+ articles to document. After several public emails from me pointing to district refusal to respond to our two students’ questions, and another public email documenting similar district illegal “orders” requiring masks outdoors (CDPH + CDC say “optional”), I filed two additional employee Grievances on Sunday Jan. 23. In the Grievance email to the Superintendent, I promised to share these Grievances with HHS teachers, and to assist another round of QU-segregated students (26 of my students this cull) file official district complaints, at their requests. The Superintendent placed me on paid administrative leave on Tue. Jan. 25 to “investigate” how and why I was asking these public questions rather than answer the questions

**
Update 1:

Principal sends “Covid” “testing” schedule; I respond to repeat questions he refuses to answer about “testing:” On the first day back from Winter Break of two weeks, on Monday Jan. 3, 2022, the HHS Principal sent a cryptic email not to announce more “mandatory” testing, but “the testing that HUSD is sponsoring this week.” I responded to ask the principal again to answer questions he had ignored, and alert him to coming questions from students.

Here’s that email chain; this time from most recent to least:

From: Herman, Carl
Date: Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: COVID Testing Schedule
To: (principal) , (teachers’ union VP) , (teachers’ union President)

More of the questions to expect:
Why did HHS QU students for 10 days without evidence of 6 feet for 15+ minutes?
Why did HHS not inform students of this rule?
Is this a crime to remove students from school without evidence of exposure?
Shouldn’t HHS be helping students to know their rights under “exposure,” not lie to take their rights away?
Why did HHS participate in segregation and harming students by illegally removing them from school? (We’re all assuming this is illegal to remove students without evidence of anything to remove them for)
(HR Asst. Superintendent) said it “wasn’t practical” to respect students rights for “exposure.” HHS Admin were in agreement that students’ rights aren’t worth standing for?
**

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:40 PM Herman, Carl wrote:

oh, and students are far more interested in why they need to comply with any EAU given their Title 21 federal rights puts families and students in charge of medical experiments, and not the state, county, and/or district.

Our students wonder why HHS suspending then expelling them if they decline masks, etc., a “broader right” than Title 21 on their own. Students prefer not to be medical experiments of the state, and will ask you why you’re participating to violate their federal rights, (principal).

**

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:24 PM Herman, Carl wrote:

Given (HR Asst. Superintendent) is also silent, please assist to get answers at least for:
Given HUSD is “picking and choosing” what to enforce with unvaccinated students having no consequences for not testing, is this also true for your 20+ staff?
If not, how is enforcement of one group and not the other legal?
How is forced unpaid leave for staff a “broader right” than Title 21 federal law that EUAs are our choice without duress or influence? That is HUSD’s position. If you understand it, please help me by explaining how this can be true. If you don’t, then please assist for a rational answer (I predict there is no answer because HUSD cannot destroy federally-protected rights).

I have more questions for (HR Asst. Superintendent), but don’t you want to know these three? I promise students will come to you for answers if (HR Asst. Superintendent) remains silent. I have ~50 students requesting to attend a meeting for answers.

Thank you for leadership in challenging times

**

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 3:00 PM (principal) wrote:

Carl:

I do not have the answers that you seek.

Please stay safe and well,

**

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 2:35 PM Herman, Carl wrote:

(Principal):
Please answer my questions about “testing.” There is no reasonable basis for anyone to know what to do when the PCR tests were rescinded their EUA status, HUSD will not enforce “tests” for students, and Title 21 Rights for free choice is not “broader” by threatening forced unpaid leave.

I will request a meeting with you if I do not have basic answers by Wednesday.

**

On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 1:43 PM (principal) wrote:

Hi All,

Here is the testing that HUSD is sponsoring this week.

www.husd.us/testing

Please stay safe and well,
(principal)

**

Update 2:

Assistant Principal without answers goes silent after seeing evidence of district lies rather than join our questions: On Thursday Jan. 6 before school (as introduced last chapter), a healthy female 11th Grade student who was “health” “ordered” to isolated segregation for 10 days accepted my invitation to meet together with the principal before school to ask how HUSD/HHS has segregation authority without proof she had “close contact” (within 6 feet for 15 minutes). The principal didn’t know, so she sent the student to an assistant principal for further assistance, as I went to class to teach. The assistant principal didn’t know, so he called the school nurse. She didn’t know, so the assistant principal called an assistant superintendent, who didn’t know, but promised to meet with the student on Friday Jan. 7. A second segregated student also arrived for that meeting, with the two students reporting that the assistant superintendent tried for an hour to have them accept their segregation “out of an abundance of caution.” The two students refused, and instead asked to return to class because HUSD had no proof of close contact. The assistant superintendent promised to call the county health board to find out “what to do with these two student,” and report back no later than Monday, Jan. 10. Now 21 days later, she has not reported. She did not rescind the segregation order.

This is the email chain clarifying HUSD use of an ambiguous chart to obfuscate the requirement of close contact by not defining “exposed”:

Flowchart for “positive” “test” HUSD is using?

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 10:29 AM Herman, Carl wrote:

Team,
This one (and below) is from the state and county, so it should be authoritative for the limits of power. May I please see the other one that (principal) and (asst. principal) mentioned to (student)?

For a correct interpretation of “broader rights,” that legal concept applies here that HUSD cannot reduce the broader rights of the state of “YES” (legal burden of proof for objective evidence) with “MAY” (discretionary power without burden of proof). Correct me if I’m wrong.

Without correction that state and county is superior over local district, then HUSD’s position to destroy “YES” with “MAY” is prima facie-illegal. This is a topic of the Grievance I filed yesterday.

Thank you all for the best cooperation we can imagine as we take step-by-steps forward, as best we all imagine that direction to be

Thank you, (student), for courage to explore your/our rights with your best intelligence and heart

Thank you all for exercising what we stand for as FARMERS:

Focused learners
Analytical thinkers
Responsible and respectful citizens
Mindful collaborators
Effective communicators
Resourceful users of technology
Self-advocating individuals

pastedGraphic.png

–
Carl Herman
(Omitted) High School Mathematics Department
National Board Certified Teacher
National Board Certified Teacher Coach

May everything add up for you

Social Justice: save millions of lives, help billions of people, redirect trillions of dollars to help build a future brighter than we can imagine

**

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 10:32 AM (asst. principal) wrote:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J9WaT1jXfU3nYVvqyTRcVqJr_oBGH7Vt/view

This is from the district website. (original from county)

**

Herman, Carl
Jan 6, 2022, 10:41 AMpastedGraphic_1.png
pastedGraphic_1.png
to (Asst. Principal, Principal, teachers’ union President + VP, student)pastedGraphic_1.png

Thanks, (Asst. Principal)!

This is the same policy as the one I have from the state because “was exposed” means 15 minutes within 6 feet. HUSD/HHS still has to be able to demonstrate with proof “was exposed = 15 minutes within 6 feet” to be authorized to quarantine.

Again, this seems like basic 12th Grade US Government class facts I’m pointing to.

If HUSD thinks they have another argument, I’d like to hear it. So far, all I’ve gotten is that forced segregation for a doubled-failure rate form of school is a student’s “broader rights,” which as I’ve repeatedly expressed is Orwellian doublespeak that we’re all Oath-bound to oppose, as best I can discern in good-faith professionalism.

Thank you again, (student), for being brave enough to stand for your rights in good faith!

**

Herman, Carl
Jan 6, 2022, 12:11 PM
pastedGraphic_1.png
to (Asst. Principal, student)
pastedGraphic_1.png
(Asst. Principal and student),

(Asst. Principal): Thank you for your time this morning. The definitions that (student) sent me that you showed her still states the same: “close contact” = 15 minutes within 6 feet. What is the reasoning HUSD is using to quarantine students without proof of “close contact”?

(Student): (Asst. Principal) owes you a written explanation on the day of sending you off campus. Because you have shown an apparent district error to downgrade “YES” to “MAY,” and/or an apparent error that “close contact” requires proof that HUSD does not have, the next move I see is to see (Asst. Principal’s) written answer. Once we have a written answer, we can consider further moves.

(Both): I am assisting (student) at her request, and am Oath-bound to “support and defend” limited government that I’m exercising in good-faith professionalism for all students, staff, and teachers. We all deserve a written explanation how “YES” can be destroyed to “MAY,” and how “close contact” can be ignored because HUSD has no evidence to demonstrate “close contact” occurred.

Thank you,

**

Herman, Carl
Jan 7, 2022, 7:07 AM
pastedGraphic_1.png
to (student 2, Asst. Principal, student 1)Harold, Waylon, Carl, Andrea
pastedGraphic_1.png
(Asst. Principal),
(Students 1 + 2), and I will try to find you about 8:00 AM this morning to get an update on promised HUSD documentation how they can destroy limited government of students under the definition of “exposed” to arbitrary “MAY” that can extend wherever HUSD chooses dictatorial power.

If this were your children being segregated with an apparent LIE that “MAY” can be used rather than demonstrable proof, I’m sure you would also pursue justice.

So far, we have no documented explanation for HUSD dictatorial power of “MAY” from:
Our wonderful Attendance Office
Principal (omitted)
AP (omitted)
Nurse (omitted) ([student 1] wrote she spoke with a nurse, so I assume it’s [omitted])
Whoever you contacted at the district
Superintendent (omitted), who (student 1) emailed
We will continue until we have an answer, Brother.

Happy Friday,
pastedGraphic_1.png
**

Herman, Carl
Jan 7, 2022, 7:55 AM
pastedGraphic_1.pngpastedGraphic_1.png
to (Assistant Principal, Students 1 + 2)

From HUSD’s Covid dashboard:
Close Contact: Close contact is defined as someone who was within 6 feet for a total of 15 minutes or more within 2 days prior to illness onset, regardless of whether the contact was wearing a mask. (Note: *Close Contacts will be individually notified as needed and not reported on the dashboard).
(Asst. Principal): if we don’t have reasonable documentation TODAY from HUSD to destroy students’ right to an equal education, then I request you honor our Oath to stand with those being prima facie-illegally segregated. The above “was within 6 feet…” demands a legal proof that can be demonstrated to anyone caring to see. HUSD fails this basic 12th Grade US Government class real-world test, and ALL OF US with Oaths to uphold limited government are Oath-bound to withdraw consent, just as we honor Dr. King for doing.

**

The one replay was/is all we received from this Assistant Principal.

**

Update 3:

Appreciating Student 1 for challenging the school principal, assistant principal, school nurse, and assistant superintendent, AND staying strong for students’ rights:

(Student 1): a Professor Emeritus, engineer, and I thank you!

Carl Herman

Jan 8, 2022, 1:40 PMpastedGraphic_1.png
pastedGraphic_1.png
to (Student 1), James, joe

Dear (Student 1),
Sister, please know that thousands of people are following the articles I write about our HHS conditions, and will thank God and you for standing up You opened a BIG door for other students, parents, and teachers to follow you, as well as helping the attorneys trying to help literal millions of students like you around the world.

Two friends I work with would like to thank you for your leadership and courage to stand-up to the Empire!

Jim Fetzer is a retired professor honored for his teaching in Philosophy of Science, and with over 100 published professional articles and 20 authored books. Among the professional scholars working for decades on the most important topics for truth (JFK, 9/11, Covid), he’s considered among the very best. He’s in my Human Being Hall of Fame! His first response:

(Student 1), I admire your spunk, your intelligence and your dedication to truth. Great work! Jim

Joe Olson is a retired Civil Engineer (PE), author to 100+ major civil engineering and climate-related articles, and a founding member of Principia Scientific International. Joe’s technical expertise, frankly, kicks my ass plain and simple. Joe’s first remark:

encourage early leadership skills often

And this is what I wrote about what you did

Two students working with me met with a different Assistant Superintendent yesterday, who again had no answers to sharp questions.

The hero student is an 11th Grader who’s about 4’11″ and 90 pounds. She scored 4 straight knock-outs on the principal, assistant principal, school nurse, and now an assistant superintendent. She fried the superintendent in an email he won’t be able to answer, that I’ll feature in my report to our 100 teachers.

(Student 1), you won round 1 of the fight because starting our next day of school you now have an equal education with everyone else at HUSD going to distance learning. All the QU/segregated students at HHS and every other HUSD school are now on equal ground. Sister, I think you had a lot to do with the district hiding behind “distance learning” because just as you said: you’ve exposed some evil secrets the district wanted hidden.

They’re trying to run, but they can’t hide.

I’ll listen to your recordings of your meeting with (Asst. Superintendent) and write a report to our 100 teachers to get them up-to-speed. One popular teacher emailed me asking how you did (I don’t want to give his name because he’s not as courageous as you for people to know he’s on our side). Another key staff member also emailed to thank us for standing up for everyone (she’s VERY important to HHS, and also feels vulnerable if people knew she is with us).

Keep going, Sister. When you tell your children and grandchildren this story in the future, they will be blown away that you were the 1st high school student to stand for literal Truth, Justice, and the American Way

It’s both fun and an honor working with you, (Student 1),
Carl Herman

**

(Student 1)
Jan 8, 2022, 2:54 PM

Thank you all so much, I really do appreciate your kind words. I hope you all know I stand with everything I said and will not stay quiet if my voice can be used for the better. I will continue to fight until justice is served for the whole situation and all students who may not have the voice I do. Thank you again!:)

**
Up next!

The Assistant Superintendent reneged on her promise to our two hero students that she would report back by Monday Jan. 10 on her promised Fri. Jan 7 call to the county board of public health in attempt to discover the district’s legal authority to “order” their isolated segregation from public school without evidence of a close contact. After further emails providing this Assistant Superintendent full and fail opportunity to respond, I shared the facts in an email to district and teachers’ union leaderships and boards, our school’s Admin Team and teachers not opting out (~15%), and students who requested to be informed of breaking events, and my conclusion that without answers, HHS should withdraw support of school segregation. The principal responded to all, stating what I wrote “is by far the lowest I have ever seen any “educator” sink in my 16 years in the profession.” The principal gave instructions how anyone can block all emails I send as a teacher at the school. And that opened a door for other teachers to engage in similar public statements. Those attacks allowed me to respond in full

I’ll get these reports out as quickly as possible under the circumstances.

Stay tuned for our next episode

**

I make all factual assertions as a National Board Certified Teacher of US Government, Economics, and History (also credentialed in Mathematics), with all economic factual claims receiving zero refutation since I began writing in 2008 among Advanced Placement Macroeconomics teachers on our discussion board, public audiences of these articles, and international conferences (and here). I invite readers to empower their civic voices with the strongest comprehensive facts most important to building a brighter future. I challenge professionals, academics, and citizens to add their voices for the benefit of all Earth’s inhabitants.
**
Carl Herman worked with both US political parties over 18 years and two UN Summits with the citizen’s lobby, RESULTS, for US domestic and foreign policy to end poverty. He can be reached at [email protected]

Note: My work from 2011 to October 2017 is on Washington’s Blog, which the owner closed from Internet censorship in 2019, and here since. Work back to 2009 is censored by Examiner.com (blocked author pages: here, here). This means that some links in essays are inactive. If you’d like to see those articles, go to http://archive.org/web/, paste the expired link into the search box, click “Browse history,” then click onto the screenshots of that page for each time it was screen-shot and uploaded to webarchive.