Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

Child Sexual Abuse Campaigners and Whistleblowers targeted by state organisations, Thats why Chris Spivey was targeted by the uk paedophilelitee

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

Child Sexual Abuse Campaigners and Whistleblowers targeted by state organisations

Whistleblowers and people who campaign for a truth that implicates powerful establishment figures in misdeeds, face at best, institutional inertia and at worst, outright criminality to discourage them from doing so.

The people in positions of power, from local councillors, MPs, police, crown prosecution service, civil service and council employeees will use all the apparatus of the state, corporations and institutions under their control to defend the status quo. A whistleblower will face first denial of their assertions and then an attack upon themselves as a potential upsetter of the applecart or gravytrain.

People in power can also often call upon legal expenses at taxpayer expense or their own, compared to little often available to the outsider. The corporate and media world who rely on their money from the establishment will most often support the status quo.

The potential truthteller, as messenger of an unpalateable truth can expect to have their own life forensically examined and broadcast to the world for the financial benefit of unscrupulous corporate media owners.

To an extent some of the above is understandable but it is also often mixed with corrupt elements in the police, cps, secretive freemasonry and kept hidden behind a facade of legitimate processes to not reveal the harrassment and skullduggery. This is not even counting spying on individuals online legally or illegally, special branch and “security services” interference.

When a campaigner has allegations and court action against him, his own criminal status is in doubt, and his allegations less likely to be believed. He is also effectively silenced, as it become sub judice. He has to look to defend himself rather than tell the truth he started out doing.

Once a campaigner is in prison he is effectively silenced and neutered. If he is still troublesome, then ghosting can occur – moving the prisoner around the system at the will of whoever, and the prisoner finds it hard to tell people where he is, let alone tell the truth or defend himself. Medical treatment can also be delayed or not given by various techniques. Suspicious death also occur.

All these methods are brought to play in child abuse allegations, partly due no doubt to the powerful network of abusers built up within British institutions over decades, and the disgust that most people feel for child abusers.

The following is a list of some campaigners and whistleblowers who have faced opposition to their claims, please feel free to draw more to my attention. It is perhaps time to compile a more extensive list.

Child Sexual Abuse Campaigners and Whistleblowers subjected to Court Action

1. Citizen Journalists Nigel Ward and Tim Hicks, having thoroughly embarassed North Yorkshire police with their expose of Savile and Jaconellis misdeeds and the cover up of child abuse by the force, face civil legal action from 9 people in or associated with the Police. Nork Yorks Police laughably stating that the journalists have cost the police over £400,ooo! The police predictably have started but delayed the proceedings- an often used but still disgusting tactic to paralyse and worry the whistleblower, whilst costing them a fortune in legal fees, whilst the police legal fees are paid for by the public. [12]

2. Michael Doherty complained to police that an individual was grooming his daughter. It turned out to be a policeman. Far from charging the perpetrator, Michael himself has been relentlessly attacked, the Met have even set up a Gold Group to conspire on how to deal with him. He has pioneered the use of private prosecutions and campaigns on police corruption. [1] [29]

3.  Melanie Shaw one of the two main whistleblowers with Mickey Summers, on the cover up of child sexual abuse in Nottingham by Police and councils. Children in every childrens home in Nottingham were subject to sexual abuse. Melanie was imprisoned for supposed arson and has faced further harassment from the police. [5] Update 2015 Jul 22  Mickey Summers reports Melanie Shaw arrested today at approx 1745 at public place in Nottingham. Alleged charge is harassment against Helen Chamberlain the Nottingham Police Officer in charge of Public Protection including Child Abuse [38]

4. Chris Spivey has written many articles on child abusers and is a leading exponent on the actors in false flag terrorist events.  He is facing charges of malicious communication and indecent images on his computer [27] . Chris Spivey is being harassed himself, his property subjected to criminal damage and the social services have attempted to take his granddaughter away [3][42] Chris lost his case but a summary of his travails are here [49] [50]

5. Brian Pead/ Freeman was a whistleblower on child sexual abuse in Lambeth. His whistleblowing was ignored and he then faced harrassment, his book was banned and he was imprisoned after police accusations of grooming a young girl [2]. Imprisoned and ghosted round the prison system.

6. Robert Green was instrumental in bringing Hollie Greig child sexual abuse case to the notice of the public, after the named perpetrators were not even questioned by police. His bizarre prosecution for “Breach of the Peace” cost the best part of £1m, and he has been imprisoned twice now I think if I recall correctly, once for breaking the unreasonable conditions set for him [6]. Update 25th July 2015 Robert Green still has not got a copy of the court order detailing what he must do [43] but it appears he is not allowed to talk worldwide for ever about Hollie Greigs abuse.

7. Jason Packer Campaigner on child sexual abuse and corruption and particularly against ex MP Michael Hancock. Now charged with possession of indecent images. His trial is now due on 24th August 2015 at Portsmouth Crown Court [31] .

8. Andrea Davison Working for Intelligence services, she investigated child sexual abuse in North Wales. She ended up with her possessions stolen by the police, charged with fraud, banned by a judge from paying for her defence and all the documentation on child sexual abuse taken. She had to flee abroad [10]

9. Michael Shrimpton spoke about ex Prime Ministers Ted Heaths paedophilia and link to child murders in a radio interview [19] . He felt he could not break the official secrets act but if they were not official secrets because it officially did not happen it was ok to tell. He also felt if his source was other intelligence services then he was not breaking British official secrets. He wrote a book, Spyhunter, on how German intelligence was prime mover in dirty tricks in world geopolitics. Officialdom was not impressed and he was found guilty of indecent images and later of false communication of a Olympic bomb threat. [18] [11]

10. Stuart Syvret was Minister for Health & Social Services in Jersey and went public in the Jersey parliament in 2007 with his conclusion that Jersey’s entire child “protection” apparatus had failed. Within hours of him giving that accurate, honest answer, he became subject to an illegal plot by Crown officers and senior civil servants to engineer his dismissal as Minister. He was arrested and prosecuted in 2009 for whistle-blowing and hounded out of the Jersey parliament by the island’s openly corrupt and politicised “judicial” system. [51]

11. Ben Fellows eventually gave a written statement by police who virtually demanded time after time that he do so. Part of this was against Kenneth Clarke. He was then charged with perverting the cause of justice and tried July 2015 [45]. He was found not guilty in Aug 2015.

It may be that images found on a computer are particularly useful for the authorities in framing people, as “possession” is indicated by the images being present however they got there. More information is required on this though.

There are other cases of whistleblowing which do not involve overt or known state involvement but that involve other criminal elements eg in the Lambeth case Bulic Forsythe was killed [21] and another lady had a murder attempt against her [21].

There are also many many cases of whistleblowers who do not face court action but do face injustice. Alison Taylor whistleblew on North Wales child abuse years ago and was sacked, yet she is being proven right years later [23]. Nottingham whistleblower Cameron Blair has also recently come forward with tales of having been silenced [22]

Whistleblowers about Police Corruption

1. Peter Hofschroer fought for years to stop corrupt elements in police and council social services taking his mothers property. At the private prosecution court case he instigated against the perpetrators to prevent this happening, he was arrested and imprisoned for possession of  6,969 child abuse images [4]. This would appear to be perverting the course of justice. His mother has been dumped in a home, apparently so that her own home can be stolen. The court case date is being changed all the time, see below

Peter Hofschroer being arrested by plain clothes policeman at the court where he was taking action against the people stealing his mothers house 2014

2. Maurice Kirk became a whistleblower on police harassment and corruption as much was against him. He was imprisoned, not allowed proper access to medical treatment. Now released [16]  [7]

3. James Patrick was a whistleblower from the Police who exposed the police crime figures scandal. Senior officers tried to silence them and he felt he had to resign [17] [46]

4. Norman Scarth is a World War 2 veteran, who became a victim but refuses to bow to the corruption of the judicial system, so he had to move to Ireland. A man of principle, his story is here. [20] Norman reccommends going to You Tube and searching for his name, or going to his blog [48] but a technical hitch means that it only goes up to 2012.

5. Ian Puddick faced charges of harrassment when in fact it was he who was subject to horrendous harassment and investigation by City of London Police and chums [24] [25]

6. Neil Wilby campaigns against police corruption and runs a website called the Unprofessional standards department has had a High Court harassment case against him. [30]

7. Gurpal Virdi, a former Detective Sergeant of the Met Police was the victim of racism [40]. He was then himself wrongly charged with sending racist mail and acquitted. He now faces charges of alleged sexual abuse of 15yr old boy he arrested some 30yrs ago. His trial  Monday 27th August 2015 at Southwark Crown Court. Cleared [47]

Family Rights, Forced Adoption Campaigners

1. Haydn Burton was a campaigner for childrens and family rights. It appears he was arrested on a trumped up assault charge, kept in Winchester Prison whilst waiting to be charged or for a trial. He was then found hanged in his cell. RIP Haydn [37]

It would be good if someone campaigning for family rights and forced adoption could make a list of those targeted for political reasons.

Other methods are also used to silence people –

Family Courts and gagging orders [32]

Forced adoption, where social services abuse is rife a huge amount of parent whistleblowers are silenced by gag orders and threat of losing their children. Part of this are vaccine induced injury children taken from their parents for forced adoption to  conceal this.

The Mental Health Acts and misuse of Mental Health Acts,

Improper prescribing and forced administation of drugs.

Gang Stalking (see Butlincat’s comments at the end of this post)

Perhaps we need to start compiling a list of those so silenced and the who, what, why, when and how. If you can help with this please email the address at the end of this post.

Add to this list Police, possibly corrupt ones,  asking Google for private information. Police Scotland have asked Google for information on HollieGreigJustice and others and even state that Google should not tell Hollie Greig Justice [44]. As far as I know Google have provided this information.

Google shut down Justice Denied blog in Jul 2015, according to the Tap Blog post [34]. It is believed that it was for harrassment, and the Tap has also had posts barred. Is this Google Truth Rankings in use [36] ? A recent archive of Justice Denied blog is here [33]. They are back online [41] on Jul 23 with a brief explanation of what happened.

More than one case above use harrassment as the reason. It may pay to study the Protection from Harrassment Act 1997 [35] which appears to be being misused, often in fact the people accused of harrassment are being harrassed themselves.

Trials Coming up

If anyone wishes to attend to oversee the British Justice system in action. It is always best to check beforehand either online or by phone with the court. Delay are of course another tactic that the court and/or prosecution uses to ensure that injustice is not seen to be done, or not by very many.

1. Jason Packer 24th August 2015 at Portsmouth Crown Court.

2. Peter Hofschroer  Just one working day before the 27th July, when his case was due to start, it was announced that the case had been ‘vacated’, had been moved to Teeside Crown Court & is not to start until January 2016.  Even if the prosecution were justified (it’s not!) and with no reason whatsoever why he should not have been given bail at the start, his incarceration is already well past the legal time limit for a Remand In Custody. This takes it even further.

3. Chris Spivey  [42] Found guilty sentencing later in Aug 2015.

4. Nigel Ward and Tim Hicks pending n/a

Some people may disagree with one or more of the cases outlined, as they are entitled to do. However it is hard to disagree with the pattern that this number of cases reveals and the lack of due process in these cases, in what are already asymmetric cases in terms of massive power and influence of the institutions of the state against individuals. They could be called political prosecutions or persecutions.

There are many many more child sexual abuse whistleblowers that have been targeted. If you would like to bring your case to my attention please do so either by email or by comment on this post.

Just to correct the nonsense going round that 76 MPs are being investigated, when it is 76 local and national politicians NOT 76 MPs [28].  It does the cause of truth no good to get this wrong.

Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers.  National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups. Other useful sites are One in Four [C]  and Havoca [D]. Useful post on Triggers [E]  from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog. Jim Hoppers pages on Mindfulness [G]  and Meditation [H] may be useful.


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 1 comment
    • scallywag

      The Chief Magistrate’s Office,
      Westminster Magistrates’ Court
      181, Marylebone Road,
      NW1 5BR. [email protected]
      Dear Chief Magistrate

      I am writing to you to ask that the trial of Chris Spivey be examined closely and re assessed in regard to certain legal issues. In addition to the legal issues pertains to how this case has been handled are I believe other issues of importance.

      Irrespective of the views of a large portion of the population there are an increasing number of “conspiracy theorists” that believe there is a sinister aspect to this and other recent events.
      Public trust has been eroded in the judiciary as the child sex abuse “conspiracy” becomes more apparent. If Chris Spivey is not seen to receive a balanced and fair trial for this event respect for the judiciary and particularly those involved irreparably, political figures come and go, but a complete breakdown in the public perception of our most revered representatives would be catastrophic.
      I and others feel strongly that Chris Spiveys trial should be reassessed and given further thought, although I have no legal background and so could not tell you how to move forward I hope it is in a way that preserves your personal integrity and that of the judiciary you represent.
      Kind Regards

      The following is a legal opinion offered to the Chris Spivey support campaign “hands off spivey” anonymously, your opinion would be highly valued.
      Definition of an ‘admissible witness statement’
      To be admissible (allowed) in court section 9 of the Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 1967 states for a witness statement to be used as evidence in any criminal proceeding, other than committal proceedings, it must:
      * be a formal written document of a person
      * be a set of facts relating to a certain event, or events
      * be signed by the person who makes it, to confirm that the contents of the document are true, this is known as a statement of truth, and
      * have had a copy served on the other parties before the trial.
      If all of the above apply, the witness does not always need to attend the trial to give oral evidence. But once they have made a written statement they may be called on to attend court and give their evidence in person. The jury do not see witness statements so the evidence contained in them will either be read out by counsel or be given orally by the person who has given the statement.
      When you can produce a witness statement as evidence in court
      To be admissible in court, evidence must be relevant to a fact which has to be proved, or disproved. Every fact, and document relied upon in court must be proved by admissible evidence.
      You can produce a witness statement as evidence in court when:
      * The relevant conditions in section 9 of the CJA 1967 are met:
      ** This allows the defence to agree to a statement being read at trial where it has been served in advance to them. For more information on the act, see related link.
      * Section 116 or 117 of the CJA 2003 applies:
      ** This allows first hand hearsay and business documents to be admitted as evidence.
      *Schedule 1 paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (CPIA) applies:
      **This allows a written witness statement to be read in court as evidence without further proof.
      ** This happens where both the defence and prosecution agree on what is written in the witness statement.
      Section 9 of the CJA 1967 only applies to statements taken in the UK. The Crown Prosecution Service lawyer will decide what statements are to be used under section 9, and what exhibits will be produced as evidence.
      When you cannot produce a witness statement as evidence
      A written witness statement is not admissible on its own as evidence at trial if the defence do not agree with the evidence that has been written within it.
      How the statement is used in court
      The statement will be read out at the hearing, only if it has been agreed by both the prosecution and defence. This allows for evidence to be given without having to call the witness to attend. If there is no agreement, the statement will not be read out in court.
      A witness may refer to specific documents in a statement and these documents or items of evidence will be ‘produced’ as exhibits in the case. Any document or object referred to as an exhibit and identified in the statement will be treated as if it has been produced by the person who made the statement.”
      I’m wondering if it is significant enough to have a mistrial declared on the grounds that the Judge failed to follow the correct procedure. I find it difficult to believe that everyone at the trial who was legally qualified could have been unaware that what was done appears to have been illegal.

      Now move on to Pages 9, 10 and 11 in the Home Office document, which I have again combined for convenience:
      “Taking a witness statement in the UK
      This section tells you what you must do when you take a witness statement in England, Wales or Northern Ireland.
      Which form to complete and storing the witness statement
      If you take the statement in England, Wales or Northern Ireland, you must record it on an MG11, see related link: The MG forms.
      If you take or receive the statement in Northern Ireland you must make sure you sign the additional declaration.
      You must keep the original copies of all witness statements in the case file and send copies to the Crown Prosecution Service.
      What you must tell the witness
      Before a witness signs a witness statement you must always explain:
      * the perjury clause to them before you take the statement
      * a statement taken in this form meets the legal requirements, and so they may not need to attend court:
      ** but you must make it clear the Home Office cannot guarantee they will not have to attend the court because the court, and the defendant, have the right to call any witness to attend and give oral evidence.
      Drafting the witness statement
      When you draft a witness statement you must make sure:
      * it is concise and to the point
      * you only deal with matters within the witness’s direct knowledge, and
      ** as far as possible, it is in their words.
      You may find it helpful to take notes before you begin writing the witness statement. When you question the witness you must make sure you:
      * ask all relevant questions to satisfy your duty under the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, and
      * pursue all reasonable lines of enquiry whether they point towards or away from the suspect.
      For more information, see related links:
      * Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996
      * Manual of guidance, and
      * MG forms.
      Sign and check the witness statement
      You must always give the witness the opportunity to check the contents of the statement and make any corrections before they sign it. The witness must sign the declaration at the top of the statement and beneath the last line of the text in the statement.
      You must make sure the person making the statement:
      * consecutively numbers and signs all the sheets, and
      * initials all alterations and deletions.
      If you need to read the statement to the witness
      You must insert the following clause at the end of the statement:
      ‘(Full name of witness) being unable to read this statement, I (name of officer reading the statement) of (official address) read this statement to him or her before they signed it.’
      When you finish taking the witness statement the witness must sign it and you must provide them with a witness information pack. For further information see related links: Witness information pack, parts 1-4.
      If the witness may have committed a crime or becomes a potential suspect
      If you have reason to suspect a person may have committed the offence before you take the witness statement, you must not treat them as a witness and must interview them under caution.
      If a witness becomes a potential suspect in the course of you taking a witness statement you must stop and offer to interview under caution.”
      From what I can recall from a very brief view of the witness statements, there may have been deviations from the requirements. I had the impression there were no crossings-out and the content of all the statements reminded me of what I call ‘police speak’ – emotionless, bland, standard phraseology.
      If you looked at the MG11 form (link in first post on this particular subject), you would have noticed that details have to be filled in on the back. Only Chris and his legal advisors will know if that is on the statement sheets handed to them.
      Thank you for reading this far your genuine interest is highly valued

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.