NASA Wipes Out Alien Moon Bases
NASA has wiped out alien moon bases from old photos charges UFO researcher Scott C. Waring. NASA deleted old NASA moon photos that showed over 100 structures claims Waring.
Above is original screenshot, below NASA edited new one.
UFO Daily Sightings author Scott C. Waring says, “I have just been made aware by a reader that NASA has indeed not only deleted the original Moon photos that contained lots of structures but they also replaced them with an edited version. To prove it the edited version has locations marked in yellow words, and the original has white words. Now it looks like this is proof of NASA using UFO Sightings Daily site for finding the alien evidence that slipped past their photo editors and they are taking advantage of my skills and my time. I did warn the public that NASA would delete these photos once they discover them…and they did! And they cannot say they did it to update it, because the quality is so good on the originals we can more detail where the replacement has been smoothed down so we can’t see detail.”
He adds, “Oh, and a note to NASA: You are deceiving the public and I and others will help reveal that you deliberately edited out and altered the true images that are placed on your NASA sites. You are stealing the work I have done and using it to alter your photos! You are the lowest scum on this planet, con artists and I will reveal all that to the public!”
The photos that Waring saved are here, Please copy them and post them to your sites. http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/2011/08/plz-help-100-bases-on-moon-discovered.html?showComment=1364167583837#c7036552517094299687
The original location of the Moon map photos that NASA edited here:
http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Page/Moon1to1MAtlas?map=lo
Waring found these structures on the moons surface and you can zoom in on them to get some real good views. The detail stands out a lot. Waring says, “I am asking all those interested in UFOs both amateur and professionals to please go to the source immediately and search for these black buildings, there are over 100+ of these structures. Please record them on your camera or cell phone and upload them to youtube ASAP. There are too many for me to document all of them. Below are some examples of how much detail and how close you can get. The photos above are from #4 on map.”
Moon photo locations
http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Page/MOON/target
MAIN PHOTOS HERE!http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/Page/moon1to1mShadedRelief?map=lo
UPDATE TO THIS POST (NOV 3, 2012) ONE CLICK TO GET TO THE LONG BUILDINGS…BELOW.
Or to make it easier…url directly to photos here (remember the # sign mean map location):
#3 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_3_lo.pdf
#4 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_4_lo.pdf
#5 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_5_lo.pdf
#10 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_10_lo.pdf
#12 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_12_lo.pdf
#13 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_13_lo.pdf
#23 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_23_lo.pdf
#24 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_24_lo.pdf
#25 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_25_lo.pdf
#26 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_26_lo.pdf
#27 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_27_lo.pdf
#38 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_38_lo.pdf
#39 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_39_lo.pdf
#40 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_40_lo.pdf
#41 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_41_lo.pdf
#42 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_42_lo.pdf
#43 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_43_lo.pdf
#45 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_45_lo.pdf
#46 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_46_lo.pdf
#57 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_57_lo.pdf
#58 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_58_lo.pdf
#74 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_74_lo.pdf
#75 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_75_lo.pdf
#76 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_76_lo.pdf
#77 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_77_lo.pdf
#78 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_78_lo.pdf
#79 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_79_lo.pdf
#88 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_88_lo.pdf
#90 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_90_lo.pdf
#92 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_92_lo.pdf
#93 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_93_lo.pdf
#109 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_109_lo.pdf
#110 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_110_lo.pdf
#111 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_111_lo.pdf
#112 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_112_lo.pdf
#113 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_113_lo.pdf
#114 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_114_lo.pdf
#115 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_115_lo.pdf
#123 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_123_lo.pdf
#125 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_125_lo.pdf
#126 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_126_lo.pdf
#128 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_128_lo.pdf
#136 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_136_lo.pdf
#137 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_137_lo.pdf
#138 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_138_lo.pdf
#139 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_139_lo.pdf
#143 on map: http://planetarynames.wr.usgs.gov/images/Lunar/lac_143_lo.pdf
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,605,477,742 |
| Stories: | 8,137,240 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
Thank goodness NASA wiped out all those damned aliens hiding on the moon — filthy sneaky little buggers.
thank goodness we have people here whop copy and paste stuff that was posted YEARS ago..
some people need look up the definition of a few words, maybe start with “before” and “news”…
Well, as apparently the only resident mind here with any background and credibility in photo manipulation, let me be the first to point out that all 1960′s to 80′s moon photos were shot with a literal film camera. Rolls of film often have feeder lines along the edges and usually have a tip end on the final section of film. This is there to help with initial feed and then durability to the edge. Basically the negative roll is reinforced on both ends. What you see in this set of images is where a roll of film ran out. But the reinforced section on the end still captured images of the moon’s surface, so rather than lose that narrow little spot, the NASA personnel went ahead and left it in the collage of the moon’s surface. In the first image, look out to the left, see the light distortion and distinctive line? That’s because that section was shot at a different time and with a different roll of film. Thousands and thousands of images must be shot and then painstakingly pieced together like a giant jigsaw puzzle to produce these surface mapping images. Look at Google maps and you’ll see similar lines and coloration differences. With modern camera methods [digital rather than film] you no longer have problems with things like you see in the mood pics above. So to a moron who doesn’t know what he’s looking at, I guess he sees alien bases. Me, I look at it and I see obvious film strip edging. If you look closely, you can see the “stitch” lines or where they attached the extra film edging to the film roll to reinforce it. It’s usually pressed in, but the little marks are the same as stitches.
“Well, as apparently the only resident mind here with any background and credibility in photo manipulation”
pi55 off wanker
@ Anonymous
you are a dork. i know photography and lithograghic printing. and what JacksReport says is perfectly legit. you are just a moron when confronted with actual intelligence
@ PlowingUrMom
you are a dork
i wasnt questioning his photography credentials, i took issue with his position that he was the only one around able to offer a credible critique..
if ive upset you… lick me.
intelligence…. pffft.. you wouldnt recognise it if it jumped up and bit you on the ar5e
he wasn’t criticizing, he was explaining the evidence and the cause. you have nothing intelligent to say other than negative criticism and smart ass answers to the people who post here. if you have something to add, why don’t you comment about the actual article, or the replies to the article, instead of the person’s own opinion of his ‘credible critique’
Thanks for the de-fend, PlowURM — and I totally agree. I added the line about being the only one with credentials, because nobody ever chimes in on these things and makes any technical sense with them. Hence, I assume I’m the only one with credentials bothering to comment on them. And Anonymous – wow, man…that’s nice…the whole “l*ck me” comment…spectacularly intelligent and witty…I’m impressed…seriously. Let me know when you graduate from grade school. I want to be there to cheer you on.
Great post! I love it when someone posts the facts!
burp..yeah ok
Thanks for ur time spent on trying to figure out the truth. What ever happened to the
astrologer that took photos of the moon at close up. You could see little glass domes.
He also explained how to use a comp. camera on a telescope. Can u Help?
google….. ffs /smh
What about the huge humanoid statue up there?
It says:
“NASA has wiped out alien moon bases from old photos…”
Hey, at least it’s not Airbrushed Alien Asses.
We can not figure out how to handle North Korea but we can destroy Alein bases on the moon? Right.