Why CERN will NEVER Prove the Big Bang Theory

CERN has cost over 13 Billion Dollars so far and costs almost 1 Billion per year to maintain.  And what have we learned from this?  Very little.  In fact for the past 500 years we have not learned very much regarding our Universe even though many brilliant scientists, astronomers, physicists, and cosmologists have done enormous amounts of research.   Every time they think they find something, they end up with more questions than answers.  They are always changing their theories, their formulas, and their beliefs.  One theory becomes obsolete and is replaced by a new one.   A new formula then has to be designed to accommodate this new information.   And then it has to be tested.  And this pattern continues to repeat itself with no tangible results, just more theories.  And there is no consistency among the researchers, one says this and another says that and the third one disagrees with the other two.  You would think that with all the people that have worked on this problem for hundreds of years, some basic progress would have been made, but instead, Nothing Has Yet Been Proven. It’s all theory.    And the reason for this I will discuss later.  

Here are some quotes from various publications which confirms what I just said.  

“The evidence for the Big Bang comes from many pieces of observational data that are consistent with the Big Bang. None of these prove the Big Bang, since scientific theories are not proven.”

“Under the Big Bang model, the Universe is theorized to be expanding outward from the point in space where the cosmic egg allegedly exploded. However, no direct evidence has ever substantiated the claim that the Universe inflated in the violent way implied by the Theory—only circumstantial evidence.”

“According to the standard theory, our universe sprang into existence as “singularity” around 13.7 billion years ago. What is a “singularity” and where does it come from? Well, to be honest, we don’t know for sure. Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of “black holes.” Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density (a mathematical concept which truly boggles the mind). These zones of infinite density are called “singularities.” Our universe is thought to have begun as an infinitesimally small, infinitely hot, infinitely dense, something – a singularity. Where did it come from? We don’t know. Why did it appear? We don’t know. “

“The team of astrophysicists that claimed to have found proof of the Big Bang theory a few months ago has now admitted that they may have spoken too soon.  Yahoo! News reports that last March, the American team led by John Kovac of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics announced that they had discovered the gravitational waves in space that Albert Einstein said would confirm how the universe formed.  The team’s conclusion was immediately criticized, however, and they have avoided media scrutiny ever since.”

“The detection of miniature black holes by the Large Hadron Collider could prove the existence of parallel universes and show that the Big Bang did not happen, scientists believe.  The particle accelerator, which will be restarted this week, has already found the Higgs boson – the God Particle – which is thought to give mass to other particles.  Now scientists at Cern in Switzerland believe they might find miniature black holes which would reveal the existence of a parallel universe.  And if the holes are found at a certain energy, it could prove the controversial theory of ‘rainbow gravity’ which suggests that the universe stretches back into time infinitely with no singular point where it started, and no Big Bang. “

“A March 2014 experiment known as “Bicep2” supposedly found evidence in favor of the Big Bang model of the universe. The Big Bang model, the belief that the universe originated from being less than an inch across, is the belief that most scientists hold about the origin of the universe today.  Proponents of Bicep2 believe that the universe expanded rapidly after the moment of the Big Bang.  However, now the researchers at King’s College have come to the conclusion that the universe could not have remained intact if Bicep2 was the case. Instead, there would have been a “Big Crunch” of the universe. The leader of the study, a PhD student at King’s College in London, commented about this as follows: This is an unacceptable prediction of the theory because if this had happened, we wouldn’t be around to discuss it.”

“Black holes do NOT exist and the Big Bang Theory is wrong, claims scientist – and she has the maths to prove it.  When a huge star many times the mass of the sun comes to the end of its life it collapses in on itself and forms a singularity – creating a black hole where gravity is so strong that not even light itself can escape.  At least, that’s what we thought.  A scientist has sensationally said that it is impossible for black holes to exist – and she even has mathematical proof to back up her claims.  If true, her research could force physicists to scrap their theories of how the universe began.  She claims that as a star dies, it releases a type of radiation known as Hawking radiation – predicted by Professor Stephen Hawking. However in this process, Professor Mersini-Houghton believes the star also sheds mass, so much so that it no longer has the density to become a black hole.  Before the black hole can form, she said, the dying star swells and explodes.  The singularity as predicted never forms, and neither does the event horizon – the boundary of the black hole where not even light can escape.  ‘I’m still not over the shock,’ said Professor Mersini-Houghton.  ‘We’ve been studying this problem for a more than 50 years and this solution gives us a lot to think about.’”

This is the kind of contradicting articles you will find when doing research on the Big Bang.  So what are we to believe?  So far it seems like…..Nothing.  Because there is no agreement among scientists, no results, and no proof.  And billions of dollars are spent trying to find answers which don’t seem to exist.  And rightfully so.  There is one very basic reason that CERN will Never prove the Big Bang Theory.  And this is because they are not pursuing science.  Science is the practice of studying the behavior of the natural world by observation and experimentation.  This means that ALL possibilities must be studied and tested.  But instead, the scientists have only one goal in this endeavor.  To Prove that the Big Bang really happened.  And this is why they keep hitting one dead end after another.  They are not out to see what they can learn, they are only focused on proving the Big Bang.  What if they find the Big Bang never happened?  Then what will they do?

To better understand this let’s go back in time.  For thousands of years people believed that “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth”.  And they were satisfied with that explanation because they could observe it.  They had days and nights and seasons, and when they looked up in the sky, they could see the sun, moon and stars.  Then about 500 years ago, Copernicus brought forth a new concept.  The sun did not circle the earth, instead, the earth circled the sun.  Something that was totally opposite of what the Bible taught.  He didn’t publish this until his death for fear of ridicule, and it lay dormant for about 100 years.  Then many others over the years like Galileo, Keppler, Newton, and Einstein all added to and changed this concept until we arrived at the heliocentric model that we use today.  And they all had to create ever changing formulas and theories to make this somewhat believable.  And the great debate began:  Who is Right – God or Man?   This is really the bottom line of what this is all about.  The geocentric model that is described in the Bible is totally ignored and the Big Bang is being attempted to be proven.  Because if they could just prove the Big Bang, then they could disprove the Bible and show us that God was wrong.  But as it stands, they have not been able to do so.  And those that believe this “theory” do so only because this is all they were ever taught.  Having nothing else to compare it to they accepted it as the truth. 

But to try to prove that man is smarter than God is a big undertaking.  As we can see by the results so far, man has not done very well at this.  No one has proven that God was wrong.  Therefore, we should accept that God is right unless someone can prove that he isn’t.  After all they have had 500 years to do so and still come up empty handed.  God made a simple statement:  ”I Made It.”   If scientists would only consider the universe that God made and try to understand it, God would be more than happy to show them everything they want to know about it.   In fact all they would have to do is just read the Bible where God describes how he made the earth, the sun, moon, and stars.  It’s all there because it’s no secret, God wants us to know, that’s why it’s in the Bible.   But some men are just too proud to admit they could be wrong, that they may have made a mistake, and so they keep doing what they hope will someday produce the results they want.  They are too proud or maybe too afraid to consider that God might be right.   Because if they did, their entire career would be over.  They would have to admit that the Bible is right, that God did indeed create the heavens and the earth, and they couldn’t accept that humility so they simply disregard it.  And this is why CERN will NEVER prove the Big Bang…..because they are working on the wrong model.  Copernicus’ work would have made a good science fiction novel.  A pleasure fantasy reading, and maybe that is what he intended.  But to try to prove a fantasy is impossible.  This is why they will never do it even after wasting billions of dollars that could be put to much better use.  

As God said to Job “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth.  Tell me if you understand.”    If you want to pursue this further with an open mind like any good scientist should, please read THIS and decide for yourself what you think happened.