A Benevolent New World Order?

The evil angle of a NWO has been discussed ad nauseam online. Lots of information regarding men of power holding secret meetings. Yet the opinion that they are conspiring to do evil is paranoid in nature.That they are in discussion means they are plotting against us. I see a few arguments against that:

- given a substantial timeframe, I don’t see any direct harm to society that cannot be assigned to other, non-NWO factors

- evil is far easily achieved than good – perhaps they are just trying to achieve good and failing?

- the sheer number of conspirators!

The larger the involvement, the greater the odds of a believable whistle-blower. Yet I don’t think there has been one.

A good example is the three “city states” that exist, seemingly outside of the law of the country they are contained within. I’ll ignore The Vatican, for it can encompass an entire global conspiracy all by itself.

City of London Corporation

Ancient, convoluted, powerful. A huge number of connected, powerful people. Situated in the heart of London. So little evidence of any wrong-doings that I don’t believe a modern book has been written on the subject. In fact, Talisman by Graham Hancock and Robert Bauval didn’t mention the city state of London at all.

Washington D.C.

As it says at Wikipedia: The city’s unique status creates a situation where citizens in the District do not have full control over their local government, nor do they have voting representation in the body that makes such decisions.

It is clearly a special place, and books like Talisman point out the clear Masonic background. Yet abuse of any privileges seem to not exist…

Aside from the lizard people allegations of David Icke, the most prominent likely leader of the NWO is 96-year-old David Rockefeller. The best evidence against him revolves around his not talking to rebel press, and his investments in businesses that could be doing (good) or (bad).

He is worth $3 Billion. Inherited.

His senior thesis at Harvard was socialism. Not something that Hitler did…

His father founded the Council on Foreign Relations which has been much discussed due to the powerful people that meet. Again, powerful people meeting is seen as being nefarious, yet they could just as easily be aiming to achieve good.

As an example of how easy it is to be evil, Rockefeller could pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to pay someone to poison the local water supply.

If the NWO really wished to reduce the global population (and thereby reducing their own profits), they could just donate a few million towards initiatives like RISUG from India, an extremely cost-effective and safe male contraceptive. Much more efficient and less prominent than mas slaughters.

I suggest that the New World Order, as mentioned by Woodrow Wilson, Winston Churchill, H.G. Wells, and George H. W. Bush, is just as likely to be an uninspired effort from powerful men to make the world a better place. Evil-doing is too easily achieved for these privileged people to have failed for so long.

Perhaps the people who really rule our world are not evil, but merely inept: lacking get-up-and-go, failing to do the good they slightly aspire to. Pathetic leaders, as ineffectual as the British royal family… But not evil?

Full story at Survive 2012