Dailypaul.com censorship - thought police on patrol!

I have been a regular contributor at the dailypaul.com website for many years now. My ability to post articles there was taken away for posting these articles, offering professional medical opinions on one of the injuries from the Boston bombing.
http://www.justanswer.com/medical/43tmd-long-will-bleed-death-traumati…
http://fauxcapitalist.com/2013/05/10/dr-stan-monteith-a-35-year-orthop…

Here is an example of how Jon the moderator handles anyone with questions:
http://www.dailypaul.com/285639/some-of-these-conspiracy-theories-only…

“so if you’re not denying it didn’t happen, did it happen?
Submitted by Jo? on Thu, 05/16/2013 – 22:59. Permalink
Did Jeff Bauman in fact get his legs viciously blown off, and did he, through a sum of great fortunes, still manage to live?
or
Are you still unsure, because you still think his loss might have been in some manner staged, faked, or disingenuous, which is so very, very impossible we are not tolerating that libelous level of absurdity?”

Please note that I have not denied that Bauman was injured, I have maintained that I do not know. That is not acceptable, I have to claim to KNOW that the Bauman thing is just like the TV said. Sort of like getting saved, I have to KNOW Jesus is real, or Jesus will not save me. Any requests for evidence of Jesus’ realness pisses off his dad and he condemns me to hell.

Now, I understand the need to moderate a forum, but I am deeply disappointed that ANY discussion of Jeff Bauman is officially forbidden now – even professional medical opinions are not welcome. What boggles my mind is that while I have been banned for bringing professional expertise to the discussion, there is an ongoing discussion about people planning to engage in violent overthrow of the government. THAT discussion is OK? I was under the impression that the dailypaul promoted peace, in the spirit of Dr. Paul. I thought moderation was specifically to prevent people from making violent threats and other possibly criminal discussions. I was wrong – you are free to threaten violence, so long as you buy the official Boston story. Well, I’m not buying, and I still think violence is not acceptable. I am deeply disappointed that a site that has championed truth relentlessly for so long is now insisting on uniformity of opinion, regardless of facts. Sad day for me, sad day for truth.