After 80 Years, the Lockness Monster is proven to be an unidentified swimmer after all.

The Lockness Monster Hoax has been alive as of this posting for 81 years.  It’s an arm and this article proves it.  Long after the original photograph was taken by a medical practitioner in 1934, people refuse to acknowledge simple logic that it is just a swimmer.  The propagandized hoax discounts the photograph as being a mythical beast of the water is made of wood?  How can this be determined?  Why not simply suggest it’s the arm of a swimmer made of flesh and bones?  The body and head are momentarily submerged.  Simple deduction and obvious layman’s forensics analysis makes nobody money, no one famous, and conspiracy theorists and or myth overs a bad name.  It’s our foolish desire to believe the absurd that keeps us entertained… and book writers lots of cash.

Original article:

The Lockness Monster is most likely the foreshortened view of someone’s arm swimming freestyle towards the photographer.  It appears to be the left arm with the thumb completely hidden in shadow, but facing the photographer in a foreshortened angle.  I never thought twice about the infamous Lockness monster photograph being anything other than what it is.. a left arm sticking out of the water appearing to be going on the downward swing before hitting the surface of the water coming towards the shore.  

If the forearm was the opposite direction as if the subject swam away from the shore, the forearm would be highlighted.  If this is the case, then the elbow break explains the sudden curving appearance just before the wrist breaks in a very foreshortened angle of view.   Whatever the stroke whether it is freestyle or the back stroke,  the fact that the silhouette dominates the contours of the over all shape conveniently opened itself to a free range controversy – a remarkable legend is created and the deplorable debunking more intriguing as perceived truth.  The object, an arm in this case, cannot possibly be a living survivor of the dinosaur era.  Comparisons to a smoothly curved neck of an animal does not jive with the middle of the neck “break” in the curvature.  The angles of a head, if it were a head coincide more closely with the wrist and knuckles of the human hand.  Will you continue to live their lie?

Hoax claim is the hoax
Claims that the image was a wooden sculpture affixed to a submersible vessel is the hoax.  The original photograph taken by a gynecologist is authentic, however, romanticized to the extremes of fiction. 

The ripples of water are scaled and match the relative size of a human arm regardless of age.  If “Nessy” is indeed real, it would have to be the size of a person and not the perceived size of a large marine animal… dinosaur or other.  If the fixture was made of wood, then a tree branch would be a fitting answer, but the reality is, who would stand on the shore and photograph a stick.  Keep in mind, the photographer could not possibly have mistaken the object because it was in motion and in full color.  The quality of the photograph suffers and is why the entire story is easy to manufacture ‘stories’. 

For over 80 years, a professional in the field of medicine and those that investigated were not interested in revealing the truth.  Money, it seems, can spawn selfish control over anyone including those you trust.

.

[email protected]

.

For fun:

.

.