THE DEEP STATE HAS WON.  NOW IT IS SUCCESSFULLY SEWING THE SEEDS OF CIVIL WAR WITH A FAKE ELECTION FRAUD SCAM TO ANGER VOTERS.  AS AN INDEPENDANT I AM ALARMED BY HOW MANY LIBERALS WANT TO HANG REPUBLICANS AND VICE VERSA.  IS THERE NOT AN OBJECTIVE HEAD IN THE CROWD?  THE BIBLE HAD WARNED US ABOUT THIS VERY THING.  FAKE ENEMIES AND FAKE HEROES.  DIVISION THROUGH DECEIT AND LIES.  NEVER MIND TRUMP IS A ONE PERCENTER. NEVER MIND THAT HE IS NOT THE PENTAGON, THE FORTUNE 500, THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY.  HE IS A PUPPET AND THEY CAN TAKE HIM OUT TOMORROW SHOULD HE NOT COMPLY WITH THEIR AGENDA.  THE ISRAEL LOVING PRESIDENT HAS NEVER ONCE SPOKE OUT ABOUT THE FEDERAL RESERVE SCANDAL.  HE TALKS OF REFORMING MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IS MIS APPROPRIATIONS AND GIVE AWAYS, BUT WE NEED REFORM IN THE BILLIONS AND TRILLIONS, MAKING HIS ANTI DEEP STATE POSITION SUSPECT. THE RICH KEEP ON DRAINING THE MIDDLE CLASS AND THAT PROCESS HAS NEVER STOPPED.  HERE HE IS PRINTING MONEY LIKE COMIC BOOKS, AND RUNNING UP RECORD DEFICITS. NOBODY CAN KEEP THEIR EYE ON THE PRIZE,  THEY ARE TOO BUSY ARGUING OVER PUPPETS AND THE ELECTRONIC VOTING SCANDAL IS PROOF THAT THE ELECTIONS HAVE ALWAYS BEEN SUSPECT. ITS NOT PROOF OF A COUP.  PLUS, THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE ITSELF IS A FORM OF VOTER FRAUD.  ANYTIME A CANDIDATE GETS 49 PERCENT OF THE VOTE IN A STATE BUT ONLY GARNERS ZERO PERCENT OF THE ELECTORAL VOTE, WHO NEEDS ELECTONIC FLIPPING?  WHO EVEN NEEDS VOTER FRAUD?  IT’S SO SIMPLE ITS STUPID.  THE WHOLE ELECTRONIC VOTING ISSUE REALLY DOES SHOW HOW THE US GOVERNMENT ALWAYS HAS WANTED FLIPPING MACHINES.  THE DIEBOLD SCANDAL REVEALS JUST HOW CROOKED OUR ELECTIONS HAVE BEEN FOR QUITE SOME TIME. THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE IS ALL ABOUT AN INCIDENT THAT SHOULD HAVE SHOOK THE WORLD BUT DIDN’T.  AND TODAY WE ARE SEEING THE REPURCUSSIONS OF OUR INACTION AS A PEOPLE. THE DEEP STATE WINS.

Please help keep truth alive:  www.patreon.com/highertruthrises

Hacking Democracy

The documentary follows Bev Harris and Kathleen Wynne, director and associate director for nonprofit election watchdog group Black Box Voting, as they attempt to discover the extent to which it would be possible to alter results on the electronic voting machines of Diebold Election Systems (now Premier Election Solutions). Andy Stephenson, an employee of Black Box Voting from July–December 2004, assisted with comparisons of audit documents in Volusia County and obtained a secret videotape of Harris interviewing a voting machine testing lab. Kathleen Wynne captured live video of Harris finding voting machine records in a Volusia County trash bag, and captured video of Cuyahoga County, Ohio elections workers admitting that the initial 3% recount ballots had not been randomly selected during the 2004 presidential election. Harris and Wynne then embarked on a series of five voting machine hack tests with Dr. Herbert Hugh Thompson and Harri Hursti in 2005 and 2006. During the course of the documentary, multiple methods of tampering with the votes are shown.

The first is through editing the database file that contains the voting totals. This file is a standard Microsoft Access database, and can be opened by normal means outside of the encompassing voting program without a password. Some jurisdictions have disabled Microsoft Access, making it more difficult to alter the database, but this protection was shown to be bypassed by Dr. Herbert Hugh Thompson through a Visual Basic program which searched for a string of text and edited the file through external means. However, alterations of the results in either of these fashions would be caught if a vigilant elections official compared the results with voting machine tapes.^[2]

Another hacking technique was demonstrated through hacking the actual computer code used in the Diebold Accu-Vote memory cards. This method was discovered by Finnish computer security expert Harri Hursti and is known as “the Hursti Hack“. In this hack, Harri Hursti rigged the Diebold optical scan voting system to make the wrong candidate win by adding negative (minus) votes to one race. This resulted in that race having votes literally subtracted from its vote total. These methods were tested by the Leon County Supervisor of Elections, Ion Sancho, on the actual Diebold optical scan voting system used by Tallahassee, Florida in all their prior elections. This method demonstrated, contrary to a previous Diebold statement, that a person attempting to rig the votes of a precinct would need access to only the memory card, not the optical scan voting system or tabulation software. This method, when cross-checked between the optical scan voting system and tabulation software, perfectly mimics a legitimate result, and further makes the voting machine produce a false zero-vote print-out, falsely confirming that the memory card has no votes inside it before voting begins. Following this historic hack Ion Sancho stated: “If I had not known what was behind this I would have certified this election as a true count of the votes.”^[2]

Reaction

Even though no one from Diebold Election Systems admitted to having seen the film,^[3] Diebold President David Byrd suggested that Hacking Democracy was “replete with material examples of inaccurate reporting”, and demanded that it not be aired.^[4][5] His criticism was based on an earlier film made by the same three filmmakers. However, HBO refused to remove it from their schedules. In addition Diebold wrote a letter to HBO referring to the famous vote changing ‘Hursti Hack’ featured in the film, claiming that “Harri Hursti is shown attacking a Diebold machine in Florida. But his attack proved later to be a complete sham.” This statement by Diebold was proven to be wholly wrong by independent computer scientists at UC Berkeley who investigated the Hursti Hack.

California’s Secretary of State commissioned a Special Report by scientists at UC Berkeley to investigate the Hursti Hack. Page 2 of their report states:

Harri Hursti’s attack does work: Mr. Hursti’s attack on the AV-OS is definitely real. He was indeed able to change the election results by doing nothing more than modifying the contents of a memory card. He needed no passwords, no cryptographic keys, and no access to any other part of the voting system, including the GEMS election management server.

One of Diebold’s objections to the film was that it failed to mention that Avi Rubin, a Johns Hopkins computer science professor and vocal Diebold critic, may have a conflict of interest. Rubin at one point owned stock options in VoteHere, which sells auditing software and systems for voting machines. However, Rubin disposed of his stock options and withdrew from the VoteHere advisory board in August 2003, and says he had not had any meaningful contact since joining over two years before, except occasionally receiving press clippings.^[6]