UPDATE: Kari Lake Attorneys File Blistering Response to Maricopa County Filing – Why Were There Over 35,000 Unaccounted for Ballots in the Election – Where Did They Come From?

UPDATE: Kari Lake Attorneys File Blistering Response to Maricopa County Filing – Why Were There Over 35,000 Unaccounted for Ballots in the Election – Where Did They Come From?

Maricopa County filed a response to Kari Lake’s Petition for Review in the Arizona Supreme Courton Monday… The Gateway Pundit has reported extensively on Kari Lake’s stolen election and her lawsuit challenging the fraud in Maricopa County, Arizona. On March 1, 2023, after the Maricopa County Superior Court and the Arizona Appeals Court dismissed the case, Lake filed a ‘Petition for Review’ and a Motion to Expedite Review’ for her election contest in the Arizona Supreme Court.

This case is most likely to wind up at the U.S. Supreme Ct. The blatant corruption of the3 courts is the reason the case hasn’t advanced; certainly NOT for lack of evidence. Don’t be surprised if a lot of the various spending bills passed by Conress doesn’t include money for bribing judges in critical cases. If the globalists lose in the Kari Lake case, the whole corrupt ‘ball of wax’ goes with it and globalists are NOT going to let that happen.

Maricopa County filed a response to Kari Lake’s Petition for Review in the Arizona Supreme Courton Monday… Lake’s attorneys previously argued that according to Findley v. Sorenson (1929), even if not intentional, election errors can nullify an election if “they affect the result, or at least render it uncertain.” This is further confirmed by the opinion in Hunt v. Campbell (1917), which states, “wherever such practices or influences are shown to have prevailed, not slightly and in individual cases, but generally, so as to render the result uncertain, the entire vote so affected must be rejected.”

As I mentioned before, I sat and watched the trial conducted by Superior Court judge Peter Thompson while Elections director Scott Jarret prjured himself in the trial by contradicting his testimony the day before about the machines printing the wrogd ballots on election day.  If this isn’t fraud then nothing can ever qualify and that’s the picture that Judge Thompson and his asine friends would like3 you to belikeve. Reading either of these laws .i.e. Findley v. Sorenson or Hunt v. Campbell one can readily see that making machine changes on election dayor causing ballots to be rejectede by the machines is nothing other than FRAUD !

This is corruption at it’s highestt level and it cannot be allowerd to stand !