Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By Environmental and Urban Economics (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

Sean Lennon's NY Times OP-ED About The Environmental Costs of Fracking

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


Sean Lennon may not remember the one time we were 10 feet from each other.  I was a young Asst. Professor at Columbia and he was an undergraduate there sitting on the Low Library steps being cool.   I spotted him and gawked and then kept walking.  Today, we were reunited as I read his piece about rural environmentalism.  We have some things in common but surprisingly we disagree on some issues.

A quote:

“In the late ’70s, when Manhattanites like Andy Warhol and Bianca Jagger were turning Montauk and East Hampton into an epicurean Shangri-La for the Studio 54 crowd, my parents, John Lennon and Yoko Ono, were looking to become amateur dairy farmers. My first introduction to a cow was being taught how to milk it by hand. I’ll never forget the realization that fresh milk could be so much sweeter than what we bought in grocery stores. Although I was rarely able to persuade my schoolmates to leave Long Island for what seemed to them an unreasonably rural escapade, I was lucky enough to experience trout fishing instead of tennis lessons, swimming holes instead of swimming pools and campfires instead of cable television.”
“Natural gas is clean, and cigarettes are healthy — talk about disinformation. To try to counteract this, my mother and I have started a group called Artists Against Fracking.”
So, his piece really focuses on his opposition to fracking and the extraction of natural gas.  
One mildly interesting issue here is to quantify how large are the social costs of pursuing natural gas and how do these social costs vary across locations? Suppose that there is a natural gas deposit in a geographical area where few people live.  Does this low population density reduce the likelihood of toxics exposure?
To quote young Lennon:
“Don’t be fooled. Fracking for shale gas is in truth dirty energy. It inevitably leaks toxic chemicals into the air and water.”
But, to an economist the question is; “how many people are exposed to this and how much are they willing to pay to not be exposed to this activity?”   The Coase theorem would say that the total negative externality from this resource extraction will be low in less populated areas where per-capita incomes are lower.  A GIS analysis could identify such areas.
If fracking creates jobs for low income individuals then such communities may be willing to pay to allow fracking to take place there.   



Source:


Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!


Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST


Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 1 comment
    • Anonymous

      “Negative externalities?” ~ are you saying the only negatives in your Coase calculus are anthropocentric? Think again: “population” is a term that is also applied to non-human entities like bees for example, or members of any other species for that matter. Consider the greater feedback loops and natural cycles implicated in any co-ordinated assault upon an ecosystem. It may not affect humans in a given area immediately, but in the long term it will wherever it affects the ecosystem in a destructive way; as in the short term it has a direct and immediate impact on native populations of any species associated with a given bio-region, and that must eventually be factored into the global equation. You are purporting to invoke science but in actual fact you are illustrating the fundamental error that afflicts all economic logic ~ the myopia of selectivity, by cherry-picking your data to support an “economic” argument that excludes ecological facts. This is the root of all the significant problems in our world today. Corporate interests rig the game. The “externality” you should be concerned with is the exclusion of authentic independent science.

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.