Read the story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
Story Views
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:

IMF Worries End of QE Will Trigger Stock Market Crash

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

The IMF Says Stock Prices are Overvalued
Worried That The “Taper” Will Deteriorate Asset Prices

It makes you wonder when the IMF (Interntional Monetary Fund) worries about individual investors selling stocks because of values “deteriorating unexpectedly”.   


Do they know something that we don’t?  Is this a signal that the market is going to crash? The following article written by the IMF indicates they are very concerned about the effect of ending QE; predicting that stock prices will go down, which will trigger a panic and huge sell-off, thereby crashing the stock  market.

This chart highlights the risk-taking in red, indicating that there is more risk-taking now than just before the crash of 2008.

IMF expects a stock market  crash after end of QE in October

An IMF article, Heat Wave: Rising Financial Risks in the United States states, ”Six years after the start of the global financial crisis, low interest rates and other central bank policies in the United States remain critical to encourage economic risk-taking—increased consumption by households, and greater willingness to invest and hire by businesses.”

In other words, printing money and keeping interest rates low were designed to get you to invest in risky stocks and take out low-interest rate loans and mortgages. And this money you borrowed was intended to be spent, thereby increasing consumption. But now the IMF is concerned that low interest rates have encouraged people to go into stocks, driving stock prices to overvalued heights.

“However, this prolonged monetary ease also may have encouraged excessive financial risk-taking. Our analysis in the latest Global Financial Stability Report suggests that although economic benefits are becoming more evident, U.S. officials should remain alert to excessive financial risk-taking.”  

“Persistently low global interest rates have prompted investors to search for higher returns in a wide range of markets, such as stocks, and investment-grade and high-yield bonds.

This has resulted in escalating asset prices, and enabled issuers to sell assets with a reduced degree of protection for investors…The combined trends of more expensive assets and a weakening quality of issuance could pose risks to stability.” Did I hear “risky assets”?

“The heat map shows that financial risk taking in corporate debt markets is rising and markets have begun to overvalue many assets. Spreads in the high-yield and leveraged loan markets are not far from levels seen before the financial crisis.”

“Meanwhile, the risk that many investors could sell their holdings all at once is now even higher than before the crisis.  Mutual funds, exchange traded funds, and households hold about 30 percent of corporate bonds  as of the end of June 2014. 

The worry is that such  “retail” investors  [individual investors who buy and sell securities for their personal accounts]  could start selling suddenly if the value of their assets deteriorates unexpectedly.”

I’m wondering why they are thinking that stocks will unexpectedly “deteriorate” – forget that ridiculous word (this isn’t a weather report) – what they mean to say is that stock prices will crash!

“For example, high-yield corporate and emerging market bond markets saw large retail outflows in May and June 2013, when investors panicked during the “taper tantrum” episode. That event was relatively short-lived and did not involve institutional investors.” Taper tantrum? Economist Peter Schiff expects taper “convulsions.”

So it is about the “taper”, which is the ending of the 6 years of profligate money printing to the tune of 4 Trillion dollars, (QE, quantitative easing) that is scheduled to end this month,  that they are worried about.

“A more severe episode of flight from risk by retail investors could lead to even greater financial volatility with wider systemic repercussions than were suffered during the 2013 event.” In laymen’s terms,  that means that if a lot of people take their money out of the stock market, it will crash.  And the IMF is already preparing for it. They don’t know exactly HOW they will react to try to fix it, but they are are anticipating a stock market crash.

What to do 

“Officials have acknowledged some of these risks, most recently in U.S. Fed Chair Yellen’s testimony to Congress in July in which she noted some potential financial stability effects of sustained unconventional monetary policy.” This means they are worried that the past 6 years of printing 4 trillion dollars may have some negative ramifications. The IMF is realizing it is time to pay the piper.

“While U.S. officials have already taken some measures to restrain excessive risk-taking, for example in the leveraged loan market, we believe more could be done. Macroprudential policies designed to keep the overall financial system safe could be deployed as the first line of defense against rising financial stability risks.  

The United States is getting closer to ending six years of policies designed to stave off the worst effects of the crisis. The U.S.  banking system is now much more resilient, and economic risk taking by households and corporations is taking hold.

For the sake of a smooth exit and a durable recovery, not only in the United States but globally, it is critical that officials continue to respond to rising financial stability risks.

So, just what are these “macroprudential policies”? According to the IMF, they are evolving and need to be flexible to include whatever the IMF deems necessary to prevent the collapse of what they consider systemically important banks. In other words, they don’t know what exactly they will do, but they will just try something new and see if it works.

Money Printing, or QE, Definetely Caused the Stock Market to Rise
Removing QE will cause the stock market to tumble

Notice the direct correlation between higher stock prices and QE (money printing)

Macroprudential policy does not seek to replace traditional regulation of financial institutions, such as commercial banks, which are essential to a healthy system. Instead, it adds to and complements microprudential policy.

It can often deploy traditional regulatory tools, and relies on traditional regulators for implementation and enforcement. But it adapts [changes] the use of these tools to counter growing risks in the financial system. 

This evolving [making it up as you go along] approach may require a new type of regulatory setup to monitor the financial system for evidence of growing threats to stability and to enable the authorities to take action to counter those threats…it is an approach that is still evolving (FSB/IMF/BIS, 2011).”

Even the IMF realizes that it can do nothing to prevent this coming crash. “Even the best macroprudential policies cannot prevent all financial crises. As a result, there is a need for a strong and flexible lender of last resort—typically a central bank—to ease temporary shortages in liquidity and for credible policies to resolve or close failing financial institutions.” So they expect some banks to fail, and they will decided which ones to save and which ones to close.

If you are somewhat confused, so are the experts. ” Kevin Warsh, former member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System said it well at the IMF meeting this past weekend: “macro-prudential policies are vital, but we have no idea what they are”.  

There is no doubt there will be effects when the taper occurs. As this country has never implemented such a massive money-printing scheme of this magnitude before, we are in uncharted territory.  No doubt we shall soon find out if the IMF’s prediction of a crash [deterioration] occurs. 

Now that Ebola has been established as the “October surprise”, we may also be in for a “November surprise.” Let’s just hope it’s not both new Ebola cases and  a market crash.

Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!

Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Order by Phone at 888-388-7003 or online at M - F 9am to 5pm EST

Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!

HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation

Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.

MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen! 
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

Immusist Beverage Concentrate - Proprietary blend, formulated to reduce inflammation while hydrating and oxygenating the cells.

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 2 comments
    • lottopol

      Most investors now believe three things about the Federal Reserve, money and interest rates. They think that the Federal Reserve is artificially depressing rates below what would be a “normal” level. They believe that in the process of doing so the Federal Reserve has enormously increased the supply of money and they believe that the USA is on a fiat money system.
      All three of those beliefs are incorrect. One benchmark rate that the Federal Reserve has absolute control of is the rate paid on reserves deposited at the Federal Reserve. That rate is now 25 basis points, after being zero since the inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913 until recently. If the Federal Reserve had left that rate at zero t-bill rates would now be even lower than they are now. The shortest t-bills rates would now be probably negative.
      Paying interest on reserves combined with the subsidy to the banks of providing free unlimited deposit insurance on non-interest bearing demand deposits is keeping t-bill rates positive. Absent those policies the rate on t-bills would be actually negative. The Chinese and others all over the world are willing to pay anything for the safety of depositing funds in the USA. Already, Bank of New York Mellon Corp. has imposed a 0.13% charge on large deposits.
      An investor who believes that interest rates are headed up may respond that the rate paid on reserves is a special case and that the vast increase in the money supply resulting from the quantitative easing must result in higher rates when the Federal Reserve reverses its course. The problem with that view is that the true effective money supply is still far below its 2007 level.
      Money is what can be used to buy things. Historically money has first been specie (gold and silver coins), then fiat money which is paper currency and checking accounts (M1) and more recently credit money. The credit money supply is what in aggregate can be bought on credit. Two hundred years ago your ability to take your friends out to dinner depended on whether or not you had enough coins (specie) in your pocket. One hundred years ago it depended on the quantity of currency in your pocket and possibly the balance in your checking account if the restaurant would take checks.
      Today it is mostly your credit card that allows you to spend. We no longer have a fiat money system. Today we have a credit money system. Just because there is still some fiat money does not negate the fact that we are on a credit money system. When we were on a basically fiat money system there was still a small amount of specie in circulation. Even today a five cent piece contains about 5 cents worth of metal, but no one would claim we are still on a specie money system.
      Fiat money is easy to measure; M1 was $1.376 trillion in 2007 and was $2.535 trillion in May 2013. The effective money supply is the sum of fiat money and credit money. Credit money cannot be precisely measured. However, When the person in California whose occupation was strawberry picker and who had made $14,000 in his best year was able to get a mortgage of $740,000 with no money down and private equity could buy a company like Clear Channel in a $20 billion leveraged buyout, also with essentially no money down, the credit money supply was clearly much higher than today. A reasonable ballpark estimate of the credit money supply is that it was $70 trillion in 2007 compared to $50 trillion today.
      The effective money supply is the sum of the traditional fiat money aggregates plus the credit money supply. Thus, despite the claims of Ron Paul and Rick Perry to the contrary, the effective or true money supply has fallen drastically over the last few years….”

    • StormyB4

      When QE ends, who’s going to buy treasuries and where will that money come from? The only way to attract investors to treasuries is to raise rates. That will have 2 effects. It’s going to attract money that would normally be invested in stocks. The market will fall dramatically. Second, the government won’t be able to finance its debt at those interest rates.

      The bottom line? QE can’t possibly end. It’s the slower road to destruction and the path of least resistance.

    Load more ...




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.