Tomorrow’s election changes nothing about the national debt

Johnny Moon was homeless and unemployed in the early 2000s. A high school dropout with a bad drug habit, Moon was hardly someone that banks would consider creditworthy.

And yet, over the course of a single year, he was able to borrow more than $600,000 to buy five different investment properties.

This wasn’t some heartwarming “only in America” story of bankers helping a homeless guy turn his life around. This was just sloppy, risky lending. And Moon was not an isolated case.

In those days, lending rules were so relaxed that banks threw money at even the biggest credit risks. And no one cared because everyone was making a fortune.

Mortgage brokers raked in handsome commissions. Home appraisers, real estate attorneys, and title companies generated tremendous fees. Investment banks posted record profits packaging up risky loans into special bonds. And ratings agencies minted money slapping pristine AAA ratings on those bonds.

Everyone knew what they were doing was risky. But they were making so much money, they were happy to ignore it.

Another risky hallmark of this era was the popularity of adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs).

Rather than borrow at a fixed rate for 30-years (which is typical in most residential mortgages), banks made loans that carried a super-low introductory teaser rate, often just 0.9%.

But that teaser rate was adjustable; after 6, 12, or 24 months, the mortgage rate would reset to the current market rate… which ended up being MUCH higher. And once the interest rate adjusted higher, the monthly payment adjusted higher as well.

Do the math: at 0.9%, a $1 million loan only costs around $750 a month in interest. But if the teaser rate resets to 4%, the monthly payment hits $3,333, more than 4x higher.

At its peak, roughly 1/3 of all new mortgages in America were adjustable with low teaser rates. And this is what nearly brought down the global economy: borrowers could no longer afford their mortgages once the teaser rates reset.

It should have been one of the most predictable crises of all time. When heavily indebted borrowers suddenly see their monthly interest payments skyrocket, bad things happen.

But very few ‘experts’ saw it coming, and everyone acted surprised that it almost destroyed the global economy.

The United States government is in a similar position today.

For decades, the US Treasury borrowed money across the entire ‘yield curve’, i.e. the government issued 30-year bonds, 20-year bonds, 10-year notes, etc. all the way down to 28-day T-bills.

But it’s a much more difficult environment these days; with the national debt at $40 trillion and annual deficits at $2 trillion, fewer investors are willing to buy 30-year US government bonds whose rate is fixed for THREE DECADES.

That’s simply too much duration risk given the America’s current fiscal trajectory.

So the Treasury Department has started borrowing more and more via short-term bonds, like the 2-year note.

Similar to adjustable-rate mortgages from the early 2000s, rates on short-term bonds are much lower. But it creates the same risk when the interest rate essentially ‘resets’ in the future.

Right now there’s $7 trillion worth of Treasury bills which mature in 12-months or less. That means $7 trillion of debt will have to be refinanced over the next year, potentially at a significantly higher rate.

And that’s on top of any NEW debt that the Treasury Department issues.

This means that if interest rates continue to rise, the Treasury Department could have a serious (and yet completely predictable) catastrophe on its hands over the next couple of years.

Every 1% increase in the Treasury’s average interest rate costs taxpayers $400+ billion PER YEAR. Given that the annual budget deficit is already $2 trillion, this extra $400 billion in interest expense will have to be borrowed as well, which only makes the problem worse.

In short, the government will borrow more money to pay the extra interest on money they’ve already borrowed.

America goes to the voting booth tomorrow to decide which party will control Congress.

Sadly it doesn’t seem to matter; neither party has any genuine desire to reduce the deficit. Hardly anyone is talking about cutting spending, cracking down on fraud, and trimming waste.

Ironically, all these politicians know it’s a disaster in the making, just like the banks knew their housing loans were super risky 20 years ago. But the political class is benefiting too much from the waste, making it virtually impossible to stop.

The housing bubble in the early 2000s destroyed a lot of lives; Johnny Moon died on a dirty mattress on the floor of one of his houses right before it went into foreclosure; his wallet was found to have just $1 inside… and he was just one of millions of other stories.

When the ‘adjustable rate’ on the national debt resets over the next few years, there’s also going to be a lot of damage. And opportunity as well.

Don’t pin your hopes on an election outcome. Politicians aren’t going to fix this. The incentive structure just isn’t there.

Focus on the truth. Do the debt arithmetic yourself. And make sure you have a Plan B.

P.S. Real assets are one of the surest ways to protect against the inflation that comes from a central bank buying its own government’s debt.

Schiff Sovereign’s investment research service, Strategic Assets, has focused on real assets since 2022: the metals, energy, food, and ships the global economy can’t run without, in companies that are profitable, carry little or no debt, and trade for ridiculously cheap multiples of their earnings.

Our research has locked in gains of more than 10x on a small silver producer, with average gains of about 75%. Right now we are giving away a free sample issue so you can see what’s inside.

Click here to learn more.

Source

Simon Black is an international investor, entrepreneur and permanent traveler. His daily letter is both educational and entertaining, and we suggest that those who want unbiased, actionable information about global opportunities sign up for Sovereign Man’s free, actionable newsletter at http://www.SovereignMan.com.

From Simon Black of SovereignMan.com

Source: https://www.schiffsovereign.com/investing/tomorrows-election-changes-nothing-about-the-national-debt-156213/