DEBUNKED: Cow Flatulence Creating CO2 Climate Crisis  (Historical Senate Document Reveals:  Government Involvement in Releasing CO2 Emissions into Atmosphere)

 (Historical Senate Document Reveals:  Government Involvement in Releasing CO2 Emissions into Atmosphere)

 A United States Senate document regarding weather modification hearings that took place in January and March of 1974 called, “Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate,” reveals the truth behind the government’s role in purposely emitting CO2 into the atmosphere.

 I found golden nuggets that blew me away in this document. Senator Claiborne Pell (D) of Rhode Island asked Professor Gordon J. F. MacDonald, Associate Director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles, if he could insert a copy of an article Professor MacDonald wrote in 1966 titled, “How to Wreck the Environment.”

This article was a buffet of all of the experiments and research that had been conducted. Some of the topics it covered were: weather modification, climate modification, future weather and climate modification, earthquake modification, ocean modification, and more.  I found some interesting information in the climate modification section that was very telling because many of the topics the professor discussed in 1966—totally negate the climate change mantra of today.

In his opening, Professor MacDonald revealed climate modification capabilities that had been in motion decades earlier,

            “Among future means of obtaining national objectives by force, one possibility hinges on man’s ability to control and manipulate the environment of his planet. When achieved, this power over his environment will provide man with a new force capable of doing great and indiscriminate damage . . . as I will argue, these weapons are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars.”

He was basically saying that those who control the weather and have power over the environment can obtain their objectives by force from an unsuspecting victim. While the professor mentioned national objectives, I would substitute this with international objectives. He ends the statement saying these weapons are suited for secret wars.

If the people of this world are being sold a lie about a climate crisis that is being carried out on them via environmental  manipulation that will change their way of life and break them down financially, I would call that a secret war. I don’t know that the professor was thinking about the United Nations climate trick when he wrote this, but I am saying he is telling us that manipulating the weather and the people—is probably more than just a possibility.

The good professor also describes differences in climate change over the course of history; if I did not know better, I would say other periods in history had a climate emergency too, but somehow nature seemed to take care of it—all without edicts from the United Nations—imagine that!

MacDonald states at a prior time of history it was even warmer than at the time the article was written by “five degrees Fahrenheit higher,” yet those temperatures changed again throughout history. His article also documents different dry periods in history that brought about drought conditions so severe they caused people to move to different regions; yet again, conditions evened out again to a new equilibrium until the next change in conditions.

If you read his historical accounts of weather patterns, they seem to change for periods and then change again. It also seems like the variations are across the board geographically. So how did this all become a big emergency of late? I don’t think you will find this account in any of the United Nations literature.

 Professor MacDonald’s 1966 article also mentions CO2, the climate change movements’ biggest enemy.

            “Carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the start of the industrial revolution has produced an increase in the average temperature of the lower atmosphere of a few tenths of a degree Fahrenheit.”

Should a few tenths of a degree every one hundred years really cause the concern and urgency that the United Nations agenda is pushing?

 In 1966, the professor also mentioned CO2 experiments (that went back as far as 1948), but he does not say they are ridding the earth of  CO2 —but to the contrary—spreading it through cloud seeding with silver iodide.

“Experiments over the past eighteen years have demonstrated unequivocally that clouds composed of supercooled water droplets can be transformed into ice-crystal clouds by seeding them with silver iodide, “dry ice” (frozen carbon dioxide), and other suitable chemical agents. This discovery has been applied operationally in the clearance of airports covered by supercooled ground fog…

There is increasing, though inconclusive, evidence that rainfall from some types of clouds and storm systems in temperate regions can be increased by ten to fifteen per cent by seeding. Somewhat more controversial evidence indicates that precipitation can be increased from tropical cumulus by techniques similar to those employed in temperate regions.“

Did he say, “carbon dioxide”? Are these the same CO2 emissions they are constantly railing against today? Is it possible they are seeding clouds with CO2 and blaming it on people and their activities, and animal digestive gases being released into the atmosphere? Could they be creating the problem so that they can also have the solution, and ultimately worldwide control?

MacDonald also mentions the military having the ability to disperse material into the upper atmosphere to help either cool or warm the surface. Does this mean they could have been doing this in recent decades to help build a public perception of drastic warming or cooling, erratic changes to the climate, to move all nations into their control agenda?

I’ve shown you that at the very least, there is a possibility that our government has had the power to manipulate our weather and the environment as far back as the 1940s. Notice I said “manipulate.” I still contend they are deliberately manipulating the climate to scare people around the world, to cull the masses, to get them in line and sign onto the global agenda. If they have had cloud manipulation technology since the late 1940s, what could they not do today?

Source:
GeoengineeringWatch.com, Weather Modification: Hearings before the Subcommittee on Oceans and International Environment of the Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate, https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/documents/GeoengineeringWatch%20-%20Weather%20Modification%20Hearings%201974.pdf. March 1974, p. 1 & 56-59.