Shrewsbury School threatens parent with eviction

Your site is unsafe as you are creating red level radiation of at least 6 volts per metre, possibly as high as 20 Volts per metre.

I am not able to switch off my equipment as I need to know where it is safe for me to walk and drive on your site.

My doctor, Dr Jean Monro of Breakspear Hospital advises that I keep out of high radiation areas as far as possible, and move quickly through locations which present higher threat.  If I don’t I get headaches and chest pains and have other negative health effects.  I should be able to wear protective clothing which I do as necessary.

The threat includes use of mobile phones by teachers and parents.  Teachers should be switched off when in the presence of the children.

European guidelines state that levels of radiation above mW/m2 100 are not safe for children to be in for long periods.  You are denying the existence of European safety guidelines by stating there is no threat from emf.

If you are not able to accommodate electro highly sensitive people at your school, you should make a statement along those lines.  Also if you are not willing to abide by European safety guidelines regarding children in the classroom and their exposure to radiation, you should confirm this so other parents can be warned.

As you are refusing to even check the radiation in the classrooms, I need to know that my son is safe there, as well as myself.  I would far prefer it if you bought a simple meter and carried out regular checks and recorded your emf radiation levels yourselves.

You are not willing to make a statement as to what you consider acceptable radiation levels to be.  It is not acceptable to merely state that radiation is safe in your opinion, when it is known to cause cancer and children are especially vulnerable.

I see little point in engaging in conversation with individuals at the school when there is no individual willing to appear from behind the GDST (Girls Day School Trust) parapet of standard replies.  These are, for those who know what electro sensitivity means, criminally negligent and could have very serious consequences.

If I get no human response but standard legal letters drafted from within the telecommunications industry, I can reply in kind whenever necessary.  I don’t see any human being taking responsibility for this and that means I cannot hold anyone you mention in regard, which I would prefer.  Life is too precious to be squandered by such gross negligence and lack of care.

Dear Mr Curteis

I am sorry that you feel frustrated that the school, along with other organisations is not appreciative of,  or responding to your concerns.  However I can assure you that we care deeply for the welfare of our pupils and staff and indeed the wider community here at the High School.  We have taken all necessary and reasonable precautions to ensure our site is safe for our pupils and we have thoroughly looked into your concerns.

Your actions yesterday represent a risk to our pupils and upset our members of staff.  Our chief responsibility is to safeguard our pupils thus we cannot allow unauthorised activities by anyone whilst on site, including parents.  The use of your monitor has not been authorised and I reiterate that this should not be used again whilst on our site.

Moreover you are not allowed to wander around our school site unsupervised. If you do persist with these activities despite our request for you to stop, then in line with our safeguarding policy and procedures, we will seek further advice which may lead to you being removed from site.

I hope that this sets out our position clearly.

Best regards

Mrs Fiona Fox

Director Of Operations

Shrewsbury School Prep