The sordid business of fake epidemics

Of course, the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control are relentlessly pushing the idea that: this is a spreading epidemic, and it is caused by COV-19, a new human coronavirus.

Now, the US Centers for Disease Control is rolling out a program to test Americans (e.g., travelers who have been to China).  As time passes, the program will likely pull larger numbers of Americans into that net.

The CDC program immediately raises two problems: why bother testing for a virus if it isn’t really causing human disease; and what kind of test is being done?

In this article, I’m focusing on the type of test, and whether it’s accurate, even if you assume the coronavirus is causing disease.

Reading through CDC literature, I believe the two most prevalent US testing methods are: antibody, and PCR.

Antibody tests are notorious for cross-reactions.  This means factors in no way relevant to a given virus can make the test read positive.  In that case, the patient would be falsely told he “has the coronavirus.”  But it gets worse.  Traditionally, antibody tests reading positive were taken as a good sign for the patient: his immune system had contacted a germ and defeated it.  Then, starting in 1984, the science was turned upside down: a positive test was, astoundingly, taken to mean the patient was ill or would soon become ill.

The PCR test (which requires excellent technicians who will not make any number of possible mistakes) takes a tissue sample from a patient which might contain a tiny virus particle(s) much too small to be observed—and blows it up many times, so it can be seen.  However, the test says nothing reliable about HOW MUCH virus is in the patient’s body.  Why is that important?  Because millions and millions of replicating virus in the body are necessary to even begin talking about actual illness.  A positive PCR test, nevertheless, will be taken to mean the patient “has the epidemic disease.”  —An even deeper issue: where is the PRIOR PROOF that the PCR is testing for a virus that actually causes disease?

The prospect of these two tests being done on Americans is not comforting, to say the least.  People will be roped into believing they are “epidemic cases,” and therefore need to be isolated, and treated with highly toxic antiviral drugs.

In the event they become ill, from the drugs, they’ll be told “the coronavirus is doing the damage.”  In some cases, this will result in even further dosing with the same drugs, at higher levels—a disaster.

A very small percentage of doctors are aware of the profound shortcomings of these two diagnostic tests.  Most of them will shrug off their doubts and perform the tests anyway, because refusal would endanger their careers and medical licenses.

This is the sordid drama now unfolding in the American landscape.

It’s not just America.  The same tests are being done all over the world.

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)