Trudeau, China, leftism and Islam: Links 1 for May 13th, 2023

1. Trudeau likely guilty of treason to the level of an imprisonable offence.

(This site has been posting materials on this for years. It is well known. CSIS has been warning of this for years Pre-Trudeau, but Trudeau appears to be an actual Chinese asset)

2. Slippery slope isn’t a warning. its damn purpose of these efforts. Each chink in the armour of our civilization in the name of tolerance etc. was not to create a better world. It was to destroy it.

Critics say government “educators” and the sex-ed fanatics have some serious explaining to do after a 6-year-old girl at a government school in Texas was forced to perform oral sex on a boy in first-grade class. Classmates filmed the monstrous crime on April 19 even as a teacher was in the room, according to news reports. 

The horrific event at South Elementary first came to the attention of parents after a video of the sex act was found on a district-issued device. From there, despite officials’ efforts to cover it up, word spread rapidly as parents and members of the community began protesting and demanding answers from officials online and outside the school. 

“A 6-year-old was exposed to things that even adults would have a hard time overcoming,” one of the outraged parents protesting outside the elementary school told the Plainview Herald. “This is trauma at its worst, and it is a trickle-down effect because it affects everyone around them.” To protect the identity of the children involved, most media outlets are not disclosing any names at all. 

(Gay marriage is one easy example. If homosexuals wanted equality before the law, then a civil union would have been fine. But the purpose of redefining marriage to include two men or two women, or now multiple people or people and animals and people and themselves or people and things, was to destroy the institution altogether.)

3. Blackrock appears to be forcing behaviours to change

Blackrock CEO Larry Fink….”Behaviours are going to have to change, You have to ????? ?????????? and at Blackrock we are ??????? ??????????….?? pic.twitter.com/38s3N4N43A

— ????????????? (@Risemelbourne) May 11, 2023

4. Islamized Belgium: Muslim Students Shouting ‘Allahu Akbar’ Attack School ‘LGBTQIA+ Event’

Please read the above story and watch the video.
There may be an explanation for why leftist advocates both for mass Islamic immigration and the LGBTQIA++ are failing to condemn Islamic hatred of homosexuality, or even acknowledge it.. What we are seeing now across the Western World is something far more sinister than seeking equality before the law for homosexuals. We are seeing the creation of a weaponized segment of the population against classical or Western Civilization by creating sexual identities, real or imagined. Then creating a victim class out of those sexual identities and often ones where children are pushed into, without any prior sense of their being victims of anything, Then “liberating Tolerance” is applied to these victim groups granting them permission and power to attack anyone who objects or disagrees with their pseudo-reality. The silence from leftists becomes clear in this context. Both Islam, and the semantic marxist weapon of “Islamophobia”, along with for example, men who claim they are women using the same weapon but calling it “Transphobia” both represent an existential threat to Western institutions, right down to the safety of women in showers in public schools and high schools. For the left, the point is never the point. The communist revolution is always the point. So they will not speak out against Islamic aversion to homosexuality, while destroying culturally Western men for insisting on maintaining the biological reality of human sex differences. This happened to feminist, J. K. Rowlings of Harry Potter fame. Leftists would call this Islamic attack on a gay-promotion day, ‘acceptable losses’ on its war against civilization.

Think back on Johnny U’s comment about the Aspen. Under the ground there is one root system from which what appears to be many individual trees sprout. Each tree has a group of people standing around it arguing about the merits of the particular tree, These people are accidentally controlled opposition. Because they are distracted from the giant root that is taking over literally everything as people think each tree is a separate issue. One being gay rights, another Islamic rights and so on and so on but all of them using Marxist dialectics to attack the entire Western method of thought and organization. So ignoring Muslims attacking another vector of attack such as an anti-transphobe day at a high school makes perfect sense. The key thing is that both Islam and the LGTBQ++ etc. continue to be effective dialectical weapons against classical points of reference and taxonomies. The left also knows that what they ignore gets ignored. They also know that if you point out any aspect of reality, you get struck down by Habermas’ Discourse Theory. That is to say, if you violate the leftist think tank “consensus” on say, Global Warming or Islam as the religion of peace, you are an ‘islamophobe’ or a ‘climate denier. I remember a conversation between a fellow we know and a woman who then was working on a Masters in Feminism. She was explaining the nature of feminism today. When her interlocutor pointed out that the massive importation of muslims to the West was a threat to all the gains of women in the past 100 years, the response was, “Careful! You will sound like an Islamophobe!”.

In the simplest terms, the conflict in the story above is friendly fire or acceptable losses. Ezra levant comes closest when he calls it “politically correct poker” where the winner of any given conflict is determined by victim group status. But that doesn’t really describe it. The left controls the narrative. They know that what they ignore gets ignored, and more, that insisting on looking at what is real and evident is a thought crime. And the number of people in our day to day lives who have been pulled into this without their awareness of it, is staggering.

5. This is an interview with a former Islamic jurist on the true nature of Islam. Sam Solomon was very high up in the world of Islamic jurisprudence. He created laws based on Sharia with a council of other jurists. At one point someone gave him a bible and he began to read it and it made sense to him. In council he asked a couple of questions and the looks he got meant he knew he didn’t have much time to live before being killed as an apostate. Ultimately he converted to Christianity and gave a limited number of talks on Islam as he is a very high value target for Islam’s violent front men. IF we know this about Islam, so does the left.

Thank you all for reading this far and considering the points of view presented, and hopefully gleaning some insight that you all might share in the comments.