Appearances, Disappearances, AI camels, Horse sense, mutiny in the ranks, and the risky downsides of the genocides

I’ll probably be seen to break ranks here, but what seems to be buzzing right now is not just the release of Julian Assange, but also the “Why now?” angle. Nobody in the neolithic media this morning will go anywhere near answering the question. I’m fairly certain the one word summary is “distraction”. This is being done as a preparation for something far more significant. There are only about 200 possibilities, so fear not.

I do not question Assange’s courage, but I have never liked his ‘Lawrence of Arabia looking into the distant horizon philosophically’ pose. There’s an air of self-importance about the bloke, and more than a whiff of narcissism.

As for the continuing saga of Schwab the invisible man, the question is not “Why now?” so much as “Why not yet?”Do you want to know the reason why it’s now four months since Klaus Schwab became media-invisible, and so “decided” to step out of the limelight, and still hasn’t made any public appearance to say, “Un’ so, mein kleinern Schnitzel Poppas, this is not auf weidersehen but ze end titles, hoho,” if nothing else.

Ask Kate Middleton: she tried to get herself a photoshop makeover using AI (twice) and got caught (twice). Santa Klaus Schwab therefore remains oudda-sight man, yo! It’s now safer to think, “The best way to “prove” my existence generally is to remain hidden and make sure the Establishment media are briefed to assert that there is nothing to see here, I am just fine, Gott in Himmel.”

So, it’s time for the inestimable forces of Slog Paparazzi – having gained secret access to Klaus ‘Garbo’ von DavoSchwab’s love nest here in African Ecowas – to reveal this exclusive, unique, one-off snap of liddle Klausi legging it to safety by using his secret lover as the escape vehicle:

Well there you are, Klaus was always a sucker for a pretty face. Of course, we can’t see his face – but that’s the game, innit? Surely this shot must be incontrovertible proof that Herr Schlaphead von Davos is alive and well, but being pursued by those of malign intent. It represents classic post empirical New Normalism, settled science, on messageness – but with the added advantage of being -59.7% AI manipulation free…and we here in the exalted halls of principled Slog journalism wish the Clara-Klaus Union a long and happy life free from tabloid Nobslobs like – to take an example at random – Smears Pogrom, and his best mates Alan Rustybridges and Paul McCuntry – none of whom had the cojones to stand up to the Guardian/New York Times/Washington Post Trident of Reality killers.

However, the chances of that coming to pass are less than Gareth Southgate having a torrid affair with Christine Lagarde based on their shared love of the soccer offside rule….and the pro’s and con’s of penalty shoot-outs.

We have to ask ourselves [I rather think] now that Klaus Schwab is disappearing from view [perhaps forever] what his ‘stakeholder’ model of capitalism really was all about. Old Chinese saying has it that “Steakholder with sharp eating utensils way ahead of game if opponent only has a stake promised in delivery with chopsticks as only weapon”.

Schwab was never a key player in the era of massive power shifts from Nationality to globalist business curency wars – and thence onward to the insane idea of World Government. But if what he had created could be taken over by the less naive nasties and used as an apparently Gentle Giant…..well: I sense that this is what’s being going on since last March.

Things are no longer what they seem in any situation. Digital manipulation, image technology, great wealth and the power to exert deadly threats have killed reality.

But probably the thing to remember at all times is that only seven per cent or so of First World populations have skin in the Distortionist Power Game. US polls now, for instance, show the Swingometer heading back towards Biden since the conviction of Trump for the crime of being blackmailed by a hooker. In a research situation, respondents will feel the need to show disapproval; such is not often turned into polling booth private action.

The kick in the balls that the French electorate recently gave to Emannuel Macron is seen by many (including myself) as instructive. The mark of good market research is that which discerns defensive social lies.

Further, very few quantitative studies take into account the exact vehicle for translating the popular vote into power. In the US, some States are using a form of ranked choice voting ( RCV, a sort of pr) for the primaries, most aren’t – and for the POTUS election itself, to win, a candidate needs a simple majority of vote in 270 States. If you’re confused at all about this, here’s a visual guide issued by the organisation keen on RCV becoming universal:

Well, as we can see here, one picture is worth a million words, and as exemplary proof of that contention, this diagram goes one further. For it could confidently offer Albecht Einstein a million years to crack it and still leave the enigma intact – primarily because Einstein died seventy years ago, but equally because the illustration could be anything from the Faroe Islands making their bid for freedom from the Earth’s* pull to Gennifer Flowers’ latest wall-art attempt to save our civilisation**

*In my opinion, an excellent call….and well worth the risk.

** Did you know she’s 74? No, neither did I.

More complexity from the House of Windsor: Princess Anne has apparently been injured after “contact with a horse”. That’s what the PR release says: far from being a wiseass here [the Princess Royal is by far my favourite family member] I wonder why idiots continue to raise eyebrows due to their inability to construct simple sentences with an air of credibility? Anyway, the press pack says ‘The Princess Royal has been admitted to hospital with a minor head injury and concussion thought to have been caused by a horse….Her medical team suggested the head injury is consistent with the type of impact from a horse’s legs or head.’

Extrapolating from this, as she was walking in the grounds of her home at the time, she was not what we equestrian experts call “in the saddle”. In short, was she attacked by the horse? Bear in mind, Anne is a long-standing eventer of Olympic standard who has been horsey since 1954. One assumes she is on first-name terms with her horses.

So why the contretemps?