Three incidents of antisemitism which show that communism is implemented by the culture as much as by the state

The first one is a minor but meaningful incident in Australia. While it was resolved by the company and very well, it does not mean that it never happened, or that there is no meaning in it.

Here is a link to a story about how a girl working at a print shop in Australia refused to laminate something for a guy because it had Israeli or Jewish content.

?#BREAKING: Australian-Jew REFUSED service at @Officeworks in Elsternwick (Melbourne) because the staff member identifies as “pro-Palestinian”

Disgusting pic.twitter.com/iTpKbGEmaA

— Avi Yemini (@OzraeliAvi) August 1, 2024

Without doing too deep a dive into this, its likely this worker abused a company rule that allowed them to avoid pornographic material that would be offensive to them in order to justify refusing to laminate this gentlemen’s page. The company did exactly what it should have done, and more. But the question is, how did we get here. How did we get to a place where people can’t show a Jewish heritage or support of Israel, wear a trump hat, or show support for any counter-narrative position without people on the street or with whom they are working with, then feeling justified in whatever measure they may chose to take against you?

Communism it seems, has been implemented via the culture. A Jewish person may not feel comfortable ordering take out when the restaurant staff or delivery person has their name. What might they do rather than just refuse service? Or anyone famously conservative for that matter. We no longer have a trust based society. In fact, we clearly are moving from a de jure society to a de facto one in the sense that it doesn’t matter what the law says when calculating the consequences of expressing a view.  Or even belonging to a group to which others would impute your views onto you and then punish you for them.

The second: A mohel, or a Rabbi specifically trained in how to do circumcisions as Jewish ritual was arrested and jailed and denied bail in Ireland. Keep in mind, Muslims also do circumcision as religious ritual. Not aware of any arrests of their practitioners. And if one imagines that in Ireland they are not doing this also to women with relatively untrained people, they are living in a myopic dream state. This site is full of examples of this having been discovered, right up to where the media stopped reporting on it.

Man in court charged with circumcising child in Dublin

A 47-year-old man has appeared in court charged with circumcising a child at a house in Dublin two days ago without being a registered medical practitioner.

Jonathan Abraham, with an address in London, was remanded in custody.

The judge refused bail on the grounds of the seriousness of the charge, the potential flight risk and the nature of the offence.

Mr Abraham was brought by detectives from Blanchardstown before Dublin District Court.

He is accused of performing a surgical procedure – the circumcision of a male child – without being a medical practitioner.

The offence is contrary to section 37 of the Medical Practitioners Act 2007.

Detective Garda Megan Furey said that she arrested Mr Abraham at 10.15pm last night at Blanchardstown Garda Station and when the charge was put to him, he made no reply.

The court was told that gardaí went into a house in west Dublin on 30 July after 1pm with the consent of homeowners and Mr Abraham was there dressed in a white doctor’s style coat, wearing blue gloves, with medical implements nearby.

Det Gda Furey said that a very young child was naked on a changing pad and a circumcision had been carried out on another child.

She objected to bail. She said he had flown into Ireland at 12pm and had a return flight for 7pm.

Defence solicitor Tertius Van Eeden said that Mr Abraham was a rabbi and a member of the oldest Anglo-Jewish society that governs the practice and procedure for circumcision.

He said he was a mohel, a person trained and allowed to carry out the practice in line with the Jewish faith.

Read the rest at the link above. And whatever your views of this practice are, the issue is the selective enforcement against the Jewish community it in a way that has broader political implications. This kind of enforcement has a word, dia dia something.

Meanwhile in Canada: The hate crime arrests in numbers by a Toronto Police chief.

Justin Trudeau is failing to defend Jewish Canadians again and again and again.

Listen to the numbers from Toronto police chief. ?

“Since October 7th, we have attended 1,556 suspected hate crime calls for service, an average of 156 calls a month.” pic.twitter.com/7paDJfZjnq

— Melissa Lantsman (@MelissaLantsman) July 31, 2024

The concept of hate speech and hate crimes is anathema to a republic. Crime is crime. Motives is up to the trial to determine and punishment is up to the judge to determine based on those motives and the damage done. The notion of thought crimes gives ultimate power to the state and the state will use it in the interests of the state and at the expense of the people. It will be enforced dialectically. We already see that with gangs of communists, college LARPers and Muslims calling for Jewish blood on most Western city streets with a university, and no charges or even statistics recorded. But should anyone say anything that counters the revolutionary narratives, well watch the UK. Here is a link to PJ Watson with a few examples of how the same politicians spoke about violent minority riots in 2020 and the ones this weekend. If they can enforce on reality this diabolically, then what can they do with thought and speech crimes. Hell telling us all what we meant by what we say started as early as the 1960s when words started to be banned for some groups because of what they told us we meant as if we didn’t know why we used those words.

That started a trend in which the entire language became the patented property of the left. You then had to mean what they said, and you better not say it.

As the revolution is not quite complete, or because the above video serves it in some way that isn’t immediately obvious, we see that hate-crimes are still phenomenally more against the Jewish community than against any other group, on top of it being generally protected by the state. Ezra Levant did a great job of demonstrating that with the arson of a Jewish school and several school busses used to bring Jewish kids to school in Toronto. in the past month. The media and police denied the nature of those crimes and the police went so far to specifically deny arson of the Jewish school claiming it was just a homeless guy with a hobo-fire went awry. The Media managed to avoid any mention of the school busses being next to a Jewish school and having Hebrew signs all over them. They only mentioned, the two media that did mention it at all, CTV and City News, that the busses were parked next to a discount grocer.

Since we now know for a fact that this is how it was reported and recorded, at least initially till Rebel found the facts, we can then safely ask, how many attacks on Jewish people, Christians, white people by communists and Muslims are not reported? Once you know the state and the media lies to you, you actually know a great deal. But coming to accept that is difficult.