Helen Grus verdict in, and went according to its clearly preordained conclusion

This site as well as  others have written a lot of articles on Helen Grus and the dialectical state and the reversal of process and outcome which is a core aspect of that communist-dialectical state.

One of the examples used was the Helen Grus hearings, where all aspects of the procedure had been so stunningly skewed and even reversed to create a guilty verdict that there could be no other outcome. not because of the evidence presented, as anyone who was paying attention knew the evidence was far more than enough for a reasonable doubt that Helen was within her job description to investigate those baby deaths and check a potential causal relationship to the deadly mRNA injections to nursing mothers. But because the effort put into making the process one of a guilty determination meant there was no chance that actual truth or evidence would change the outcome. It was, as we postulate, a dialectical process and not a Socratic one.

Having been to a number of the hearing dates, the tactics used by the court were nothing short of what one might expect in the Stalinist Soviet Union minus the really obvious signs of thuggery. In fact, Helen was back at work at the Ottawa Police while this 3 year hearing went on. So the analogy is so far, only philosophical and not practical. No gulags as of yet. But there is no doubt that she was found guilty in these hearings for daring to investigate something that would prove a state narrative was incorrect. The sacred narrative that the mRNA vaxx was “safe and effective”. No matter how many babies and pre-born babies would die from exposure to the vaxx or its byproducts and secondary products created in the human body and fluids, daring to look at the deaths and connect them to the vaxx is a criminal offence. And with that, truth dies.

This also may mean another click to this morning’s post about the upcoming Canadian selection of Mark Carney for PM scheduled for April 28th is worth another read, as they appear to have done similar things for that performance.

The verdict screams a brutal truth: dare to question the COVID-19 narrative as a skilled, seasoned investigator, no matter your employer, and the system will grind you to dust. Detective Helen Grus’s fate is a glaring warning—conform or be crushed.

Now it’s up to the Ottawa… https://t.co/QBtQOenxjJ

— Tom Marazzo (@TomMarazzo) March 25, 2025

Full text of both tweets:

The verdict screams a brutal truth: dare to question the COVID-19 narrative as a skilled, seasoned investigator, no matter your employer, and the system will grind you to dust. Detective Helen Grus’s fate is a glaring warning—conform or be crushed. Now it’s up to the Ottawa Police Service rank and file to decide: are you gutless sheep or fearless lions? This fight isn’t just hers—it’s yours too. If you can’t see that, then heaven help you, stick to writing parking tickets and leave justice to those with spines. Stand up, or stay down.

Inner Tweet:

Following a three year long Disciplinary trial against Detective Helen Grus of the Ottawa Police Service, the verdict is now in. The overwhelming political pressure, intentional failure to accept expert medical testimony during these proceedings and the failure of OPS to investigate the forensic evidence that would have proven the officers hypothesis has led the hearing officer to render a Guilty verdict on a single count of Discreditable Conduct against the officer asking questions. The message delivered is loud and clear. In Canada, political pressure will suppress the Rule of Law in matters that conflict, expose or question dangerous Governmental policies. This historical decision is a pivotal moment and a dark day for Justice as the consequences are far reaching.