Staggering amount of Hegelian language used by Texas Senatorial political candidate, James Talarico

Just observing patterns here, but it seems to me that when a candidate openly advocates for this much communist policy and uses this much dialectical language, or put another way, initiate language of the left, they believe the election is rigged for them. That way when they ‘win’, they can implement the policies with the plausible idea that the majority of the people actually voted for them and face less resistance.

For those that remember several of James O’Keefe’s hidden cam reveals of Democrat politicians, there was a solid theme back in 2020 and 2016. The leftist candidates would all lie about what they wanted, but talking to volunteers and campaign staff, they were of course open about their real intentions. Those elections were only fraudulent then, in the sense that the candidates were not honest in order to trick people into voting for them. Then they would move policy leftwards.

Full text:

Every word is James Talarico’s. 27 clips. 4 minutes. 2019–2026. “God is non-binary.” “…many more than two biological sexes. In fact, there are six.” “If you deny your child’s gender identity… it’s abusive for sure.” “There’s only one person who can determine a child’s gender identity, and that’s the child.” “I want to acknowledge that our trans community needs abortion care too.” “…the bill that would have denied gender-affirming health care to trans children… All these ideologies stem from this Christofascism movement.” “The way I fought for trans kids in the legislature is how I will fight for the U.S. Senate, and my position hasn’t changed.” “Prophetic voices like Jesus have helped me reckon with my own whiteness.” “It’s always rich to me that defund the police is considered off limits…” “Prison is violence.” “Tear down this secret police force.” Assault weapons ban? “Absolutely.” Send this to 10 Texas voters and tell them to vote today.

But when someone is this open about their intentions, and it should be obvious, perhaps especially in Texas that they could not be elected with this platform, it makes one suspect that they have machinery in place to help assure an electoral victory beyond the one person one vote model.