Branson vs Adam accepted by Supreme Court to overturn 2020 election

This is NOW real. It is on supreme court.gov. The court will hold a Jan 6th hearing to see whether or not they will take the case.

Branson vs Adam accepted by Supreme Court to overturn 2020 election

From the plaintiff’s Questions:

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from
along with this Court and lower appeal courts, constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case.

This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs
for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this
country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions.

These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, ettled by this Court without delay.  A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from along with this Court and lower appeal courts, constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether
or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case.

This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the
United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation
of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions. These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be ,settled by this Court without delay.

It should ALSO be noted that 388 members of Congress are included as DEFENDANTS