How DJT Lost the White House – Introduction: Why I Was Involved Before November 3 and What I Learned Because I Was

(Warning to reader: this introduction is really choppy. I am just trying to accommodate the public by getting the blocks of my narrative up quickly. When I finally weave them all into one story I will improve the writing, add more links etc.).

On the last day of July, 2020 a dear friend of mine from Montana, a stolid, Native American fellow some several years my junior, visited me at my home in Utah. A few days earlier I had had surgery on my spinal chord, and he was checking in. He told me that there was a group of people, some ex-federal some not, some cyber-experts and some with other expertise, who were organizing on the subject of election fraud. My friend was adamant that I get involved and help them. My friend was quite a squared-away individual, and I took his advice and requests seriously. The next day, August 1, my friend died in a plane crash: though the coincidence is troubling, I looked into it personally (I am a multi-engine instrument land and seaplane pilot), and it does seem to me to have been the error of his instructor (who flew the plane in a box canyon without the power to climb out).

At my friend’s funeral I met some of the people he had described. A sober, quiet man with a FEMA background and a deep knowledge of biowarfare; a retired Army Colonel with a background in Military Intelligence including psyops; other men and women with backgrounds in everything from law enforcement to cyberwarfare in military context and in support of law enforcement, to (most recently) operating against human trafficking in the Southwest to…. The possibility of election fraud on a mass scale.  An industrial scale.  It turned out that there were some irregularities in the Dallas 2018 election that had spawned a network of enthusiasts on election fraud, and that had spawned this broader network. Soon some key players were dropping through and seeing me in Utah, and I, recovering from surgery, was moving around to meet them elsewhere.  

Over the next couple months I sat through lectures by “white hat hackers” on the security vulnerabilities of the software used in election equipment. Vulnerabilities such as slots in the motherboard that should be soldered shut, but which are open, meaning anyone who can slip a chip into that slot for a few seconds has compromised the machine forever. R232 ports giving root access without a password (thus any technician that plugs in can compromise the machine forever). Strange violations of good computer science practice, such as a weirdly architected triple databases within the machine, without integrity among the lawyers. Audit logs that were editable by users (making them not”audit logs” at all), and lacking in fixed numbering systems that could reveal tapering. I asked the white hat hackers involved who were demonstrating such porous security to me and others to rate the security, on a scale of 1-10, of these systems. Their considered answer: “2, maybe a 1”.

Now when I write, “white hat hackers”, I should make clear that I am referring to people who not only follow the law, they generally operate under authority and direction of law enforcement, or under contract with law enforcement at state and federal levels. There is a certification for working the field of cyber-forensics, a certification that means you maintain proper chain of title and  image hard drives and swear out affidavits and produce work that is admissible in court. Courts look for this certification. These “white hat hackers” of whom I speak who were teaching me about these systems had such certifications.

Beyond those kinds of hacks, they began to introduce me to other “hacks” understood in the broadest sense.  The extraordinary  privileges enjoyed by precinct administrators was confirmed simply by  examination of the operating handbook of one of the machines.  More explanations were given me of the reason for spikes in offshore packet traffic to certain locations during our elections, though the full reasons for that were not yet fully understood. A technique that in November  was written of as the “drop & roll” was explained as the core of one form of theft:

https://rumble.com/vb8ksn-drop-and-roll-how-the-2020-election-was-stolen-from-donald-trump.html

As the weeks rolled by I became increasingly conversant with these oddballs who were convinced we were on the edge of a massive election steal. They had meetings arranged with DHS in their state, and their briefings were taken at least twice in September by DHS and propelled up the chain of command…. only to be killed from Washington. In particular, a portion of DHS called CISA (“Cybsecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency”) put the kibosh on further meetings. This was odd because election security is within their mandate.

Then November 3, the night of the election, everything they had been predicting to me would happen, happened.  I am not going to make this essay a full account of the steal. ONE SHOULD SEE SIDNEY POWELL’S SUBSEQUENT LAWSUITS AT SCOTUS FOR EXPLANATIONS AND AFFADAVITS: IT IS NOT THE POINT OF THIS ESSAY I AM WRITING HERE. But any political scientist can explain that to steal the national election one does not need “widespread election fraud”:  instead, with deep election fraud in five cities, one can flip the states they are in, thereby flip the electoral college, and thereby steal the election nationally. And what do you, know, those five cites (Atlanta, Philadelphia, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Phoenix) experienced unprecedented “shutting down” of vote counting in the middle of election  night on November 3. Some of those cities saw goons muscling observers away from vote counting centers on various trumped up reasons, while others taped pizza boxes across windows to block observation.In Atlanta’s State Farm Arena in Atlanta, a “water main break” forcing the evacuation of the vote counting area of and in the few hours when the courting was “closed”, hundreds of thousands of votes were pushed through the system, often showing 99.4% and even 100% runs for Biden, thousands of ballots in a row.  (A month later, the Georgia investigators reported that a urinal had simply overflowed. ) In some places, security cameras caught workers in these windows grabbing cases of ballots out of hiding and feeding them into machines while counting was stopped for spurious reasons.

Now I know from experience there are those who say coyly, “But how you you know that cheating occurred?” I don’t have time for such people. Five cites play a special role in being able to flip five swing states; those five cities say bizarre unprecedented activity on voting night, up to and including the shutting down of vote counting; the water pipes knew just which cities to break in, oddly; in each case a huge spike of Biden votes followed in windows where counting had ceased and observers had been cut out…. It is just an insult to our intelligence. It clearly reaches and reasonable person’s threshold for, “That’s suspcious enough it warrants further investigation.”

Within days a self-organized digital army sprung into existence. Networks of networks of volunteers. People willing to research any question we needed answered, people willing to track down others and record their experiences; precinct voters who had experienced some of the techniques of the fraud first-hand, at a retail level; precinct workers describing extraordinarily lax enforcement of standards; freight drivers who had realized they were moving hundreds of thousands of fake ballots from one state to another. Lawyers who were able to mobilize and gather sworn statements. It became clear that the problem was not going to be turning up facts of the crime, it was going to be in managing the firehouse of facts that were pouring in, so many hundreds and then thousands of Americans were stepping forward with details of things they had experienced or witnessed on Election Day. These networks began finding each other and then finding me, as I quickly organized a team of people who could handle the volume. The cyberteam collecting and processing data, the affidavits coming in by the dozens, and then hundreds (ultimately I heard that 50,000 Americans signed affidavits) concerning their experiences.

We had much more than a rough idea of the various forms of election fraud that had occurred, in various permutations, on retail, wholesale, and industrial scale. We knew that nailing things down definitely would require examining hard drives and doing other computer forensics, but the rough outline of the steal was child’s play to see, and the mountains of new statements and affidavits that surfaced daily all just filled in points of confirmation within the greater theory.  Mathematicians started pouring on with their analysis that confirmed what we were seeing empirically.

By a week after the election I was in Washington, DC. The cyber-sleuths and investigators with me already had things perhaps 50% sorted out. They had the strategy behind the theft: pick those five cities to cheat like hell, flip their states, thus flip the electoral college and the nation (though more refined versions of the strategy evolved over subsequent weeks: we found, for example, that whoever was doing the stealing would also target heavily red counties and shave a few percentage points in each).  Reams of data showing machines processing votes in those special windows at 3X or more their actual capacity; statistical outliers showing up in results in those special windows that were of astronomical impossibilities, rivers of affidavits gushing in where people reported experiences precisely consistent with what our team had predicted was happening under the table.

Approximately one week after the election I walked into an office building in suburban Virginia, just outside DC. That is to say, a week after this election, my colleagues and cyberexperts walked in with a still-fragmented but still highly compelling reconstruction of what had happened on November 3 and the days immediately following it. We had the crime more than half-solved, and what was remaining was almost a mechanical matter: dig here, compare this with that, the answers will spit out. We can see they  were doing this this and this, but we also need to look at that.  I and my cybersleuth colleagues walked into that building to take a meeting with America’s Mayor Rudy Giuliani, and Sidney Powell, Esq. (esteemed lawyer for Michael Flynn, the “Peoples’ General”).

And that, dear reader, is where our story really begins.

This story was first published on Deep Capture. Deep Capture features original investigative reporting on the all-too-cozy relationship Wall Street has with regulators, media, government and the intellectual establishment.