Open Witchcraft And Satanism On Display At 2014 Grammys
“… but this is your hour, and the power of darkness.” Luke 22:53
For a number of years now, we have been warning you that Hollywood has begin to embrace and promote open Satanism in the “entertainment” products they have been offering. NTEB’s ground-breaking article last year on how multi-platinum singer Beyonce and her husband Jay-Z are openly members of the Illuminati and proud Satanists left most of middle America gasping to catch it’s collective breath. This year, however, marks a full 100% increase in open witchcraft, Satanism and the occult being broadcast through music, movies and television.
Protect your children, unplug your television.
InfoWars: Popular Christian gospel singer Natalie Grant walked out of the Grammys after witnessing a series of performances that even the mainstream entertainment media admitted were occult in nature.
Grant, who was nominated for a Grammy in 2012, tweeted her excitement upon arriving at the event but soon made it clear that she left early because what she witnessed conflicted with her Christian beliefs, stating, “We left the Grammy’s early. I’ve many thoughts, most of which are probably better left inside my head. But I’ll say this: I’ve never been more honored to sing about Jesus and for Jesus. And I’ve never been more sure of the path I’ve chosen.”
Although she remained coy on the exact circumstances, Grant was probably referring to Katy Perry, who was surrounded by demons as she danced around an upside down broomstick before being encircled by fire during a performance of her song “Dark Horse”. Perry wore clothing bearing an illuminated Knights Templar cross.
Even E! Online tweeted that Perry’s performance resembled “actual witchcraft”.
Christian music website BreatheCast complained that Perry’s performance was “filled with satanic imagery and witchcraft.” Viewers also expressed their shock at the occult overtones of the show.
However, Grant could also have been offended by the mass gay wedding ceremony which took place during a performance by Macklemore & Ryan Lewis.
Not to be outdone, Beyonce and Jay-Z attempted to up the ante by performing a risqué duet which provoked fury from parents who complained that the spectacle was too explicit for children. Jay-Z’s acceptance speech, during which he said, “I would like to thank God… a little,” also prompted claims that the rapper was invoking the Illuminati.
The International Business Times reacted by claiming that Perry, Beyonce and Jay-Z’s antics were merely an example of the Grammys, “trolling Illuminati conspiracy theorists.” source – InfoWars
The post Open Witchcraft And Satanism On Display At 2014 Grammys appeared first on Now The End Begins.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
This been sad day for America for a while. Churches no longer preach against worshipping other gods to homosexuality. In ten years or less the churches will join the Grammys and it will show they Never did believe nor loved God and his commandments the fist and second most important.
If the churches don’t check their spiritual lives, they are going to wreck themselves through sin.
I leave you John 14:6.
You want the truth, check this out! I saw a video today
and then this one and BAMMM!!! Dan Davidson part 4 6 minutes
into it and it all starts to really make sense. I’m not a believer
of the religious aspect, but the energetic aspect, well judge
for yourselves. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PcLIx1333fg
They are just performing anything stupid to sucker people out of money. They are not Performers.They are bad actors.Some will stand up for them…..although they have no clue as to what they are actually standing up for…..You will see these type of followers in Peer Groups, they are usually forced into believing, or doing something they normally would not do because of these peer groups. The peer groups even gather donations, and force certain people to seek sponsors, and the Sponsors work for the peer groups, whom is controlled by the Corporate Elitist.
People can not see this…..so many have had their total lives ruined because of what is going on….
It is bad…
These type of shows by certain actors/pretenders are a ruse to draw in the young, and set them up to fail….they bait them, before they know it they end up in what is called a support group/community with a sponsor assigned to them…..this is deep, I am very surprised that no reporter has picked up on this, and do some home work…….Yes it is deep.
“Witchcraft And Satanism On Display At 2014 Grammys”
Yeah, so what?
I guess you christians will just have to become accustomed to the fact that not everyone subscribes to the same spirituality as you.
Read Malachi Martin’s book: “Hostage to the Devil”. You might change tune.
Don’t need to, I don’t put any stock in anyone’s fairytales.
Of course you don’t big guy!
Wouldn’t want your narcissism’s ability to OBEY being limited.
Not believing in the same mythology as you makes me a narcissist?
Which spirituality do you subscribe to?
not everyone is a cripple in need of a crutch..
some do perfectly well without the need to subscribe to any categorised delusion at all.
Soon enough God’s judgement will fall and you will just have to become accustomed to the fact that you chose the wrong side.
its win win for us… even if you are right, we will be spending eternity without you.
“If a heaven exists, and it is full of “christians”, then hell is the place for me.” – Chief Joseph of the Nez Perce
Who is trying to force kids to accept that there are NO monsters in the world (except what Heart of Winters bought and paid for politicians say are monsters)?
If you’re looking for a fictional monster for kids to be afraid of, you need look no further than the god of the bible:
He impregnated a 13 year old girl (with himself lol)
Killed children, infants, ordered parents to eat the flesh of their children,
Killed 70,000 people just to punish King David
Needed severed heads to calm his anger
Ordered mass executions of unarmed captives
That’s only a small sampling, if you need REAL LIFE monsters to scare your children with, just look at the actions taken by christians on command of church authorities. They slaughtered pagans, peasants too poor to pay a suffocating tax to the church, “witches”, “heretics”, jews, native peoples, and the crusades, all in the name of christianity.
Guess that whole “Thou shalt not kill” stuff was just BS, huh?
That should be more than enough to assure children that there are in fact monsters in the world.
@Heart Of Winter
Shut up you semitic (racist) anti-semitic (anti-semitic) tosser.
As could be expected you, in your anti-Semitism (Ant-Racism) run through a list of all the things that Christianity considers monstrous and then say that you are doing this, destroying and deconstructing those you categorize as anti-semites (anti-racists) for the ‘Jews’.
The reason you hate Christians is because Christianity shows you what monsters are (the proof being that it is what Christianity shows you monsterousness is when you try to think of what monstrousness is) and you hate it for it as it might cramp your mass murdering messianic politicians style.
And sexuality begins at puberty you pathetic little brat. When the average persons life expectany was under 30 WTH else do you expect our species to have done in the past. What exactly do you want? Going to university becoming a dyke doing a social ‘sciences’ course?
Yet more comments from a “believer” which reflect that they are angry, volatile, primitive, arrogant, mentally unbalanced and incapable of critical thinking.
You ‘thumpers really make it too easy.
Whenever I hear a “judeo-christian” “ranting, raving” and “censoring” THEIR LIES, I just have to do my daily talmud reading!
AND, JEWS ARE A religion, NOT A RACE, YOU IDIOT MEMBER OF chris scum dumb!
You can “feel it” can’t you, mirabolin?
YOUR WAR-MONGERING “Euro-Caucasian Colonial Mind Control religion” called “christianity” IS DYING!
RIGHT BEFORE YOUR EYES! YOU ARE NOT “BELIEVED” ANYMORE, you despicable deceivers known as “christians”!
SO, @ mirabolin, YOU SHUT UP!
And get used to this NEW WORLD!
Let’s Do Our Daily talmud reading together, dumb as SPIT mirabolin!
THE “holy book” that, if not designated as “religious”, would get jews thrown in prison for promoting pedophilia!
“A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old”
“When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing”
“Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement”
“Mary, the mother of Jesus, was a whore and played the harlot with carpenters”
(Sanhedrin, 106a, 106b
“[Christ] practised sorcery and enticed Israel to apostacy”
“Jews must destroy the books of the Christians, i.e. the New Testament”
“A Jew may have sex with a child as long as the child is less than nine years old”
“When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is nothing”
“A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest”
“All gentile children are animals”
“Jews may use lies (‘subterfuges’) to circumvent a Gentile”
(Baba Kamma 113a).
“When a Jew murders a gentile (‘Cuthean’), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep” (Sanhedrin 57a).
But I’m not a believer Heart of Winter. You are. If you are an atheist you are the product of fundie Christianity. I’m an agnostic of agnostic parents and grandparents. As such I see all social systems as religions because that is what religions are (and that doesn’t exclude their being true, doesn’t exclude their being true). Difference is that religions are conscious because they are aware of what social systems are – them. It’s the difference between a computer and a conscious person.
Your retard problem is that you, like Pix, have a Santa Claus complex. When you found out that your parents lied to you about Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny you went into an apoplectic ‘Truth’ hate fit which has festered within you all your life.
So it likely is with your anti-christian bigotry. It can only be there because you consider that your fundie parents lied to you just like all atheists are stomping around in a rage repeating their little text book parables and proofs (Dawkins 23:12).
This is also what you are. An Anti-Semite (anti-racist). Sometimes flagellating sometimes crying out but always the same degeneracy.
As for Christianity dying … you consider Christianity to only be Anti-Semitism (anti-racism) anyway (you just think that you can do that better) and that is clearly not dying.
Take your Anti-Semitism (anti-racism) Adolf and go get sodomized in a public toilet by the muslims you consider your fellow gentiles.
Heart of winter aka Sean Morgan has issues with people’s point of view and has to force his own on others.
The very next time you have a thought? Let it go.
Maybe it’s about time you let go of that stale old one-liner, Bander.
Heart of Winter. Just curious? What is your belief system? Do you believe in an afterlife? If so, specifically state your view of that afterlife, or better yet, your exact spiritual beliefs. If you don’t believe in God (at least a Christian God as you have admitted) it follows that you certainly believe that Satan is also a human construct. So, why do you represent yourself on this medium with an avatar representing satanic symbolism? Is it merely to antagonize Christians…to get their goat (no pun intended)? Enlighten us.
quite a demanding sort arent you? what makes you think anyone owes you any sort of explanation for anything?
you dont need an excuse or a reason to tell religious people they are nut cases, because common sense speaks for itself.
if you need to believe in fairy tales .. fine, but you shouldnt expect people to justify why idiots keep being told theyre idiots. its self explanatory.
The Shroud of Turin is an authentic supernatural garment. Care to argue that fairytale anonymous?
“The Shroud of Turin is an authentic supernatural garment.”
supernatural? lol… does it fly? can it turn itself invisible..
care to argue ? its over before it begins idiot..
if you can prove gods existence, do so… otherwise, ive heard enough from you religious nutjobs to last me ten lifetimes.. pity i dont believe in reincarnation…
Anonymous. You need to work on your intellectual arrogance. I know, ignorance is bliss. But, I’ve got news for you. Modern scientists can’t figure out the nature of the Shroud. One thing is for sure, men far more intelligent than you and I can’t figure it out today, it’s impossible that it was created in Medieval times. And here’s why:
Encode the image on only the most superficial fibrils of the cloth’s threads;
Produce an image that is a vague negative when observed by the naked eye, but with highly focused and finely resolved details that become visible only when photographed, at which the negative turns into a positive image with light/dark and left/right reversed;
Encode accurately proportioned, three-dimensional information on a two-dimensional surface that directly corresponds to the distances between a body and cloth;
Include realistic scourge marks so minute that they are invisible to the naked eye and can be seen only with cameras, photographic enlargers, microscopes and ultraviolet lighting;
Encode the appearance of a Pontius Pilate lepton (coin) over the right eye of the man so that only when photography, photographic enlargers and three-dimensional reliefs are invented 600 years later, the montif, letters and outline of the coin can be ascertained. The forger would not only have to anticipate the technology, but also develop the field of archeology and the discovery in the late 20th century that coins were used in burials in Jerusalem and the surrounding area between the 1st century B.C. and the 1st century A.D.;
Encode the thousands of body image fibrils with the same intensity;
Create an image that is not soluble in water, remains stable when subjected to high tempetures, and does not demonstrate signs of matting, capillarity, saturation, or diffusion into the image-forming fibrils.
Incorporate specific effects of the draped cloth that fell through a body region- such as blood marks displaced into the hair, motion blurs at the side of the face and in the neck/throat region and below the hair, along with elongated fingers;
Encode a superficial, resolved, and three-dimensional image of a closed eye over a different and invisible features of a coin;
Transfer the blood marks before encoding the image, yet still place them in the appropriate locations and ensure that the blood marks are not altered when the body image is later transferred onto the cloth;
Create actual blood marks with actual serum around the edges of the various wounds;
Create an image that is pressure-independant so that both the frontal and dorsal images are encoded with the same intensity, even though the dorsal side of the cloth would have the full weight of the body lying on top of it;
Transfer an image so low in contrast that it fades into the background when an observer stands within six feet of it;
Use an image-forming mechanism that operates uniformally regardless of what lies beneath it, i.e., over diverse substances such as skin, hair, coins, flowers, teeth and bones;
Create an image that is not composed of any foreign particles, or foreign materials of any kinds, with the individual joints of its individual fibrils remaining distinct and visible;
Encode an image that lacks any evidence of two-dimensional directionality (try painting something without two-dimensional directionality);
Compose a yellowed body image out of chemically degraded cellulose with conjugated carbonyls that has resulted from processes associated with dehydration and oxidation;
Encode the front and back full-length images on cloth of a real human being in rigor-mortis;
Reproduce blood marks incurred at different times with different instruments that correspond with both arterial and venous bleeding;
Encode blood marks on the cloth in exactly the form and shape that develop from wounds on human skin;
Embed into the cloth the various blood marks leaving the original smooth surfaces between the skin and the blood intact;
Remove the cloth from the body within three days without breaking or smearing the numerous blood marks;
Employ a mechanism that transfers distance information through space in vertical, straight-line paths;
encode a line representing the narrow lesion of the side of the wound that corresponds to the shape of a lancea used by Roman executioners in such a manner that the line would not be visible with the eye and could not be seen until the development of computer imaging technology 600 years later;
Distribute an array of pollens onto the Shroud beneath the linen’s threads and fibers that reflected its manufacture and history in Jerusalem and Turkey. To do this successfully, the forger would have to be a pollen expert, but also anticipate development of the theory that emerged 600 years later which asserts the Shroud, Mandylion, and Image of Edessa are the same cloth;
Encode the subtle appearance of Judean plants in the off-image area of the Shroud that would not be seen for more than six centuries;
Place microscopic samples of dirt and limestone at the foot of the man in the Shroud that match the limestone found in Jerusalem, but which would not be visible for centuries;
Encode actual whole blood and watery fluid at the side wound and the small of the back in a uniquely realistic manner and also encode this and all other clotted bloodstains on the Shroud so that they remain red and do not darken over time like all other actual blood;
Encode the wound on the cloth at the man’s left side so that when the image was photographed 500 years later, the wound would be located in precisely the correct location on the man’s right side so that the blood and water would escape from the victim if he had received a postmortum wound at this location.
To encode these features, our forger would not only have to understood advanced scientific principles, but also possessed a knowledge of anatomy and medicine that was centuries ahead of his time. Obviously, it would have been impossible for him to have possessed such knowledge and understanding, but even if he had, somehow, he still couldn’t see numerous features to know if he was getting them right. The technology needed to visualize them would not be developed for another 500 to 600 years.
How could a medieval artist have displayed a knowledge of physiology that would not be known until centuries later?
How could an artist paint without showing any evidence of directionality?
How could an artist encode three-dimensional information (on a two-dimensional surface) that directly corresponds to the distance between a body and a cloth?
How could a Medieval artist include details that are undetectable with the human eye and become visible only under ultraviolet light, or only through a microscope, or only on three-dimensional reconstructions, or only with the most advanced, 20th century computer scanning devices?
This idiot wants your expert opinion on the above-mentioned? And try not to outsmart the scientists that analyzed it. I don’t need an arrogant opinion from a lesser primate. Lmao.
chan, you need to work on your reading comprehension skills..
i said if you had proof of gods existence, to post it. instead you regurgitate gibberish and garbage about a dirty rag.
which seems, as you didnt supply any proof of your other claim either, that it doesnt really have any supernatural abilities either..
like i said.. ive heard enough or your tiresome trivia to last me ten lifetimes.. your latest spiel is not proof of gods existence. the fact is.. even as christians, youre all divided, you cant even agree on an acceptable scenario amongst yourselves.. come back when you have a consistent story, one that can survive the slightest scrutiny, and prove beyond all reasonable doubt..
until then, like i said.. ive heard it all before, youre a bore.. you want to preach, go start a church lumpen.
This garment proves God’s existence. That so-called “dirty rag” was not made by human hands. Ergo, it’s supernatural nature. Did you even bother to read the facts I posted on the Shroud? Seriously, what is you counter-argument to the facts presented by leading scientists in their fields’ of study? This isn’t an emotional argument based on faith. It is an intellectual argument based on scientific fact. Please don’t make me echo the statement you claimed earlier: “It’s over before it begins, idiot.”
The shroud of Turin has already been definitively proven as a fake multiple times. Not only did radio carbon confirm that it was from the middle ages, but scientists can perfectly replicate the techniques used to make the shroud, AND the archbishop of Turin, where the Shroud is stored, has ADMITTED the shroud is a hoax.
But as with the bible, and everything else a true “believer” holds true, no amount of proof will ever be enough.
Sorry Heart of Darkness. The Archbishop of Turin did not ADMIT it was a hoax. On the contrary, he believes in it’s authenticity as noted in the following interview. The carbon dating taken by the Sturp team was later concluded to be a false result based on the fact that it was cut from a part of the cloth that had been repaired during the middle-ages, as a result of the shroud being damaged due to fire. Furthermore, scientists cannot replicate the shroud today. Again, they are still perplexed as to how it was created? But, you’re missing the point. A person 600 years ago could not have created such a sophisticated article based on the findings of the Sturp team. Read the findings again. And here’s your interview:
THE HOLY SHROUD OF TURIN. INTERVIEW WITH THE ARCHBISHOP OF TURIN.
The correspondent of the Paris Figalo at Turin has telegraphed to that newspaper an account of an audience which his Eminence Cardinal Richelmy, Archbishop of Turin, was good enough to grant to him, and in the course of which the venerable prelate set forth the reasons which induced him,for his own part to believe in the authenticity of the Holy Shroud.
“In the first place,” declared his Eminence, “it must be well understood that in such a matter opinion is entirely free. There is no question here of an article of kith. One may be a perfect Catholic and not believe in the authenticity of the Holy Shroud of Turin. I believe in it myself for several reasons. To begin with, Christ might work a miracle outside the order of nature and print his features on a winding sheet, but I set aside that hypothesis.”
The Cardinal then showed the correspondent two handsome photographs of the head of Christ, and said :
Look at these two proofs—one a negative, and the other a positive, taken horn the Holy Shroud. Is it not extraordinary that you should discover tnfinitely more detail and sharpness in the positive than in the negative ? And, moreover, when you look at the Holy Shroud with the naked eye you see only a negative without much detail, To whom do we owe the exact and minute portrait of Our Lord ? To the positive obtained through photography. Without desiring to go back to more ancient times, we have had this precious relic at Turin (to which it was brought by Emmanuel Philibert) since September, 1578, that is to say, for 324 years, carefully enclosed in a box. It cannot have been subjected within that time to any alteration. Now, is it reasonable to say that these marks, instead of being the blood of the Redeemer, are merely the result of a painting made with the blood of an ox, or with any other product ? For, remember, that in those days there was no question of photography, of which no one had yet the slightest suspicions. Who, then, could have been the incomparable artist to paint on the cloth this image, offering to the naked eye what were merely shadows, often formless, yet with details so extraordinary in the photograph ? A painter would have executed the details on the cloth so that human eyes might discover a recognisable image. An artist, who should have had a knowledge of what photography produces, and who would have given a work like this negative, would have been a man of sublime genius,whose name would certainly reach posterity. As for me— and for impartial people who reflect—that hypothesis is impossible ; and we are glad to see modern science confirming our convictions. There are many things I might add, but I limit myself to a single observation. Look at the traces of the nails of the Crucifixion. The nails are driven not into the palms of the hand, but into the wrists. That is a fact which had not been noticed. Look at all the pictures of the Crucifixion, at all the Crucifixes, that have existed since the commencement of Christianity—all of them represent Christ on the Cross with the nails piercing the palms of the hands. Now, if the Holy Shroud were the work of a painter would he have suddenly departed from tradition ? No; be would have continued to paint the nails into the palms of the hands, and so adhered to a tradition which appeared to be the true one. He would never have had the boldness to oppose the current of so many centuries. It is precisely the Holy Shroud which has established truth. Nothing is more logical. The nails driven into the palm would net have found sufficient resistance between the fingers to hold up the body. Nails, on the contrary, driven above the wrist meet with the resistance of all the bones and muscles of the hand and wrist. This fact is a powerful proof that we are not dealing with a mere work of art. The same observation may be made on the subject of the lance which pierced Our Lord, which painters and sculptors place en the left side, beside the heart. On the Holy Shroud, on the other hand, the wound is on the right. A painter would have followed tradition.
heart of winter is a gaytheist. He isn’t occupied in tell ing religious people that they are nutcases but in ranting about christians because he has replaced his own fundie christianity with anti-semitism.
Yes, of course. Not believing in bronze-age fairy tales always makes someone an “anti-semite”.
And “gaythiest”? How clever. Did you think that one up all by yourself?
@Heart Of Winter
I make up all of my thought myself. As I, as an agnostic, am technically an ‘atheist’, I’m not going to call some fundie twit looking for kudos either an atheist or gay so gaytheist is an ABSOLUTELY appropriate term for fundies on the make. I’d say claiming to oppose religion and then claiming so for the ‘Jews’ DOES make you an Anti-Semite. There are diffferent types of Ant-Semite. The ones who are flagellating themselves in joy at their anti-semitic evil and those about to burst a bloodvessel trying to get everyone else to leave their families and follow them in their armageddon fight against the Jews.
I have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about.
@Heart of Winter
But Heart of Winter this is just the typical response of the narcissisitic bigot. When you’re conceit of yourself isn’t echoed as you expect it to be (negatively or positively) you’re brain melts. Your inability to understand is NOT a counter argument. It’s defeat.
@Heart of Winter
But Heart of Winter this is just the typical response of the narcissisitic bigot. When your conceit of yourself isn’t echoed as you expect it to be (negatively or positively) your brain melts. Your inability to understand is NOT a counter argument. It’s defeat.
You think I’m some sort of “fundie”? No, I’m an atheist. And I’m sure in your immature mind calling me a “gaytheist” (how clever) is some sort of insult. However, I am an atheist so that part is accurate. While I’m not gay, I don’t see anything wrong with being gay so calling me that isn’t an insult to me.
And I’m not an “anti-semite” either. I despise all of the Abrahamic religions equally, along with all superstitious collections of beliefs from humanity’s age of intellectual immaturity. I don’t single any of them out. Though since christianism is the one most often thrown in my face, that’s the one that receives the biggest backlash from me.
Where you came up with the strange notion that I’m an anti-semite, I have no idea. But if your rambling, incoherent responses are an indication of your thought process, it’s not surprising that you come to asinine conclusions.
@Heart of Winter
You are a self deluding scout of your fundie background.
You claim to be attacking religion for the ‘Jews’. You are and will be gleefully Anti-Semitic and anti-racism imposing on people (like anti-racism was imposed on western blacks) until you are caught and called out for it and try to rationalize it away.
You think you inability to understand what is shown to your narcissism just confirms your exceptionalism.
You claim that there is no God entails that religious communities are social systems and therefore free game for your ranting racist abuse.
You are a rancid little scout of hell flailing about for smug hypocritical social standing.
You’re an idiot. I have no “fundie” background. My parents are both atheists, as was my grandmother.
And no, I’m not attacking religion on behalf of the “Jews”, nor did I ever claim to be. I think their religion is just as ridiculous as christianity. I don’t know where you pulled that from, but it definitely isn’t from anything factual or from anything I’ve said. In fact, christianity itself is the very root of anti-semitism.
However, since all of your posts seem to indicate that you’re delusional, it’s not surprising that you’re able to make stuff up.
And you say “You claim that there is no God entails that religious communities are social systems and therefore free game for your ranting racist abuse.”
Wrong again, genius. Christianism isn’t a race, it’s a religion. Not sure if anyone’s ever told you that before. And also, I’m an American with 1st amendment rights, therefore absolutely anything is free game for my “ranting abuse”. Don’t like it? Too bad.
@Heart of Winter
You DO come from a religious fundie background. If it’s not you family then it is your ‘friends’.
You, like your fellow foaming fundie Pix WILL use every chance you can get to feed off of the any Anti-Semitism your fundie hate can get away with. Muttering when called on doesn’t prove you are NOT scum – it proves that you ARE! I quote:
“That’s only a small sampling, if you need REAL LIFE monsters to scare your children with, just look at the actions taken by christians on command of church authorities. They slaughtered pagans, peasants too poor to pay a suffocating tax to the church, “witches”, “heretics”, jews, native peoples, and the crusades, all in the name of christianity.”
And you say “You claim that there is no God entails that religious communities are social systems and therefore free game for your ranting racist abuse.”
“Wrong again, genius. Christianism isn’t a race, it’s a religion.”
That is meaningless! You ARE a hate monger and a hypocrite just like every one of your fellow fundie YHWH-ists. Like Pix the only place you will end up is screamng at everyone that they have no past and no future just now and blamability.
Tell yourself what you need to, trying to rationalize with religious people is like trying to kick water up hill.
Well, I am a Christian and I really don’t care what another person believes. We all have a right to think what we want. Even if you think I’m the world’s biggest moron for being a Christian. -eh- don’t bother me none. We all have the right to be stupid now don’t we?
We can agree on this though, nobody likes someone shoving their beliefs down their throat. You don’t like people doing it to you, I don’t like people doing it to me. So, I call a spade a spade and walk away.
I’m not down with the grammys or any of what society has become for that matter. But, I’m not going to be some self-righteous prick and say “you gotta be like me because I’m so freaking perfect and I have ALLLLLLL the answers!!!” Nah, forget that. I just do my own thing. Love God, treat people with kindness and respect (regardless if they’re different or not), and walk away when I’m offended.
Live and let live dude. What’s wrong with that?
“Beyonce and her husband Jay-Z are openly members of the Illuminati and proud Satanists”
What about Sharqueena and Boomquisha
I tried to watch this video and had an excruciating pain shoot through my head. I turned it off and the pain was gone. God admits He has wrath in Him…hence the sending of His son. Jesus paid it all for you. You should appreciate that if you never appreciate another thing in your life. Mockers… you are being punked by satan.
just some lame music with a “hollywood” scary “occult” b.s. fake ritual. nothing to see here. that chicken is prime for a true master of the art to pluck.
The devil has managerial ownership of the world, this is no surprise. Phony religions like Wicca, the self worshiping murderous religion of Atheism, the power hungry religion of satanism, the demon worshiping religions of polytheism, etc, are all a part of the dark and broken system this world that they love so much. It was long prophesied, and this is just another sign of the times in which we live. But still, this should not be surprising, we should be expecting it.
Oh really, he has “managerial ownership” of the world, even though 2.2 billion people are some type of christian, 1.6 million are muslims, and about 14 million are jewish? That means about half the population of the planet all believe in the same god.
No mythicial “devil” has “managerial ownership” of the world, christians just love the theatrics of pretending they’re so persecuted.
Meant to say 1.6 *billion are muslims, not million.
Apparently you’re not very smart and have studied little if at all, otherwise you’d know what I was talking about. After the fall of man the managerial responsibility of man was handed to the devil, which in turn gives him dominion. Sin, death and the devil entered the world and it’s been dying since.
The Muslims Allah and the Judeo-Christian God are not the same. If you did some basic studying, you’d have known that.
Your biggest flaw is your confusion over what the Bible actually says (which you obviously have never read; another reason why I chose not to argue with you), the 4,000 flavors or Christianity, and Roman Catholicism. In fact, we must not venture any further than your own profile picture to see how ignorant you are. You said that Christians ‘took over this site’. True as it may be, Jesus never told his followers to rebel and set up graven images; thus, these things are not of God. And if you want to talk numbers, lets compare the number of pagan takeovers of Judeo-Christian sites to the number of Judeo-Christian takeovers of pagan sites. This practice of restoring sites to the Biblical God became unnecessary and even condemned in the New Testament, so like I said, any such act could not possibly be attributed to Jesus Christ, but carnal man. And please, stop pretending like Roman Catholicism and Christianity are the same thing.
Heart, if you will humor me….if you are atheist…and don’t believe satan has dominion over the earth…why is your image that of satan/baphomet…..you have an icon that you chose to represent you or a thought that you don’t believe in…..i am confused….i hope you don’t get what you are asking for because it won’t be what you expect…..just curious
He does it because he’s an atheist and he doesn’t believe that these things hold any kind of supernatural influence. It just goes to show the true quality of his character as he seeks to aggravate those who might see that as offense. He is driven by hate and deserves no sympathy. Simply put, he’s a coward.
JC…what would you think of a ‘Christian’ who went to a Muslim forum and used a comedic image of Mohammed?
Fortunately, Christ didn’t teach “christianity”
He taught the will of the Father YHVH Elohim
None of this should be a surprise to anyone -
If one is a true student of Christ it is welcome news -
Soon this filthy, liars paradise will be no more -
I didn’t watch the Grammy’s, if you don’t like something, don’t buy it or buy into it and it will go away. It’s that simple. If people all across the nation would turn off their stupid tubes and stop watching this crap it would go away.
It made it easier for me to tell my 11 year old why she should be wary of and question USA popular culture. That it was not Katy Perry that did this but the evil multinational corporations and their leaders behind her. I asked her if it was Godly or not. She got it.
And don’t worry about people that don’t understand it is a bad thing the USA has turned from a God fearing Christian people to one where satanism on live tv is ok. Hopefully someday they will get it but for now save your energy.
O Ye of Little Faith.
One need not fully understand the origin or identity of the designer to determine that an object was designed. Christianity postulates the religious answer to this question that the designer is God who by definition is eternally existent and has no known origin.
Certain features of the universe and of living things are best explained by an intelligent cause, not an undirected process such as natural selection.
There are only two possibilities as to how life arose. One is spontaneous generation arising to evolution; the other is a supernatural creative act of God. There is no third possibility. Spontaneous generation, that life arose from non-living matter was scientifically disproved 120 years ago by Louis Pasteur and others. That leaves us with the only possible conclusion that life arose as a supernatural creative act of God.
You will not accept that philosophically because you do not want to believe in God. Therefore, you choose to believe in that which you know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution.
“Therefore, you choose to believe in that which you know is scientifically impossible; spontaneous generation arising to evolution. Why?”
Why? Because the alternative is revolting to them. They think they know Who the Almighty from Scripture IS, and they do not care for Him in the slightest.
Therefore, they outwardly deny the possibility of His existence.
Inwardly, however, their denial of His existence is a lie. This fact is most aptly demonstrated by them each and every time they are pushed far enough in the direction of admitting what they desperately want to admit anyway, which is…
They actually know very well that He exists…
they just hate Him.