Madame Frexit, Hillary Clinton, and “the imprisonment of Europe”

It is hard not to become a fan of France’s “radical” Front-National leader, Marine Le Pen. On this side of the Atlantic, her name first surfaced during the Greek crisis, when “Grexit” (i.e. talk of Greece leaving the EU) was being frequently bandied about. Le Pen’s response? “Moi aussi.” (Me too.) She dubbed herself “Madame Frexit.”

Equally, she earned the eternal hatred of the One Bank, since the Big Bank crime syndicate uses the EU as a political/monetary straitjacket, by which it bludgeons Europe’s once-sovereign nations into serving this crime syndicate.

Despite this, Front-National continues to lead France’s polling, making Le Pen the current favorite as France’s next president. As a result, we can likely expect that “something will happen” to Ms. Le Pen, between now and France’s next election.

Maybe she will be secretly threatened/blackmailed into submission, like Alexis Tsipras of Greece, and end up becoming another one of their servants. Maybe she will suddenly be (politically) destroyed via manufactured “scandal”, as we saw with Dominique Strauss-Kahn. In the meantime, Ms. Le Pen is the most-powerful voice in French politics, and this week she has let us know what she thinks about the Wicked Witch.

There is a candidate who appears a lot more dangerous to France than the others — that’s Hillary Clinton,” the head of the National Front told RT France in an exclusive interview.

…”I think if she was elected she would continue this policy, a destructive policy, a policy of conflict, a policy of imprisonment of Europe in blinded Atlanticism,” Le Pen said, “I think it’s a danger for world peace.” [emphasis mine]

Bingo!

After the Cold War had ended, after Russia had become a more free-and-open society, and a respected (and peaceful) member of the global community, what have we seen from the U.S?

One by one, it has been bribing/coercing/deceiving Russia’s neighbours into the NATO military alliance — a “military alliance” that no longer had any relevance, in a mono-polar world. It then immediately militarized these nations, loading as many missile bases and other military hardware into these now-subservient regimes as those populations would tolerate.

After two decades of preparing Europe to once again be the world’s largest battleground, the U.S. has more recently engaged in several years of the most-extreme political and military provocations it could devise against Russia, starting with staging a coup inside Russia’s closest neighbour and (former) ally: Ukraine.

While this ultra-aggressive military policy may suit the twisted, imperialist aspirations of U.S. neo-cons (and the Puppet Masters whom they really serve), it does not serve the interests of the nations of Europe. Even more obviously, it doesn’t serve the interests of the peoples of Europe, who have no desire to (once again) be the fodder for another banker’s “World War”.