Read the Beforeitsnews.com story here. Advertise at Before It's News here.
Profile image
By cereal killer (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Now:
Last hour:
Last 24 hours:
Total:

2010 Dietary Guidelines: Dr. Eric B. Rimm, "Dietary fats do not lead to obesity..."

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.


On Tuesday, June 15, 2010, the proposed 2010 Dietary Guidelines were released by USDA and HHS recommending even more stringent reductions in animal fats and cholesterol than all previous guidelines (1980-2005). The Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2010,  recommended that Americans reduce saturated fat intake from 10  to 7 percent of calories and continued to demonize dietary fats and animal foods rich in saturated fat such as egg yolks, butter, whole milk, cheese, and red meat.

Yet, a careful reading of the transcripts for the first meeting of the 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (second day), which took place on October 31, 2008, reveals a completely different scientific assessment about dietary fats than was published in the DGAC report issued on June 16.

On October 31, 2008, during that first meeting, DGAC member Dr. Eric B. Rimm, Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School; Associate Professor of Epidemiology and Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, questioned what he called the “artificial limit” on dietary fat in the U.S. Dietary Guidelines.    

From the transcripts located atwww.cnpp.usda.gov/DGAs2010-Meeting1.htm

Dr. Rimm:  “I wanted to make a radical point, one for which I’ll probably get kicked off the stage, but the whole issue of total fat and the 20 to 35 percent of calories from fat is one that has troubled me…”

Dr. Rimm:  “… There is not one point which is the healthiest point of fat intake which is why we came up with the range. But the high end, 35 percent of calories from fat, actually was not really based on much science; it’s based on the fact that we don’t have a lot of science beyond 35 percent, and there was a concern that higher fat diets would lead to obesity.”

Dr. Rimm:  I think if you look at the science, there is actually no good human data to suggest that higher fat diets lead to obesity. If anything, higher fat diets, at 35 to 40 percent, lead to lower triglycerides because it’s a lower carbohydrate intake.

Dr. Rimm:  “I am not saying that at this point we should just say everybody eat as much fat as we want, but I think there is the dogma that low-fat diets are beneficial, and you can go in the grocery store and see a lot of low-fat foods that are essentially just high in carbohydrate, highly processed sugars.”

Dr. Rimm:  “So my concern is that we, over the last 30 years, have created the dogma that all fat is bad, and I think that the high end of 35 percent of calories from fat is artificial. And, if you look at some new data that has come out from dietary patterns among people in Greece or European countries, in fact they don’t have higher rates of heart disease, yet they have healthy fats …”

In an interview with Melissa Healy in the Los Angeles Times on June 28, 2010, Dr. Walter C. Willett, Chairman, Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, agreed with Dr. Eric Rimm, his Harvard associate.

Referring to the proposed 2010 Dietary Guidelines, Dr. Willette said:

“Shortcomings of the report include the percentage of total fat is still recommended to be less than 35% of calories…”

“The best available evidence demonstrates that percent of calories from fat in a diet has no bearing on weight loss — a point the dietary guidelines committee acknowledges. It makes no sense to base the dietary guidelines on an outdated recommendation.”

For a comprehensive and critical analysis of the proposed 2010 Dietary Guidelines, please go to dietHeartPublishing.com.



Before It’s News® is a community of individuals who report on what’s going on around them, from all around the world.

Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.

"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.

Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex

HerbAnomic’s Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex is a revolutionary New Humic and Fulvic Acid Complex designed to support your body at the cellular level. Our product has been thoroughly tested by an ISO/IEC Certified Lab for toxins and Heavy metals as well as for trace mineral content. We KNOW we have NO lead, arsenic, mercury, aluminum etc. in our Formula. This Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral complex has high trace levels of naturally occurring Humic and Fulvic Acids as well as high trace levels of Zinc, Iron, Magnesium, Molybdenum, Potassium and more. There is a wide range of up to 70 trace minerals which occur naturally in our Complex at varying levels. We Choose to list the 8 substances which occur in higher trace levels on our supplement panel. We don’t claim a high number of minerals as other Humic and Fulvic Supplements do and leave you to guess which elements you’ll be getting. Order Your Humic Fulvic for Your Family by Clicking on this Link , or the Banner Below.



Our Formula is an exceptional value compared to other Humic Fulvic Minerals because...


It’s OXYGENATED

It Always Tests at 9.5+ pH

Preservative and Chemical Free

Allergen Free

Comes From a Pure, Unpolluted, Organic Source

Is an Excellent Source for Trace Minerals

Is From Whole, Prehisoric Plant Based Origin Material With Ionic Minerals and Constituents

Highly Conductive/Full of Extra Electrons

Is a Full Spectrum Complex


Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex has Minerals, Amino Acids, Poly Electrolytes, Phytochemicals, Polyphenols, Bioflavonoids and Trace Vitamins included with the Humic and Fulvic Acid. Our Source material is high in these constituents, where other manufacturers use inferior materials.


Try Our Humic and Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex today. Order Yours Today by Following This Link.

Report abuse

    Comments

    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 2 comments
    • Anonymous

      Very true .. WHO’S own stats show that meat eaters have less cancer etc…

      Look up Dr. Price and other doctors who have studied primitive people who happened to be pretty much disease free and ate basically meat and it’s fat.

      The Eskimo’s ”were” also an example.

      They are trying to kill us off or what?

      people in Haiti fry their foods in pig fat for crying out loud ! Yet have less cancer and are mostly slim.

      it never makes sense to go against mother nature.

    • Anonymous

      Dr. Rimm said he might get “thrown off the stage” for questioning the anti-fat guidelines going back 30 years – recommednation, he said, that resulted in excess carbohydrate consumption. But the proposed guidelines released on June 15th are even more anti-fat and continue to emphasize carbs! Dr. Rimm didn’t get thrown off the stage but someone obviously shut him up!

    MOST RECENT
    Load more ...

    SignUp

    Login

    Newsletter

    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.