HIV AIDS IS A LIE

HIV: A phantom is about  http://www.nwoacademy.com 

No man and no monkey has HIV Positive, Only Negative HIV exists, it is one of the most negative is lying at all! 
If you will be subject to Hiv positive, then they calm down immediately! they do not have HIV or AIDS, and put off their medications by NOW, the drugs make you sick with AIDS.

AIDS, the specter of millions, is a business with the fear – a fear that can kill.

Eighteen years have passed since the AIDS epidemic for the first time her. Medusa rose. Since then people have died slowly and painfully, on the death certificate ‘AIDS’ was written. About 35 million people worldwide will have been infected by the ‘deadly’ HIV virus. Alone in Central Africa have been made according to UNICEF, more than ten million children orphaned by AIDS: in ten years is expected already at thirty millions.

At K). January 2000 dealt the UN Security Council so for the first time in its history to a healthy healing political issue and listened to the appeals of the UN Secretary General Annan and U.S. vice-president Gore, the AIDS designated as a “real threat to peace in Africa” ​​and an extensive information and prevention campaign called for.

The disease is galloping allegedly continues unabated, although issued annually for nearly two decades, billions in the fight against AIDS. - While actually fighting? Peter Duesberg from Berkeley University in California, a prominent virologist and a prominent critic spoke of AIDS. what you do not want to admit: “As you look at it. the fight against AIDS was a colossal failure. L’ur leading scientists and politicians still have to show for it. that their efforts had saved even a single human life. “

They will never be. Because it is still valid. what we are, five years ago under the title ‘The HIV-lie is no longer tenable’ ZS l7, published. Unfortunately, mass media seem. Orthodox science and politics have conspired in a sinister alliance. which is still trying by every means to keep the long since disproved AIDS theory alive.This will benefit primarily the pharmaceutical companies involved. But the bill to pay the victims. Most of her life. For this reason, we are all called upon. spread the truth about AIDS.

HIV does not cause AIDS

Another critic of AIDS is Kary Mullis. the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded. In 1998 he wrote: .. I finally understood. why I had such great difficulty. To find research results, which brought the HIV virus in conjunction with AIDS. There were none. “

This wipes the official Mullis AIDS theory off the table. Because the estimates. that the HIV Körperbeflillt and special white blood cells – the T4 helper cells – are destroyed in the blood. In the Immunsvstem Folae collapses and AIDS arises. The idea of ​​a dangerous AIDS virus was born at a time. as they also believed.Retroviruses cause leukemia w ürden. An embarrassing failure hypothesis. as it turned out later. As was then observed in the early eighties when some of the first gay AIDS patient an inexplicable loss of T4 helper cells, it was concluded prematurely, a virus had destroyed them and betallen. 1983 Luc Montagnier announced then. he had ‘isolated’ in AIDS patients, a new retrovirus (although this virus only in one third of AIDS patients was detectable at all. as the investigations showed Gallo). Montagnier, however, never claimed to prove that this virus was indeed the cause of AIDS.

Nevertheless, precisely this still unsubstantiated conjecture soon became the official Lehnnei-tion and led to the development of ‘AIDS test’, with which one wants to prove the allegedly deadly virus in the blood. From this time it was also about a lot of money. which was evident in a Gerichlsstreit between Gallo and. Monlagnier said. Who, then, this ‘AIDS virus’ was first discovered.

It says Eleni Eleopulos. Australian AIDS researcher. Professor and senior physician at the hospital in Perth.prove that neither the work of Gallo nor Montagnier of the existence of HIV, much less. that this virus triggering AIDS.

This view is Peter Duesberg. As early as 1987, the virologist out. that HIV even in AIDS patients in too little Menaen vorkomme to do damage to you (if it actually should be an aggressive virus!. This medically unexplained dilemma Gallo did so in a rage. that he refused to Duesberg a scientific dispute .. to perform addition, it fulfills the Duesberg HIV, none of the conditions (Koch’s postulates) the disease-causing pathogens are for a typical.:

• The allegedly responsible for AIDS, HIV, in many AIDS patients can not be proven.

• HIV can not be isolated from AIDS infected cells under normal conditions (in vivo l.

• Who has the HIV virus in the blood. still suffering from AIDS does not automatically.

• AIDS is not contagious. Duesberg: .. Although millions of people in medical professions Aidspatienien care is, in all these years not a single case is known, so that a nurse or doctor would have infected with AIDS “Even animal studies clearly show.. that AIDS is not contagious. It is not surprising that in some western countries the number of AIDS deaths decline, such as in Switzerland: Died in the record year of 1994 686 people AIDS. there were in 1999 nor its 42nd

Dr. Peter Duesberg is one of the first and most famous Aidskritikern.DerVirologeist professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley,

Dr. Eleopulos is a medical professor at the Royal Perth Hospital, which belongs to the University of Western Australia. With its scientists since it represents the mid-eighties against the HIV theory,

Dr. KaryMullis got for inventing the polymerase chain reaction (needed for AIDS test) 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Today he is a vehement opponent of the HIV theory

AZT & Co. to promote AIDS

At the beginning of the nineties, it was again Duesberg. the publicly announced, in his view, is the immune system, not least on drug use due -.. and the AIDS agents AZT (brand name Retrovir} This pharmaceutical ‘drug’ is an antiviral chemical mace that kills has been shown not only microbes but also healthy cells Why a to save such a strong cytotoxin an organism. remains an open question.

The Free University of Berlin, published in September 1999, the results of animal experiments with the AIDS funds and Crixivan. Of ‘»’. which was, these entities suspected of causing birth defects. These drugs are therefore not recommended for pregnant women.

An even more significant are the results of three comparative studies from the years 1994/95 AIDS patients who are treated with AZT die more frequently than others. All survivors of AIDS is common, that they refused to take pharmaceutical drugs against retroviruses.

A German by the Government in 1993, prematurely aborted trial (they should have continued until 1996) concluded in its interim report concluded that the immune response of asymptomatic HIV-positive in 71 percent of patients will be significantly weakened. when they take AZT. As an alternative-medicine in the control group treated with only 7 percent of HIV-positive after the medication had a diminished immune response.

Donald Abrams. Director of the AIDS program at San Francisco General Hospital said in a 1996 lecture: .. I have many patients. that no anti-retroviral drugs and accept that I’ll monitor from the beginning. They looked on. like all their friends on the anti-viral ‘train’ jumped and died. “

However, mid-1998, was Mirror: “The pharmaceutical cocktail against HIV is not as good as hoped. For many he gives a few extra months to live – then again, the virus wins, “This is not only a smooth distortion of the truth, but also a testament to the strong cementing the wrong AIDS ideology in public..

So it’s already needs to be a breakthrough that South African President Thabo Mbeki in late October 1999 in a speech to Parliament about the effectiveness of the products manufactured by Glaxo Wellcome AZT Zellelftes cherished and proclaimed. he would begin an official investigation on the safety of AZT, because “there is much literature. which this drug is classified as hazardous to health “. In addition, AIDS could critic Peter Duesberg in the South African Nationalfemsehen speak openly.

AIDS by oxidative stress in the cells?

Together with her team of researchers, the Australian doctor Eleni Eleopulos found in 1986 a possible explanation for AIDS. does not emanate from a deadly virus. With her thesis can treat AIDS patients as an alternative and cheap and also explain the atypical demographic spread of AIDS. There is no reason why, why not a supposedly contagious virus affects all people. but only certain groups, as in the Western world is the case. On behalf of all industrialized countries are the numbers from Australia: By 1998 93 percent of all AIDS deaths still one of the original risk groups of homosexual men. Drug users and hemophiliacs. All estimates, which predicted the OECD countries a sexual pandemic – a sexually spread disease throughout the population – not entered.

Eleni Eleopulos must emphasize that healthy cells have a balance of redox processes in its interior l reduction and oxidation are tw o opposing chemical processes i outweighs the oxidation. the cells are sick.

Eleopulos saw here a connection between the AIDS risk groups: gay men as well as both drug users and hemophiliacs are chemical stressors such as semen. Nitrites, and exposed to hard drugs Blutverdickem.We know that all these substances lead to a strong oxidation in the cells. This causes a weakened immune system and decrease of T4-helper cells – which is indeed just as an indicator of AIDS.

The oxidative stress in cells is now backed by hundreds of scientific papers. Recent experiments with cell cultures also showed that a low number of T4 helper cells is not sufficient to cause AIDS. Share this view now renowned virologist with Eleopulos. This is the cornerstone of the AIDS virus hypothesis-namely that destroy immune cells, which induces AIDS – shaken,

AIDS is not sexually transmitted

It is impossible to become infected with HIV through sexual intercourse. This is already evidenced by the fact that in the Western world, nearly all men suffer from the above three risk groups.

All studies were ever done on AIDS and sexual behavior, indicate only a single common factor for an increased risk of AIDS: passive anal intercourse. The more one holds out his own butt. the greater the statistical risk of developing AIDS. This is true for both men and women. Women have also only an increased risk of AIDS, if they allow anal sex. On the other hand, men who penetrate the anus of a man already suffering from AIDS or an HIV-positive women are not infected. This completely contradicts the theory of an infectious disease. because there is no virus. the contagious only in one direction.

AIDS would be actually a communicable disease through sexual intercourse, it would have spread like an epidemic among prostitutes have. But even in the early years of AIDS. als’Safer Sex’kaum was practiced, HIV-positive results are limited almost exclusively to those prostitutes. took the drug. All the others were not ‘infected’. With this result covers all U.S. and European studies, both the older and the newer ones. A Spanish study of prostitutes was also mentioned on the connection between anal intercourse and a positive HIV test.

Furthermore, statistics show that a man should sleep HIV nesativer about sechsiausendmal with an HIV-positive woman. a theoretical ‘contagion’ of 50 percent have. With an average of two sex acts per week this would be almost 58 years. The risk is so vanishingly small and of a Ver ‘infection’ can not be discussed.Added to this is that even this low ‘risk’ was calculated for statistical purposes only – in fact you can not get infected with AIDS, as we shall see.

Existence of HIV not proven

Today is considered to be suffering from AIDS, who is HIV positive. The ‘AIDS test’ to detect specific surface proteins, indicating a contact with the HIV virus. To a virus whose existence has been scientifically proven to clean but not today. The Australian scientists at the Permian-going group led by Eleni Eleopu emphasize, namely, that they had neglected the most fundamental rules in HIV virology: To make sure that you have found a new, infectious virus. 
has its shape. Size and structure are analyzed and described clearly: you have to isolate the virus also. This isolated virus is then injected into healthy cell cultures, where it must again trigger the expected disease. In a last step one has to clean the infected cell culture again and again isolated virus again demonstrated.

This logical and scientifically valid methodology but was left with the HIV completely ignored. Only in 1997 by a electron microscope images were circulated to the present-which supposedly ‘purified HIV’ alleged offender then pulled the first mask.

Eleopulos Eleni and her team keep this sample, however, for nothing more than cellular debris.interspersed with a few particles, which are called non-critical ‘HIV, although these particles are not the form.yet the weight and especially do not exhibit the characteristic dimpled, said to be typical of the HIV virus.

So surprised because it does not admit that Berlin’s Robert Koch Instimt must. nominate up to date, no Photo to an isolated HIV.

In addition, the occurrence of identical, according to a Harvard study ‘HIV particles’ in almost all lymph node swelling – no matter. whether these are caused by AIDS or not. This raises the question of what then is the significance of these are HIV particles.

If the official medical claims to have isolated the HIV virus or proved its existence, this is misleading.Namely, it has been demonstrated to date only. that the cell cultures in the laboratory to respond to the alleged antibodies from AIDS. However, this is only an indirect ‘detection’, which can be additionally influenced by many factors.

How else can ‘HIV proteins’ in the body tissues of individuals ‘proven’ to be. who are not HIV infected? How else there will always be HIV-negative pregnant women, the placenta still ‘HIV proteins’, respectively.missing while on the other hand, these proteins in the placenta of HIV-positive pregnant women? That makes absolutely no sense. Nor does the fact that HIV-specific antibodies may be present in the blood of a person in the ‘AIDS virus’ is not penetrated. This is confirmed by new experiments and indicates that such proteins also occur without ‘foreign intervention’.

This view is also Eleopulos Eleni. The retrovirology has long been shown that in case of excessive oxidation.such as those prevailing in the bodies of AIDS patients, endogenous (= endogenous) retroviruses can arise in the cells by itself, without the latter were previously infected from the outside. Will contain the genetic material (DNAI a healthy man, about one percent of genetic material, derived from endogenous retroviruses – that is three thousand times more than the DNA of the alleged HIV.

Conclusion: Even healthy people can carry a nuclear Grabbleskrit eisspartikel in the blood, as erroneously be interpreted as HIV. What, then, then an HIV antibody test or for a purpose?

Pointless AIDS test

Added to this is that the criteria for a positive result of the ‘AIDS test’ is very different. In different laboratories.Countries and continents are taken into account various factors. Thus, one can in a country as ‘HIV positive’ apply, although with the same test result in a different place in the world as if ‘HIV negative’ classified.

These fluctuations are due in the interpretation of fact. that they will not just ‘HIV antibodies’ with the alleged HIV proteins, but also false ‘HIV antibodies’. These antibody proteins. which says that even orthodox science.they had nothing to do with HIV. therefore lead to unpredictable interactions. The ‘AIDS test’ can not only be wrong. but come out even doubly wrong.

Anyone with scientific explanations, continue, for now when these interactions as genuine ‘HIV according to’ have to apply and when not, feels inevitably reminded of a dice game – or obvious: like Russian roulette.

Furthermore, it was found. that drug addicts lose their ‘HIV antibodies’. if they get away from the drug. A fact.according to the official theory of AIDS is not possible. That would mean. that the so-called ‘AIDS infection’ not a life to carry around.

For these reasons, scientists reject such Eleopulos the AIDS test as worthless. The other way to over 60 diseases. positive ‘response. In addition, a positive test result may be negative again tomorrow. It is known that under certain circumstances only because of a previous vaccination, the test ‘HIV positive’ is. Some people are even capable of. deliberately to influence the result (because the blood reacts to our emotions and thoughts)!

Africa and the AIDS hysteria

When millions of people in Africa should be so ‘HIV positive’, they are so far from ‘suffering from AIDS, “as the international center the susee Gesundheitsorsanisationen. Even these figures may be questioned.Lately, even the start against Western African States ‘patronizing’ to defend themselves. Above all, Zambia: According to UNAIDS, twenty percent of Zambia’s population is infected with AIDS. In order for a health disaster is evoked by almost apocalyptic scale. what the country has already inflicted enormous economic damage. because, for the alleged AIDS epidemic Milliardenbeirä-ge of foreign investors have been canceled.

Took place at an international AIDS conference in mid-September 1999 in the Zambian capital Lukasa, this African country is practiced as the first public criticism of the United Nations organi-sations. Government officials made it clear. that these UN figures were as far from assured, and based on no broad-based studies. In addition, to date, no African country had itself conducted AIDS research, but only rely on the information (claims?) International organizations such as the World Health Organization.

In Africa people are dying as before the age of AIDS primarily as a result of poverty, from poor drinking water, lack of or poor nutrition, inadequate hygiene, and many long-known infectious diseases.

Therefore, the statistics of deaths from AIDS falsified: AIDS is in fact not a disease. but a syndrome. . AIDS ‘stands for 29 different diseases that existed earlier. Someone dies from one of these diseases (which include about herpes. Salmonella sepsis or diarrhea) and is supposedly ‘HIV positive’. then the cause of death is officially ‘AIDS’ – no matter what it actually was. Thus, the statistics on AIDS deaths in Africa in particular are much too high.

Philippe and Evelynne Krynen. AIDS experts in Tanzania said that some years ago; .. Treatment of the Diseases of the ‘AIDS patient’ as in HIV-negative people are the equal treatment successes. “

Similar experiences were made in the Kenyan Nyumbani. There is a large station, the HIV-positive and partially completed, and takes care of children suffering from AIDS. Yet not a single child died of AIDS, such as Station Manager D’Agostino announced last year. On the contrary: With good nutrition and hygiene, healthy children. D’Agostino: “The only losses we have to ‘complain’, that is. where healed. HIV-negative children, our station leave. to return home. “

The censorship of the media

Such words do not like to hear the establishment – which is why they are in the mass media not published.With chemical ‘AIDS funds’ can be just a lot more money. About 15 000 U.S. dollars per year per patient. With more than 35 million ‘HIV infected’ opens as a potential human pharmaceutical market. leave in the year to earn well over $ 500 billion.

This explains why AIDS critics have so much difficulty, to gain in academic circles hearing. And not only there. The influential and prestigious scientific publications deny any possibility of dissent, their research and theses experts and the public to submit. A healthy debate. which is concerned with finding the truth is not sought, but suppressed the contrary. Thus, the journal Nature refuses since 1986. to publish the scientific work, allegedly by Eleni Eleonora Pulos and her research team for lack of space. The same magazine refused to Peter Duesberg. public to respond to the controversy that had caused his sight to AIDS.Sir John Maddox. former editor of \ UNIRE. justified the censorship by the fact that Duesberg’s views .. many infected people tempted to believe that the HIV infection itself is not the misery. as they are in all likelihood will prove to. “

It would be just that but the good news is that AIDS is not a viral disease and therefore is not contagious.The virus – so there is this fact – may never be the cause of AIDS. Viruses and bacteria are always Folye a weakening of the organism and not the cause. This had been recognized Louis Pasteur, when he stated: .. The microbe is nothing, the terrain everything “(cf. ZS 12, page 19l viruses and bacteria adapt to their environment, namely the alteration in blood or tissue change.. . also the microbes contained the same bacteria in a diseased blood receives a completely different face than in a healthy and it is usually aggressive, dangerous (see page 5 ZS 11)

At the end of his life, Pasteur said: .. If you say so. To eliminate diseases simply by the fact that you suppress the occurring bacteria and kill them, then you can experience bad surprise. “- The AIDS agents AZT is the best proof.

Do you see now why antibody tests such as those for HIV are basically useless? How is one able to reliably and objectively demonstrate viruses when they are infinitely mutable and customize their host organism (cf. 12 ZS 17th ropes ‘fungi in the blood’?

It was Professor Günther Enderlein (1872-1968). of this so-called cyclo-genius evolution – had discovered the microbe in 1916. Enderlein demonstrated that there is no truth in countless forms of microbes. but that these are all individual stages of development of micro-organisms:

Seen under this light and vaccinations are useless l see Impfreport ZS 12)-on the contrary. They pose a risk, because access to the vaccine virus into the blood components that can be changed, despite all assurances to the contrary, the manufacturer in an unpredictable way. ‘

With self-responsibility “AIDS”!

Why chronic metabolic disorders, anal sex and drugs may trigger an immune deficiency.

In his book, Water – the healthy solution dedicated to the famous physician Faridun Bat-manghelidj (see ZS 22, page 22) of the disease AIDS is a whole chapter. He also vehemently contradicts the official HIV theory: “I believe that AIDS is not caused by a virus, but that it is a metabolic disorder is caused by an unhealthy lifestyle. Similarly, AIDS caused by severe malnutrition in poor, hunger-ridden societies. “

In these two sentences, the explanation is included, which is why AIDS spreads in industrial countries and the Third World demographic so different: In the rich nations to AIDS still limited almost exclusively to men from the original risk groups, particularly homosexuals and drug addicts. Here is the cause of an unhealthy lifestyle. In the Third World, the ‘AIDS cases’ are distributed evenly among the whole population, women meet as frequently as men. There is ‘AIDS’ usually caused by malnutrition and poverty.

AIDS – a metabolic disorder? AIDS as a metabolic disorder. This can be explained easily, Batmanghelidj many of the diseases such as diarrhea occurring in AIDS, diabetes or lung infections – even without the virus. He points out that in the body of AIDS patients in the stock of Animoseren significantly different from the normal composition. Amino acids are vital, including the production of antibodies in protein metabolism leads in consequence to a weakening of the immune system.

Has a ‘HIV positive’ mother too few amino acids in the blood (such as malnutrition), it can also provide their expectant child not sufficient, either in utero or through breast milk. This lack of essential proteins is one reason why die just so many babies in Africa to ‘AIDS’ (used to be called just the ‘malnutrition’). Many cells die off and need to be replaced, filled lnterieukin-6 from the body and other substances that break down the DNA of dying cells.

Nuclei can also collapse due to malnutrition and lead to the mentioned fragments, which frequent the ‘AIDS diagnosis’ declared in poor countries.

Anal sex and AIDS? Tissue is destroyed, for example, during anal intercourse. The wall of the rectum is in fact very sensitive. Expansion joints and can quickly lead to injury. Befänden like in the skin and in the intestinal wall

Nerve cells, it would be an anal penetration not possible – you could not stand the pain. With frequent anal intercourse is the damaged intestinal wall again and again and must be constantly repaired. Consequently, increases in blood DNA and RNA fragments of the destroyed cells are present, their concentration with time is so great that these particles are detected by an ‘AIDS test’ and lead to an alleged HIV diagnosis.

In addition, the male seminal fluid develops a strong physiological effect. The thick skin of the vagina, however, is well protected, but not the gut. Whose cells shrink and are no longer able to absorb water. For this reason, many AIDS patients suffer from diarrhea.

Sperm are made of protein. Foreign proteins in the organism and lead to a severe immune reaction.Therefore, the legislative body of each transplanted organ immediately reject his defense would not be suppressed by chemical means. Sperm activated in the gut and the immune system is also burdened it.Just sperm but also have a strong ability to suppress the immune system (This is necessary so that the sperm freely through the vagina into the uterus of the woman can penetrate). In the intestine, the vagina is not as protected, the foreign sperm, however, put paralyze the immune system, like bombers, which have undermined the enemy’s radar systems.

For this reason, take off dramatically in homosexuals with AIDS, the T4 helper cells, while increasing the immune-suppressing cells, helper T 8. Bat-manghelidj: ‘Where frequent sperm in the male or female intestine is a suppression of the immune response inevitable – not by a virus, but by the chemical properties of the sperm. “

So call all AIDS statistics of developed countries in addition to the drug only anal sex as a factor for an increased risk of AIDS.

Drugs and AIDS

In drug use Batmanghelidj also sees a possible cause of severe metabolic disorders, that is ‘AIDS’: Drugs act on the nervous system and alter the mind next to the feeling of hunger. Drug addicts lose their appetite and feed upon their own bodies. Also put the body under constant stress, drug and alter its metabolism.Even if you provide the body with the necessary, this would be because the drugs are no longer able to absorb everything he needs. Man dies of exhaustion. Batmanghelidj: “In countries where people were smoking opium, many of them eventually died of lung infections – and that is what people do today, the virus and dirty needles responsible.”

Faridun Batmanghelidj gives us courage. AIDS can be cured. You can protect yourself from AIDS. There are no deadly AIDS virus. Unfortunately, this knowledge is not all happy people, it is in fact not ‘politically correct’.Helpless, innocent victims of AIDS are present just better (and make more donations to flow) than the fact that some AIDS patients suffering you have caused yourself.

Fortunately, organizations like the World shear foundation for natural science (WFNS not the flower of the swamp. Political Correctness’ and take an uncompromising respect for scientific truth, an Aids. Thus, in the writings of the WFNS information pertinent sentence: “AIDS is not a virus, but a sick way of life.”

Taken from magazine 26

If you could not convince this article, you will continue her research! There are plenty of sources to confirm the Hiv, AIDS is a LIE grose