The Greatest Vaccine Debate: Shattering the Intoxication “Paradigm”

 click banner to see debate

 

U.S. Biodefense Chief and Hawaii Senator Charged with Consumer Fraud in PBS Vaccine Debate on “Mandatory Injections” for All “Healthy Children”

by

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane

Co-authors and Hosts of the “Hollywood Spin” Series of

Commentaries on RevolutionTelevision.net.

 

Honolulu, HI. (Feb. 20, 2015)– PBS Hawaii confused and frightened viewers with a live program debating whether all healthy children must be vaccinated or otherwise quarantined if any outbreak occurs. The INSIGHTS ON PBS HAWAII show featured four of the nations leading analysts, two pro, and two con, who debated the controversial matter most candidly.

 

America’s bio-defense chief, Sarah Park, and Senator Josh Green, Hawaii’s Health Committee chairman, got slammed for consumer fraud and conflicting interests in the genetically-modified vaccine industry; concealing, among other things, Monsanto and parent-company network sponsor Pfizer—a repeat offender fined the largest criminal damage award for fraud in U.S. history.

 

Vetting the “con,” and the widespread crime, leading anti-vaccinationists, Dr. Leonard Horowitz and Dr. Janet Edghill, disclaimed the program as part of a national campaign to deceive parents into vaccinating children by smearing better-informed resistors, marginalizing them as “crazy” for rejecting the “intoxicating injections” and expressing legitimate religious, philosophical, and medical concerns.

 

INSIGHTS ON PBS HAWAII is a live public affairs show that is also streamed on PBSHawaii.org. The producers and host, however, failed to mention their conflicting sponsorship from Merck, Pfizer, and other vaccine makers,when they promoted the show that stunned viewers, and convinced most critics that vaccination resistors are better informed and certainly more candid for examining the “risk/benefit” science grossly and “criminally neglected” by doctors and pharmacists who are heavily invested in the “intoxicating paradigm” controlled by untrustworthy drug companies.

 

The Unnerving Con

Measles outbreaks allegedly linked to “non-vaccinated children” on the mainland have “many in Hawaii questioning whether our vaccination requirements are strong enough to prevent an outbreak here,” the show’s advertisement read. “Although several vaccinations are required to attend public schools, parents who believe the shots are dangerous or unnecessary can seek exemptions for religious and medical reasons. But now that the nearly eradicated measles virus has returned, should exemptions for healthy children still be allowed?”

 

That “PBS con” framed the program with vaccine-industry-bias, only recognized by people privy to the tricks of “media persuasion,” as you will learn more as your continue reading. . . .

 

This article reviews the PBS “program,” pointing out omissions, misrepresentations, diversions, and downright fraud committed on behalf of the network’s concealed “underwriters.”

 

Dr. Leonard Horowitz is a Harvard-trained filmmaker, public health expert, media intelligence analyst, and award-winning author of seventeen books, including the American best-seller Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola—Nature, Accident or Intentional? that is credited by health officials internationally as largely responsible for the anti-vaccination movement globally.

 

Complementing the opposition, Dr. Janet Edghill is a leading vaccine injury researcher and parents-rights activist who spent 28 years as an electrical engineer for the Department of Defense, held positions with the Department of the Navy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense, and the US Pacific Command, before earning three Master’s Degrees. Initially a vaccine-proponent, she witnessed her youngest son, Ryan, becoming severely autistic following a vaccine that redirected her life. “Janet” was forced to pursue a new career into special education for vaccine injured children. She went on to earn her doctorate in this field from the University of Southern California. Since then she has served several non-profit organizations in Hawaii, promoting rights for the disabled, and publishing information to help children with autism on AutismInParadise.com.

 

PBS host Malia Mattoch moderated the feud. She began, “While there are currently no measles cases in Hawaii, outbreaks connected to Illinois daycare centers and Disneyland have brought the debate to the forefront. . . . Should Hawaii require vaccinations for all healthy children?”

 

For the next hour, Horowitz and Edghill pummeled medical doctors Green and Park for their willful blindness to vaccination risk studies, and the “intoxicating paradigm’s propaganda,” despite Mattoch giving Park more than her fair share of time.

 

PBS’s motivation for heralding the program, “Should Hawaii Require All Children to Be Vaccinated?” is not hard to glean. Their influential sponsors seeks to express their bias by abusing the liberal-leaning “public broadcasting” platform to protect and promote their petrochemical-pharmaceutical interests.

 

“It’s a cartel,” Dr. Horowitz commented to his partnering journalist, Sherri Kane, after the show. “The mob’s murderous history stretches from Nazi infamy with the IG Farben-Rockefeller Standard Oil Company partnership that directed the holocaust of World War II, and repeatedly experimented on humans, to the more recent environmental and public health disasters profiting special interests that are PBS’s leading sponsors.”

 

Dr. Park’s Propaganda

 

Rather than vaccine toxicity popping the question, “When will drug companies stop damaging people and the environment?” the show focused on measles and the question, “Are un-vaccinated children putting vaccinated children at risk?”

 

Mattoch directed the majority of questions to Park, appointed in 2012 to chair the “National Biodefense Science Board” charged with assessing risks and recommending drug and vaccine stockpiling by the federal government. Alternatively, their propaganda claims to be helping to “prevent, prepare for, and respond to public health emergencies” stemming from bioterrorism and infectious diseases.

 

“I think, ahmm, they pose quite a significant risk,” Park replied to Mattoch’s question to begin demonizing parents of un-vaccinated children. Her transparent effort to cause people to fear vaccine resistors disturbed many viewers.

 

“[Un-vaccinated children are a risk], ahmm; not only to themselves, but to the community. Hence, ahmm, you know, should they be opting out of vaccination, we, we, . . . will take the measures to protect them, and those around them, by asking them to excuse themselves from school, ahmm, and from the community in general, during the incubation phase if they’ve been exposed.”

 

In other words, still reeling from the federal embarrassment over the abysmal bio-response to the recent “Ebola crisis,” or similarly embarrassing inefficacy of the 2014 “flu vaccine,” Park pushed fears and threats to promote quarantining people during pronounced outbreaks, regardless of the different risks that different diseases pose to different people in different parts of the world.

 

“Ahmm,” Park continued to defend the drug cartel’s increasing preference for quarantines. “That’s so we can monitor them. They can, you know; and make certain [children] get the perfect care; but also to protect other kids who would be, you know, potentially in danger from, ahhh, getting the [measles] disease. So they [that is, unvaccinated children] pose quite a significant risk.”

 

The “Significant Risk”

“The most ‘significant risk’ is to Americans’ ‘life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness’ after vaccine intoxication whack your immune system, health, children, family, and finances, as they did in Dr. Edghill’s case,” Dr. Horowitz commented to Kane after the show.

 

“Vaccine science is like a new religion,” Kane replied. (Sherri Kane is a journalist, psycho-social analyst, and women, children’s and animal rights activist who works with Dr. Horowitz analyzing media propaganda on their Revolution Television Network, and generating “medicinal music” on 528Records.com and the 528 Radio Network.)

 

“Most governments and religions use fear to control ‘We The Sheeple.’ Kane continued. ” The media is used to get the ‘herd’ to follow corporate fascist agendas—generating a virtual hypnotic trance state in which alternative views are shunned and ‘radicalizers’ are persecuted. This is how the drug cartel manages populations for profit. And now they are aiming to control your most valuable and sacred personal property—your body, forced into quarantines or injected with God knows what.”

 

Park’s propaganda was transparently Orwellian. Precisely like Kane’s diagnosis.  Dr. Park never answered host Mattoch’s question, but skirted the risk-differential issue without providing any scientific evidence whatsoever.

 

“There are no studies that have ever been done comparing risks between unvaccinated versus vaccinated children, putting either at more or less risk,” Dr. Horowitz said after the show, applauding Dr. Edghill’s comments (as detailed below). “The main reason is that officials under the influence of Big Pharma’s bribes and academic indoctrination neglect and conceal data on injuries that would condemn the vaccine industry irreparably.  So the definitive proof, for either side, doesn’t exist; thanks to the special interest groups neglecting the studies and concealing the evidence. This is why Dr. Park can’t argue, but simply diverts from this point. She too is a victim of medical-scientific evidence tampering; and her ‘paradigm’ is, therefore, fundamentally flawed and untrustworthy.”

 

Nonetheless, that dearth of data didn’t stop Park’s doublespeak setting the standard for the Green-Park team.

 

“But, I might also add,” Park rambled, “the risk now is not just from unvaccinated children, but unvaccinated adults, because a number of kids have now grown up. And we are now seeing a sort of changing epidemiology in that we are seeing unvaccinated kids being affected; we’re now seeing the unvaccinated adults, the kids that grew up, and now bringing the diseases back home to Hawaii, and spreading it in our communities. Ahmm.”

 

What did she say? “Unvaccinated adults . . . now bringing the diseases back home to Hawaii,” after Mattoch opened the show admitting that no cases of measles have been reported in Hawaii. (Beam us up Scotty, there are no longer intelligent life forms on this planet.)

 

Park’s propaganda would be laughable, if it wasn’t so severely serious and unsettling. Other than spreading fear for the sake of vaccine sales, and boosting consumer confidence that has been eroded by the abysmal public health failures in 2014, the bio-defense chair’s assertions just don’t make sense without considering the media agenda–to spin the “Disneyland Measles Outbreak” to socially engineer families to feud over compliance with childhood vaccination “requirements,” and at the same time advertise old and new, supposedly ‘improved,’ vaccines.

 

The disparity is as large as Bill Gates’s infamous admission at a recent Ted Conference. There the world’s leading vaccine supplier lectured on his mission with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. “Television is a good thing,” Gates said, and “vaccines are expected to reduce the world’s population by 15 percent,” so that survivors can all keep watching television.

 

“Many of these diseases are actually worse, getting them as an adult,” Park continued frightening viewers. “So the fear is, you know, for them, as well, you know; the worry is that, we’ll see, we’ll start to see some complications that are going to occur, are more likely to occur, in adults. That certainly those over 20, are more likely to have, ahh, complications from measles, ahh, virus, than, than, say those between 5 and 20.”

 

Park’s Appalling Presentation of Propaganda and “Complications”

 

“Park’s propaganda is appalling,” Dr. Horowitz commented after the show. “Park demonstrated gross negligence by omitting the fact that vaccines’ purported ‘protection’ wears off after several years. So that, let’s say you get your baby injected with hepatitis B vaccine as officials recommend; it wears off by the time your teenager finishes high school. That’s what many studies are proving.”

 

 

For instance, one study published in the Journal of Hepatology in 2007, showed that cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, and even ethnicity, terminated the protection allegedly provided initially by intoxicating vaccinations.

 

Park continued to explain that “complications” could arise from children not getting vaccinated, but incredibly the example she provided was from her clinical practice treating a terminally ill child who HAD BEEN VACCINATED with the measles vaccines, and later developed “complications” from adult-onset measles.

 

“What percentage of people have vaccine injuries; which don’t always occur [immediately, but over the long term]?” replied Dr. Edghill, challenging Park’s propaganda.

 

“I agree completely,” concurred Dr. Horowitz. “The number one issue that’s been completely neglected, grossly neglected, and it’s a violation of the public’s faith and trust in the public health department, is the fact that there is no definitive risk/benefit analysis done.

 

“The cornerstone of public health is to make sure that we’re not killing and maiming more people than we’re helping and saving. The fact is,” the doctor surmised from researching history and the dangers and damages done in the name of “health science,” “without definitive data on knowing how many people are being injured, essentially what you are doing is propagandizing what amounts to the mass killing of people, or maiming of people, for profit for the pharmaceutical industrialists.”

 

The Polio Eradication Deception

 

Senator Green responded very defensively to Horowitz’s medical blasphemy.

 

“Before vaccinations, polio caused paralysis in vast segments of society and killed people. Before vaccinations, smallpox devastated societies killing millions of people. Before flu vaccinations, we had global pandemics. . . . We could be wiped out if we didn’t have some capacity to immunize ourselves. This has been the greatest public health success that we’ve seen. . . .”

 

Dr. Edghill rebutted Dr. Green’s statement saying, “The polio vaccine was initially, just ahh [carcinogenic and deadly], there was so much faith placed in it. . . . It was contaminated with simian virus 40, . . . the 40^th monkey virus . . .”

 

“And that’s a hideous story,” Dr. Horowitz interjected. “The reality is, what the Senator just said is really incomplete. And, again, omissions and misrepresentations in law is fraud. So essentially, to say that the polio vaccine caused the disappearance of polio, you have to forget first Salk, and Salk’s vaccines were hideously contaminated with SV40 which caused horrific cancer pandemics. The reality is that the Salk vaccine, replaced by the Sabin vaccine that was not much better because it was still live attenuated virus, and the killed Salk vaccine was never fully killed, because of the SV40—the 40^th monkey virus ever discovered [that caused cancer in virtually every animal it was injected into.]

 

Dr. Horowitz continued: “Two brilliant women  [Bernice Eddy and Sarah Stewart] went to the National Institutes of Health Director, Smidell, and said to him . . . ‘We’ve tested the Merck Pharmaceutical [Co.] polio vaccine off the shelf, [and] if you continue to allow these vaccines to go out, I guarantee you over the next twenty-years you will have epidemics of cancer unlike the world has ever seen. That woman [issuing the warning] was Bernice Eddy. And [the virus] was initially called SE [short for Sewart-Eddy] Polyoma Virus; and essentially it took her ten years before she got to the United States Congress, and in an appeal—because she had been demoted, defunded, and ostracized, persecuted; and [then] SE Polyoma was stolen, and renamed. Dr. Hilleman at Merck renamed it the SV 40 virus. Basically, it [the theft of intellectual property] was sexist, it was outrageous, and it was a complete cover-up of what the true reality is with regard to the original polio vaccines.”

 

“SV40 is today still being isolated in tumors—in cancerous tumors,” Dr. Edghill responded. “There has also been demonstration of vertical transmission between parent to child.”

 

“That’s right,” Horowitz concurred. “It’s hideous.”

 

Measles, More Deception and Diversion

 

“I’ve brought a few charts,” said Dr. Edghill, “because I believe the risk of measles, and adverse effects from contracting ‘wild measles’ are grossly overstated.”

 

Showing a vital statistics chart from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) website, Edghill continued, “The vaccine was licensed in about 1963, and it wasn’t widely introduced until after that.”

 

Pointing to the chart, Dr. Edghill explained, “You can see that this shows the death statistics per 100.000. You can see, Dr. Green, that it is well less than 1 person. About maybe .25 [meaning that for every 400,000 people who get measles, one is expected to die], or maybe less than that.”

 

“I have something here from the British Medical Journal. These writers agree that measles is nowadays normally a mild infection,” Edghill continued to educate Green. “When you say that polio is eradicated, and that measles has almost been eradicated, well what about [attributing that success to] nutrition and/or sanitation?”

 

“Exactly,” Dr. Horowitz affirmed.

 

“Polio! Forty-nine thousand cases [caused] from the vaccine in India, [reported] from the peer reviewed Indian [Medical] Journal,” Dr. Edghill courteously added, “Happy to share this with you.

 

“The vaccine schedule continues to increase out of control. Kids are getting between 49 and upwards of 60 vaccines prior to starting school.

 

“I think one thing that we can all agree on is that we’re not all genetic clones. There are genetic issues that we really need to do better in identifying,” Edghill concluded, citing several more scientific studies corroborating evidence that adverse vaccine reactions linked to genetic predispositions are gathering increased attention worldwide.

 

Stymied by the opposition, Senator Green noticeably retreated stating, “Well, it’s a passionate topic.” Then, he gathered himself to rely on the standard statistic repeated over-and-over again by sychophants of the Rockefeller-directed World Health Organization.

 

“In 2000, over 750,000 kids globally died of measles. Okay. So 770,000 children died,” Green began.

 

“In Third World countries,” corrected Dr. Edghill. . . .

 

“How many died of cancer [from vaccine intoxications] or vaccine injuries?” Horowitz added.

 

“Well, let’s have Dr. Green [finish what he was saying], refereed host Mattoch. . . . “I’ll give everyone a chance. Viewers are tuning in so they can learn. So let’s give everyone their chance to speak. So Dr. Green.”

 

“So, I say; and I worked as a missionary doctor, even though I am not a missionary. I’m a Jew, okay; married to a Mormon girl. I immunized my two kids, okay. But 770,000 died of measles globally, and as a family physician, and now an ER doc., that hurts, okay.”

 

“I’m not saying we shouldn’t continue to improve vaccinations and their formulations. Of course we should; that’s science,” Senator Green continued. “So I appreciate the statements that were made by Janet. So I’m not arguing with anyone about always improving the science of our immunology, of what we propose as public health officials. I’m not even trying to defend anyone globally. I’m saying if we can save children’s lives, if we can look at the data I believe is sound, we should do it.”

 

Religious and Philosophical Exemptions

 

Taking questions from viewers, PBS host Mattoch asked Dr. Park, “Don’t schools in Hawaii require children to be vaccinated in order to be admitted?”

 

“For school entry it is required to adhere to the vaccine schedule,” the director of infectious diseases for the State replied. “Ahmm. However, in the State of Hawaii, unlike, or like many other states in the nation you can, ahmm, request an exemption from that vaccine requirement—either medical exemptions . . . usually it’s, for instance, a child whose on chemo-therapy, and obviously that affects their immune system. . . . So their exempt for that period that they’re on the chemotherapy. It’s not a, you know, an ‘all for life’ kind-of-thing, ahmm,” Dr. Park stammered.

 

“But, the other potential is to request a religious, what we call a ‘religious exemption,’ which really, in all intensive purposes, is essentially a philosophical exemption, because a parent can just write in and say it’s against their personal belief. Ahmm. So that is the route that people can take.”

 

“Are those exemptions going up or down?” asked the PBS host. “Do we have any sense of what the trend is?”

 

“The medical exemptions stayed stable. . . . The religious exemptions, however, just like in many other states, we’re starting to see edge higher and higher. And that is, that’s what I’m referring to, that is the concern.” [The main reason for this, actually, is that during the past quarter century, Dr. Horowitz’s video and audio presentations to the religious world have begun to overcome the ignorance caused by suppression of information about vaccine ingredients and religious prohibitions to to them.]

 

“You know,” Dr. Park continued demonizing religious objectors, “before people used to, maybe, say, ‘Oh, well, we know this community, on this particular island is, that’s where all these anti-vaccine folks are. Ahmm. But, what we are seeing now, it’s scattered throughout the State; and it’s like every other state in the nation. We’re seeing it. In every other community. And as I was just saying to someone, it could be your next door neighbor. It’s not just one, one area with one population. Ahmm. So it [i.e., religious objection to vaccination] is, it is starting to grow.

 

“But this is an option for, ahhh, kids in Hawaii, for their parents, if they are really strongly against it. However, as I mentioned earlier, we do have the authority to protect the public’s health [by segregating religious objectors]; and again, protect the individual and say ‘If you’ve been exposed, or if you actually have a vaccine-preventable disease, I mean, you’re, I’m sorry, but you need to be isolated from the rest of the public. . . . This applies [for] public or private [schools.] The only exceptions are children who are home schooled.”

 

Host Mattoch turned to Dr. Edghill for her response. . .

 

“. . . Live viruses do ‘shed’. We actually do, in fact, have shedding. And you guys have shared sob stories, sad stories, of patients who have succumbed to what you term ‘vaccine preventable diseases.’

 

Continuing to balance the broadcast, Dr. Edghill recalled, “I have a friend whose daughter, at fifteen months, received the MMR [vaccine]. She quickly deteriorated into autism, bowel disease, all sorts of other things; but on top of that, three weeks after receiving the vaccine, the measles virus shed in her poop, in her diaper. Her mom was changing her diaper, didn’t know she was perhaps an immuno-compromised person, and [and not knowing about the risk of shedding, thereby lacking ‘informed consent,’ my friend] developed multiple sclerosis. A very severe case. She had to be institutionalized. A young woman in her thirties.”

 

“So there are all sorts of cases,” Dr. Edghill concluded, “where vaccinated people do, in fact, shed, [and pose a risk to others not vaccinated]. We do know that the DTAP vaccine, for example, is not fully effective. Tons of research, peer reviewed research, about the lack of eff[icacy]. But what we hear from the medical community is, ‘It’s unvaccinated people [who are causing the problems putting others at risk]. There’s a study that shows 80% of the people in the California outbreak were fully vaccinated. Another 10% or so were partially vaccinated. . . .”

 

“. . . Vaccines are not perfect in their protection,” defended Park.

 

“Well, they’re not perfect, but they injure [people]” Edghill replied. “When over 80% of a population is fully vaccinated [and still get the disease] what does that say?”

 

“The goal is to increase the immunity of the entire population,” Park retorted.

 

“But it’s not doing that,” Edghill scolded. “It isn’t doing that.”

 

“Understanding that there will always be a few people who will not respond,” Park defended.

 

“Is 82% [of vaccinated Californians] a ‘few’ to you?” Edghill challenged Park. “Is that a ‘few’? Because it seems to me that that’s quite a lot!”

 

Dr. Horowitz intervened. “And are religious people ‘crazy’ [Dr. Park]? Are people who are conscientious objectors ‘crazy?’ In you’re opinion they are.”

 

“In fact,” Dr. Edghill added. “Merck [that along with Pfizer sponsors PBS] is being sued by two whistleblowers; and there is also a CDC whistleblower who has been providing information to Congressman Posey ‘s [R-Fla.] office. He’s indicated that statistically-significant information was withheld from a 2004 study that showed a rapid increase in, ahhh, 340[%], 3.4 fold, in African American males who received vaccine prior to three years of age. This is very important information. Hopefully, he’ll be providing further information. He released an e-mail from Colleen Boyle [Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities (NCBDDD) at the CDC] . . . in which she said, ‘You know, it’s not usually diagnosed until 3 [years of age]. How ‘bout if we introduce 18 month olds and 2-year olds into the study.’ What does that do to our data?” Edghill questioned responsibly, concluding, “It shows you that they’re ‘cooking the books’ in some cases.”

 

Concealing Conflicting Interests

 

Near bedlam followed Drs. Edghill and Park’s dialogue, at which point Dr. Horowitz politely asked Mattoch for equal time, and through Dr. Park’s attempted interruptions, Horowitz responded to Park’s challenge to him, “Have you taken care of a child with whooping cough?”

 

“I receive probably at least three or four telephone calls from parents of [vaccine] injured children [per week] and I am sick-and-tired of it, frankly. The reality is you’re not paying any attention to the data of the risks vs. what you claim are the benefits. . . . If vaccines worked, why would you [Dr. Park] be so concerned about those few people, let’s say 3% in Hawaii, for religious reasons, or any other reason, [such as] philosophical, exempt out?

 

“Cause we worry about them.” Dr. Park replied.

 

“Oh, yeah. Right,” continued Dr. Horowitz. “You want ‘herd immunity’ [but now you claim you ‘worry about them.’] Now wait a minute. Let’s take a look at your conflicting interests. Do you work on the board of the National Biosurveillance and Response [federal group] with Pfizer?”

 

“No,” Dr. Park falsely replied.

 

“Pfizer is not one of seven members of that board?”

 

“It’s a government, eh, board. It’s a federal advisory board,” Park diverted from the question.

 

“Excuse me. Is one of the major people administering decision-making on a national basis with the Pfizer group? And representing now an influence on the national [vaccination] response, and emergency response [policy]?” Dr. Horowitz clarified.

 

Dr. Park replied, “There are members from different, deliberately from different, ahhm, walks of life on the board.”

 

“How many are there?” Horowitz demanded to know.

 

“We’re not supposed to be bringing in our, sort of, commercial interests, or what not.” Park astonishingly admitted.

 

“Exactly.” Dr. Horowitz concurred with the suppressed truth. “You’re not supposed to be. That’s my point. The point is it’s outrageously biased.” [Omissions and misrepresentations in law is fraud, and this is scientific fraud by concealment of conflicting interests.]

 

Referee host Mattoch called time, knowing full well her station and broadcast was underwritten by Pfizer, the same conflicting interest Dr. Park falsely denied, and fraudulently neglected. “Let’s make this a little less personal,” she directed Horowitz. “Let’s talk about facts, everyone.”

 

“Look,” Dr. Horowitz continued. “If you saw a murder going on in the street, and you don’t report that; you have a public duty to report that, to do everything in your power to stop that crime—that’s, in fact, ‘public duty doctrine.’ So it is personal. There are children, and I’m hearing from parents, weekly, many of them who are outraged that the government, in this case, Dr. Park represents the entire national security apparatus that is potentially keeping us from an outbreak and emergency. And the reality is that the manner in which they’re going about doing this [is unconscionable]–injecting foreign RNA, foreign DNA, from bacteria, virus, fungus, yeast, chicken embryo, bovine fetal serum, monkey kidney tissues, [and] with smallpox it’s cow pus. You might as well inject ‘eye of newt’ [to complete the witch’s brew]. Because the reality is they don’t know what the heck they are doing.”

 

Dr. Green was given the floor to respond, “I’m just pleased to be the calm one. It’s been a long day.

 

“First of all I don’t know everyone at this table well. Dr. Park is an extraordinary individual. I’m gonna say this because it’s not, it’s not acceptable to me personally to have someone reference ‘murder,’ and this and that, and then accuse someone. This is a person that works to prevent, from her paradigm, which I respect and if others don’t, that’s OK, to prevent infection from spreading. I turn to her and trust her to protect my children.  I’m just saying that as a father, OK.”

 

But Senator Green was not simply speaking as “a father, OK.” Nor did he simply defend his close colleague, Dr. Park, in the process of diverting attention from, and obfuscating, Dr. Horowitz’s main point—that if doctors and government health officials neglect the abundant studies irrefutably proving vaccination risks of cancers and more, then the deaths caused by their negligence is murderous and treasonous.

 

It is most reasonable Dr. Green would defend Dr. Park’s complicity in what amounts to “criminal negligence” by definitions in law. To purposely neglect morbidity and mortality data as the vaccine industry does regularly, in both scientific and public spheres, is criminal because it is deadly. But there is more than Dr. Green’s personal friendship with Dr. Park, and their allegiance to the medical-pharmaceutical “paradigm” that discredits his defense.

 

Remember what Dr. Horowitz told Dr. Green earlier, that alarmed the Senator greatly: “Omissions and misrepresentations in law is fraud!”

 

Just before the show, Dr. Horowitz asked Dr. Green (in Kane’s presence) if his political campaign contributors included Pfizer (parent company to Monsanto), AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein-Beecham, Walgreens, that promotes “free vaccines.” (What do you get for “free” in this world? Dr. Horowitz often responds—“genocide.”). And besides these companies being cited on the Internet by reputable sources as Dr. Green’s campaign contributors, the world’s leading genetic engineering company, Genentech, that stole and privatized the entire “HUMAN GENOME” from the publicly-funded “Human Genome Project,” for profitable patenting, also repeatedly gave Green money.

 

Genenech’s heist was committed by its co-founder, J. Craig Ventor; the world’s wealthiest genetic industrialist, who was aided-and-abetted by the “willful blindness” of leading (probably bribed) government officials within days of the Human Genome Project’s celebrated completion. This topic was covered by Dr. Horowitz in his landmark book about the anti-trust treason committed by the GMO industry, titled, DNA: Pirates of the Sacred Spiral.

 

It is also noteworthy in this discussion to consider the genetic risks from recombinant vaccines, or recombinations of viruses occurring in vivo, that is, in live people, such as children, after they receive dozens of different vaccinations, injecting many species of germs and their genetic ingredients. Studies completed during the past two decades have confirmed “vertical transmission” of genetic mutations. That means, parents who received vaccines have been transmitting foreign genes, including cancer virus genes, to their children!

 

Autism and the “Paradigm” of Criminal Concealments

 

PBS host Mattoch asked Dr. Green to address the question of vaccines linked to autism.

 

“I’m very focused on this issue,” the senator told viewers. “Autism is tragic . . . absolutely a multi-factorial problem [involving] . . . many factors. . . . I think, personally, that a lot of the problems from industrialized society are contributing. I think it is pesticides. I think our diagnoses are becoming more sophisticated, and that has changed [increased] the number [of autistic cases]; and so those are the kind of concerns I have. And I’m also open at all times for the science to absolutely proceed so that we find out whether there is a genetic cause. Whether its fractured DNA. I don’t know. I’m not a molecular biologist. But I know its not just one factor, because that doesn’t make sense to me, as a ‘developmental problem.’

 

After viewing these statements by Green, Kane concluded, “Senator Green’s collusion with Dr. Park, both of whom share conflicting corporate interests to protect their “paradigm,” diverts from the mercury intoxication data that has been linked to autism in many studies in many countries, which is why American officials were finally compelled by guilt, embarrassment, and the threat of lawsuits, to remove thimerosal—the mercury—from most vaccines,”

 

“Consider Dr. Green’s hypocrisy in accepting, and then concealing, campaign contributions from Monsanto’s parent company Pfizer; then purposely diverting from Pfizer’s liability for vaccine-victims suffering from autism. He knowingly conceals the most obvious and scientifically-established risk factor for autism—mercury poisoning. But then, equally disgusting, he assets the skyrocketing rates of autism are an artifact of “better diagnosis” in medical practice.

 

Then he hypocritically condemns primarily “pesticides” produced by and for the same companies contributing to past and present political campaigns–companies that are profiting from Monsanto/Pfizer’s “agri-science” featuring GMOs and pesticides. Then Green has the nerve to acknowledge autism as ‘multi-factorial’ problem, a ‘developmental disease,’” but doesn’t want to talk about his campaign contributors contributing to the environment and human blood supplies the multiple factors causing the “developmental disorder.”

 

Kane continued venting, “This Green-Park diversion evidences a psychological operation, or PSYOPS, that began a few years ago when vaccine industrialists and their legal defense teams plotted to advance good excuses to confound science, confuse people, and reduce liability risks from having caused generations of children to become brain damaged and furthermore inherit cancer genes from their inoculated parents.”

 

“When I watch these two doctors defend their vaccination ‘paradigm,’” Kane concluded, “I see more than two ‘pharmawhores’ in denial, covering-up their conflicting interests. I see two weak souls lacking intelligence to discern their own complicity in public and professional programming, academic and media indoctrination, and mass public persuasion, or mass hypnosis, to accept and defend a deadly and deceptive ‘paradigm’ administering omnicide–risking or killing virtually everything.”

 

Is There a Middle Ground in the Hepatitis B Vaccine?

Since “we know [vaccines] hurt people,” the “ultimate goal” would be to “individualize vaccines,” explained Dr. Edghill. To develop vaccines based on “different genetic polymorphisms” unique to every person.

 

“There are huge subsets of people for whom vaccines are unsafe; yet on day one of life we vaccinate neonates with an immature blood-brain barrier [and immature immune system as well] against a sexually-transmitted disease, blood-borne [pathogen, hepatitis B vaccine] usually associated with drug addicts [and sexually promiscuous people]. And we know the hepatitis B vaccine protection wears off in a few years.

 

“So is your toddler having sex?” scoffed Dr. Edghill, rhetorically.

 

Mattoch turned to Dr. Park to answer, but diversion exclusively followed the clear and present danger of vaccinating infants with hepatitis B vaccines–neonates without risk of catching hepatitis from unprotected sex or i.v. drug use. That accounts for more than 96 percent of cases. The other four percent are health care workers who stick themselves with bloody needles.

 

Hepatitis B infections have “been linked to hepato-carcinoma (or liver cancer),” Park replied to reconcile the irreconcilable–the insanity of injecting and intoxicating all neonates with a germ rarely infecting them, and with a vaccine that sourced the AIDS pandemic according to massive scientific evidence, and even officials’ admissions.

 

Liver cancer from hepatitis B infection “is a very severe disease, and in many cases incurable, ahmm, This is one of the successes of vaccines,” Dr. Park lectured. “. . . There is all sorts of research looking, trying to find, see, determine, is there a link between some sort of adverse effect and vaccine? And over and over and over again they keep not finding it.”

 

“You know, that’s just not valid. That’s not factual,” objected Dr. Edghill. “What the media points out are certain studies that are pro-vaccine; and that’s all you get.”

 

Pharmaganda from the Pharmamedia: “Paradigm” of Bias to Poison

 

Dr. Edghill’s criticism is well advised. In 2011, for instance, these authors published their investigation in Medical Veritas Journal online, titled, “Pharmaganda: A Study of Conflicting Interest,” that they first submitted for publication in The Lancet, because The Lancet editors published a commentary condemning the impact of special interests on the practice of medicine.

 

“A few days later (on Dec.10, 2009),” Dr. Horowitz wrote, “we received a rejection notice from the Senior Executive Editor, Sabine Kleinert, without any criticism or suggested redirection as the system of peer reviewing was established to provide for everyone’s benefit in advancing science.”

 

Determined to understand why this rejection was administered, in light of this paper’s obvious urgency, Dr. Horowitz Google-searched the corporate owners of The Lancet, and quickly discovered that the journal’s publisher, Elsevier, had been purchased by the Reed Company. The merger formed Reed-Elsevier, a virtual monopoly over the entire medical and scientific publishing industry. That, in-an-of-itself, is illegal in America–a violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act. Yet, the “pharmawhores” have gotten away with this white collar organized crime.

 

“Elsevier alone publishes 250,000 articles annually in 2000 journals. Reed-Elsevier’s archives contain seven million publications important to medical scientists and authors who research the “old stacks.” Total yearly downloads of this company’s articles amount to 240 million. Multiply that times $30 per download and you get more than $7 billion.

 

Who’s making the money? Not surprisingly, BigPharma mainly.

 

Relatedly, in an Australian court, Merck & Co., another PBS sponsor, was sued by a user of VIOXX. The plaintiff alleged that Merck paid Elsevier to publish the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine, which appeared to be a peer-reviewed academic journal, but only contained articles promoting Merck’s drugs.1 Merck first denied claims that the articles in this “complimentary publication” were authored by Merck’s ghost writers. Company officials defended saying all reprints came from peer-reviewed medical journals. In May 2009, however, Elsevier conceded by stating that their “sponsored article compilation publications,” are produced “on behalf of pharmaceutical clients,” and are “made to look like journals.” The company admitted neglecting “the proper disclosures” fooling doctors and patients alike.

 

Even more disturbing is that Reed-Elsevier purchased ChoicePoint in 2008 for $3.6 billion in cash.

 

According to online descriptions of ChoicePoint, this is a “prime intelligence service.” The company supplies governments and multinational corporations with demographic data, including confidential voter records. The company is best known for its administration of corrupted records used to certify Past-President George W. Bush’s contested 2000 election.

 

Yes, you read that right.

 

According to Wiki online, “In the aftermath of the vote, the owner of DBT Online, ChoicePoint, was accused of cooperating with Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Secretary of State of Florida, Katherine Harris, and the Florida Elections Unit Chief, Clay Roberts, in the voter fraud conspiracy involving the central voter file. It was also accused of having a bias in favor of the Republican Party, for knowingly using inaccurate data, and for racial discrimination.”

 

Additional online research shows that many people are concerned about ChoicePoint’s census data, acquired and provided to untrustworthy agents, government agencies, companies, and even crime rings.

 

Even the Better Business Bureau has warned unwary residents to resist disclosing confidential information to ChoicePoint’s census informers that have walked door to door across America.2

 

And there’s more outrageous evidence of corruption and industry-wide collusion in concealing and controlling intelligence to sustain medicine’s poisonous “paradigm.”

 

To advance these authors’ investigation further, following The Lancet rejection, we submitted “PHARMAGANDA: A Study in Conflicting Interests,” for review and possible publication in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (JRSM).

 

Dr. Horowitz considered adding to his cover letter, but didn’t, an appeal to their editors and peer reviewers that they could either be heroes and publish this urgent, honest, life-saving labor of love, or generate “instant-karma” when the doctor’s regular readers, whose numbers certainly make JRSM’s circulation pale by comparison, were informed about the expected rejection.

 

The prompt response from the JRSM Editor, Kamran Abbasi, was intriguing. He wrote, “Thank you for submitting your article . . . I read it with interest, but I am afraid . . .” Kamran’s rejection lacked particularity.

 

So, Dr. Horowitz wrote back, “If you read it with interest, what made you disinterested?”

 

Dr. Horowitz certainly deserved to gain some feedback, or hear Dr. Abbasi’s truth, as the author spent at least a half hour filling in all the required fields in JRSM’s online submission forms. But Kamran never replied.

 

We conclude, therefore, that medical doctors in Britain, and elsewhere, deserve to know what Dr. Abbasi neglected to admit–that The Wellcome Trust, among JRSM’s leading contributors, was royally exposed in our “study.” The supposed, widely publicized “divestment” by The Wellcome Trust from holding conflicting interests with drug companies, never really happened, was a media-driven deception, or at least a criminal misrepresentation, for reasons we cited linking Dr. Green’s and PBS’s financial contributors in Genentech, and the Human Genome Project heist, directly to The Wellcome Trust.

 

Ironically, in completing this online application, JRSM’s instructions cited The Wellcome Trust in an explanation of how to disclose conflicting interests and financial support for submissions! Precisely what Drs. Park, Green and PBS neglected to do at anytime pursuant this show.

 

Conversely, the point is, the only studies, scientists, authors, and organizations that the Green-Park team trust to advance their medical vaccination “paradigm,” universally conceal their corporate conflicting interests. Shame on you Senator Green and Dr. Park, your consumer and scientific fraud is showing.

 

As publicized in PBS’s online promotions, the network and documentary film maker regularly co-sponsors health and genetic science gatherings and publications with The Wellcome Trust; such as their co-production on Dr. Spencer Wells, an American scientist who runs a genetics laboratory at the Wellcome Trust.

 

These conflicting interests best explain the bias of PBS host Mattoch, favoring Dr. Park with the majority of time and questions, while inferring with Dr. Green that Dr. Horowitz was less than “civil” in the manner in which he opposed their concealed conflicting interests, and their propaganda perpetrating viewer deceptions and downright consumer fraud.

 

The Legal History of Mandating Vaccines for We Deceived People

 

In deciding “the issue of mandatory vaccinations,” Dr. Horowitz informed PBS viewers, you’ve got to go back into the law—the case of Jacobsen vs. Massachusetts Public Health Department (1905). . . The reality at that time, and the reason why the decision was made, exactly like Dr. Park is saying, that for the benefit of the ‘herd’—the mass public—we’re going to neglect the individual; in that case Jacobsen was a minister, a religious person, who said, ‘No, I’m not going to buy into this vaccine [agenda]; I don’t want to intoxicate my body [with foreign recombined genetic materials] because Leviticus 19:19 says to keep my blood pure.’

 

“What happened was that in those days we didn’t have what we have today, that’s sitting on the Board with Dr. Park, on the national bio-surveillance board. We didn’t have a drug cartel. We had people who had faith in the medical system. They had faith in medical doctors. And they had faith in the truth being told for the people. Today, we have outrageous violations, criminal contempt. The fact is this organization that Dr. Park sits in [the National Preparedness and Response Science Board, according to Dr. Park who instantly advised the audience that she had just resigned her “tenure” with that organization] outrageously has . . . the pharmaceutical company Pfizer [on that board], that has been fined by the United States Attorneys General $1.3 billion, billion, not million, for fraud. And it’s the biggest outrage, and . . . payment and damage award that has been given to the federal government for violations of the public’s trust [in history] . . .

 

Pfizer was also fined another “$2.3 billion for BEXTRA, which is an arthritis drug [that the company falsely labeled and deceptively marketed],” Dr. Horowitz continued.

 

“I brought the documentation here from the European Union, because both Senator [Green] and Dr. Park is saying that we need to go forward with the vaccination for the pneumococcal [problem associated with the] otitis media situation; and the fact is that the European Union, in this sophisticated study, said there’s no good risk-benefit analysis. In fact they conclude that NO, it doesn’t seem that they should go where the United States has gone, thanks to Dr. Park and her colleagues sitting on that board and on ACIP [the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, that for all practical purposes is a ‘front’ for BigPharma].”

 

 

The Medical System is Rigged to Neglect Vaccine Injuries and Victims

 

Following Dr. Park’s briefing on the need for smallpox vaccines in defense against threats of bioterrorism, despite the illness allegedly being “eradicated;” and Dr. Green expressing his preference for the American healthcare system over certain underdeveloped nations, host Mattoch asked Dr. Edghill to respond to the matter of what a parent should do if or when their child becomes autistic from a vaccine.

 

Directing her answer and attention to Dr. Green, Dr. Edghill responded, “Let me just say that if an adult were to come to your practice, and suddenly had lost the ability to walk, to talk; they became incontinent, and that they could no longer process language, you would probably not consider it a ‘coincidence.’ You would probably [elect to] do a cat scan, or an MRI, [or say] ‘Let’s dig into this.’ But if a toddler came into your practice, you would say it’s a ‘coincidence,’ and you would say, ‘It’s just autism, [and] we don’t know why. It just happens. It’s all a coincidence that happens around vaccine time.’

 

“We’re vaccinating children younger and younger,” Dr. Edghill continued. “And now we tell pregnant women that, ‘You don’t drink a glass of wine when you’re pregnant.’ But [hypocritically and unconscionably] you say, ‘Let’s go ahead and vaccinate you with pertussis [for whooping cough, injecting foreign antigenic proteins and genetic material into the blood and fetus]; [or] ‘Let’s give you a flu vaccine [during pregnancy].

 

“There are studies that show a huge increase in ‘spontaneous abortions,’ well beyond what you would expect in a normal pregnancy after the flu vaccination and the DTP vaccination,” Dr. Edghill testified.

 

“When you look at epidemiological studies, you’re looking at statistics across a wide swath of a population who has gotten a disease or have received a vaccine, and you’re looking at outcomes. But there’s often no context, because it is [exclusively] a statistical analysis.

 

“But when I hear medical doctors tell me that there is no literature that shows there is a link [as Dr. Park asserts], I don’t think they’re looking in the right places [within the corporate- controlled scientific data-base.] And I don’t mean to demean your education and experience. I think, though, that your observation is as biased as [you claim] mine is. You see sick people, . . . But most people who get measles [are completely capable of defeating the infection naturally, because they are immune-competent, not immune-compromised by petrochemicals and pharmaceuticals, including vaccines.]

 

“When I was young we had ‘measles parties.’ People got it, and you know what, you were [only] sick for five days, maybe a week, [not a lifetime of illness and misery as we see with vaccine injuries, including autism. And these horrific side-effects are no longer rare]. Rarely were there complications [from natural measles], because often measles complications come with secondary opportunistic infections, and you would probably go to the doctor and he would say, ‘You need an antibiotic.’

 

Dr. Park offered a lame rebuttal, citing a California study pursuant to autism relative to vaccinations. “Is there a link there?” she asked rhetorically.

 

“[W]hat they found was that autism was increasing in incidence; but meanwhile, it was during a time when we were doing more and more to decrease [poisonous] things like [mercury] thimerosal in vaccines. We were seeing increases in vaccine exemptions [that Park already testified is so low that it is comparatively insignificant]. So it is interesting why we are seeing an increase in autism when we are doing all we can [short of acknowledging commercial bias, falsified data, and tainted intelligence in the medical “paradigm’] to decrease some of the issues around vaccines, as well as, ahmm, . . . seeing increases in vaccine exemptions.

 

“On top of that,” Dr. Park continued, “if you look at some countries where they’ve had, they, have a full, you know, thimerosal, and other things, they don’t see the same thing we do in terms of [skyrocketing rates of] autism.”

 

“Let me address thimerosal,” Dr. Edghill interjected, but following Mattoch’s point of order, she was not able to advance her rebuttal.

 

“We’re going to start with you, Dr. Horowitz,” the PBS host courteously offered. “Because it looks like everyone around the table has information to share.”

 

Diagnosing Before Treating Vaccine Injuries

 

“Well, the first thing is, like your question, most parents are concerned about how do you deal with the [vaccine injury] problem after it’s created. In medicine, you have to diagnose before you can treat. You have to ‘see through’ [to the cause of the problem]. Diagnosis means seeing through to the root of the disorder. Well the root of the disorder in the vaccinations is you have what’s called ‘antigenic complexes’ formed.

 

“Let me give you an example of what that means.

 

“When you get injected with foreign RNA and DNA from, as I mentioned, all of these different sources: bacterial, viruses, fungus/yeast; with smallpox, which I mentioned, it’s literally cow pus. When you get injected with that what happens is those protein particles land on your own host cell proteins; and it kind-of-like forms a globule, it comes together, and that’s what called an “antigenic complex” that your white blood cell body guards, which is your immune system, recognizes that whole complex as ‘foreign.’ And they now send out messages to the rest of your white blood cell body guards throughout the entire immune system, that say, ‘If you ever see this [globule of antigenic complex], attack and destroy [it]. Now you have the reason why, the best explanation, why you have all of the increases in all of the autoimmune diseases. Eighty some different new diseases have been prompted, in my opinion based on the [scientific, peer-reviewed published] evidence, from the vaccinations.”

 

Dr. Horowitz continued to cite many of the new diseases most reasonably explained as vaccine injuries. “You have chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, lupus, MS, ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease, chronic crippling rheumatoid arthritis, adult and juvenile type 1 [autoimmune] diabetes, Crohn’s disease, Guillain-Barre disease that my mother died from after she got the swine flu vaccine in 1976. I can go on and on. There’s eighty-some-odd diseases.

 

“So the reality is, these folks, as you [Dr. Park and Dr. Green] mentioned, have a ‘PARADIGM.’ You have a view of the way a human being is, and that we’re going [to demand compliance with the medical “paradigm,” especially during announced ‘emergencies’ for ‘national security’] to chemically treat it; were going to pharmaceutically treat [you]; completely neglecting . . . wholistic medicine.

 

“The fact is, I don’t know about you,” Dr. Horowitz said looking at PBS host Mattoch, “I’m a ‘spiritual being’—an ‘energy being’—and I want to be treated as such.

 

“And now you [need to] begin to integrate the entire religious and philosophical, and spiritual, as well as scientific ‘paradigm’.”

 

Concluding Remarks

 

“I would say that each of us can choose to be treated how we like to be treated. And that’s part of the respect we have for all humankind,” Dr. Green diplomatically opined.

 

“My general belief, about these multiple immunological, cons, concerns, syndromes and diseases that have arisen, is that there is a multitude of insults to the immune system that, yes, are very scary, and terrifying; and you can talk about heavy metals [neglecting to mention mercury and aluminum in vaccines]; you can talk about pesticides [neglecting to mention the Senator’s contributors in the petro-chemical-pharmaceutical cartel, including Pfizer’s subsidiary, Monsanto, most responsible for pesticide and herbicide poisonings in people and the biosphere, complements of their toxic products, including sweeteners Aspartame, Equal, and NutraSweet, and Agent Orange purchased and used by the U.S. military that killed and injured countless veterans along side their Asian targets]. You can talk about all of these things that have developed over the last hundred to two hundred years, okay? That, in my opinion, is what is causing an uptake in developmental disorders that are tragic, and a lot of these other major problems,” Dr. Green continued.

 

“But [diverting from the subject of vaccine injuries, and what Drs. Horowitz and Edghill asserted] to pigeonhole physicians as only focused on one medical model [as he and Dr. Park had been arguing about vaccines for the past hour while neglecting massive vaccine injury data], that’s not a reasonable way to approach things. That’s a bombastic approach. But there are many physicians. There are many naturopaths who I have a great deal of respect for. People will choose the modalities they want [except after Dr. Park commands them to get vaccinated, drugged, or otherwise be quarantined if and when she follows “emergency response” orders from corporate-influenced bureaucrats vying for profits, as seen during the 2014 Ebola crisis.]

 

But,” Dr. Green concluded, “if we base it on science [exclusively provided by university grantees covertly bribed by drug industry conflicting interests] then my feeling is we’ll take better care of more people.”

 

Dr. Edhill summed her view next. “I just want to address Dr. Park’s point about thimerosal.

 

Briefly, thimerosal [an ethyl mercury compound] has, largely in 2001 and 2002, been taken out of childhood vaccines for children [age] six and under. It is still in the seasonal flu vaccine [that may adversely impact the nervous system and brain function of elderly people, at higher risk for Alzheimer’s disease and memory loss, seduced by drugstore appeals to shoppers to save on their grocery bills by getting instantly vaccinated]. However, when we look at statistics (And, I do not believe that thimerosal is the sole cause of autism. I believe it is a contributing factor), looking at statistics from the CDC, the one-in-sixty-eight (i.e., 1:68) figure [for the incidence of autism in children] is for children who were born in 2002. So you would not see the effects of thimerosal coming out of vaccines yet [in that group]. So, it could be that we may see a reduction.

 

“But what I am more concerned about,” Dr. Edghill continued, “is ‘adjuvants;’ and that they have been implicated in Gulf War Syndrome [chronic fatigue immune dysfunction disease]; and they do indeed, ahh, they injure adults as well.

 

“So, briefly, an adjuvant [may be toxic] if you are getting a killed virus, your body will not recognize it and go on the offensive. So, [the vaccination ‘paradigm’ insists]we have to do something artificial to ramp up your immune system. [That’s the purpose of ‘adjuvants’] The most common one being aluminum hydroxide, AlHO₃ [and aluminum intoxication is also linked to Alzheimer’s dementia]. It has been shown to be neurotoxic. And a paper from LUPAS–a peer reviewed journal—by Yehuda Shoenfeld [professor and founder of the Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases at the Sheba Medical Center, affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine at Tel-Aviv University in Israel, evidences Alzheimer’s and other problems as] an autoimmune disease induced by adjuvants. [This peer] reviewed [science] paper . . . also raises great concern. [As Dr. Horowitz just explained, t]here are many foreign bodies that don’t belong in your body. Flu vaccines cultivated in army flatworms, it’s a parasite, and this DNA is going into your body [causing untold effects.]”

 

Dr. Edghill also rebutted the disingenuous thimerosal assertion by Dr. Park, by pointing out that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had not yet counted children who received “thimerosal-free” shots in their autism study, that reflects in the incidence statistics.

 

It should also be noted that despite official misrepresentations (i.e., consumer fraud) in claims that mercury/thimerosal had been “removed from the vaccines,” that it is still in seasonal flu shots, and two other vaccines received in infancy, Dr. Edghill charged. And the mercury is still in shots for children 6 and older.

 

Also, Dr. Edgill was accurate, and trying to be very helpful, pointing out that “individualized vaccines” were now being researched for development and safer usage. That new terms in the scientific literature–“vaccinomics” and “adversomics”–reflected this effort to tailor vaccines for each individual, thus reducing risks for everyone.

 

Dr. Edghill noted that vaccine developers are now aware of certain genes that make people susceptible to vaccination injuries, called “adverse events” (or  “AEs”). They are now researching to make safer vaccines for certain people who carry certain genes (such as the  “MTHFR” gene). Investigators are identifying known risk factors for vaccination, and, indeed, many autistic children share this “MTHFR” gene.

 

Dr. Gregory Poland, MD, an immunologist at the Mayo Clinic, and Editor-in-Chief of Vaccine–a leading peer-reviewed journal for vaccine developers and manufacturers–is a leading researcher in this area of “adversomics.” So, clearly, drug companies making vaccines are aware that people will have AEs to vaccines; but at the same time, the corporate-controlled media censors this subject due to BigPharma’s conflicting interest.

 

Dr. Green was granted the floor, but deferred to Dr. Park, at which time she turned to Dr. Horowitz to disparage and discredit him, stating, “You’re not a physician, so I understand . . .”

 

“I’ve trained in internal medicine [at Tufts University School of Dental Medicine in 1974 thru 1978, wherein the class was educated  in general and family medicine, to take the place of family physicians at that time when medical specialty fields were diverting doctors away from family and general practices. Dr. Horowitz’s class was trained to take their place.] I would understand that you do not have the same perspective that we do,” a statement attempting to character assassinate the messenger, rather than rebut Horowitz’s message.

 

Then, Dr. Park challenged Horowitz, “How do you suppose natural immunity occurs?”

 

“Great question, I’d love to answer it,” replied the “retired dentist,” before Park continued.

 

“The difference being,” Park lectured, “the vaccine only presents that part that will induce your body to recognize it as foreign [ridiculously neglecting the past hour’s discussion on the risks attributed to active vaccine ingredients, and the dangerous stabilizer and sterilizers, including mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, formalin, MSG, phenol, poly-sorbate 80, tween, non-oxynol 9 spermicide, and the adjuvants Dr. Edghill discussed, including interleukin-2 compounds]. Whereas, the disease will do that and give you the disease itself and the complication. So the idea of vaccine is to try to give something [to fool ‘Mother Nature’], introduce something to the body in a safe fashion. And I agree, the studies need to continue.”

 

“Dr. Horowitz, you’ve got ten seconds,” the PBS host warned.

 

“The word ‘immunization’ is a complete fraud. ‘Immunization’ [traditionally used in medicine for hundreds of years until the past few decades of vaccination propaganda] is a natural exposure, from a natural germ, via a natural route. And vaccination is an injection, its intoxicating, full of all sorts of chemicals [and recombined with genetic material and protein pieces].

 

“Okay,” closed Ms. Mattoch. “We’re going to have to leave it there.”

 

_________________

 

 The Panelists and their Biases:

Sarah Park, MD, MPH, Chief, Disease Outbreak Division, State of Hawaii Department of Health, Assistant Clinical Professor of Pediatrics; Specialty: Pediatric Infectious Disease

http://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/legal/boards/nprsb/bios/Pages/park.aspx

Dr. Park is Hawaii’s chief epidemiologist, and widely publicized chairwoman of the National Biodefense Science Board Situational Awareness Working Group.  She has served on national working groups and committees covering pediatric anthrax vaccines and public health preparedness to bioterroristic threats.  Dr. Park is also a former CDC Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer, covering bacterial respiratory diseases, West Nile Virus, antimicrobial resistant organisms, and SARS; and has worked internationally with WHO and CDC in areas such as polio elimination and vaccine preventable disease surveillance and program assessment.  Dr. Park completed her pediatrics residency at Stanford and pediatric infectious diseases fellowship at the University of California at San Francisco.  She occasionally attends for the pediatric infectious diseases service at Kapiolani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu, HI.   http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2008/Sep/10/bz/hawaii809100395.html

 

During the PBS program, Dr. Sarah Park’s diversions and denials were obviously committed to defraud consumers. When caught in her malfeasance, she acted suddenly announced she had resigned from the National Biodefense Science Board. She falsely denied knowledge of Pfizer’s involvements on that Board, and the, with Dr. Green and the PBS host, claimed Dr. Horowitz’s statements regarding her conflicting interests were too “personal” for the show.

 

Note below that Emilio A. Emini, Ph.D., representing Pfizer, worked with Park as one of only seven members determining what drugs and vaccines should be stockpiled by the federal government in preparing for bioterroristic attacks and “emergency outbreaks”–government purchases at taxpayer expense exceeding hundreds of billions of dollars.

 

APPENDIX II

National Biodefense Science Board Situational Awareness Working Group Roster

Voting Members

 

Chair, Sarah Y. Park, MD, FAAP

State Epidemiologist and Chief

Disease Outbreak Control Division

Hawaii Department of Health

Honolulu, HI

 

Co‐Chair, Manohar R. Furtado, PhD

Founder and President

Biology for Global Good LLC

San Ramon, CA

 

Georges C. Benjamin, MD, FACP, FACEP(E), FNAPA,

Hon FRSPH

Executive Director

American Public Health Association

Washington, DC

 

Nelson J. Chao, MD, MBA

Chief

Division of Hematological Malignancies and Cellular

Therapy

Duke University

Durham, NC

 

David J. Ecker, PhD

Divisional Vice President and General Manager

Ibis Biosciences, Inc.

Carlsbad, CA

 

Emilio A. Emini, Ph.D.

Chief Scientific Officer

Vaccine Research

Pfizer, Inc.

 

Collegeville, PA

John S. Parker, MD, Major General (Retired)

Senior Vice President

Scientific Applications International Corporation

Virginia Beach, VA

 

 

 

 

• Josh Green was educated at Swarthmore College and Penn State University, where he received his medical degree in 1997.

• After finishing medical school, Josh traveled to South Africa where he worked in missionary hospitals as a volunteer physician, treating a rural population overwhelmed by AIDS and malaria.

• Upon completion of his residency training in Family Medicine, Josh accepted a position in the National Health Corps to practice medicine in under-served areas of Hawai’i.

• In 2009 was named Hawaii Physician of the Year

• Emergency Room Physician on the Big Island of Hawaii

• Josh was elected to the Hawaii State House of Representatives on November 2nd, 2004 and served two terms, spearheading the movement to provide affordable, and accessible quality healthcare for all the people of Hawaii.

• In 2008 Josh was elected to the Hawaii State Senate where he now serves as the Chairman of the Health Committee and provides a leadership role statewide as Hawaii’s Voice for Healthcare.

• Married Jaime Ushiroda in 2006 and is the proud father of Maia and Sam.

Dr. Green’s campaign contributors, including Pfizer, are divulged on the following websites:

 

http://votesmart.org/candidate/campaign-finance/32389/josh-green#.VOjayMbIqko

 

http://data.influenceexplorer.com/contributions/#cmVjaXBpZW50X2Z0PUpvc2glMjBHcmVlbiZnZW5lcmFsX3RyYW5zYWN0aW9uX3R5cGU9YWxs

 

http://projects.propublica.org/docdollars/payments/checklist/11091323

 

http://www.friendsoffreedominternational.org/articles.php?command=show&ID=17240&tID=60

 

http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/ID/6790/Oxycontin-Contributions-Clayton-Hee-Josh-Green-Karl-Rhoads-and-HB466.aspx

 

Note: The Aloha State has been friendly to physician dispensing and to certain legislative officials, including Senator Clayton Hee, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary and Labor Committee, receiving funding from individuals and entities associated with physician dispensing companies [Hee’s contributors have been identified pursuant to a physician dispensing cost control bill advanced by the physician dispensing lobby that works to thwart the independent medical evaluation process in Hawaii. HB 466 was passed by the State’s Joint Committee on Judiciary and Labor (chaired by Senator Clayton Hee) and the Committee on Health, chaired by Senator Josh Green, who had been the recipient of campaign contributions from conflicting interests aligned with physician dispensing companies.

 

The caveat in what Senator Green seeks to accomplish by legislating zero co-payment policies allegedly helping patients and medical consumers afford drug prescriptions and vaccinations is that it is pushed mainly by the drug companies since ultimately it will increase, not decrease, profits for BigPharma, as well as increase the drug side effects damaging the misinformed public. See:

 

http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:E2XBlmPeGl4J:www.pharmacychoice.com/News/article.cfm%3FArticle_ID%3D966874+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/13/health/states-seek-to-curb-exorbitant-drug-costs-incurred-by-patients.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

 

Bills that would limit out-of-pocket payments by consumers for expensive drugs used to treat diseases like cancer, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and inherited disorders, are sponsored by pharmaceutical companies including Pfizer that has helped draft some of Dr. Green’s proposed legislation.

 

“In September 2009, Pfizer pleaded guilty to the illegal marketing of the arthritis drug Bextra for uses unapproved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and agreed to a $2.3 billion settlement, the largest health care fraud settlement at that time.[8] Pfizer also paid the U.S. government $1.3 billion in criminal fines related to the “off-label” marketing of Bextra, the largest monetary penalty ever rendered for any crime. Called a repeat offender by prosecutors, this was Pfizer’s fourth such settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice in the previous ten years.^“

 

As one viewer questioned, responding to the PBS broadcast and this blog, “How can Dr. Park allow Pfizer to sit on her committee? How can Senator Green accept their campaign contributions? How can PBS accept Pfizer money to sponsor educational shows for the public? And how can these panelists now sit here and look the good people of Hawaii in the face and and claim scientific objectivity? Why should anyone trust that these panelists have the public’s best interest at heart when they tell us vaccines are safe?”

 

 

Not your average “working mom,” Janet spent 28 years as an electrical engineer for the Department of Defense, and held positions with the Department of the Navy, the Office of the Secretary of Defense and US Pacific Command.

 

Dr. Edghill holds a Bachelor’s degree in Electrical Engineering, and three Master’s degrees, two in Business Administration and International Commerce from the University of Maryland; and her third Master’s degree in National Resource Strategy from the Industrial College of the Armed Forces–one of two US war colleges.

 

After her youngest son, Ryan, was diagnosed with severe autism following a vaccination, Janet became interested in the education of children plagued with autism spectrum disorder. She then earned her Doctorate in special needs education from the University of Southern California.

 

Dr. Edghill is active with several non-profits in Hawaii, promoting the rights of the disabled, and offers opportunities through her lectures and professional consultations for healing children with autism.

 

-end-

 

The Greatest Vaccine Debate: Shattering the Intoxication “Paradigm” on PBS Hawaii

CLICK HERE to view the compelling PBS Debate.