In search of a cure...

Chemistry is in todays world trying to explain everything with chemical formulas but is that necessary for understanding? As the physicist believe everything is constructed by atoms (understood as some kind of matter particle) and then the chemist also came to the same conclusion. Both began studding something that can be understood as the smallest matter in a microscope, even thou scientists writes about quarks it is explained as subatomic. In medicine it is better to find another approach when you try to explain. For medicine men the cell is of importance. Scientist of chemistry explains according to their thinking that its hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon and phosphorus and some other. That is said to be approximately 99% of a cell. But you still have the 1% that that’s not explained. (This differ a bit according to sources). Statistical math can probably help chemistry men show them not interested to know more regarding that. Although the building blocks of an organism (cell) have more to tell, one should focus more on its properties as it´s a living thing. What do cells want? Toxins (chemicals and other) in the body I believe interfere badly with cellular reproduction and cellular activity. So, opposed to that I believe Good Standard Medicine (GSM) from natural origin (not synthectic made) would work curing to the body organism so it can become healthy.

So, what’s going on with medicine science of today? Why is it so hard to understand what science men have come up with? If you read different medicine science publications, do you find it understandable? They talk molecules and so on. To be a patient and in search for a cure means you are in doctors hands. How can today and future doctors be trusted? Do they know what they talk about? Or have they just remembered their words from school books and other publications? Who practice real evidence-based medicine?

Good Standard Medicine (GSM) could be developed if we solve the problem with toxicity. Nowadays all medicals go through a process when they try to define how it works in the human body and what it does. This is a complicated science with many medical words making your head wonder what they do. In developing a Good Standard Medicine, I think we need to work our way through how foods work in the human body. What implication have foods with cells. How will cells  and the body change eating food? What’s preferred food? I think that many can argue that non chemical food is preferred as understood not toxic. Organisms as the human body usually thrives when it accepts something without rejecting it. But you also need to watch out for substance cells accepts making it cancerous. In today’s world I argue there are researched medicals that is rejected by the body organism but science men try having them anyway. So, by keeping it as simple as possible, medicine is made by extracting a substance from plants (a few other origins can be used to) and make medicine in first hand found body not rejecting. Then there is question regarding how to create a tablet/pill without something other than the actual substance? I believe you can use a press technic (other technic’s as well) and then a binder that easily is digested. Keeping it as natural as possible is of importance so you can be without changing a substance formula to something toxic or non potent working. Make medicine practice find its way to basic sense.