Here Are 18 Reasons Why I Don't Want This COVID Vaccine

“I don’t want to argue with anyone, I just want to explain what I’ve read, what questions I still have and why I can’t do anything with these COVID vaccines.”

A couple of friends asked me for my thoughts on the COVID vaccinations so I thought it was time to write an article on the subject.

Knowing how controversial this topic is, part of me would rather just write about something else. But I think the discussion/messages are so one-sided that I should speak up.

As I always try to do, I promise to do my best to be level-headed and not hysterical.

I’m not here to start a fight with anyone, just to explain what I’ve read, what other questions I have, and why I can’t figure out these COVID vaccines.

Three basic rules for discussion:

If you want to get involved with this topic with me, excellent. Here are the rules. I am more than happy to correspond with you if:

You are respectful and treat me as you would like to be treated.
They really ask thoughtful questions about what makes sense to you.
You make your arguments with solid logic and don’t hide behind links or the word “science”.

If you reply and break any of these rules, your comments will be ignored/deleted.

To get that out of the way, let me say this: I don’t know everything, but as of now nobody has been able to answer the objections below. So here are the reasons why I choose not to have the COVID vaccine:

1. Vaccine manufacturers are immune to liability

The only industry in the world that accepts no liability for injury or death resulting from their products is vaccine manufacturers.

As first established in the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act in 1986 and reaffirmed by the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, vaccine manufacturers cannot be sued – even if proven negligent.

The manufacturers of the COVID vaccine are allowed to make a unitary vaccine without testing on subpopulations (i.e. people with certain health conditions) and yet they are unwilling to accept any responsibility for any adverse event or death that their products cause.

If a company is unwilling to stand up for the safety of their product, especially if it comes to market quickly, I am not ready to take a risk for that product.

No liability. No trust. Here’s why…

2. The eventful past of vaccine manufacturers

The four big companies that manufacture COVID vaccines are / were either:

• Never launched a vaccine before COVID (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
• Are serial criminals (Pfizer and AstraZeneca).
• Are both (Johnson & Johnson).

Moderna had tried to “modernize our RNA” (hence the company name) for years, but never successfully brought a product to market. How nice for the company to have received a large injection of funding from the government to keep trying.

In fact, all of the major vaccine manufacturers (except Moderna) paid tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they put on the market despite knowing that those products would cause injury and death – see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Contergan and Opioids as a few examples.

If drug companies deliberately choose to bring harmful products to market – if they can be sued – why should we trust a product for which they are not liable?

Three of the four COVID vaccine manufacturers have been sued for products they put on the market despite knowing that injury and death would result.

• Johnson & Johnson lost major lawsuits in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2010, 2011, 2016, and 2019 (the company’s vaccine also contains tissue from aborted fetal cells, by the way, perhaps a topic for another discussion).
• Pfizer has the largest criminal disbursement award in history. The company has lost so many lawsuits that it’s hard to count. You can read his criminal record here. Perhaps that’s why Pfizer is demanding that countries where they have no liability cover provide collateral to cover claims for vaccination claims.
• Similarly, AstraZeneca has lost so many processes that it’s hard to count. Here is one. Here’s another one … you get what this is about. And in case you missed it, the company has suspended its COVID vaccine in at least 18 countries over blood clot concerns, and they completely botched their meeting with the FDA, with numbers from their study inconsistent.
• Oh, and apparently Johnson & Johnson (whose vaccine has received emergency approval in the US) and AstraZenca (whose vaccine is not approved in the US) had a little ingredient mix-up … in 15 million doses. Oops.

Given the indemnity and inglorious past of these companies, why should we assume that all of their vaccines are safe and made completely safe?

Where else in life would we trust someone with such a reputation?

It makes as much sense to me as the expectation that a ruthless, abusive, unfaithful lover will become a different person because a judge said deep down that he was a good person.

No. I don’t trust them. No liability. No trust. Here’s another reason I don’t trust them…

3. Ugly history of attempts to make coronavirus vaccines

There have been many attempts in the past to make virus vaccines that ended in complete failure – which is why we didn’t have a coronavirus vaccine in 2020.

In the 1960s, scientists tried to make a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine for infants. In this study, they skipped animal testing because it wasn’t necessary at the time.

In the end, when exposed to the virus in nature, the vaccinated infants became much sicker than the unvaccinated infants. 80% of the vaccinated infants had to be treated in hospital. Two of them died.

After 2000, scientists made many attempts to develop vaccines against the coronavirus. Over the past 20 years all of them have failed because the animals in the clinical trials became very sick and many died, as did the children in the 1960s.

A summary of this story/science can be read here . Or if you want to read the individual studies you can check out these links:

• In 2004, an attempted vaccine resulted in hepatitis in ferrets.
• In 2005, mice and civets became sick and more susceptible to coronavirus after being vaccinated.
• In 2012 the ferrets fell sick and died. And in that study, mice and ferrets developed lung disease.
• In 2016, lung disease in mice also occurred in this study.

The typical pattern in the above studies is that the children and animals produced nice antibody responses after vaccination. The manufacturers thought they hit the jackpot.

The problem came when the children and animals were exposed to the wild version of the virus.

When this happened, an inexplicable phenomenon called antibody-dependent enhancement, also known as vaccine-enhanced disease, occurred in which the immune system produced a “cytokine storm” (ie, overwhelmingly attacked the body) and the children / animals died.

Here’s the problem: vaccine manufacturers have no data to suggest that their hasty vaccines have overcome this problem.

In other words, no attempt to manufacture a coronavirus vaccine has ever been successful, nor has gene therapy technology in mRNA “vaccines” been safely brought to market.

One might assume that because the companies received billions of dollars in government funding, they must have solved this problem. They just don’t know if they have it…

4. The “data gaps” submitted to the FDA by vaccine manufacturers

When vaccine manufacturers submitted their filings to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Emergency Use Authorization (which is not the same as full FDA approval), one of the many “data gaps” they said they had in their Studies have nothing to suggest they got over the pesky problem of vaccine-aggravated diseases.

They just don’t know if the vaccines they made are producing the same cytokine storm (and deaths) as previous attempts at such products.

As Dr. Joseph Mercola emphasizes…

“Earlier attempts to develop an mRNA-based drug with lipid nanoparticles failed and had to be abandoned because the drug showed no effect at too low a dose and became too toxic at too high a dose. An obvious question is: what has changed to make this technology safe enough for mass use?”

If that’s not alarming enough, there are more gaps in the data – in other words, there is no data to suggest safety or effectiveness:

• People who are younger than 18 years or older than 55 years
• Pregnant or breastfeeding women
• Autoimmune diseases
• Immunocompromised people
• No data to transmit COVID
• No data on preventing mortality from COVID
• No data on the duration of protection against COVID

If you think I’m making this up, or if you want to see the actual documents Pfizer and Moderna sent to the FDA for their emergency clearance, you can read this. The data gaps can be found from page 46 and 48.

For now let’s turn our eyes to the raw data the vaccine manufacturer used to submit for emergency authorization…

5. No access to raw data from studies

Would you like to see the raw data that resulted in the “90% and 95% effective” touted in the news?

Me too. But the companies don’t let us see this data.

As pointed out in the BMJ, something about the efficacy claims made by Pfizer and Moderna smells really funny. There were “a total of 3,410 suspected but unconfirmed COVID-19 cases in the entire study population, 1,594 occurred in the vaccine group vs. 1,816 in the placebo group.”

Wait… what? Did you fail in your scientific study by not verifying an important variable?

Couldn’t they test these “suspected but unconfirmed” cases to find out if they had COVID? Why not test all 3,410 participants for the sake of accuracy?

Can we only guess that they didn’t test because it would mess up their “90-95% effective” claims?

Wouldn’t it be wise if the FDA expected vaccine manufacturers to test people who have “COVID-like symptoms” and publish their raw data so that independent third parties can study how the manufacturers justify the numbers?

It’s just every citizen in the world we want to get into taking these experimental products – why didn’t the FDA ask for that? Isn’t that the whole point of the FDA anyway?

Good question. Foxes guarding the chicken coop? No liability. No trust.

6. No long term safety tests

We do not have long-term safety data for products that have only been on the market for a few months.

In other words, we have no idea how this product will affect the body in months or years – regardless of the population.

Given the risks listed above (which all pharmaceutical products have), wouldn’t it be wise to wait and see if the worst-case scenarios were actually avoided?

Wouldn’t it make sense to try to fill in those pesky “data gaps” before we try to give this to every man, woman, and child on this planet?

That would make sense. But to have this data you have to test it on humans, which leads me to my next point…

7. No informed consent

What most who get vaccinated don’t know is that anyone who gets vaccinated is now part of the clinical trial – part of the experiment.

Those (like me) who don’t get vaccinated are part of the control group. Time will tell how this experiment ends.

But, you might ask, if the vaccines did harm, wouldn’t we see it all over the news? Surely the FDA would step in and stop the distribution? (Editor’s note: Federal health officials paused Johnsons & Johnson’s vaccine Tuesday due to blood clot concerns).

If the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) – the government-run system for reporting deaths and injuries after vaccination – worked, things might be different, but…

8. Minimal information on side effects and deaths

According to a Harvard study (commissioned by our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually reported to VAERS.

While the problems with VAERS have not been resolved (as you can read in this letter to the CDC), VAERS is reporting over 2,200 deaths from the current COVID vaccines, as well as nearly 60,000 side effects, at the time of this writing.

If those numbers represent only 1% of the total side effects (or 0.8% to 2% of what this study recently published in JAMA found), do the math for yourself – but that’s somewhere between 110,000 and 220,000 Deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of side effects.

Bet you didn’t see that on the news.

That death toll would be lower than the 424,000 medical error deaths that happen every year (which you probably won’t hear about either), but we’re not even six months into getting those vaccines up and running.

If you want to delve deeper into the issues with the VAERS reporting system, you can read this or this up.

But then there is my next point that could be argued, makes these COVID vaccines seem pointless…

9. The vaccines do not prevent transmission or infection

Shouldn’t these vaccines be what we’ve been waiting for to “get back to normal”? Nope.

Why do you think we are getting all these contradicting messages that we should distance ourselves socially and wear masks after vaccination? This is because these vaccines were never meant to prevent transmission or infection.

If you don’t believe me, I’ll refer you again to the papers submitted to the FDA that I linked above that show that the primary endpoint (what the vaccines are supposed to achieve) is to address your symptoms alleviate.

Sounds like any other drug out there, right? That’s it … lowering your symptoms is the big win we’ve been waiting for. Does this seem completely pointless to anyone but me?

• The vaccine can’t stop the virus from spreading.
• It can’t stop the virus from infecting us once we have it.
• Getting the vaccine means accepting all of the risks of these experimental products and the best it could do is reduce symptoms?

There are many other things I can do to relieve my symptoms that don’t involve ingesting what appears to be a genuinely risky product.

Now for the next logical question: if we are concerned about asymptomatic spreaders, wouldn’t the vaccine make the chances of us producing asymptomatic spreads?

If the vaccine does actually reduce symptoms, anyone who gets it might not even know they are sick, so they are more likely to spread the virus, right?

I’ve heard a lot of people say the side effects of the vaccine (especially the second dose) are worse than contracting COVID.

I can’t understand that either.

Take the risk. Received no protection. Do you suffer from the side effects of the vaccine. Keep wearing your mask and social distance … and you can keep spreading the virus.

It gets worse…

10. People become infected with COVID even though they are fully vaccinated

Such a crap. You get vaccinated and still catch COVID. It has already been proven in various countries, Washington State, New York, Michigan, Hawaii, and a few other states.

In reality, this phenomenon is likely happening everywhere, but these are the ones who are making the news now.

Given the reasons above (and what’s below), you might not be surprised, but bad luck if you thought the vaccine was a shield to protect you.

But it is not. That was never the point.

If 66% of LA health workers delay or skip vaccination … maybe they don’t love the rash science either.

Perhaps they are watching the questionable way deaths and cases are reported…

11. Overall death rate from COVID

According to the CDC’s own figures, COVID has a 99.74% survival rate should you contract it.

Why should I take a risk for a product that won’t stop infection or transmission to help me overcome a cold that has a 0.26% chance of killing me – which is actually a 0 in my age group Has 1% chance of killing me (and 0.01% chance of killing my children).

With such a low bar (death rate) we will be locked up every year … that is, forever.

But wait, what about the more than 500,000 deaths, that’s alarming, isn’t it? I’m glad you asked…

12. Bloated COVID death toll

Something smells really weird here. Never in the history of death certificates has our own government changed the way deaths are reported.

Why are we now reporting everyone who dies with COVID in their body as having died of COVID instead of the comorbidities that actually took their life away?

Up until COVID, all coronaviruses (colds) were never listed as the primary cause of death if someone died of heart disease, cancer, diabetes, autoimmune diseases, or any other major comorbidity.

The disease was listed as the cause of death and a confounding factor such as flu or pneumonia was listed on a separate line.

To inflate the number even further, the World Health Organization and the CDC changed their guidelines to include those who are suspected or likely (but never confirmed) to have died from COVID also in the death toll.

If we do, shouldn’t we go back and change the numbers of all past cold and flu seasons so we can compare apples to apples when it comes to death rates?

According to the CDC’s own numbers (scroll down to the “Comorbidities and Other Conditions” section), only 6% of deaths attributed to COVID are cases where COVID appears to be the only problem.

In other words, reduce the number of deaths you see on the news by 94% and get the probable number of deaths that are only due to COVID.

Even if the former CDC director is right, and COVID-19 was a laboratory-made virus (see reason # 14 below), a death rate of 0.26% is still in line with the viral death rate that occurs each year on the planet bypasses.

And then there’s this Fauci guy. I would really like to trust him, but aside from the fact that he hasn’t treated a single COVID patient, maybe you should know…

13. Fauci and others at NIAID hold patents on the Moderna vaccine

The Bayh Dole Act allows government employees to file patents on any research they do with taxpayers’ money.

Tony Fauci owns more than 1,000 patents (see this video for more details ), including the patents used on the Moderna vaccine … for which he approved government funding.

In fact, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) – the the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), of which Fauci is the director – have joint ownership claims on Moderna’s vaccines.

Does anyone still see this as a major conflict of interest or even a criminal?

I say criminal because there is also this annoying problem that makes me even more suspicious of Fauci, NIAD and the NIH in general…

14. Fauci is in the hot seat for illegal gain-of-function research

What is “gain-of-function” research? This is the attempt by scientists to equip viruses with new functions – that is, to make them more transmissible and more deadly.

Sounds a little unethical, right? How could that be helpful?

Our government agreed and banned the practice in 2014.

So what has the Fauci-led NIAID done? They panned and outsourced gain-of-function research (in coronaviruses no less) to China – in the amount of $ 600K in grant.

Mr Fauci, you have a few things to explain … and I hope the cameras will record if you have to defend your actions.

Let’s now turn to the virus again…

15. The virus continues to mutate

Not only does the virus (like all viruses) continue to mutate, but according to world-renowned vaccine developer Geert Vanden Bossche (whom you will meet below in case you don’t know him) it mutates about every 10 hours.

How on earth are we going to keep developing vaccines to keep up with this mutation rate? We don’t do it.

Could this also explain why fully vaccinated people keep getting COVID?

Why do we suddenly no longer trust her, even though natural immunity has never failed humanity?

Why are my thoughts getting deleted from all the major social media platforms when I ask questions like the above or post links like the above?

That brings me to the next worrying problem I have with these vaccines…

16. Censorship and the total lack of scientific debate

I can’t help but get snappy here so cheer me up.

How did you enjoy all of these nationally and globally televised robust debates staged by public health officials and simultaneously broadcast on every major news channel?

Wasn’t it great to hear the best in medicine, virology, epidemiology, economics, and vaccinology from around the world as they energetically and respectfully discuss things like:

• Lockdowns or Shutdowns
• Wearing masks
• Social distancing
• Studies on the effectiveness and safety of vaccines
• How to Screen for Vulnerability to Vaccine Damage
• Therapeutics, (i.e., non-vaccinating treatment options)

Wasn’t it great to see public health officials (who have never treated anyone with COVID) question their “science”?

Wasn’t it great to see the FDA panel publicly grilling prime-time vaccine makers while they asked hard questions in the hot seat about products for which they are not responsible?

Oh wait … you haven’t seen these debates? No, they do not have. Because they never happened.

What happened instead was a heavy censorship of all but one story.

Mark Zuckerberg may question vaccine safety, but not me? Since when has the first amendment been a suggestion?

It’s the first amendment to the constitution, Mark – the one our founders thought was the most important.

With so much at stake why are we being fed only one narrative. Shouldn’t many perspectives be heard and professionally debated?

What happened to science?

What has become of the scientific method of repeatedly questioning our assumptions?

What happened to the lively debate in this country, or at least in Western society?

Why is anyone who disagrees with the WHO or the CDC so heavily censored?

Is public health science a religion now – or should science be about debate?

When someone says “the science is fixed,” I know that I am dealing with someone who is narrow-minded. By definition, science (especially biological science) is never completed.

If it were, it would be a dogma, not a science.

I want to be a good citizen. I really want that.

If lockdowns work, I want to do my part and stay home.

If masks work, I want to wear them.

If social distancing is effective, then I will submit.

But if there is evidence that they don’t (masks for example) I want to hear that evidence too.

If top scientists disagree, I want to know what they think. I want to have a chance to hear their arguments and form my own opinion.

I don’t think I’m the smartest person in the world, but I think I can think. Maybe I’m strange, but when someone is censored then I really want to hear what they’re thinking. Don’t you too?

To all of my friends who have no problem with censorship, will you have the same opinion if what you think is censored?

Isn’t censorship the technique of dictators, tyrants and greedy, power-hungry people?

Isn’t it a sign that those who do the censorship know that this is the only way to win?

What if a man who has spent his entire life developing vaccines was willing to risk his entire reputation and urge all world leaders to stop COVID vaccines immediately because there are problems with the Science there?

What if he advocated an open, academic debate on a global stage?

Would you like to hear what he had to say? Would you want to see the debate he’s asking for?

17. The world’s leading vaccine expert is sounding the alarm

Here’s what is perhaps the biggest reason this COVID vaccine doesn’t make sense to me.

When someone who is very committed to vaccination and who has spent his entire professional career overseeing vaccine development shouts from the mountaintops that we have a big problem, I think this man should be heard.

In case you missed it, and in case you want to check it out, here is Geert Vanden Bossche who explains:

• Why the COVID vaccine may be putting so much pressure on the virus that we’re accelerating its ability to mutate and become even more deadly.
• Why the COVID vaccines may create vaccine-resistant viruses (similar to antibiotic-resistant bacteria).
• Why we may have to expect mass extinction in the next few months / years due to previous problems with antibody-dependent amplification.

If half of what he says comes true, these vaccines could be the worst invention ever.

If you don’t like his science, speak to him about it.

I am just the messenger.

But I can also speak personally about COVID…

18. I already had COVID

I didn’t enjoy it. It was a nasty cold for two days:

• Relentless pain in the buttocks and lower back
• Very low energy
• Light fever

It was strange not being able to smell anything for a few days. A week later, the coffee still tasted a little “off the shelf”.

But I survived.

Now it shows (as always) that I have a nice, natural, lifelong immunity – not something that wears off in a few months if I get vaccinated. In my body and in my household, COVID is over.

In fact, now that I had it, there is evidence that the COVID vaccine might actually be more dangerous to me.

This is not a risk that I am willing to take.

Summarized

These are just my reasons why I don’t want the vaccine. Maybe my reasons make sense to you, maybe they don’t.

Whatever makes sense to you, hopefully we can still be friends.

For my part, I think we have a lot more in common than what separates us.

• We all want to live in a world of freedom.
• We all want to do our part to help others and live well.
• We all want the right to express our opinions without fear of being censored or maliciously attacked.
• We all deserve to have access to all the facts so we can make informed decisions.

Whether you agree with me or not, I will not treat you any differently.

You are a person who deserves just as much love and respect as anyone else. I greet you for this and I really wish you all the best.

I hope you found this useful. If so, feel free to share.

If not, please let me know in the comments below which didn’t make sense to you.