Self-Spreading Vaccines Signal End Of Informed Consent

Article posted with permission from the author, Suzanne Hamner.

Editor’s Note: Suzanne’s new book is out!  Pick up Informed Consent: An Unalienable Right.

The cornerstone of medical practice has been comprised of many tenets upholding the rights of patients – ethics, morality, informed consent, lawful practice, etc. Unfortunately, the cornerstone of medical practice is changing to exclude ethics, morals, and informed consent. How many times during the CONvid-1984 planned scam-demic did “medical professionals” advocate for “force injecting” individuals with the CONvid-1984 bioweapon? Most advocates were government shills, but many were not. Individuals were subjected to coercion, blackmail, propaganda, and other criminal actions by supposed medical professionals to increase the uptake of the bioweapon when none could provide adequate information to obtain informed consent.

Individuals who did not submit were dubbed “vaccine hesitant” when many were standing for their right to informed consent. Now, it seems the right to informed consent is a hindrance to those who seek to violate the bodies of free individuals evidenced by the suggestion of “vaccinating” individuals through food, the airborne release of “vaccines”, and possibly chemtrails. Another avenue is also being explored – self-spreading vaccines.

• Activate Your Own Stem Cells & Reverse The Aging Process – Choose “Select & Save” OR Join, Brand Partner & Select Silver To Get Wholesale Prices
• Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
• How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation
• Protect Your Income & Retirement Assets With Gold & Silver
• Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Get Free Shipping With Promo Code TIM
• Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
• Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
• Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify

If this gets released, “you’re going to have no choice effectively but to take it.”

Investigative reporter Jefferey Jaxen brought to light an alarming reality on The Highwire Thursday: the ability to “vaccinate” the entire world without injecting large amounts of the population is upon us.

What we’re referring to is self-spreading vaccines, a technology that was almost ready to be deployed for the coronavirus pandemic — but ultimately passed on for mRNA injections instead.

Please watch the segment on self-spreading “vaccines” on The Highwire before continuing.

According to the article at Blacklisted News, “The whole idea behind self-spreading vaccines is largely grounded in circumventing informed consent from individuals, or what scientists like to refer to as ‘behavioral barriers’ or ‘vaccine delay’.”

These “behavioral barriers” or “vaccine delay” are known as your God-given unalienable right to informed consent and exercise control over your own body.

What happens when this technology known as “therapeutic interfering particles” (TIPs), which are man-engineered molecular parasites of supposed viruses go into clinical trials? Remember, these are self-spreading, meaning the clinical trial participants would be “vaccinating” all those with whom they come in contact, then those contacts would “vaccinate” their contacts, and so forth and so on. Contacts would not be informed nor would they have the option to consent or refuse. The initiation of a limited clinical trial would mean “game over” for the population.

Technically, they could skip standard clinical trials altogether through aerosolization of these manmade particles to the general population through the use of the 21^st Century Cures Act, where the Food and Drug Administration could say the risk is so minimal informed consent can be limited. It would turn the united States and the world into one big clinical laboratory Mengele would envy.

As was stated in the episode of The Highwire, Operation Warp Speed was not fast enough. This new technology would spread, like cancer, through the population without cessation. What happens when one individual is “vaccinated” through self-spreading “vaccines” more than once? The Department of Health in the United Kingdom freely admits “Some people will die who otherwise would have lived, even though fewer people die overall”.

In other words, we know some people will die from this technology, but their deaths are acceptable for the general good. How can they be sure that fewer people will die overall? They can’t. It’s a guess and a gamble using your life as the poker chip.

Just because science CAN do something, doesn’t mean scientists should do it. As previously mentioned, ethics and morality have disappeared from much of medical practice and scientific investigation. Those in whom you thought you could place your confidence have violated the very tenets of what they once pledged to uphold. Ethics and morality are now viewed as a “hindrance” to medical and scientific advancement. The Nuremberg Code, adopted after World War II, to curb or cease experimentation on individuals without their consent is little more than a blurb of words housed in history to those who seek to engage in experimentation for “the greater good” using their latest scheme to circumvent individual God-given unalienable rights.

The mental prisoners of the “New Auschwitz” will comply willingly due to their inability to escape from the Stockholm Syndrome to which they have succumbed. Many will advocate for this self-spreading technology. Unfortunately, this now includes members of the medical and scientific industrial complex that deal directly with the public in their bought and paid-for practices and offices. And, none of them will consider the very real aspect of individuals receiving “overdoses” of these “self-spreading vaccines”. In the same manner, no one is considering individuals receiving too high a dosage of aerosolized “vaccines” or “vaccine-laced” chemtrails. No one will consider the very real possibility of Big Pharma getting the technology wrong with these “vaccines”, just as no one is willing to consider that Big Pharma missed the mark with the CONvid-1984 injections. Big Pharma has a reputation for not delivering what it claims – childhood illness injections are the prime example.

The minority is pushing this disastrous method of inoculation in the same way it is pushing the “zero carbon” initiative, banning gas-powered appliances and equipment, implementing 5G technology, promoting “green” energy, fake food, continued murdering of the unborn, and iatrocide (medical murder) as a medical treatment through “euthanasia” laws. All of this is without informed consent or adequate investigation into unintended consequences or even consequences of such measures. During the CONvid-1984 planned scam-demic, individuals were medically kidnapped – denied their right of informed consent to refuse services and leave against medical advice.

None of this is new. It happened before in the united States with forced sterilizations and the Tuskegee Experiment. We know of atrocities committed against Hanson’s disease (Leprosy) sufferers due to fear. The internment of Americans of Japanese descent during World War II in the united States as Germany interned the Jews. The only difference is the united States interned those of Japanese descent under the guise of “safety”. Nothing has changed today. Because Americans didn’t stand in opposition then, the government became emboldened to do more.

Now, it is coming down to the mantra “the greater good outweighs your individual God-given rights”. While some may disagree, one of the most powerful verbs in our language is “choose”. It conveys the right of self-determination strongly supported in the Declaration of Independence, tempered by our choice obeying the laws of God; and, when ratified, our Constitution. Being denied the right to choose signifies one is at the mercy of others – a slave, chattel to be used at the whim of others; objects to be abused; commodities to be sold, traded, and discarded when the self-appointed masters determine the usefulness has been outlived.

It sounds dismal – well, it is. But, there is hope. No more can we “request” our rights given to us by God. We have to demand those rights. We have to look at every scenario through the lens of informed consent. If there is no freedom of speech, assembly, religion, press, or petition for redress of grievances, one is denied informed consent as these rights convey choice. It is the same with the right to bear arms, the right to due process, and all the rest contained in the first ten amendments known as The Bill of Rights. These choices also have to comply with the laws of God.

Understand, being denied any right means being denied all rights.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media