who controls the world financials?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2017/04/09/federal-prison-execs-got-thousands-bonuses-despite-ongoing-problems/100072938/

https://www.ted.com/talks/james_b_glattfelder_who_controls_the_world/up-next#t-831623

The Royal Orders of November 20, 1606

The first paragraph of this letter appoints the King’s Council (of Virginia) in England and gives them (theCouncil) a general description of their duties towards the two separate councils and colonies in Virginia.They were to nominate and appoint the members of the Councils of the two first settled colonies and to causeeach of the two Councils to nominate and appoint one of their own members “not being a a minister of God’sword” to be the President of his respective Council, with the position to be held for one year maximum, and tohave another President, but not the same person as formerly held the position, thereafter re-elected by the sameCouncil. These same two colonial councils were to be subservient to the “full authority” of the Kings’s councilin England.97

The King, through his English Council, not only requested, but required that the members of the colonies”with all diligence, care and respect do provide that the true word of God and Christian faith be preached,planted and used, not only within every of the several said colonies and plantations but also as much as theymay amongst the savage people which do or shall adjoin us to them or border upon them, according to thedoctrine, rights and religion now professed and established within our realm of England”.Laws, criminal and civilCriminalAll criminal offences or offences against the State or the King, were tried, as has been said before, underAdmiralty Law.Those offences of tumults, rebellions, conspiracies, mutiny and sedition which “may be dangerous to theestate there” (the degree of “dangerousness” being decided by the local Council of authority), and murder,manslaughter, rape, incest and adultery were all punishable by death, and, except on the case of manslaughter,the convict was not to be allowed “the benefit of the clergy”.All cases were to be tried by the Council of authority before a jury of twelve honest and indifferent personswho were to either convict or acquit the accused. Should the accused confess to the crime, or remain mute inanswer to his accusers, then he would be convicted as if the jury had deliberated and convicted him.The Colonial Councils also had the sole power of sentencing the convicted to death, but the ability of grantingpardon to the convict was reserved solely by the King.Where a criminal was suspected of having committed an offence outside the boundaries of the colony could bebrought back to the colony for trial.Should any member of the colonies be kidnapped and removed from any of the colonies by an outsider, thenthe kidnapper, should he or they be caught, were to be imprisoned “until he (or they) shall fully andthoroughlyreform himself. Should this miraculous reformation not take place, then the malcontent(s) were to bespeedily exported to England where he or they would (presumably) be suitably punished at the King’spleasure.

Page 117

Christopher: Pandora’s Box

CivilAny civil complaints registered by the members of either colony were to be taken care of by the respectiveColonial Councils “as near to the Common Laws of England and the equity thereof as may be”, and the localCouncil “shall have power and authority…to hear and determine all and every other wrongs, trespass, offencesand misdemeanors whatsoever…upon accusation of any person and proof thereof made by sufficient witnessupon oath: and the Councils were granted the authority to punish the offenders “by reasonable corporalpunishment and imprisonment or else by a convenient fine, awarding damages, or other satisfaction to theparty aggrieved”,

The Royal Orders of November 20, 1606The first paragraph of this letter appoints the King’s Council (of Virginia) in England and gives them (theCouncil) a general description of their duties towards the two separate councils and colonies in Virginia.They were to nominate and appoint the members of the Councils of the two first settled colonies and to causeeach of the two Councils to nominate and appoint one of their own members “not being a a minister of God’sword” to be the President of his respective Council, with the position to be held for one year maximum, and tohave another President, but not the same person as formerly held the position, thereafter re-elected by the sameCouncil. These same two colonial councils were to be subservient to the “full authority” of the Kings’s councilin England.97The King, through his English Council, not only requested, but required that the members of the colonies”with all diligence, care and respect do provide that the true word of God and Christian faith be preached,planted and used, not only within every of the several said colonies and plantations but also as much as theymay amongst the savage people which do or shall adjoin us to them or border upon them, according to thedoctrine, rights and religion now professed and established within our realm of England”.Laws, criminal and civilCriminalAll criminal offences or offences against the State or the King, were tried, as has been said before, underAdmiralty Law.Those offences of tumults, rebellions, conspiracies, mutiny and sedition which “may be dangerous to theestate there” (the degree of “dangerousness” being decided by the local Council of authority), and murder,manslaughter, rape, incest and adultery were all punishable by death, and, except on the case of manslaughter,the convict was not to be allowed “the benefit of the clergy”.All cases were to be tried by the Council of authority before a jury of twelve honest and indifferent personswho were to either convict or acquit the accused. Should the accused confess to the crime, or remain mute inanswer to his accusers, then he would be convicted as if the jury had deliberated and convicted him.The Colonial Councils also had the sole power of sentencing the convicted to death, but the ability of grantingpardon to the convict was reserved solely by the King.Where a criminal was suspected of having committed an offence outside the boundaries of the colony could bebrought back to the colony for trial.Should any member of the colonies be kidnapped and removed from any of the colonies by an outsider, thenthe kidnapper, should he or they be caught, were to be imprisoned “until he (or they) shall fully andthoroughlyreform himself. Should this miraculous reformation not take place, then the malcontent(s) were to bespeedily exported to England where he or they would (presumably) be suitably punished at the King’spleasure.

Page 117

Christopher: Pandora’s Box

CivilAny civil complaints registered by the members of either colony were to be taken care of by the respectiveColonial Councils “as near to the Common Laws of England and the equity thereof as may be”, and the localCouncil “shall have power and authority…to hear and determine all and every other wrongs, trespass, offencesand misdemeanors whatsoever…upon accusation of any person and proof thereof made by sufficient witnessupon oath: and the Councils were granted the authority to punish the offenders “by reasonable corporalpunishment and imprisonment or else by a convenient fine, awarding damages, or other satisfaction to theparty aggrieved”,

The Royal Orders of November 20, 1606The first paragraph of this letter appoints the King’s Council (of Virginia) in England and gives them (theCouncil) a general description of their duties towards the two separate councils and colonies in Virginia.They were to nominate and appoint the members of the Councils of the two first settled colonies and to causeeach of the two Councils to nominate and appoint one of their own members “not being a a minister of God’sword” to be the President of his respective Council, with the position to be held for one year maximum, and tohave another President, but not the same person as formerly held the position, thereafter re-elected by the sameCouncil. These same two colonial councils were to be subservient to the “full authority” of the Kings’s councilin England.97The King, through his English Council, not only requested, but required that the members of the colonies”with all diligence, care and respect do provide that the true word of God and Christian faith be preached,planted and used, not only within every of the several said colonies and plantations but also as much as theymay amongst the savage people which do or shall adjoin us to them or border upon them, according to thedoctrine, rights and religion now professed and established within our realm of England”.Laws, criminal and civilCriminalAll criminal offences or offences against the State or the King, were tried, as has been said before, underAdmiralty Law.Those offences of tumults, rebellions, conspiracies, mutiny and sedition which “may be dangerous to theestate there” (the degree of “dangerousness” being decided by the local Council of authority), and murder,manslaughter, rape, incest and adultery were all punishable by death, and, except on the case of manslaughter,the convict was not to be allowed “the benefit of the clergy”.All cases were to be tried by the Council of authority before a jury of twelve honest and indifferent personswho were to either convict or acquit the accused. Should the accused confess to the crime, or remain mute inanswer to his accusers, then he would be convicted as if the jury had deliberated and convicted him.The Colonial Councils also had the sole power of sentencing the convicted to death, but the ability of grantingpardon to the convict was reserved solely by the King.Where a criminal was suspected of having committed an offence outside the boundaries of the colony could bebrought back to the colony for trial.Should any member of the colonies be kidnapped and removed from any of the colonies by an outsider, thenthe kidnapper, should he or they be caught, were to be imprisoned “until he (or they) shall fully andthoroughlyreform himself. Should this miraculous reformation not take place, then the malcontent(s) were to bespeedily exported to England where he or they would (presumably) be suitably punished at the King’spleasure.

Page 117

Christopher: Pandora’s Box

CivilAny civil complaints registered by the members of either colony were to be taken care of by the respectiveColonial Councils “as near to the Common Laws of England and the equity thereof as may be”, and the localCouncil “shall have power and authority…to hear and determine all and every other wrongs, trespass, offencesand misdemeanors whatsoever…upon accusation of any person and proof thereof made by sufficient witnessupon oath: and the Councils were granted the authority to punish the offenders “by reasonable corporalpunishment and imprisonment or else by a convenient fine, awarding damages, or other satisfaction to theparty aggrieved”,

The Royal Orders of November 20, 1606The first paragraph of this letter appoints the King’s Council (of Virginia) in England and gives them (theCouncil) a general description of their duties towards the two separate councils and colonies in Virginia.They were to nominate and appoint the members of the Councils of the two first settled colonies and to causeeach of the two Councils to nominate and appoint one of their own members “not being a a minister of God’sword” to be the President of his respective Council, with the position to be held for one year maximum, and tohave another President, but not the same person as formerly held the position, thereafter re-elected by the sameCouncil. These same two colonial councils were to be subservient to the “full authority” of the Kings’s councilin England.97The King, through his English Council, not only requested, but required that the members of the colonies”with all diligence, care and respect do provide that the true word of God and Christian faith be preached,planted and used, not only within every of the several said colonies and plantations but also as much as theymay amongst the savage people which do or shall adjoin us to them or border upon them, according to thedoctrine, rights and religion now professed and established within our realm of England”.Laws, criminal and civilCriminalAll criminal offences or offences against the State or the King, were tried, as has been said before, underAdmiralty Law.Those offences of tumults, rebellions, conspiracies, mutiny and sedition which “may be dangerous to theestate there” (the degree of “dangerousness” being decided by the local Council of authority), and murder,manslaughter, rape, incest and adultery were all punishable by death, and, except on the case of manslaughter,the convict was not to be allowed “the benefit of the clergy”.All cases were to be tried by the Council of authority before a jury of twelve honest and indifferent personswho were to either convict or acquit the accused. Should the accused confess to the crime, or remain mute inanswer to his accusers, then he would be convicted as if the jury had deliberated and convicted him.The Colonial Councils also had the sole power of sentencing the convicted to death, but the ability of grantingpardon to the convict was reserved solely by the King.Where a criminal was suspected of having committed an offence outside the boundaries of the colony could bebrought back to the colony for trial.Should any member of the colonies be kidnapped and removed from any of the colonies by an outsider, thenthe kidnapper, should he or they be caught, were to be imprisoned “until he (or they) shall fully andthoroughlyreform himself. Should this miraculous reformation not take place, then the malcontent(s) were to bespeedily exported to England where he or they would (presumably) be suitably punished at the King’spleasure.

Page 117

Christopher: Pandora’s Box

CivilAny civil complaints registered by the members of either colony were to be taken care of by the respectiveColonial Councils “as near to the Common Laws of England and the equity thereof as may be”, and the localCouncil “shall have power and authority…to hear and determine all and every other wrongs, trespass, offencesand misdemeanors whatsoever…upon accusation of any person and proof thereof made by sufficient witnessupon oath: and the Councils were granted the authority to punish the offenders “by reasonable corporalpunishment and imprisonment or else by a convenient fine, awarding damages, or other satisfaction to theparty aggrieved”,