Pandemic and Vaccines Used as Justifications for a “Global Coup”

Friday, February 18, 2022

Lucas Leiroz, researcher in Social Sciences at the Rural Federal University of Rio de Janeiro; geopolitical consultant.

In recent weeks, the world has been paying attention to the major political crisis affecting Canadian society. The prolongation of the protests and the strengthening of the movement against the vaccination passport organized by the truckers has been treated by western media agencies as yet another episode of “anti-scientific rebellion”, which is an extremely fallacious speech, seeking to defame the protesters rather than analyzing the issue in depth. In fact, as the restrictive measures advance in parallel with vaccination, it becomes increasingly clear that there is a great globalist agenda expanding with this process, not being a mere matter of “science x pseudoscience”.

Since the beginning of the pandemic, a series of agendas have been put under discussion by several relevant groups in international society. In 2020, a great debate arose about what would be best way to contain the spread of the virus. The globalists believed that it was proper time to take international cooperation to the extreme and tried to advance agendas in defense of measures of universal aspect. On the other hand, political groups more concerned with national interests prioritized isolationist measures, blaming globalization for the global health crisis.

With the emergence of vaccination, the situation of global polarization continued. Regardless of the effectiveness of vaccines to guarantee immunization, a series of problems appeared with the beginning of vaccination campaigns. First, there is an extremely ideological and irrational debate about which vaccines can be taken and which cannot. In the US and EU, vaccines from non-aligned countries are not allowed, for example, despite their proven effectiveness. There is an institutional boycott in Western liberal democracies against Russian, Chinese and Cuban vaccines, while the use of vaccines produced by large American and European pharmaceutical companies is practically mandatory, with various sanctions curtailing the civil rights of the unvaccinated part of the population.

It would be naive to think that the choice of Western countries for vaccines produced by the Big Pharma is due exclusively to a concern with public health. There are economic, political and geopolitical interests involved in this matter. In the way the situation is developing, there seems to be a simultaneous interest in vaccinating as many people as possible and constantly postponing the return to normality – or, in other words, instituting the “new normal”, perpetuating the restrictive sanitary measures. In countries that use sovereign-produced vaccines, such as Russia and China, the advance of vaccination coincides with the gradual return to normality, while in the West, on the other hand, more and more people are vaccinated while simultaneously curtailing freedoms even more day by day.

This situation indicates that there is a communion of interests between economic, political, and ideological groups in the current global status quo. The pandemic brought with it a new horizon of possibilities for some of the main contemporary global agendas. For example, on the environmental issue, the results of a world with less industry, a slow economy and more people indoors were considered ecologically positive. The agenda of the so-called “green capitalism” has been significantly advanced, aiming to use modern technologies to reduce contemporary levels of production as much as possible, achieving an ecologically “healthier” world. A world with more people indoors and less industrial production would therefore be a “better” world. But, at the same time, it is necessary to vaccinate people, as Big Pharma plays an important role in the pandemic scenario and the interests of companies in this sector need to be met.

In theory, an immunized person does not have his health threatened by contact with non-vaccinated, considering that he is protected by the vaccine – and speeches against this inevitably raise suspicion about the effectiveness of the immunizers that are being used. However, for this whole global project of “new – and green – capitalism” to really be implemented, it is necessary that the population be “trained”, “indoctrinated” and “educated”, even if by coercive means. So, governments, instead of simply offering vaccines, choose to punish those who decide not to take vaccines, curtailing civil rights.

The situation is not being well accepted. For more than a year, protests have been widespread around the world. The so-called “antivax” groups claim their right not to take immunizers, making use of individual freedoms, but, as a consequence, they are fought by the official forces of liberal democracies. In any other situation, refusing to take a vaccine would not cause any scandal. It is common for people to abandon treatments for diseases, for example, and this should be the same with vaccine – but there are other interests in dispute now.

There is currently a union of interests between liberal governments, Big Pharma and Big Tech (considering that the more people stay at home, the more they use technologies), in which all parties agree to build a “greener” world order in the name of their profits and agendas. The Canadian economist Michel Chossudovsky has called these attempts to build a new world order a “global coup d’état”. This “global coup” is related to the thesis of a “Great Reset”, proposed by the World Economic Forum as a way to achieve modern and ecological capitalism, “resetting” the world order.

Obviously, not everything is easily accepted by the people. The anti-vaccine protests that were taking place all over the world have now reached their peak, with the truckers in Canada. The so-called “freedom convoy” had as its initial objective only to claim the right of drivers to work around the country without a vaccination passport, but police violence and popular dissatisfaction contributed to the increase in demonstrations, which now take over the main cities of the country, forcing the president to an emergency evacuation.

Now, the Freedom Convoy is growing day by day and has already spread outside of Canada, with protests also taking place in the US. This scenario only tends to escalate: representatives of the traditional working classes will certainly become more and more dissatisfied with the globalist green capitalism agenda, generating conflicts and social crises around the world.

Finally, the scenario is still one in which governments are called upon to act sovereignly. Adhering to the green capitalism project basically consists of capitulating to a global coup d’état that will serve the interests of technological and pharmaceutical corporations. These companies simply ask the countries to stop their industrial programs and in return give a promise of “reset” and “green future”. The governments that are part of the project have simply abdicated their strategic purposes in the name of the Davos Forum.

It is necessary that the debate that emerged at the beginning of the pandemic be commented once again and that sovereign measures be used in order to establish vaccination campaigns whose purpose is really to guarantee public health, not masking globalist agendas.

Source: InfoBrics