The Globalists’ Plan for Ukraine up to 2024

10 months ago

The new year 2020 opens another stage of Ukraine’s transformation from an economically and socially developed state to a backward and depressed territory. So it turned out that the country became an ideal experimental model for working out the technology of downshifting (simply put – reducing) of the European people to a state of primitive on the verge of savagery.

Let’s try in a thesis format to mention the main points of this experiment, what it will lead to, and what an ordinary person in these conditions should do.

Who reduces Ukraine

Simply put, Ukraine is being destroyed by influential international forces called globalists or mondialists, associated with international speculative financial capital, supranational political-economic organisations (IMF, World Bank, WTO, partly the United Nations, etc.), and network non-governmental organisations, symbolically called Soros funds (although there are many structures sponsored by other individuals or organisations among them).

The goal of globalists is to build a global community governed from a single center. To do this, they need to destroy strong nation-states, such as Russia. It is precisely as part of historical Russia that globalists perceive Ukraine. They successfully solve the problems of separating Ukraine from Russia, pitting countries against each other, and the preventive destruction of Ukraine. The latter is in the event of Russia’s return to its territories, to force it to spend super-strength and enormous resources to rebuild the destroyed country.

Ukrainian oligarchs and first-tier politicians involved in downshifting processes are only agents of globalists, and nationalists and “patriots” are lower-level agents or simply expendable material.

The colonial administration in the reign of Vladimir Zelensky became pupils of Soros funds. The cohort of Soros agents was secretly raised in Ukraine for more than 20 years and only now has it received the real levers of power in the country. Its representatives took key positions in the government, supervisory boards and boards of state monopolies, in the leadership of the security forces (not all yet), and in the regional authorities.

How Ukraine is reduced

The main thing is that the industrial sector of the economy is being destroyed. In 2015, the second year after the coup d’état, the country’s GDP fell by half. Then there was some recovery growth, but in many ways not because of industry. In 2019, after Vladimir Zelensky came to the post of President, a sharp decline in industrial production began again, which is not a coincidence, but a pattern.

READ:  Mediation Efforts of the Persian Gulf Countries in Resolving the Conflict Between Russia and Ukraine

The government plans to privatise the remains of the state economy, eliminate state-owned enterprises, and sell agricultural land to transnational corporations. Their goal is an agricultural country with 15-20 million people. From this number, 3-4 million (with families) work in agriculture, the rest in the spheres of service and management, transport, infrastructure, and the remnants of industry and energy in cities.

The excess population is strongly squeezed out of the country by the method of the stick (mass cuts) and carrot (creation of more favourable conditions for gastarbeiters).

The remaining profitable pieces of the economy (finance, partly transport, including the gas transit system, and in the near future – energy) will be given to the foreign curators of Ukraine’s reduction. Even the most loyal local oligarchs will receive only crumbs, incomparable with what they had before 2014.

Of course, the social sphere (education, medicine, pension, and social security) will become increasingly inhuman. The state will continue to waive social obligations. Ideally, until pensions, benefits, free medicine, and education are completely abolished.

Much of this transformation should be carried out during Vladimir Zelensky’s presidency. Of course, not everything will be done under Zelensky, but they will do a lot.

So far, the success and scope of globalist transformation in Ukraine has caused people of goodwill not only to become indignant, but also involuntary respect for the brilliant social architects. But if the success of certain social processes had been pre-determined and obvious, there would have been no wars and no revolutions.

On the threshold of World War III

The whole world is entering a stage of acute crisis of capitalism and transformation. Unresolved global contradictions are growing between the First and Third Worlds, the West and Russia, the United States and the People’s Republic of China.

Not everything is smooth in the West itself. There is a growing conflict between globalists and their allied financial oligarchy and national imperialists in association with producing transnational corporations. This conflict is also unresolved, which is reflected in the irreconcilable struggle between US President Donald Trump’s supporters and opponents. There has been no such level of contradiction in the political elite of the United States since the Civil War of the North and South of 1861-1865.

In Europe, conflicts are growing between right-wing conservatives and ultraliberals-multiculturalists. And between the indigenous population of old Europe and millions of emigrants from Asia and Africa.

READ:  Why Were We Left With No Choice

All of these contradictions are unresolved within the framework of the West’s generally accepted ultra-liberal ideological discourse and monetary approach to the economy. The events of the last decade (since the financial crisis of 2008-2009) show that any attempt to resolve economic and military-political crises at best leads to their postponement and freezing. And then the problems come back with even more strength.

Since the peace path has failed, it is logical to assume that contradictions and crises can only be resolved by military means. More precisely, the war itself will not solve anything – but the winners will be able to impose on the defeated their will and their mechanisms for a new world order.

In fact, World War III is already under way, and the strongest powers are only held back from fully joining it by the fear of mutual damage. But the US, Russia, and, to a lesser extent, China and the EU are all involved in local armed conflicts. Conflicts in Syria and earlier in Libya, Iraq and Afghanistan, minor conflicts in Africa are typical small imperialist wars, precursors of a World War. The situation was the same before World War I (Anglo-Boer, Russian-Japanese, Balkan Wars) and World War II (Italo-Ethiopian, civil in Spain, Soviet-Finnish, etc.) wars.

It is very possible that the mass use of armies of great powers against each other will not happen. But military conflicts involving proxy armies, allies, and mercenaries must inevitably intensify. Political interference by the great powers in the internal affairs of the target countries should also increase. The pattern here is: the more intense the global conflict will be – the shorter it will be in time. It is obvious that its modern, rather sluggish course will soon become increasingly tiresome – and influential forces will opt to escalate.

Where here lies Ukraine

The conflict in Ukraine can only be ended within the framework of a global confrontation. I.e., after one of either Russia or the US acknowledges its defeat on the Ukrainian battlefield. Meanwhile, the Russian Federation does not give up what it holds here for itself, and the United States is not ready for terms of peace acceptable for Russia, demanding its unconditional surrender. But before that, the US must deal with its internal conflict and work out a consolidated position in relation to Ukraine.

READ:  Ukrainian Soldier Opens Fire on a Bus, Killing and Wounding Civillians

And now that there is a low-intensity conflict in the east of the country, Soros agents have carte blanche to pursue their cannibalistic and destructive socio-economic policies. It is theoretically clear that they will also have complete freedom of action if Donbass is surrendered on American terms. Alternatively, in the event of Trump’s election victory, it is possible that Russia will gain greater freedom of action in Ukraine. And the question in such a case will be rather if it will want to use it or focus on the problem of 2024 (transfer of power from Vladimir Putin to a successor).

But no matter which way things go, radical change in Ukraine before the end of Zelensky’s presidency is unlikely. And it will continue on the course planned by Soros. Unless there are uncontrolled and unexpected events and peace.

What should the layperson do

The Ukrainian people, for the most part, turned out to be malleable material for a social experiment: gullible, politically immature, morally unstable, falling for false promises, and bearing great internal potential for hostility. However, people need to survive somehow.

After 2014 the layperson is not able to influence political events at all. The only tool available to them – participation in elections – is completely under the control of the architects of Ukraine’s collapse. This is confirmed by the election of Zelensky, who in fact turned out to be not the opposite of Petro Poroshenko (as the citizen imagined), but his natural continuation and development to a higher level.

Moreover, under the current circumstances, even political parties have limited opportunities to influence Ukraine’s domestic policies. Any opposition forced to play by established rules can be eliminated by an established regime that changes those rules as it is convenient to it. The fact that there are still some opposition parties and media in the country is explained only by the insufficient strength of the regime so far.

So for the citizen it is best to focus on personal survival, as well as establishing social ties. And finding the right answers to the questions of what’s going on and who’s to blame. This is if we do not take into account the option of leaving the country.

---

Igor Georgiev