New York Times: End Prohibition, Again

they don’t have jurisdiction to prosecute.. the people are not PARTIES to the constitution nor are we signatories!
Padelford, Fay & Co., vs. Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520
“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it.”

The authority for the statutes comes from the constitution..
There is no federal government, there are not states, counties or cities! THEY ARE ALL PRIVATE FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS MASQUERADING AS GOVERNMENT!
Did you take an OATH and swear to be obligated to the constitution and statutes??

What is the PROOF that the constitution applies to someone within a geographic area?? As stated earlier, the alleged government are CORPORATIONS and a LIVING BEING CANNOT EXIST WITHIN A FICTION! The GROUND is not the CORPORATE STATE!

An indictment is not proof of jurisdiction! A ticket is not proof of jurisdiction! They are nothing more than ALLEGATIONS! and an allegation does NOT establish JURISDICTION!

We are presumed to be innocent of ALL ELEMENTS OF A CRIME! Jurisdiction is an integral element of an alleged crime! Since we are presumed to be INNOCENT of ALL elements of an alleged crime, are we not also PRESUMED INNOCENT OF JURISDICTION!?!?!

WHEN A JUDGE BELIEVES/PRESUMES THAT HE HAS JURISDICTION OVER EVERYONE THAT APPEARS BEFORE HIM “without any proof”
That is “under their own rules” a due process violation and FRAUD!

Vlandis v. Kline, 412 US 441 – irreversible and irrebuttable statutory presumption is a due process violation Supreme Court

Heiner v. Donnan,285 U. S. 312 conclusive presumption
holding that this irrefutable assumption was so arbitrary and unreasonable as to deprive the of due process. Court stated that it had “held more than once that a statute creating a presumption which operates to deny a fair opportunity to rebut it violates the due process.

Likewise, in Stanley v. Illinois, 405 U. S. 645 (1972), the Court struck down, as violative of the Due Process Clause, Illinois’ irrebuttable statutory presumption.

DEMAND THEY PROVE JURISDICTION ON THE RECORD! “fyi, they can’t prove it”
U.S. Supreme Court The Clara, 102 U.S. 200 (1880) The Clara 102 U.S. 200
the maxim applies, quod non apparet non est. The fact not appearing is presumed not to exist.”

“If you´ve relied on prior decisions of the Supreme Court you have a perfect defense for willfulness.”
U.S. v. Bishop, 412 U.S. 346

“The law requires proof of jurisdiction to appear on the record of the administrative agency and all administrative proceedings.”
Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. S. 533

Where there is no jurisdiction over the subject matter, there is, as well, no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction. [John J. Joyce v. United States of America, 474 F.2d 215, 219] Joyce v. U.S., 474 F.2d 215, 219 (C.A.3 (Pa.), 1973)

“Court must prove on the record, all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.” Latana v. Hopper, 102 F. 2d 188; Chicago v. New York, 37 F Supp. 150.

“The law provides that once State and or Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be proven.” Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980).

There is no discretion to ignore that lack of jurisdiction.” Joyce v. US, 474 F2d 215

“A court has no jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction, for a basic issue in any case before a tribunal is its power to act, and a court must have the authority to decide that question in the first instance.” Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los Angeles, 171 P2d 8; 331 US 549, 91 L. ed. 1666, 67 S.Ct. 1409.

“Sovereign immunity does not apply where (as here) government is a lawbreaker
or jurisdiction is the issue.”
Arthur v. Fry, 300 F.Supp. 622

These are their laws and court decisions, USE THEM !!!