Here’s a Glaring Example of a CIA Agent/Crisis Actor Posing as a Mockingbird Media Network Anchor +Videos

The Liberty Eagle

During Sen. Ron Johnson’s appearance on ‘Meet the Press’ Sunday, host Chuck Todd just about lost it when the Wisconsin senator pushed back on his line of questioning by bringing up texts between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

In the lead-up to Johnson’s response (which was edited out of the clip tweeted by ‘Meet the Press’), Johnson told Todd that he should ask John Brennan (who was also on Sunday’s show) what Peter Strzok meant with his “leaking like mad” text to Lisa Page.

This apparently upset Todd because he immediately started interrupting, raising his voice and chiding Johnson for bringing a “Fox News conspiracy” to his show.

If you watch the entire exchange, Johnson did answer the specific question Todd asked while putting his narrative to bed. Nevertheless, the Left descended into character assassination. Later on, Todd told John Brennan that Sen. Johnson was “triggered” by the discussion.

It was quite apparent that someone on the show was triggered, but it wasn’t Sen. Johnson. Please remember to like, comment and subscribe to our channel. Hit the notification bell to never miss when we upload a new video.

Democratmedia do not like questions about the Democrats to be asked, only party approved propaganda is alowed to be disseminated by ther agitprop machine that is the legacy media.

Democrats have created such a poisonous climate that it is imperative to educate people of their evils.

Chuck Todd us a joke and a goof and NBC conspiracy hack.

German Journalist Blows Whistle on How the CIA Controls the Media

Submitted by Michael Krieger via Liberty Blitzkrieg blog, ZeroHege

“I was bribed by billionaires, I was bribed by the Americans to report…not exactly the truth.”

- Udo Ulfkotte, a former editor of one of Germany’s main daily publications, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung

Some readers will see this and immediately dismiss it as Russian propaganda since the interview appeared on RT. This would be a serious mistake.

Whether you want to admit it or not, CIA control of the media in the U.S. and abroad is not conspiracy theory, it is conspiracy fact.

Carl Bernstein, who is best known for his reporting on Watergate, penned a 25,000 word article in Rolling Stone after spending six months looking at the relationship of the CIA and the press during the Cold War years. Below is an excerpt, but you can read the entire thing here.

In 1953, Joseph Alsop, then one of America’s leading syndicated columnists, went to the Philippines to cover an election. He did not go because he was asked to do so by his syndicate. He did not go because he was asked to do so by the newspapers that printed his column. He went at the request of the CIA.

Alsop is one of more than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty?five years have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. Some of these journalists’ relationships with the Agency were tacit; some were explicit. There was cooperation, accommodation and overlap. Journalists provided a full range of clandestine services—from simple intelligence gathering to serving as go?betweens with spies in Communist countries.

Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without?portfolio for their country. Most were less exalted: foreign correspondents who found that their association with the Agency helped their work; stringers and freelancers who were as interested in the derring?do of the spy business as in filing articles; and, the smallest category, full?time CIA employees masquerading as journalists abroad.

In many instances, CIA documents show, journalists were engaged to perform tasks for the CIA with the consent of the managements of America’s leading news organizations.

Like any good intelligence agency, the CIA learned from its mistakes upon being exposed, and has since adjusted tactics. This is where the concept of “non-official cover” comes into play. The term was recently described by German journalist Udo Ulfkotte, in a blistering RT interview. Mr. Ulfkotte was previously a respected journalist for one of Germany’s main dailies, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ), so he is no small fry.

“Non-official cover” occurs when a journalist is essentially working for the CIA, but it’s not in an official capacity. This allows both parties to reap the rewards of the partnership, while at the same time giving both sides plausible deniability. The CIA will find young journalists and mentor them. Suddenly doors will open up, rewards will be given, and before you know it, you owe your entire career to them. That’s essentially how it works. But don’t take it from me…

If this peaked your curiosity, read about Operation Mockingbird.

Also see my post: How Hollywood Became “Propagandist in Chief” by John Pilger