The US Military Fears War With Syria

Over 90% of the American people do not want Obama to attack Syria. The top military leadership in this country has also advised against this fool’s errand. 

The following people, pictured below, and the criminal bankers that they represent, are the only ones that are itching for a fight with Syria. These are the faces of the people who will be the world’s next war criminals.

On Sunday, Secretary of State John Kerry said the U.S. received new physical evidence in the form of blood and hair samples that show sarin gaswas used in the August 21 attack. To Mr. Kerry, I would say that nobody is disputing the use of sarin gas in Damascus. What is at issue is who perpetrated that attacks, al-Qaeda or Assad? Since Assad had nothing to gain from the use of the chemical agents except to invite Western intervention, the perpetrator was undoubtedly the CIA backed al-Qaeda.

The fact that Secretary of State, John Kerry,  said the U.S. must respond because its credibility on the line. Really, Mr. Kerry, we have to attack Syria, kill tens of thousands of innocent civilians all because your administration’s credibility is on the line? Where do reckless statements, such as these, cross over the line from abject stupidity and enter the realm of casting this administration as a regime which commits war crimes against the helpless? If this administration attacks the innocent people in Syria, that is precisely what the responsible people will be, war criminals.

Knowing that an unwarranted American military attack is inevitable, military officials have stated that Assad has moved assets such as military helicopters, tanks as well as heavy artillery pieces around the country, thus forcing the U.S. to reconfigure the use of cruise missiles and air strikes over a wider range of territory. Further, this does not totally mitigate the nearly 700 SCUD missiles that Assad has pointed at Israel. If Syria is attacked, it is clear that Israel will also be attacked and this when events could quickly spin out of control.

Therefore, if Obama sticks with targeting a well-defined set of  military and intelligence assets, then the wider dispersal range of the cruise-missile strikes will kill untold number of civilians.  

Since military officials have told Obama that he could adjust his attack strategy  to Assad’s dispersal of weapons by expanding the number of strikes to hit more targets, this increases the likelihood that Hamas will become involved as agents of Assad. Will they be given chemical weapons? Will they carry out suicide attacks? Subsequently, there is a hidden cost to pay for Obama to widening the war. A wider dispersal of  American cruise missiles will undoubtedly cause collateral damage, thus greatly increasing the number of civilian casualties. This fact, alone, exposes the Obama deception for what it truly is because no rational leader would avenge Syrian civilian casualties caused by a sarin gas attack by killing tens of thousands of more Syrians. It is so clear that taking out Assad is a means to an end which is to use Syria as a launching pad from which to conduct a regime change in Iran and thus, save the almighty Petrodollar.

Read More Here