Put the Last Nail in the COVID-19 Coffin

 

Let’s put an end to the pandemic charade.

The United States Supreme Court has decided to hold an accelerated hearing on two of Biden’s four vaccine mandates , with the oral arguments scheduled for Saturday, January 7, 2022. The Supreme Court is due to review the Sixth District Court decision confirming OSHA mandates for private employers after the Fifth District Court unanimously ruled OSHA did not have jurisdiction over seasonal flu and issued a statewide injunction. The court will also review the “CMS Mandate,” which requires healthcare workers who work for approved Medicaid and Medicare providers to be vaccinated as well.Both the eighth and fifth federal appeals courts have banned the CMS mandate making it unenforceable in 25 states. At the time of this writing, the Court will not consider any injunctions against the “federal contractor” mandate that has been halted by federal judges in Georgia and Florida .

I hope the readers of this article will be convinced that whatever the Supreme Court rules, it will be a victory for those who do not want to participate in government-enforced drug experiments.

If the court follows the trend of Federalist Society judges and rules against compulsory vaccination, it would be a victory because it would put an end to the bogus pandemic and so-called compulsory vaccination, which is actually a massive medical experiment against consent after clarification and violates the Nuremberg Code. However, when the court is intimidated by the administrative rule of law and takes another absurd political decision and upholds the vaccination mandate, as it did in the last health care mandate case – the Obamacare mandate decision- that would be an even bigger victory. It will be an even bigger victory because it will make the already very strong vaccination opposition even stronger. The current gap between employers and the government will only widen and become more insurmountable if the Supreme Court upholds the decision. The more employers decide against this federal regulation, the faster the federal government will lose credibility, and then it will also lose its authority and legitimacy.

Smart employers, including Boeing and Southwest Airlines , got the memoalready received and know how to protect their employees while complying with ALL federal laws, not just vaccine regulations. They do this by encouraging their employees to request exemptions from the compulsory vaccination. They grant any request with no questions asked. That is compliant with the law. If the Supreme Court upholds the rules, this strategy will continue to work because it places an intolerable administrative burden on federal agencies to enforce. When OSHA / CMS attempt to attack an employer who is generous in granting exemption requests, they are in an impossible position to convict an employer for accepting an employee’s lawful exemption request based on their sincere, has accepted subjective beliefs. Applications for exemption therefore lead to a battle that federal agencies cannot win – in the minds of workers. If the Supreme Court upholds the bureaucracy’s mandates, OSHA / CMS will face wasting its limited resources in an unprofitable war over whether over 80 million people really believe what they put in their requests for exemption.

The game is over.

For interested workers, please see the latest Vaccine 3.0 Exemption Notice below.

The administrative rule of law appears as Obermotz
As two very isolated judges from the Sixth Judicial District have now made clear, the pandemic narrative was never about health or safety. It was always about using psychological tricks or bullying to enforce compliance with vaccination regulations. The Sixth Circuit’s decision gives OSHA the green light to force private employers (under threat of fines) to force their employees into a global drug experiment that violates the principles of informed consent of the Nuremberg Code. OSHA’s Urgent Regulation seeks to force employers to unnecessarily harm the lives of their unvaccinated employees by threatening them with dismissal, weekly tests, and masks that do not prevent the spread of pathogens and whose sole purpose is to stigmatize employees, who do not adhere to the regulations.

If you’re a private employer or Medicaid / Medicare service provider and you’ve been through the pandemic psyop, it’s time to wake up.

Here is the decision of the Sixth Judicial District in plain language:

(1) OSHA has and always has jurisdiction over seasonal flu, although a court of equal rank, the Fifth Circuit, unanimously decided a few weeks ago that OSHA never had and never will have jurisdiction over seasonal flu;

(2) Seasonal Flu 2020 (also known as “Covid”) is a deadly, dangerous, and scary disease and we will repeat the words fatal, dangerous and scary until you accept it is true and stop ask for relevant risk information such as B. Scientifically determined blood test-verified Infection and Mortality Rates (IFR) showing greater than 99.83% survival in all but those over 70, in multiple comorbidities, and in extremely isolated cohorts ; and

(3) Dear serfs and employers of serfs, this decision makes it clear to you that we live in an administrative state in which the federal authority has the say, determines what is reality, what is risky and what is not, and has the power and authority Forcing over 80 million innocent people to subject themselves to a drug experiment without a safety net against their will and sound judgment.

If you – like me – are wondering how an equal federal district court can “override” another equal federal district court after the first court has issued a state-wide order and found that the OSHA case has very little chance of success, then of course there is a lawthat allows such a thing. The federal bureaucracy has made sure of that. The federal bureaucracy invoked the law and a “lottery” was held somewhere. Price Waterhouse did not review this lottery. Predictably, neither the mandated 8th Circuit nor the 5th Circuit won the lottery. The lottery winner, the Sixth Circuit, the judicial district assigned to Judge Kavanaugh, then put a vote on whether the whole court should hear the case en banc or whether it should be decided by a panel of three judges. The vote was 8-8 and a majority was required to go en banc. The case was decided by a panel of three judges, and the decision was nevertheless 2: 1 in favor of the mandates, with a violent vote against. To date, 25 federal judges have commented on the mandates. 20 spoke out against the mandates and only 5 supported them. It is great luck for the administrative constitutional state that two isolated friendly judges belonged to the Sixth Federal Court of Appeal, which won the lottery …

When even federal judges don’t seem to get their way, it seems possible that they are being pressured by some hideous bureaucratic force . The Obamacare decision is the best example of the powerlessness of federal judges against the federal bureaucracy.

The main phrase in the Sixth Judicial District decision:

But the ultimate decision as to which level of risk represents a “serious hazard” is a “political consideration that is primarily a matter for the authority”.

You read that right. The risk is not determined by facts, namely by a statistically proven survival rate of more than 99.83 percent for everyone under the age of 70 . Two lonely judges from the Sixth Judicial District have temporarily turned their opposition to vaccination and declared that the federal bureaucracy may ignore facts and determine what is risky for over 80 million private employees in the context of “politics”. The two judges from the Sixth Jurisdiction who made this decision are Jane Stranch and Julia Gibbons . The dissenting opinion was written by Joan Larsen .

But don’t worry.

Accurate information, risk, uncertainty and death
The most valuable resource is not gold or silver or diamonds or rubies. It’s accurate information. And accurate risk information is the most valuable of all accurate information. The lack of accurate risk information about vaccines (“shot”) and their active disguise has made the natives uneasy. The reptilian mind hates silence and hates uncertainty. He demands revenge, and usually gets it when the truth finally comes to light.

Before the FDA was co-opted by the pharmaceutical industry, drug approval by the agency typically took years. This is because it takes time and careful observation to gather accurate risk information about new, experimental drugs. That changed when federal law was changed in 1992 to require pharmaceutical companies to pay “user fees” for FDA approval. Though touted as a taxpayer relief bill, it was actually a “Who Pays” bill that resulted in the FDA and other federal agencies becoming the agents of Big Pharma. Today, over 50 percent of the FDA’s budget comes from user fees. Only when the public realizes that “FDA Approved” really means “Pfizer bribed the FDA and forced it to approve” will they understand why and how seasonal flu has been turned into a dangerous pandemic, mass and not “Vaccinations” wanted to end.

The Covid fear and Donald J. Chumps implementation ordinance of September 19, 2019 complete the regulatory collection. Considering Trump accepted a $ 1 million donation / bribe from Pfizer when he was inaugurated, you can understand why he was able to sign the 2019 Executive Order declaring war on seasonal flu. Trump’s implementation regulation for 2019 is the hour of birth of the “Emergency Use Authorization”, which in reality means fast, mass human experiments without a safety net. “Operation Warp Speed,” as Trump called it, was a joint big pharma and federal agency operation, backed by a coalition of big media, big data, and big health, employing enormous government and private resources (through Trump’s executive order of 2019with the aim of turning the normal seasonal flu, with its very real and very negligible risk (a proven survival rate of 99.83%), into a “pandemic” to scare people into a massive medical experiment without being able to fully assess the risk beforehand. If you doubt that, ask yourself why even the federal government admits that seasonal flu has virtually disappeared in 2020 while Covid “cases” are rising parabolically. The answer is that Trump’s 2019 executive order was the pun hocus-pocus that equated seasonal flu = pandemicmade possible. The fear evoked by the word “pandemic” was effective in eliminating the herd’s critical thinking about the normal and very real dangers of seasonal flu.

The exact risk for 2020 seasonal flu (also known as Covid-19) is greater than 99.83 percent survival for those under the age of 70. The exact risk information for the vaccinations is unknown and may not be known for many years, although there is a lot of information to suggest that they are very dangerous.

With this in mind, the Sixth Judicial District decision ignores the fact that any employer who mandates vaccination (the deadline for compliance has been brought up to February so the Supreme Court can be expected to make a decision before then) , violates the principle of informed consent. Consent with knowledge of the facts assumes that one is able to collect and compile precise risk information in order to be able to make an informed risk decision. If not enough time has passed or sufficient data has not been collected, accurate risk information cannot be obtained and informed consent is therefore impossible. Any employer who blindly follows the Sixth Judicial DistrictThe Nuremberg Codex anchored informed consent to violate. The provisions of the Nuremberg Code of informed consent are codified in US law in 45 CFR 46.116 . All federal agencies that conduct human health experiments, including OSHA and CMS, must first get informed consent.

In the present case, however, OSHA and CMS will not comply with 45 CFR 46.116. OSHA and CMS can credibly claim that they are not conducting experiments on humans. You know “the story”. You are responding to a health emergency caused by a “pandemic”; a pandemic that has no serious adverse effects on 99.83 percent of the population. The fact is, these federal agencies aren’t actually doing an experiment. They force employers to conduct the experiment . Smart employers have to see through this. Should the compulsory vaccination lead to a future eugenic extermination, which many sober doctors fear, or even if the vaccinations cause only a small number of serious injuries, which is supported by current anecdotal information, plaintiff creative attorneys will not want to cash in with the legally immune OSHA or Pfizer, but rather from employers who Have accepted unlawful promises by the government and believed that waiver of liability or “following instructions” was a valid defense for sacrificing their employees on the altar of Big Pharma. The defense “on instruction” did not work in the first Nuremberg trials , and it will not work here either after all the facts about the pandemic charade are known.

Should the Supreme Court uphold the Sixth District Judgment, it would be unwise for employers to rely on claims that immunity from liability extends to employers. This is because both the OSHA-ETS and the “provisional regulation” of the CMS function like a fast-track administrative regulation. This means that the “Provisional” rule will take effect immediately, and at the same time there will be a six-month “Notice and Comment” period during which OSHA can assess the effectiveness and appropriateness of the Provisional rule. In the case of compulsory vaccination, imprudent employers will require their employees to undergo the vaccination drug experiment (and their employees are aware of health risks, including death and serious injury) while providing “feedback” to OSHA for notice and comment. So it is entirely possible that after six months of vaccinating X million people and injuring or killing Y million, OSHA and CMS will simply withdraw the interim regulations because of the “risk”. Of course, the “risk” will then become “reality” and the potential culling will be irreversible. The vaccinated are then the subjects of the mass experiment. simply withdraw the provisional rules because of the “risk”. Of course, the “risk” will then become “reality” and the potential culling will be irreversible. The vaccinated are then the subjects of the mass experiment. simply withdraw the provisional rules because of the “risk”. Of course, the “risk” will then become “reality” and the potential culling will be irreversible. The vaccinated are then the subjects of the mass experiment.

Even if federal authorities can withdraw the temporary rules on mass medical tests after the disclosure and comment deadline has expired, the injuries and potential liability will remain. OSHA / CMS and the pharmaceutical companies won’t have to take the risk. That’s because they’re not doing the experiment. You are responding to a “pandemic” emergency in case you have forgotten the story. Any employer who improperly rejects an application for time off from an employee who is later injured or killed in this medical experiment will be exposed. When the eugenics enthusiast SCOTUS If the verdict is confirmed, this bureaucratic outlier tactic is entirely possible.

There is ample, credible, and accurate risk data that shows: (1) the risk of contracting seasonal flu, whether referred to as “Covid” or “pandemic” or “death virus”, is negligible – the survival rate is around over 99.83 percent for everyone under the age of 70 and in relatively good health; (2) the anecdotal vaccination risk is real and significant and includes death from heart attack, myocarditis (heart injury), blood clotting, Guillain-Barre syndrome (paralysis), and miscarriage; and (3) the currently unknown and nascent future vaccination risk – the vaccination uncertainty – is potentially catastrophic and could include a variety of autoimmune diseases and the ultimate breakdown of the immune system. Employers who require their workers to do so are much more exposed to the risky and uncertain negative effects of vaccination than the government or pharmaceutical companies. If vaccinations lead to something like AIDS on a larger scale , as some doctors have predicted, waivers of liability and “following instructions” will not be an effective defense. That did not work for the Nazi executors of the medical experiments at the last Nuremberg trials either .

The way out
The good news for employers is that, unlike the Obamacare mandate, the vaccination requirement has a built-in fallback option. Workers have the legal and moral right to apply for a vaccination waiver. Employers have the legal and moral right to grant any such request. This battle is therefore much easier to win than Obamacare and does not require any change in law or federal policy. The strategy of “granting any waiver” puts an intolerable enforcement burden on federal agencies trying to force private employers to do the dirty work of the pharmaceutical industry. OSHA and CMS do not have the resources to determine whether 80 million workers are making legitimate requests for exemption.

Letter of Exemption 3.0
The following is the “Vax Exemption Letter 3.0”, hopefully an improvement from “No, thank you” and “Yes, and …” . Maybe the last nail in the Covid coffin. It has a dual and uniform purpose: (1) to obtain leave of absence for the employee and (2) to carefully draw the employers’ attention to the monstrous legal and moral risk that the federal authorities are trying to impose on them.

Dear Madam, dear Sir:

Thank you for suggesting that I get vaccinated. I really appreciate your concern for my health and the health of my colleagues. I am writing this letter in a spirit of collaboration and to minimize the health risk for myself and my colleagues.

And I want to keep my job.

As discussed below, there are currently many unknowns in connection with vaccination [1]. Since we will jointly determine the correct and most risky course of action, I would be grateful for any precise information that you have that contradicts the information in this letter. For your convenience, I have included footnotes at the end of this letter with specific evidence for all of the allegations made in this letter.

If we cannot agree on the facts and how best to protect me and my family if I should be harmed by vaccination, please consider this as my request for concession and release of your claim.

background

On September 19, 2019, President Donald Trump signed an executive order in which he declared for the first time in history that seasonal flu was synonymous with a “pandemic” [2] and in which he also declared for the first time in history that “vaccination is the most effective protection against influenza”. That executive order directed several federal agencies and private companies to develop a comprehensive seasonal flu / pandemic control plan within “120 days” of the order. Exactly 124 days after this order , the first case of Covid was diagnosed in the USA [3]. Since Donald Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order appears to have significantly impacted government treatment and public perception of Seasonal Flu 2020, for the rest of this letter I will refer to Covid-19 as what it was called prior to the 2019 Executive Order would be – the “seasonal flu” [4].

According to Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the m-RNA technology used in vaccination, m-RNA vaccination technology is not a vaccine or a suitable means of treating Covid or any other seasonal flu. See note [1]. Dr. Malone believes the federal government, especially the FDA, is wrong to prescribe vaccination and has failed to conduct a careful and accurate risk-benefit analysis. Dr. Malone believes the federal government is still making vaccination mandatory due to economic bias and regulatory interference. According to Dr. Malone is no longer independent from the FDA due to a 1992 amendment to federal law that requires pharmaceutical companies to pay for drug approval by the FDA, and is no longer independent from the drug companies that regulate them,

While I find this background information very believable, I don’t expect you to accept it. I provide this background information because it is important to me in assessing the risk and uncertainty associated with vaccination, and because I believe that you, as my employer, are providing information on the man-made origins of the “pandemic” should be. You should also be aware that the federal agencies that mandate you to be vaccinated may not be acting in your best interests and their motive is not in the public health interest.

Informed consent and risk

Compulsory vaccination seems to violate many laws and regulations. Most important to me and my family, however, is the Nuremberg International Code [5], which is codified in US federal law under 45 CFR 46.116. The Nuremberg Code is relevant because it requires knowledgeable consent to a medical risk. The Nuremberg Code requires that all persons who undergo drug or medical experiments are fully informed of all known risks. Unless all risks are disclosed prior to the experiment, informed consent will not be possible and the party enforcing the experimental treatment may be responsible for a violation of the informed consent principles.

Given the very short time between the outbreak of the “pandemic” in January 2020, the “vaccination campaigns” in 2021 and now, it is very difficult to assess the overall risk associated with seasonal flu versus the risk of vaccination.

Seasonal flu risk

Stanford professor and statistician Dr. med. John Ioannidis [6] has conducted a credible analysis of the known risk associated with 2020 seasonal flu. In his view, the 2020 flu season was a statistically normal flu season [8] for the vast majority of people (> 99%) , using statistically relevant samples and using serum antibody tests instead of PCR tests [7]. According to Dr. Ioannidis:

In all countries (Figure 3), the median IFR was 0.0027%, 0.014%, 0.031%, 0.082%, 0.27% and 0.59% for ages 0-19, 20-29, 30-39 , 40-49, 50-59 and 60-69 years, using data from 9, 9, 10, 9, 11 and 6 countries, respectively.

This corresponds to a survival rate of 99.83 percent for all people under the age of 70 and in relatively good health. I did not find any data that Dr. Ioannidis’ risk analysis and IFR conclusions for seasonal flu 2020, now known as Covid-19, would be disproved.

Vaccination risk

The actual risk of vaccination, however, is currently not known. There is plenty of still anecdotal evidence to show that the vaccinations caused death, heart attacks, myocarditis (heart injury), Guillain-Barre syndrome (paralysis), and miscarriages. [9] It is impossible to fully assess the exact risk or likelihood of these consequences as there has not been enough time to gather all the facts and perform meaningful statistical analysis. The vaccinations are being introduced as part of an accelerated “Emergency Use Authorization” so that there is little time left for a complete and precise risk assessment.

The tight timeframe has meant that the risks are only discovered during the delivery of the vaccinations. These known risks are not disclosed or communicated to the recipients of the vaccinations due to the EUA regulations. In addition to the known and calculable risks associated with vaccinations, there is also an incalculable uncertainty. Some reputable doctors make credible claims that the m-RNA technology in vaccination causes systemic weakening of the immune system, which ultimately leads to immune breakdown. [10] Whether this is a real risk can only be determined in a few years and is therefore rightly classified as an uncertain risk.

Since the pharmaceutical companies that sell the vaccinations are not liable for undesirable consequences [11] and the federal government is also immune to claims for undesirable consequences [12], there is little incentive for those who order or sell the vaccinations Communicate the known risks or gather information about the unknown and uncertain future risk.

If, like you, I were able to employ hundreds of people and were forced by non-liability government and pharmaceutical companies to force the shot on my employees, I would be concerned about these facts, especially in light of the Nuremberg Code and 45 CFR 46.116. I am writing to you because I am concerned about the risk to you as my employer and I do not want this letter to be used as Exhibit A in any future Nuremberg Code suit against you. “Just following orders” is not a valid defense when you knowingly endanger the life and health of other people. [13]

Authority crisis

I did research and found no clear legal, moral, or other authority to say that mandatory vaccination can be legally effective beyond a very limited subset of federal employees. Existing mandates do not include the Post Office, members of Congress, their staff, or members of the judiciary. [14]

Executive orders, regulations of the authority and decisions of the federal court

My research shows that President Joe Biden signed two executive ordinances on September 9, 2021, specifically relating to executive employees [15] and federal contractors ( “Contractor Mandate” ) [16]. On November 4, 2021, OSHA announced an administrative “provisional emergency standard” ( “OSHA ETS” ) [17] that private employers with more than 100 employees must require their employees to receive the vaccination in order to comply with the OSHA ETS. And on November 5, 2021, the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, another federal agency, issued an administrative regulation that requires employees of Medicaid and Medicare-certified providers to receive shots ( “CMS Mandate”) [18].

On November 6 , the US Fifth District Court of Appeals [19] unanimously ruled that OSHA did not have the authority to prescribe vaccinations and that the OSHA ETS was unlikely to stand up to further judicial review. On November 30, 2021, a federal judge in Louisiana [20] ruled that the CMS mandate for employees of certified Medicaid and Medicare health care providers was unlawful. On December 7, 2021, a federal judge from Georgia [21] invalidated the Federal Contractor Mandate because the federal government has no jurisdiction over private, state contractors. On December 22, 2021 , a federal judge in Florida also overturned the Federal Contractor Mandate. [22]

On December 17, 2021, the Sixth District Court of Appeals overturned the aforementioned Fifth District decision and ruled that OSHA has the legal authority to order mandatory vaccinations [23]. On December 22, 2021 , the United States Supreme Court agreed to review the Sixth Circuit’s decision and also review the CMS’s suspension decisions.

I have brought this story here because, regardless of how the United States Supreme Court ultimately rules, many capable judges firmly believe that vaccination requirements are beyond the powers of the federal government. The serious disagreement, confusion and lack of clear guidance among federal judges reinforce the view that full cleared consent is not possible in these circumstances. If a large percentage of federal judges do not believe that the government has the power to order the vaccinations, then it appears that consenting to them with known medical risks poses a legal risk that many federal judges do not consider legitimate. Since informed consent and the Nuremberg Code require full risk awareness, the disagreement among federal judges only underscores the risk and uncertainty associated with submission to the vaccinations. Given these facts, I personally won’t feel any safer if five or even nine United States Supreme Court justices say that a potentially corrupted federal agency has the power to force you to force me to give me an experimental syringe.

As one of the over 80 million workers who could be harmed or killed if the Supreme Court upholds federal vaccination requirements, I want you to be aware of all of the facts, including this dispute between federal judges which adds to the risk and uncertainty .

An informed consent is impossible under these conditions.

Sincere beliefs

I am very grateful for the vaccination requirements and your vaccine request as it has got me thinking, doing the work in this letter and wondering what I believe in and what not. I have come to the conclusion that it is better to place my fate in the hands of my sovereign Triune God and my Lord Jesus Christ than in the hands of potentially corrupt federal authorities.

Please trust me to believe what is in this letter. In fact, I see it more as a perception of reality than as a “belief”. My position on the compulsory vaccination is based on an epistemological worldview: God is in charge here. I am only doing my part using the brain and critical thinking skills that he has given me. If there are additional laws that align with my worldview, and you believe that those laws require you to work with me, then please obey those laws. That will be beneficial for both of us.

Thank you again for your vaccination application and look forward to working with you to avoid all unnecessary risks and uncertainties related to mandatory vaccination.

Please approve this application for exemption.

Sincerely, you

loyal worker.

Remarks:

According to the inventor of m-RNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, m-RNA vaccination is not a “vaccination” or an appropriate prophylactic treatment for Covid or any other seasonal flu. Dr. Malone explains that the FDA is no longer an independent federal agency due to changes to federal law in 1992 that required drug companies to pay for FDA approval. Dr. Malone believes the FDA is influenced and biased in its decisions by the drug companies that fund it. Watch the interview with Dr. Malone here at: https://evidencenotfear.com/tag/regulatory-capture/ .  

President Donald Trump also accepted a $ 1 million donation from pharmaceutical company Pfizer on the day of his inauguration. https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/health-companies-gave-generously-president-trumps-inauguration/

[2] The first case of Covid in the USA was on January 21, 2020: https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/first-confirmed-case-of-coronavirus-found-in -us-washington-state

[3] Trumps Executive Order 13887, (September 19, 2019): https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2019/09/24/2019-20804/modernizing-influenza-vaccines-in-the-united-states -to-promote-national-security-and-public-health

[4] CDC data shows that seasonal flu practically disappeared in 2020 despite intensified testing: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/season/faq-flu-season-2020-2021.htm See also the graph showing that data on deaths from flu and pneumonia fell vertically immediately after the first reported case of “Covid” in the US: https://rightwirereport.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/ Pneumonia-Chart.jpg

[5]   nuremberg.pdf

[6] https://profiles.stanford.edu/john-ioannidis

[7] The inventor of the PCR test, Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis, stated on a tape that the PCR test “can say anything,” and that it is not suitable for identifying viruses. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QPs86XB1OjE

[8] http://biomechanics.stanford.edu/me233_20/reading/ioannidis20.pdf . See also, https://patriotdailypress.org/2021/09/02/new-stanford-studies-on-covid-19-infection-fatality-rates-should-end-covidstan-forever/

[9] https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html

[10] https://odysee.com/@Coronavirus:4e/Dr-Sucharit-Bhakdi-Organs-Of-Dead-Vaccinated-Proves-Auto-Immune-Attack:e

[11] In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccination Injury Act, which exempted vaccine manufacturers from liability and established a federal fund and system to compensate victims of known harm , 42 USC 300aa-22 . As part of the Covid scheme, sellers of the Covid vaccine have been granted full immunity through the PREP Act (42 USC 247d-6e) .

[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity_in_the_United_States

[13] The United States of America against Karl Brandt et al, http://werle.rewi.hu-berlin.de/MedicalCase.pdf

[14] https://www.newsweek.com/members-congress-staff-exempt-biden-covid-vaccine-mandate-1627859 . Postal workers are exempt from the vaccination requirement for federal employees: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/postal-workers-exempt-from-new-vaccine-requirements-report/ar-AAOhiV0

[15] Implementing Regulation 14043, (9 September 2021): https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19927/requiring-coronavirus-disease-2019-vaccination-for-federal-employees

[16] Implementing Regulation 14042, (September 9, 2021): https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/09/14/2021-19924/ensuring-adequate-covid-safety-protocols-for-federal-contractors

[17] https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/ets2

[18] CMS mandate (November 5, 2021): https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/11/05/2021-23831/medicare-and-medicaid-programs-omnibus-covid-19-health -care-staff-vaccination

[19] BST Holdings, LLC v OSHA, No. 21-60845 (5th Cir. November 6, 2021): https://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/21/21-60845-CV0.pdf

OSHA itself admits that it has no jurisdiction over state , county, or local governments . https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/standardinterpretations/2006-10-11-1 . The CDC’s jurisdiction over “disease” is limited by law and excludes anything that happens exclusively within a state (and does not cross state borders). 42 USC 264 (c).

[20] Louisiana v. Becarra, No. 21-CV-0397 TAD / KDM (WD La. Nov. 30, 2021): https://www.alabamaag.gov/Documents/news/CMS Nationwide Injunction.pdf

[21] Georgia v Biden, No. 21-CV-00163 RSB / BKE (SD Ga., December 7, 2021): https://www.scag.gov/media/1pfaybfp/federal-contractor-order.pdf

[22] Florida vs. Nelson, No. 21-CV-254 SDM / TGW (MD Fla. December 22, 2021): https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.395435/gov. uscourts.flmd.395435.37.0.pdf

[23] In right: MCP No. 165, OSHA Interim Final Rule: Covid Vaccination and Tests, No. 21-7000 (December 17, 2021): https://www.opn.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions .pdf / 21a0287p-06.pdf

[24] https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/122221zr2_f20h.pdf