1961 MIT Graduate Inspired Obama Birth Certificate Forgery

Commentary by Dan Crosby
of THE DAILY PEN

Unfortunately, some ideologically corrupt letches wrapped in their Obama delusion also willfully refuse to accept the fact that the lone scrap of information submitted by Barack Obama supporting his farcical presidential eligibility is nothing more than a fabricated digital rendering of an alleged record produced by unknown individuals within the virtual imagination of cyber space.

Meanwhile, Obama continues to milk a deception from those who lack the mental acuity to understand that when information is taken from physical form of media, such as paper, and transformed to an electrical form of media, such as a computer image, it can then be changed and, unfortunately, misrepresented through dishonest reproduction in order to exploit human ignorance and limited sensory capacity.

When information becomes electronically reproduced, at the very moment of its inception, it can be altered in ways which are difficult to detect by human senses without the aid of experts or other electronic technology.

Forgers counted on this when they fabricated Obama fake Certificate of Live Birth. Sadly, among many idiots who swallowed it whole, there are a few innocent people who gagged on it in pieces as it went down. The rest of us rightly rejected it in its entirety for the following reasons.

The modern form of paper we use today was first invented around the time of the birth of Christ. Ironically, computer imagery, on the other hand, was invented in the same alleged year of the birth of Barack Obama, in 1961, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

For many, those two ironies end the case against Obama in perpetuity. For them, sentencing is long past due. For defenders of Obama, however, there remains an apparent market for a more thorough explanation of the difference between paper media and electronic media.

Aside from the lop-sided ramifications of an identity contest between Christ and Obama, the historical comparison between paper and computer imagery reveals rather an interesting disparity between those engaged in a rational pursuit of truth about Obama and their deranged obotic counterparts desperately seeking to defend the most prolific liar in American political history. This disparity is rooted in the latter’s lack of understanding of the difference between an authentic paper record of one’s birth and a counterfeit digital image of that same information and how these two forms of media lend value to one’s credibility as an eligible political leader.

In the beginning, the word “paper” was derived from the name of the reedy plant papyrus, which grows abundantly along the Nile River in Egypt. However, paper, as we know it today, is made of pulped cellulose wood fibers and is said to have been invented around 8 B.C.
Jesus may have a paper birth certificate somewhere…but, apparently, Obama does not.
Nearly 2000 years after Christ, logic dictates that, upon Obama’s emergence from his mother’s womb, someone wrote information about his birth on a paper birth certificate using permanent ink. The paper upon which this information was printed has its roots in trees, pun intended.
Here’s where Obama’s abettors become confused.

This document originated from a pulp substance derived from processed wood fiber acquired from trees which were most likely harvested by strong, burley, flannel-laden lumberjacks wielding axes and saws. We can be confident that the lumberjacks then were not informed of the plan to counterfeit Obama’s birth information 50 years later, so let’s not start hating loggers too. They simply cut the trees down, hauled them to a mill where they were reduced by machinery into little pieces (Note to Obama supporters: This illustration should not be confused with “bits”, which we will discuss forthwith) which would eventually become a fibrous pulp material.

In the latter stages of the fiber’s processing, the pulp was bleached, flattened and dried until it became a useful component of modern media which we call “paper”. In the wake of Obama’s birth certificate forgery case, it is important that we clarify the difference between paper pulp and silicon which is used to make computer circuitry or flat screen monitors. Apparently, the distinction becomes blurred when Obama is involved.

The paper was cut to the appropriate size and eventually imprinted, with permanent ink, information and a document title header which indicated to municipal and hospital employees that it was an official document which was to be used uniformly to record births in their
Today’s digital imagery applications, on the other hand, have the widespread potential to be used to misrepresent mass media in order to promote a desired false conclusion in the minds of individuals who either are not aware of other information which counteracts the lies or who are not aware of the facts used to produce the image to begin with.

The Daily Pen demonstrated this phenomena last month in our story titled “Vital Records Indicate Obama Not Born in Hawaii Hospital, Part 2”, when we intentionally altered the content of one, single computer image for the experimental purpose of misleading those we identified as attentive to such practices under Obama’s spell. We were proven right when we used digital image editing software to remove one word from a footnote of a data table found in an image of a historical document published in 1945.

The image was erroneous and benign and did not affect the content of the report which was that the information shown in Obama’s alleged birth certificate is invalid with regard to vital records collection for proving natural born citizenship which, in turn, contradicts claims that he was not born in Hawaii. Removing this word shortened the footnote which referred to a quantity in an unrelated but easily confirmable table of data taken from the VSUS report. We did not alter the numeric data, just the reference to the scope which it applied for the purpose of determining just how vigorous our adversaries are in their repulsive defense of this larger crime. Then, we sat back and waited.

Sure enough, the response was a resounding success. Prior to this test, we sent emails to supportive readers informing them of the miniscule alteration before we made it. Since we were not offering explanations to Obama supporters, we sought to demonstrate how being deceived by a digital image affects an uninformed perspective about the character of those perpetuating the deception. In the case of Obama’s supporters, we discovered they are more psychologically motivated to sound the “gotcha” alarm about a minor alternation in a digital image of peripheral information unrelated to Obama, which is easily confirmed by anyone, than they are to actually consider the possibility of fraudulent images being created which directly benefit Obama’s legal qualifications, personal history and character.

Needless to say, our test produced all the confirmation we needed to confirm that we are right about Barack Obama and his abettors in America. Their perceptions are ideologically driven and fail, not only the standards of logic and reason but, most importantly, they fail the standards of morality and decency. This means they are more willing to excuse criminal behavior in someone who shares their beliefs even when that behavior is harmful to their own future, or to innocent people with no power to prevent the crime, than they are of unknown bloggers and private citizens working to expose the truth.

Our experiment revealed that the same morally corrupt individuals Obama relies upon to defend his altered digital birth certificate image and absence of biographical information also have the capacity to identify even the smallest “fraud” in digital image content when they apply their investigative ability, and when they are provided with the original paper media content to compare it with, yet they are willing to overlook the mountain of probative evidence mounting against them.

They are terrified of the psychological pain coming with the truth about Obama. They trusted Obama and now they have to face the fact that he lied about who he was in order to confiscate presidential power in order to implement a selfish agenda based on his remote ideas of reparative justice. They are afraid of the stored wrath which finds that Obama is truly a usurper and the most prolific deceiver in American political history because they know instinctually that his brand of justice does not apply to them favorably. Therefore, they are forced to seek mental sanctuary by fighting against those who are bringing the truth upon their poor minds.

They are desperate to not be forced to face the facts about Obama. They are delusional and mentally ill because they understand, deep inside, that Obama has actually set an ideological trap for them. They realize they have been ambushed and it is confirmed by a moral truth which is: The only reason for a man like Obama to hide information about himself is to draw them in like ideological prey, into his control and influence (i.e. Obamacare) on a message of “Hope and Change” for them, before slamming that trap of enslavement and, eventually, physical death on them.

Instinctually, they know Obama is a liar but because they have invested so much of themselves into the false truth they wanted to believe, they can’t face the actual truth. So, they seek sanctuary in resistance and willful dissonance which takes the form of ridiculing those who doubt Obama’s eligibility. If they can’t call them racists, they call them conspiracy theorists.

Meanwhile the growing chasm of evidence separating them from reality continues to metastasize into what will eventually become a fatal malignancy.

Sadly, our experiment revealed the tragic weakness of ideologically corrupt minds and an endemic incapacity to understand the difference between the standards of credibility necessary to verify the legitimacy of an individual seeking untold power and influence over millions, as opposed to the unnecessary credibility of private citizens in merely writing what will eventually be proven meaningless opinions through a temporary and faceless confluence. Apparently, according to the multitude of these liberal hacks, the content issued by unknown bloggers is worthy of more scrutiny than the illegitimate content issued by the most powerful liberal politician on the planet, for whom their fetish calls.

Unfortunately, it also revealed they would rather apply their investigative vigor against faceless opinioneers bearing no authority for validating government documents, while defending the illegitimate, unverified documentation of a corrupt global power. They find more wrong in randomly fabricated blog information than they do in official, government issued documents bearing the identity of four dead people unable to defend their attestation of the record. They ally themselves among a defiled chorus against the intentional and admitted alteration of a minor footnote rather than take arms against the exploitation of the blood-ransomed constitution and millions of innocent lives being deceived by a digital fabrication of information used to exalt a liar into political power.

Ironically, our experiment also revealed that even though Obama has never provided corroborating, original paper documentation of his birth, his horde of blind defenders still possess the conscientious ability to understand how easily the alteration of computer imagery can mislead when no original information is provided to corroborate it. They just refuse to exercise the same diligence against Obama. They understand how detection of such altered digital information warrants accusations of nefarious intent, reprobate character and dishonesty, yet they refuse to apply that same standard against Obama because he is the “god” of their psychotic favoritism.

The test also revealed that Obama’s most vigorous defenders are simply hypocrites willing to accept the absence of proof from demagogues when that absence of proof supports their selfish lusts for being seen as right by a transient majority. They are not stupid, they are just uninformed and unwilling to recognize the hierarchy of scrutiny against those with power as opposed to those without power.

Simply stated, when someone like Obama works as hard as he has to hide his real identity from the public, it means that his true identity is being hidden because it is harmful to millions of innocent human beings. It means that Obama understands that if the truth enters the domain of consciousness, it will bring destruction upon the false reality he has constructed in the minds of his followers. When private citizens demonstrate how easy it is to alter a computer image in order to show why the world should question Obama, they merely get called bad names by empty headed servants of Obama.

However, the positive effect of such a tactic is that they have used their adversaries as unwitting advertisers to introduce a previously unknown platform of information which can be used by those innocent people to look into the matter themselves.

It brings us a great sense of satisfaction knowing that so many have taken interest in this matter on Obama’s dime. Sure, we get verbally assaulted by mentally inferior liberal cowards and haters. Haters will hate anything, even the truth. They hate us not because we are wrong but because, well…they have to feed an unredeemable hate monster within themselves.

Using Obama letches to carry the heavy water of truth for those thirsty for it is a worthy cause. To others for whom we have failed to uphold an otherwise pristine standard on this occasion, we ask for your forgiveness and understanding. As we grow, we realize that you include us as one of many who need to be a trusted source of diligently sought, honest facts. We seek that status in your heart and mind for the future.

Read more at The Daily Pen