Wisconsin election results challenged, Meagan Wolfe lied: “gone according to law”, Clerks allowed to cure ballots with missing information, Voter turnout suspect

Wisconsin election results challenged, Meagan Wolfe lied: “gone according to law”, Clerks allowed to cure ballots with missing information, Voter turnout suspect

“the statute is “very, very clear. If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it’s not valid.””...Retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman

“estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed.” …Wisconsin GOP

“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”…Jesus, John 8:32

From The Wisconsin Elections Commission November 4, 2020.

“Madison, WI – Meagan Wolfe, Wisconsin’s chief election official, issued the following statement:

“Wisconsin’s counting and reporting of unofficial results has gone according to law. Our municipal and county clerks have worked tirelessly throughout the night to make sure every valid ballot is counted and reported accurately.”

https://elections.wi.gov/node/7231

We now know that is a lie!

From JustTheNews November 8, 2020.

“The Constitution allows only for state legislatures to change the ways elections are conducted, but memos show Wisconsin election supervisors made three substantial changes in 2020 that impact potentially tens of thousands of ballots in a battleground state that Joe Biden won by just 20,000.

Records reviewed by Just the News show that an executive branch agency called the Wisconsin Election Commission:

• permitted local county election clerks to cure spoiled ballots by filling in missing addresses for witnesses even though state law invalidates any ballot without a witness address.

• exempted as many as 200,000 citizens from voter ID rules by allowing them to claim the COVID-19 pandemic caused them to be “indefinitely confined.”
• failed to purge 130,000 names from outdated voter rolls as required by law.

The question now is whether those changes  — in particular the instructions allowing clerks to cure ballots with missing information — will open the door for the courts to intervene as President Trump looks to contest ballot practices in multiple battleground states. The Trump campaign is seeking a recount in Wisconsin.”

“Retired Wisconsin Supreme Court Justice Michael Gableman, told local radio station 1130 WISN this week that the statute is “very, very clear. If an absentee ballot does not have a witness address on it, it’s not valid. That ballot is not valid.” The Dan O’Donnell Show, meanwhile, claimed that the Wisconsin GOP “estimates that thousands of witness addresses may have been changed.” ”

Read more:

https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/elections/many-200000-wisconsin-residents-may-have-voted-absentee-without-having

The Wisconsin Elections Commission and Meagan Wolfe have no credibility.

The Margin of victory at this juncture is approx. a 20k lead for Biden.

President Trump has already requested a recount.

Next let’s look at the voter turnout percentages in Wisconsin.

There were not more votes than registered voters as some reports alleged.

There are approx. 3.7 registered voters in Wisconsin.

If you take the vote, 3.3 million and divide by 3.7 you get 89 %.

A very high turnout rate and a red flag.

But wait, you are once again not being given the truth.

From the Star Tribune September 29, 2020.

“The Wisconsin Supreme Court weighed Tuesday whether to go along with conservatives who argue that 130,000 voters should be removed from the rolls in the hotly contested presidential battleground state, while the Democratic attorney general defended not purging them.

The Wisconsin case is one of several lawsuits across the country, many in battleground states, that seek to purge voters from registration rolls. It is being closely watched because President Donald Trump won the swing state by fewer than 23,000 votes in 2016. However, the lawsuit was unlikely to be resolved by the state Supreme Court before the Nov. 3 election just five weeks away.

Justices on the court controlled 4-3 by conservatives gave little indication during the hour-long oral arguments how they were leaning.

The Wisconsin case hinges on whether voters who were identified as potentially having moved should be removed from the voter registration database. The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative law firm, argued that the state elections commission broke the law when it did not remove voters from the rolls who did not respond within 30 days to a mailing last year indicating they had been identified as someone who potentially moved.”

Read more:

https://www.startribune.com/voter-purge-case-before-wisconsin-supreme-court/572571142/

Now let’s take the 3,684,726  registered voters including the number that was not active and subtract the inactive number 130,000 and we get 3.5 million.

If you take the vote, 3.3 million and divide by 3.5 you get 94 %.

A definite red flag.

More here:

https://citizenwells.com/

http://citizenwells.net/