Profile image
By John Rolls (Reporter)
Contributor profile | More stories
Story Views
Last Hour:
Last 24 Hours:

Son, it Was Obama We Journalists Had to Fear

% of readers think this story is Fact. Add your two cents.

By Jack Cashill / American Thinker

“I was driving my then 11-year-old son somewhere, probably soccer practice, when he burst into tears and asked me, ‘is Donald Trump going to put you in prison?’” So claimed the embarrassingly serious Olivier Knox, the White House Correspondents Association president, at the association’s annual grub fest on Saturday.

What Knox should have said is, “No, son, President Trump is at least open in his hostility. The First Amendment gives him the same rights as it gives us. It was President Obama’s dirty, covert war on the media that had me worried.” At this point, little Knox should have asked, “Did this sneaky, back-door attack prefigure Obama’s subversion of the Trump candidacy?” Now, there is a correspondent’s dinner I would pay to watch.

In May 2010, when Obama signed the Daniel Pearl Press Freedom Law, few of America’s reporters and editors were aware that Obama as president represented the single greatest threat to press freedom in their professional lives. True to his reputation as messiah, Obama would soon make even the willfully blind see.

***Support BeforeItsNews by trying APeX (far superior to colloidal silver) or any of our other great health products at ***

In May 2013, the illusion of an unfettered press disappeared like a magician’s bunny. It was in this month that the Associated Press learned Obama’s Justice Department had quietly seized all of the relevant records for twenty AP telephone lines a year earlier. These included the personal and professional lines of several reporters.

The seizure had to do with AP reporting on a covert CIA operation in Yemen. Although only five reporters were involved in that story, more than one hundred reporters used the lines and switchboards whose records were seized. AP President Gary Pruitt wrote Attorney General Eric Holder that the “government has no conceivable right to know” the content of those records. On Face the Nation, Pruitt boldly assessed White House strategy, “I know what the message being sent is: If you talk to the press, we’re going after you.”

A coalition of some fifty newsgathering organizations promptly came to the AP’s defense. In a barely polite letter to Holder, the coalition accused him of ignoring the Department of Justice’s decades-old guidelines governing subpoenas of journalists and news organizations. The authors of the letter reminded Holder, “The approach in every case must be to strike the proper balance between the public’s interest in the free dissemination of ideas and information and the public’s interest in effective law enforcement and the fair administration of justice.”

The DOJ did none of the above. Its attorneys went behind the AP’s back, failed to negotiate the scope of the subpoena with the AP, and refused to explain what threat to the integrity of the investigation made the subterfuge necessary.

An even more disturbing story broke a week later. It seemed that for the prior three years the DOJ had been secretly dipping into the personal and professional communications of Fox News Washington correspondent James Rosen. The case involved Rosen’s interactions with a State Department contractor monitoring North Korea’s nuclear program.

What troubled the media community most about the DOJ response was the use of search warrants to investigate a reporter and the threat to prosecute him under the terms of Espionage Act as an “as an aider, abettor and/or co-conspirator.”

“Search warrants like these have a severe chilling effect on the free flow of important information to the public,” First Amendment lawyer Charles Tobin told the Washington Post. “That’s a very dangerous road to go down.”

On May 16, 2013, a few days after the AP story broke but a few days before the Rosen story did, Obama took a moment during a joint press conference with the Turkish prime minister to say he would “make no apologies” for investigating national security leaks that threatened the well-being of the American military.

“I don’t think the American people would expect me as commander in chief not to be concerned about information that might compromise their missions or might get them killed,” Obama said defiantly.

This was one of those finesses that served Obama so well with the uninformed. In fact, the probes dug much deeper than “national security.” A few weeks later, in June 2013, the McClatchy newspapers broke the story of an “unprecedented” Obama administration initiative launched in 2011 in the wake of the Bradley (or, in NYT-speak, “Chelsea”) Manning leaks.

Much like Nixon’s “plumbers,” the operatives of  “Insider Threat Program,” as it was known, worked to suppress leaks in the national security agencies. Unlike the plumbers, however, the Insider Threat people extended their mission into the seemingly benign regions of education, agriculture, and social security.   

Scarier still, in the Maoist spirit of the Obama administration, everyone was expected to plumb. The administration obligated employees to turn themselves and their coworkers in for failing to report leaks. Specifically, the program’s strategic plan mandated supervisors to “penalize clearly identifiable failures to report security infractions and violations, including any lack of self-reporting.”

None of this, of course, stopped Edward Snowden, the NSA contractor who first went public with his massive document dump a week before the McClatchy article. What the Internal Threat Program could do, however, was discourage employees from reporting routine waste and corruption.

“You don’t get people speaking up when there’s wrongdoing,” said Liana Greenstein former CIA case officer. “You don’t get people who look at things in a different way and who are willing to stand up for things. What you get are people who toe the party line, and that’s really dangerous for national security.”

Most of all perhaps, the Internal Threat Program discouraged disgruntled employees from talking to the media. “The suspicion has to be that maybe these ‘leak’ investigations are less about deterring leakers and more about intimidating the press,” opined the Wall Street Journal.

Liberal First Amendment lawyer James Goodale was harsher still. In Times op-ed Goodale declared that “President Obama will surely pass President Richard Nixon as the worst president ever on issues of national security and press freedom” In liberal circles, the Nixon comparison was very nearly as damning as the Hitler one. Ouch!

Unlike Richard Nixon, who had good reason to distrust the media, Obama has no apparent motive for his secrecy other than that it gave him the space to do as he pleased and get away with it. “They feel entitled to and expect supportive media coverage,” admitted veteran correspondent Josh Meyer in speaking of the White House press office. For all the love that the media showered on the Obama administration, what they got in return, said Meyer, was “across-the-board hostility.”

In the age of Obama, however, many in the media had a hard time holding a grudge, and Obama knew it. Weeks after the Rosen story broke, the president made what the New York Times called a “ringing affirmation of press freedom.” The Times reported that Obama was “troubled” by the revelations of DOJ mischief and that wingman Holder — take out those hankies — “shared those concerns.” The Timessummarized the speech with the redemptive headline, “Obama, Offering Support for Press Freedom, Orders Review of Leak Investigations.”

Obviously, not everyone in the media was as easily appeased as the Times editors, but too many were. Six months after Goodale’s blistering op-ed and three months after the release of the devastating CPJ report, New Yorker editor and Obama biographer David Remnick went unchallenged on the Charlie Rose Show when he listed as one of Obama’s many accomplishments “the fact that there’s been no scandal, major scandal, in this administration, which is a rare thing in an administration.”

For all its merits, the CPJ report did not use the word “scandal” or any of its derivatives either. It has been said that a political incident becomes a scandal only when the Times calls it a “scandal” on its front page. Despite Obama’s shocking disregard of his commitment and the media’s acknowledgement of the same, the Times editors chose to reserve the S-word for bigger things like, say, a president’s failure to attend a dinner where even eleven-year-olds get to ding him.

Read more: 
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Support BeforeitsNews by trying our natural health products! Join our affiliate program
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at

Get our Free Ebook, "Suppressed Health Secrets"  with  Natural Cures THEY don't want you to know!

APeX - Far superior to colloidal silver!  Destroys Viruses, Bacteria, Pathogens with Oxygen plus Silver!Supreme Fulvic - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
Ultimate Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser!  Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!  
Organic Hemp Extract (CBD) - Full Spectrum high CBD (3300mg) hemp extract eases stiff joints, relieves stress and more!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.

Smart Meter Cover -  Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%!  (See Video)

FINAL WARNING!   Diseases are EXPLODING!  Watch this Video about APeX and You'll THROW AWAY Your Colloidal Silver!   APeX destroys Viruses, Bacteria and other Pathogens with the power of Oxygen PLUS Silver!  Nobody else has a product like THIS!   See why the inventor hasn't been sick in 16 years and why you'll never hear about it on the FAKE NEWS!  Get some now and tell your friends about it too so we can reach more people!  

APeX Interview - Superior to Colloidal Silver from Lee Canady on Vimeo.

Learn about APeX Here and Get the 50 Page Report in PDF format.   Call us at 888-809-8385 to order by phone.

Report abuse


    Your Comments
    Question   Razz  Sad   Evil  Exclaim  Smile  Redface  Biggrin  Surprised  Eek   Confused   Cool  LOL   Mad   Twisted  Rolleyes   Wink  Idea  Arrow  Neutral  Cry   Mr. Green

    Total 2 comments
    • Ruk9p

      :!: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :!:

      …ordered the FBI to illegally surveil myself, my business partner and the company, to use whatever they heard or learned in a creative way to SUPPRESS OUR COMPANY (and myself individually at both the Federal and State levels), which provably was happening in 2010 and to a greater or lesser extent CONTINUES TO THIS DAY.

      Imagine this in your world…..
      You see the President (any President) come on TV and communicate to all, “Without technology X, humanity is doomed and time is short because your government after 40+ years and billions of dollars trying to do just that, believes it has proven to be impossible. ”

      With your having 15+ years of professional experience in R&D of all sorts of technologies, you know for a fact that you can do the ‘impossible’ within 6 months. How? By adding another, final iteration to a machine design that worked fantastic which you had done several years before using algae for a different application. The best part is that if you get right to work you can have the whole system design ready for prototyping before the end of 2008, and assuming a prototype can be built (it was) by the end of 2009 then the President can do the one thing he promised to the public over and over, and over again which was to provide grant funding for the productivity certification testing which is the last hurdle between new technologies like this and big cap investment capital for production facility construction. The testing (3rd party) cost then $600k to have the ‘technological miracle’ proven and certified by a laboratory. We could cobble everything that is necessary (including a PhD Phycologist to observe & certify the testing as valid) for approximately $300k.

      :arrow: ‘Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country.’ – JFK

      BUT, WITHOUT THE TEST WE HAD BEEN PROMISED BY OBAMA THE TECHNOLOGY, THE COMPANY AND OUR LIVES WERE ALL ‘ON HOLD’ until the ‘progressive messiah’ either changed his mind, we went bankrupt, or we outlasted the abuse by the federal and state governments as the state of California repeated the same bait & switch, begging & betrayal dynamic but included weaponizing the California Franchise Tax Board to unlawfully seize all funds on deposit in any bank I had an account. As a result, I have been (and today still am) ‘de-personed’, or however one describes it I have been pushed out of access to the banking and monetary systems INTENTIONALLY BY THE HEADS OF TWO GOVERNMENTS BECAUSE I STEPPED UP AND ACTED IN THE SPIRIT OF THE FINEST EXAMPLES FROM HISTORY OF AMERICAN INGENUITY WHEN INGENUITY MATTERED MOST.

      I did my patriotic duty, because my country called. Not because I wanted to impress the Traitor-In-Chief. But, because the world supposedly needed it badly and nobody else appeared to have figured out how to make macro scale algae production viable as I had and almost forgotten so long before all of this. My reward for answering my country’s call has been destitution, estrangement and a seething, growing anger at those who had any part in doing this to me that refuses to allow me to sleep 3 weeks out of the month.

      The only way I can get my life back (what there is today left of it), is for me to manage to get President Trump’s attention, finagle an invitation to the WH, and petition him for a redress of the grievances above, AND FOR THE TOP-DOWN ORDERS TO STOP THE FBI HARASSMENT (and all the rest of it), TO ORIGINATE FROM THE SAME LEVEL OF AUTHORITY THAT ORDERED OUR SUPPRESSION IN THE FIRST PLACE. Without that, I don’t survive for much longer.

      :arrow: NOW, PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ADMINISTRATION IS DOING THE EXACT SAME THING AS OBAMA, IGNORING ME WHEN FOR HIM TO DO SO CONSTITUTES CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE AND DENIAL OF RIGHTS UNDER THE COLOR OF OFFICE. For lack of choice, I am going to have to figure out how to apply, ‘the squeaky wheel principle’ to getting the attention of the most powerful man on Earth, to get him to redress damages he didn’t cause, and so it without a dime in my pocket and not going to jail.


    • Slimey

      The Negro was NOT even a legitimate sitting US “President” and have long called for the arrest of this SODOMITE! :twisted:




    Email this story
    Email this story

    If you really want to ban this commenter, please write down the reason:

    If you really want to disable all recommended stories, click on OK button. After that, you will be redirect to your options page.