Scotus Rules Twice That Law Means Nothing

Federal tyranny that was so feared by the opponents of establishing a federal government (anti-federalists papers) argued that a centralized beast would not be contained by constitutional constraints. They contended that expecting adherence to the law was not enough protection for the people’s rights knowing the egos of mankind and that in time central authority would devise rationale to allow it to operate outside the scope of its defined boundaries.

The Supreme Court in its marriage decision has effectively ignored their oath to our Constitution, ignored the history, purpose, intent and the complete ideology of American liberty. No longer are they content to be a referee interpreting the law to keep all sides honest to our founding principles, they have empowered to themselves without any authority the right to rule, dictate and most deliberately to disregard their oath to uphold the Constitution.

The 14th Amendment according to the court has trumped the Constitution. The ruling has effectively silenced and castrated the Bill of Rights’ while opening the door for the court to tyrannically moralize American values it deems unacceptable regardless of the will of the people.

If the court wanted to grant legal status to gay marriage it could have ruled that all states needed to provide an equivalent to marriage in legal status such as civil union. In fact, most states already offer that provision. But instead, in an act of not just unconstitutional abandonment of oath, but as false gods, they arrogantly ruled a new definition to an historic religious union that pre-dates the modern world.

It is not just legislative activism it is far more troublesome than that, it is a denouncement of everything this nation fought and died for when we established a Democratic Republic in which WE THE PEOPLE are not governed by omnipotent dictators but rather govern ourselves.

Equally in the courts upholding of the ACA law we note a glaring inconsistency of how law was previously adjudged. For any jurist or lawyer to be able to redefine the meaning of words in order to win a favorable result, makes not only mockery of the law but reduces the power of law for any plaintiff or defendant seeking the words of law to assign them justice.

No justice can be had if law is interpreted by a mere siding of intent by a jurist to one party over another regardless of the language in a contract. When the legal language loses its invincible black and white power of arbitration then all people lose the ability to seek redress from swindle.

The checks and balances of our three branches of government have been exposed to be a sham of collusion rather than defenders of our constitutional Republic. The American people have tried to elect representation that honors the pledges and promises they make on the campaign trail only to find that once elected, they instead ignore their constituents while they sit on the lap of corporate and Wall Street lobbyists, whoring our liberties for personal and party wealth.

What we as Americans should find most offensive about these latest rulings by a politicized court is the useless notion that new law will remedy lawlessness.

Another Amendment to the Constitution? Really, so the court can ignore it, in the same careless disregard as they have the 9th and 10th Amendments? Or a repeal of Obamacare that would do nothing to protect against future odious laws passed by the legislature and upheld by a legally blind court? A new marriage contract named God’s Covenant that excludes the state from participation? Surely they will find a way to evince state power over private endeavors of liberty, that is what Obamacare did, forced individual citizens to buy a product.

There is really is only one remedy now for the people. Nullification by the states and civil disobedience until sanity returns to office holders.

The south had conceded the moral ground ideological on slavery years before succession and implored and impeached the Congress to help them end slavery in a way that was not economically punitive on the southern states alone. They asked for grandfathering, they asked for price controls on their farm commodities and they asked for federal education money to supply freed black slaves with trades and skills.

All of these proposals were reasonable and yet unreasonably rejected by a corrupt Congress lobbied and bribed by wealthy textile manufactures that wanted to lower their commodity costs by hoping plantation bankruptcies would allow them to buy these farms and exclude the middle men. The south argued that slaves to be freed should be counted in the census to afford the south more Representatives in the House than they currently were allotted so as to arrive at a fairer national sacrifice to the whole country that shared the guilt of national immorality.

All proposals were denied causing succession and the Civil war that killed many Americans needlessly.

Today, we have a Congress completely beholding to globalist corporate interests, an Executive branch that re-writes laws by executive order and fails to enforce laws it ideological disagrees with in a blatant abuse of power, while the Supreme Court has made recent political not legal decisions as immorally incomprehensible and reprehensible as the Dred Scott case of 1857. The majority of the judges on that court were pro-slavery when they ruled that a free black man was not considered an American citizen. Which is why we have a 14th Amendment (1868) precisely to correct a monumentally flawed Supreme Court decision.

Who would have imagined that 147 years later the 14th Amendment would be used by the court to redefine marriage and silence the voice of the people’s referendums on a long standing moral and religious institution with not righteousness but against the creator’s intent.

This decision is not just wrong from a ideological debate, it is as wrong a precedent against State Right’s, individual rights and America’s whole democratic Republic structure created to insure usurpations of authority would not trample people’s liberty and independence from state control.

For those liberals espousing this decision as a celebration of democracy, take note, this wrong minded decision was made by five unelected jurists that struck down the duly cast ballots of real democracy by throwing away the results of our State referendum process and nullifying the votes of millions of citizens.

If this time you agree with a court, that trashed the majority opinion, ignored our federalism, usurped a power not enumerated to them and decided above the will of the people, will you also agree to the next encroachment by government ruled by that same court that tramples your beliefs?

Perhaps maybe in the near future if this un-tethered to the Constitution Supreme Court, decides that your right to privacy is so limited, it allows the government to place camera’s in your home under the guise that the state needs to defend you from terrorists? Will you be waving in approval then?

Let me leave all to read three quotes by the author of our Declaration of Independence as we celebrate the 4th of July.

“Laws are made for men of ordinary understanding and should, therefore, be construed by the ordinary rules of common sense. Their meaning is not to be sought for in metaphysical subtleties which may make anything mean everything or nothing at pleasure.” (Thomas Jefferson)

“The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. They are construing our constitution from a co-ordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone.” (Thomas Jefferson)