This Is the Article that Got Zerohedge Banned from Twitter

Coronavirus Contains “HIV Insertions”, Stoking Fears Over Artificially Created Bioweapon

Over the past few days, the mainstream press has vigorously pushed back against a theory about the origins of the coronavirus that has now infected as many as 70,000+ people in Wuhan alone (depending on whom you believe). The theory is that China obtained the coronavirus via a Canadian research program, and started molding it into a bioweapon at the Institute of Virology in Wuhan. Politifact pointed the finger at Zero Hedge, in particular, though the story was widely shared across independent-leaning media.

The theory is that the virus, which was developed by infectious disease experts to function as a bio-weapon, originated in the Wuhan-based lab of Dr. Peng Zhou, China’s preeminent researcher of bat immune systems, specifically in how their immune systems adapt to the presence of viruses like coronavirus and other destructive viruses. Somehow, the virus escaped from the lab, and the Hunan fish market where the virus supposedly originated is merely a ruse.

Now, a respected epidemiologist who recently caught flack for claiming in a twitter threat that the virus appeared to be much more contagious than initially believed is pointing out irregularities in the virus’s genome that suggests it might have been genetically engineered for the purposes of a weapon, and not just any weapon but the deadliest one of all.

In “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag“, Indian researchers are baffled by segments of the virus’s RNA that have no relation to other coronaviruses like SARS, and instead appear to be closer to HIV. The virus even responds to treatment by HIV medications.

More…

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The above graphic from the article shows the four HIV short protein insertions in the binding sites on 2019-nCov.

1. The research involved to model a protein requires extensive experience, high end computers and laboratory equipment.
2. Note that there are four different amino acid sequences color coded in the graphic. Also note the number of inserts of these sequences in the protein.
3. Note that the inserts are made on the binding site of the protein.
4. At the time of this article’s publication, there has been no replication of this research by another laboratory.

If this research is replicated by another laboratory, I would agree that this coronavirus has been manufactured. If you wanted to weaponize coronavirus, you would want to ensure that its cell binding capabilities are increased for a higher infection rate. You would also want to use snippets that would allow rapid mutations (like HIV) to render vaccines so time sensitive that it would not impact the rate of the pandemic’s spread. This would also allow people who survive one strain to be reinfected with a new strain if the mutation is not recognized by the initial antibodies produced by the primary infection.

So if this is true, what difference does it make? At this point, not much. It does not matter how we got here, we have to deal with it. There are two possibilities if this is true:

1. The weaponized coronavirus was released accidentally. In this scenario, China will suffer the consequences of this lapse both medically and economically.
2. The weaponized coronavirus was released intentionally. This means that a vaccine is already developed and the New World Order goal of only 500 million people has been initiated.

The strange part of a vaccine as mentioned earlier is the rapid mutation rate of the HIV virus. Either a vaccine has been developed for other protein portions of the corona or the mutation rate is not as high as HIV. It is strange that President Trump has recently stated that HIV will be eliminated within 10 years.

David DeGerolamo