The Rockefeller Lock Step Script

 Dana Ashlie has put together an excellent compilation of people protesting the lockdown in every continent of the world, which is not being shown in the Mainstream Media.

She says that Anthony Fauci has quietly admitted in a scientific paper that the COVID-19 death rates originally projected, that were to supposedly justify the global economic shutdown are merely on par with an annual flu.

Likewise, the Chinese study that originally justified the harsh measures taken worldwide was retracted and the CCP has released a new study that puts completely different contagion rate on the record that it is a fraction of the original one.

So, with the COVID-19 death count on par with the annual flu, you’re probably asking what is going on?

 Dana says, “What if I were to tell you that there was a document released ten years ago that completely foretold this entire scenario we are finding ourselves living in?

 “What if I told you that that same document not only told the event but it’s devastating economic after-effects? What do you want to know the stated goal of the document, as well as the stated vision of the people who are behind it? I believe the entire world deserves to know, as well as who benefits from its implementation – because, it is not we, the people…”

The document in question, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Future Development” was released in 2010 by the Rockefeller Foundation and it describes the different scenarios that could feasibly lead to the total technocracy that they so fervently desire. It is the script that we’re living out right now. 

In the Satanic mindset of such people, the publication of these such papers constitutes us giving them our consent, which is required, according to spiritual law. The paper is almost an incantation or a form of Black Magick.

Dana reminds us that the Rockefeller Foundation not only seeded the United Nations but also the World Health Organization, the same group responsible for shaping the Unconstitutional recommendations and rules that you are now being forced to obey.

Dana notes, “As an aside, when you understand this organization’s original founder Rockefeller also benefited most from the Big Oil monopoly that systematically destroyed not only environments but as well, other forms of healthcare that did not utilize their patented petrol-based pharma products, I do hope you can understand the irony of them now claiming they want to fix the healthcare and climate…

 “The scenarios they present in this document would bring about what they understand to be the very important global, political and economic ‘Alignment’ (aka New World Order) that they say will be for the good of us all…

 “The first scenario they explore is called ‘Lock Step’. You will find this on page 18 of this document.”

 The Lock Step scenario that they describe is a world of “tighter, top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback.”

In other words, they clearly know they will be instigating citizen pushback.

This was written in 2010 and it says that a pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years, H1N1 had finally hit in 2012, referring to it as if it were in the past tense, saying, “It had a deadly impact on economies.”

As Dana says, ”This is what they wanted: ‘International mobility of both people and goods ‘screeched to a halt, debilitating industries, like tourism, breaking global supply chains, even locally. Normally-bustling shops and office buildings sit empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers…

“Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

“At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.

As Dana says, “This is what they want to see happen.”

She continues reading from the paper, “In the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue.”

To which Dana says, “Hmm, isn’t that interesting? Do they not want us to pursue the lines of research that would prove their entire narrative was based on lies? Research that would show the truth about this virus?

“They’re gonna tell us what we can research? Scientists, wake up! Speak out!

“It goes on to say, ‘By 2025, people seem to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them.

“‘Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest…’”

To this, Dana says, “I believe that, in fact this disorder that they are fully admitting is a part of the plan, is what they will utilize to come in later and propose the ultimate order that they want to see. The citizen pushback is a part of the very title of this thing that they have created.”

They know this is going to happen and they are going to use this to their complete and total advantage. Some of the headlines in Lock Step, it talks about things we’re undergoing now: ‘Quarantine restricts in-person contact.’ It also says, ‘Intercontinental trade hit by pathogen controls.’

Dana says, “It talks about the technology in Lock Step and this is what they really want to bring in, as a result of this disorder that they are causing, by destroying our very ability to take care of ourselves through our small businesses.

The text continues, “Technological innovation in ‘Lock Step’ is largely driven by government and is focused on issues of national security and health and safety. Most technological improvements are created by and for developed countries, shaped by governments’ dual desire to control and to monitor their citizens.”

To which Dana says, “hey make no bones about telling you exactly what they intend to do, while these ultimate plans and ability to use technology to extinguish the dissidents and control who is left….”

She then shows an old clip of Walter Cronkite’s acceptance speech for the World Federalist Association’s Global Governance Award:

“The first priority of humankind in this difficult era is to establish an effective system, a world law that will assure peace with justice among the peoples of all the world. First, we Americans are going to have to yield up some of our sovereignty. That’s going to be, to many a bitter pill. It would take a lot of courage, a lot of faith, a lot of persuasion for them to come along with us on this necessity.

“Pat Robertson has written in a book few years ago that we should have a world government but only when the Messiah arrives. He wrote, ‘Any attempt to achieve world order before that time must be the work of the devil.’

“Well, join me and I’m glad to sit here at the right hand of Satan.”

To which Dana says, “These people admit their allegiance because it is required.”

The scales are falling off our eyes and we can see things today, in hindsight that we could never see before about those we trust the most…

Running Time 36 mins: