October Surprise Accelerated @NYTimes Trump Tax Return Lies Are Melting Faster Than an Ice Cream Cone in Jerry Nadler's pants

Saving you the time of an exhausting New Marxist Times article that plainly admits it has no idea about the completeness or accuracy of its reporting…

The reason the October surprise was moved up to September? Two reasons: (a) they’re afraid of indictments resulting from the Obama-Biden administration’s coup attempt; and (b) they want to drip out the story, with each revelation sending Howard Kurtz into a romantic rapture.

The New York Times has obtained tax-return data extending over more than two decades for Mr. Trump and the hundreds of companies that make up his business organization, including detailed information from his first two years in office… This article offers an overview of The Times’s findings; additional articles will be published in the coming weeks.

Yes, I’m sure the @nytimes, which marketed the pee-pee tape hoax for three (3) years, can be relied upon to interpret @realdonaldtrump‘s 2015 tax return. pic.twitter.com/98ZmECaGBp

— Doug Ross 🇺🇸 (@directorblue) September 27, 2020

With all that said, the Holocaust-denying New York Times leaves this caveat:

By their very nature, the filings will leave many questions unanswered, many questioners unfulfilled. They comprise information that Mr. Trump has disclosed to the I.R.S., not the findings of an independent financial examination. They report that Mr. Trump owns hundreds of millions of dollars in valuable assets, but they do not reveal his true wealth. Nor do they reveal any previously unreported connections to Russia.

Russia? Yes, folks, they’re still going with the pee-pee tape hoax, even when we know that their chief collusion “Dossier” source was a Russian spy.

I’ll predict the following: the documents will be shown to be either inaccurate, incomplete, fictional or all of the above. We’d expect nothing less from the Holocaust-denying, Pee-Pee Tape hoaxers at the New York Times.

Hat tip: BadBlue Uncensored News.