Deep State Losing Ground On All Fronts! Time To Save America! - On The Fringe
***Support BeforeItsNews By Trying HerbAnomic Natural Health Building Products Including Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex & UltraCur Bio-Available Curcumin—NOW NEW HNEX HydroNano Extracellular Oxygen Delivery System Product–SEE BELOW! Click Here For More Information & To Order!***
The deep state is losing ground on all fronts. They are trying to force their way and their system on us and everyone is pushing back. They still are dangerous, but far less so than they have been. Stand strong patriots.
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,603,923,877 |
| Stories: | 8,151,755 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
I had to laugh about your comment twitter should be a public company..then you wandered off into common territory saying that “THIS SHOULD BE TABOO AND THAT SHOULD BE TABOO… but other than that blah blah..a brief mention tho the “we the People” who own this thing would have to “EMPLOY / hire / nominate ” people to do the monitoring and making the decision (on our behalf of course) to ban or not to ban… whatever./.. TO ME this sounds like our governmental system we have now exactly,, we vote (employ hire nominate) our government reps and just see what they have done to the system…we do not run our countries our governments do ….we no longer have any say in what goes on…they just carte blanche all over us .. what is to say these people will not do the exact same thing …after all ..we have handed them the reins .. it has turned out the same in every case ..give your “individual power” to someone else and it becomes “their individual power”..you no longer have a say
/opinion-conservative/2022/10/the-truth-about-q-is-mind-blowing-its-so-outrageous-americans-would-riot-revolt-if-they-ever-found-out-must-watch-video-3644821.html
~ ”ISN’T IT AMAZING, THAT YOU CAN’T COMMENT ON THIS, BECAUSE THEY KNEW THAT ”I AM” WOULD FIND IT, & CALL THEM OUT ON THEIR LIES = LET ME FIND THAT LETTER, THAT I SENT 2 BUSH’S / OBAMA / OBAMA / TRUMP WHITE HOUSE COMPUTER(S), SOON AFTER THE LAST 3 TOOK OFFICE, IT WAS SENT 2 BUSH, WHEN IT WAS SENT 2 THAT INITIAL TREASONOUS TRAITOR, WHICH ENCOMPASSES ~ FBI DIRECTOR MUELLER / U.S.A.G. JOHN ASHCROFT, & THEN HIS REPLACEMENT JAMES COMEY + A SLEW OF OTHERS + TRUMP DID NOTHING, ALL HE WAS WORRIED ABOUT, IS WHAT THE POWERS THAT BE, DIDN’T DISCLOSE, WHICH WAS WHATEVER THEY HELD OVER HIS HEAD = BLACKMAIL” ~
~ ”FYI” = ”GOD” IS IN CONTROL, & NOT ANY MAN, OR MILITARY, AS THEY ARE ALL GOING 2 FIND OUT SOON ENOUGH” ~
~ ”LET ME, HUNT DOWN, & FIND THOSE OFFICIAL GOVT. EMAILS, SENT 2 THE WHITE HOUSE COMPUTERS” ~
Winning? Last I checked DC was empty all bad actors were safely tucked away while the CIA spin machine was in full control of all narratives. We are not winning! We are being lead down the road to the slaughter house while Vagner plays in the background. They took you jobs then your health then SAFF they and very soon the will destroy your life’s savings with the touch of a computer keyboard. Not what I would call winning. At the same time they threaten nuclear war and world destruction as they shut down all important supply chains. Yet your indoctrinated brain dead ass calls this winning. When you are too weak from hunger as you watch your grand children starve to death remember when we could have done something you followed the pied piper with your hands in your pockets because you didn’t want to do any heavy lifting.
God never said to trust anyone. He gave you free will and choice. Not choosing is absolutely the worst choice you can make. At least if you chose wrong and your heart was in a good place you made a valid attempt.
Sitting on your hands is just proof that you are a mindless sheep and do not deserve to be considered a sovereign being. Not even smart enough to validate your own meaningless existence.
~ HERE IS SOMETHING 4 STARTERS ~ BEAR WITH ME = I GOT A LOT OF SHIT 2 GO THROUGH ~
~ 1ST TOLD THE N.Y. TIMES IN 2004 WHO REPORTED ON IT, OH I FUCKED THEIR WORLD UP BIG TIME ~
~ THIS WAS ORIGINALLY SENT IN MID 2 LATE 2005, IN THE JUDICIARY / INTEL MEETING, SOMEONE CALLED THEM THE 3 STOOGES ~
From: [email protected]
To:
Subject: U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein responding to your message
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:10:49 -0500 = ~~~ ”HER RESPONSE DATE” ~~~
January 27, 2006
Mr. S C
21 OAK RD.
SAN FRANCISO, California 94101
Dear Mr. C:
Thank you for writing to me about recent revelations that the United States Government has engaged in domestic electronic surveillance without appropriate legal authority. I welcome the opportunity to respond.
I am gravely concerned by these allegations, which the President has, at least in part, confirmed. I have carefully reviewed the Constitution and the law relating to domestic intelligence activity, along with the President’s statements and those of the Attorney General and the Secretary of State. I believe that the electronic surveillance was not conducted in accordance with U.S. law. Please find enclosed a copy of the speech I gave on the Senate floor detailing my concerns on the day the allegations came
to light.
Together with Senators Hagel, Levin, Snowe and Wyden, I have called for a joint inquiry of the Senate Committees on Intelligence and the Judiciary to determine the facts at hand….
Together with Senators Hagel, Levin, Snowe and Wyden, I have called for a joint inquiry of the Senate Committees on Intelligence and the Judiciary to determine the facts at hand. We must determine, as quickly as possible, exactly what surveillance activities were authorized, what were actually undertaken, and what the asserted legal authority for such activity was. Once the facts are clear, we can decide on appropriate corrective action.
Again, thank you for writing. I hope that you will continue to write to me on issues of importance to you. Best regards.
On Reports of Unauthorized Wiretaps Statement of Senator Dianne Feinstein December 16, 2005
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. Mr. President, I rise today as a 12-year member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and a 5-year member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. I do so indeed with a very heavy heart. I have had, until now, great confidence in America’s intelligence activities. I played a role in the PATRIOT Act. I
moved one of the critical amendments having to do with the wall and the FISA court. I have assured people time and time again that what happens at home has always been conducted in accordance
with the law.
Today’s allegations as written in the New York Times really question whether this is in fact true. I read it with a heavy heart, yet without knowing the full story.
Let me be clear. Domestic intelligence collection is governed by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, known as FISA. This law sets…
This law sets out a careful set of checks and balances that are designed to ensure that domestic intelligence collection is conducted in accordance with the Constitution, under the supervision of judges and with accountability to the Congress of the United States.
Specifically, FISA allows the Government to wiretap phones or to open packages, but only with a showing to a special court — the FISA court — and after meeting a legal standard that requires that the effort is based on probable cause to believe the target is an agent of a foreign power.
Let me cite two sources. The first is a 1978 report by the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. In the report is a comment by the then-chairman of that committee, Senator Birch Bayh. He is talking about the FISA bill that had just come to the floor in 1978: The bill requires a court order for electronic surveillance, defined therein, conducted for foreign intelligence purposes within the United States or targeted against the international communications of particular Uni ted States persons who are in the United States. The bill establishes the exclusive means by which such surveillance may be conducted.
That is the bill, FISA, which was passed in 1978.
Second, in late 2001 this subject came up again on the Senate Intelligence Committee. The Senate Intelligence Committee discussed this subject and amended at that time in its authorization bill National Security Act section 502, which is the reporting of…
which is the reporting of intelligence activities other than covert action.
Section 502 states: To the extent consistent with due regard for the protection from unauthorized disclosure of classified information relating to sensitive intelligence sources and methods or other
exceptionally sensitive matters, the Director of Central Intelligence and the heads of all departments, agencies, and other entities of the United States Government involved in intelligence activities shall:
1) keep the congressional intelligence committees – It doesn’t say only the chairman and the vice chairman – fully and currently informed of all intelligence activities other than a covert action (as defined in section 503(e)), which are not the responsibility of, are engaged in by, or are carried out for or on behalf of any department, agency, or entity of the United States Government, including any significant
anticipated intelligence activity and any significant intelligence failure.
And 2) furnish the congressional intelligence committees any information or material concerning intelligence activities, other than covert actions, which is within their custody or control, and which is requested by either of the congressional intelligence committees in order to carry out its authorized
responsibilities.
At that time, we had this discussion about just the chairman and the vice chairman receiving certain information, and this act was amended, and section (b) was added to the National…
(b) was added to the National Security Act, called “form and contents of certain reports.” It was to clarify what the form and content of the reporting to the committee would be. And the wording is as follows:
Any report relating to a significant anticipated intelligence activity or a significant intelligence failure that is submitted to the congressional intelligence committees for the purposes of subsection (a)(1) shall be in writing and shall contain the following:
1) a concise statement of any fact pertinent to such report;
2) an explanation of the significance of the intelligence activity or intelligence failure covered by such report.
And then section (c) was added, “standards and procedures for certain reports,” that those standards and procedures would hereby be established.
What has happened is that it has become increasingly used just to notify a very few people. There are 535 Members of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the United States. If the President of the United States is not going to follow the law and he simply alerts eight Members, that doesn’t mean he doesn’t violate a law. I repeat, that doesn’t mean he doesn’t violate a law. FISA is the exclusive law in this area, unless there is something I missed, and please, someone, if there is, bring it to my attention.
Section 105 (f) of FISA allows for emergency applications where time is of the essence. But even in these cases, a judge makes the final decision as to…
final decision as to whether someone inside the United States of America, a citizen or a non-citizen, is going to have their communications wiretapped or intercepted. The New York Times reports that in 2004, over 1,700 warrants for this kind of wiretapping activity were approved by the FISA Court. The fact of the matter is, FISA can grant emergency approval for wiretaps within hours and even minutes, if necessary.
In times of war, FISA section 111 states this: Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this title to acquire foreign intelligence information for a period not to exceed 15 calendar days following a declaration of war by the Congress.
I would argue the resolution authorizing use of force was not a declaration of war. I read it this morning carefully. It does not authorize the President of the United States to do anything other than use force. It doesn’t say he can wiretap people in the United States of America. And apparently, perhaps with some change, but apparently this activity has been going on unbeknownst to most of us in this body and in the other body now since 2002.
The newspaper, the New York Times, states that the President unilaterally decided to ignore this law and ordered subordinates to monitor communications outside of this legal authority. In the absence of authority under FISA, Americans up till this point have been confident — and we…
confident — and we have assured them — that such surveillance was prohibited.
This is made explicit in chapter 119 of title 18 of the criminal code which makes it a crime for any person without authorization to intentionally intercept any wire, oral, or electronic communication.
As a member of the Senate Judiciary and Intelligence Committees, I have been repeatedly assured by this administration that their efforts to combat terrorism were being conducted within the law, specifically within the parameters of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act which, as I have just read, makes no exception other than 15 days following a declaration of war.
We have changed aspects of that law at the request of the administration in the USA PATRIOT Act to allow for a more aggressive but still lawful defense against terror. So there have been amendments. But if this article is accurate, it calls into question the integrity and credibility of our Nation’s commitment
to the rule of law.
I refreshed myself this morning on the fourth amendment to the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the United States. Here is what it says:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, & effects, against unreasonable search & seizures, shall not be violated, & no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, & particularly describing the place to be searched, & the persons or things to be seized.
Clearly an intercept, a…
Clearly an intercept, a wiretap, is a search. It is a common interpretation. A wiretap is a search. You are looking for something. It is a search. It falls under the fourth amendment.
Again, the New York Times states that a small number of Senators, as I said, were informed of this decision by the President. That doesn’t diminish the import of this issue, & that certainly doesn’t mean that the action was within the law or legal.
What is concerning me, as a member of the Intelligence Committee, is if eight people, rather than 535 people, can know there is going to be an illegal act & they were told this under an intelligence umbrella — and therefore, their lips are sealed — does that make the act any less culpable? I don’t think so.
The resolution passed after September 11 gave the President specific authority to use force, including powers to prevent further terrorist acts in the form of force. I would like to read it. I read Public Law 107-40, 107th Congress:
Sec.1. Short title. This joint resolution may be cited as the “Authorization for Use of Military Force”.
Sec. 2. Authorization for Use of United States Armed Forces.
(A) In General. — That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future…
prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations,
organizations, or persons.
Then it goes on to say: Consistent with section 8(a)(1) of the War Powers Resolution, the Congress declares that this section is intended to constitute specific statutory authorization within the meaning
of section 5(b) of the War Powers Resolution.
This is use of force. It is not use of wiretapping or electronic surveillance of American citizens or those without citizenship within the confines of the United States. That is the jurisdiction of the FISA Court. There is a procedure, and it is timely.
As a matter of fact, we got into this rather seriously in the Judiciary Committee. At the time we wrote the PATRIOT Act, I offered an amendment to change what is called “the wall” between domestic
intelligence-gathering agencies and foreign intelligence-gathering agencies from a “primary purpose” for the collection of foreign intelligence to a “significant purpose.” We had a major discussion in the committee, as is the American way. We were making public policy. We discussed what primary purpose meant. We discussed in legal terms what significant purpose meant.
So this was a conscious loosening of a standard in the FISA law to permit the communication of one element of Government with the other and transfer foreign intelligence information from one element of the Government to the other. That is the way this is done, by law. We are a…
We are a government of law. The Congress was never asked to give the President the kind of unilateral authority that appears to have been exercised.
Mr. BYRD. Right.
Mrs. FEINSTEIN. I was heartened when Senator Specter also said that he believed that if the New York Times report is true — & the fact that they have withheld the story for a year leads me to believe it is true, and I have heard no denunciation of it by the administration — then it is inappropriate, it is a violation of the law.
How can I go out, how can any Member of this body go out, & say that under the PATRIOT Act we protect the rights of American citizens if, in fact, the President is not going to be bound by the law, which is the FISA court?
And there are no exceptions to the FISA court.
So Senator Specter, this morning, as the chairman of the Judiciary Committee, announced that he would hold hearings on this matter the first thing next year. I truly believe this is the most significant
thing I have heard in my 12 years. I am so proud of this Government because we are governed by the rule of law, and so few countries can really claim that. I am so proud that nobody can be picked up in the middle of the night and thrown into jail without due process, and that they have due process. That is what makes us different. That is why our Government is so special, and that is why this Constitution is so special. That is why the fourth amendment was added to the Bill of Rights — to state clearly…
to state clearly that searches and seizures must be carried out under the parameter of law, not on the direction of a President unilaterally.
So I believe the door has been opened to a very major investigation, & set of circumstances. I think people who know me in this body know I am not led toward hyperbole, but I cannot stress what
happened when I read this story. And everything I hold dear about this country, everything I pledge my allegiance to in that flag, is this kind of protection as provided by the Constitution of the United States & the laws we labor to discuss, argue, debate, enact, then pressure the other body to pass, & then urge the President to sign. That is our process.
If the President wanted this authority, he should have come to the Intelligence Committee for an amendment to FISA, and he did not.
The fact that this has been going on since 2002 — it is now the end of 2005. Maybe 8 people in these 2 bodies in some way, shape, or form may have known something about it, but the rest of us on the
Intelligence Committees did not.
That is simply unacceptable.
I yield the floor.
Sincerely yours,
Dianne Feinstein
United States Senator
http://feinstein.senate.gov
Further information about my position on issues of concern to California and the Nation are available at my website http://feinstein.senate.gov. You can also receive electronic e-mail updates by subscribing to my e-mail list at http://feinstein.senate.gov/issue.html.
~ ”THIS IS THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG, & NOW YOU ALL KNOW WHY I SPEAK LIKE I SPEAK = ALL OF THESE FUCKING TREASONOUS TRAITOR BITCHES, & BASTARDS ARE GOING 2 ANSWER 2 ME = ”I AM” GOING 2 BE THEIR JUDGE, THEIR JURY, & THEIR FUCKING EXECUTIONER, & I HAVE GOD, JESUS, & THE HOLY SPIRIT AS MY WITNESS” ~
~ ”I WILL POST MORE AS I FIND THEM = I GOT 1 ON FUCKING BIDEN THAT FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT = I POSTED IT ON FAKEBOOK & THEY SUSPENDED ME 4 LIKE 2 WEEKS, BECAUSE THEY COULDN’T FACT CHECK IT, YET IT WAS A OFFICIAL GOVT. EMAIL, GO 2 TRUMP OFFICIAL FAKEBOOK PAGE & YOU SHOULD SEE MY POSTS, LET ME CHECK THAT = THEY MAY HAVE VANISHED 2” ~
~ ”I SAID THIS PUSSY SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXECUTED LIKE 15 YEARS AGO, & BANG = ”I AM” SUSPENDED, ON MY GOD PAGE, WHICH WAS PRIVATE UNTIL, I FINALLY FOUND MADONNA & THEN I MADE IT PUBLIC & WENT OFF, & I FOUND MY CONVERSATION WITH MADONNA AS WELL, STILL LOOKING 4 THOSE WHIT HOUSE GOVT. COMPUTER EMAILS” ~
~ ”YOU HAVE NO IDEA JUST HOW MANY PEOPLE BECAME ACCESSORIES AFTER THE FACT, FROM LITTLE OLD REPORTERS, LAW ENFORCEMENT, LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL, MILITARY, & EVEN SCOTUS” ~
~ ”I AM” IS NOT GOING 2 HAVE ANY FUCKING SYMPATHY 4 THESE FUCKING COCK-SUCKING DEMONS, & THEY KNOW IT BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS SHIT HERE, THERE, & EVERYWHERE, SINCE 2005 & HERE SINCE 2011” ~
~ ”BEFORE IT IS NEWS = THANK YOU 4 LETTING ME SPEAK TRUTH 2 POWER, & BY SPEAKING WITH AUTHORITY, BY WHATEVER WAY I WANTED 2, & OR…
~ ”I AM” IS NOT GOING 2 HAVE ANY FUCKING SYMPATHY 4 THESE FUCKING COCK-SUCKING DEMONS, & THEY KNOW IT BECAUSE I HAVE BEEN SAYING THIS SHIT HERE, THERE, & EVERYWHERE, SINCE 2005 & HERE SINCE 2011” ~
~ ”BEFORE IT IS NEWS = THANK YOU 4 LETTING ME SPEAK TRUTH 2 POWER, & BY SPEAKING WITH AUTHORITY, BY WHATEVER WAY I WANTED 2, & OR CHOSE 2” ~ ”THANK YOU VERY MUCH” ~
~ ”I FORGOT 2 MENTION, AFTER THIS FACADE WENT ON = YOU KNOW WHAT CAME NEXT = THE DREADED ”NSL” LETTERS, & EVERYTHING GOT NAILED SHUT, WITH THE THREAT OF INCARCERATION, IF CERTAIN PEOPLE UTTERED A SOUND, WELL I NEVER STOPPED SPEAKING MY MIND, & THEY NEVER DID ANYTHING 2 ME, SHIT HAPPENED 2 PEOPLE IN MY FAMILY, YET THEY DIDN’T LISTEN 2 ME, & I’LL LEAVE IT AT THAT 4 NOW” ~
~ ”THAT NATIONAL SECURITY LETTER, PUT REPORTERS / LAWYERS / ON ICE, AS WELL AS THE BANKING POWER$ THAT THEY HELD OVER PEOPLE, IF THEY CHOSE 2 SPEAK UP, OR OUT, & I TOLD DAMN NEAR EVERYONE, INCLUDING HIGH POWER ATTORNEYS” ~
~ ”AT THE TIME THE DIRECTOR OF THE U.S. MARSHALS’ OFFICE WAS BENJAMIN RENYA, I SENT HIM A 15 PAGE LARGE ENVELOPE, WITH ALL OF THE PARTICULARS, & HE LIKELY CONFRONTED BUSH & GONZO, & THEY LIKELY TOLD HIM, THAT THEY WEREN’T PAYING THE REWARDS, & RESIGNED HIS POST = DO YOU NOW HOW HARD, & HOW LONG IT TAKES, 2 GET, 2 THAT POST, 4 SOMEONE 2 JUST UP & LEAVE, A FEW REPORTERS, LOST THEIR JOB OVER THIS, WHO WENT 2 BAT 4 ME, I’LL LEAVE THEM UNNAMED 4 NOW, SINCE THEY WENT 2 BAT 4 ME, COLONEL POWELL’S RIGHT HAND MAN, LT. COL. WILKERSON, DID A LITTLE, SAID A LITTLE, YET NOT ENOUGH, & HIS KNOWS THE DEAL” ~
~ ”THE WORST PART, WAS CIA DIRECTOR GOT THE MEDAL OF FREEDOM, FROM SCUMBAG BUSH, 4 REMAINING SILENT + THE JUDGE, WHO SIGNED THE INTERNATIONAL ARREST WARRANT, 4 2 OF THESE M.W.T. EVENTUALLY BECAME BUSH U.S.A.G. MICHAEL MUKASEY, WAS THE FEDERAL JUDGE, WHO…
~ ”THE FEDERAL JUDGE, WHO ISSUED THE WARRANTS, 4 2 OF THE 2, WHO WERE CAPTURED” ~
~ ”OH I GOT ALL OF THE NEWS, UP HERE IN MY HEAD, & ELSEWHERE” ~