Under The Radar: Brunson V. Adams
Read about Brunson v. Adams HERE.
While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 presidential election.In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. representatives and 94 U.S. senators who voted to certify the electors to the Electoral College on Jan. 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 presidential election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency.The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four justices to move the case forward.It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as president. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court.
The fact that the Brunson case has made it to the Court’s docket suggests profound concerns about a lawless Jan. 6 congressional committee, politicized federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies and major constitutional violations intended to overthrow an elected government by manipulating the outcome of the presidential election.
Source: http://alwaysonwatch3.blogspot.com/2023/01/under-radar-brunson-v-adams.html
Anyone can join.
Anyone can contribute.
Anyone can become informed about their world.
"United We Stand" Click Here To Create Your Personal Citizen Journalist Account Today, Be Sure To Invite Your Friends.
Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below!
Order by Phone at 888-809-8385 or online at https://mitocopper.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomic.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Order by Phone at 866-388-7003 or online at https://www.herbanomics.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST
Humic & Fulvic Trace Minerals Complex - Nature's most important supplement! Vivid Dreams again!
HNEX HydroNano EXtracellular Water - Improve immune system health and reduce inflammation.
Ultimate Clinical Potency Curcumin - Natural pain relief, reduce inflammation and so much more.
MitoCopper - Bioavailable Copper destroys pathogens and gives you more energy. (See Blood Video)
Oxy Powder - Natural Colon Cleanser! Cleans out toxic buildup with oxygen!
Nascent Iodine - Promotes detoxification, mental focus and thyroid health.
Smart Meter Cover - Reduces Smart Meter radiation by 96%! (See Video).
| Online: | |
| Visits: | 1,602,253,730 |
| Stories: | 8,146,730 |
Whistler Blowers, Insiders
I’m not sure what they are basing their conclusion on, that it was denied in conference. Typically whenever they have conference, they don’t release details of what was decided until the following week. It would be today (Monday 1/9) at the. EARLIEST we might hear something, and more than likely it will be later in the week. While I don’t have my hopes solely pinned on this case, I am still hopeful they decided to hear it. We’ll know soon. You can check for updates to Docket 22-380 on the SCOTUS website
There is nothing in this case that discusses or deals with the election held in 2020 or for that matter reinstating President Trump whatsoever. Why the writer chose to insert those unfounded comments should be self evident. This case is directly asserting that the Congress and the Executive members simply ignored the requests for investigation by more than a hundred requests to do a 10 day investigation and therefore violated the Constitutional REQUIREMENT that they do so. It asserts their failure was an act of Sedition to Treason. When writers and editors add to or draw unfounded conclusions it is a clear sign that you should seed other news as this article is intentionally misleading. As noted, The SCOTUS has already reviewed this case on 6 Jan but they never release their findings for 3-5 days later.
Disinformation piece here in my opinion- Brunsen case has nothing to do with elections but everything to do with wether or not reps failed to review what 100 reps lawfulfully requested and backed by our constitution-they failed to honor the law and placed pour country and the world in peril by this Biden B.S.
Brunson case was denied to be heard based on congress having sovereign immunity.
BUT thats not the end to this farce…
We will be filing a petition for reconsideration within the next 30 days which moves the court to reconsider their denial. After it’s filed, it gets docketed, and they set it up again for a closed door hearing. This process takes about 30 days after it’s put on the docket.
Juan, SGanon, Adams, Johnson, Godlewski the pedophile… you are all still in business. Happy days.
You see asking the fox to stop being a fox is just retardation. As zappa said: “There is more stupidity than hydrogen in the universe, and it has a longer shelf life.”