Coverage Defendant Moves to Dismiss Jan. 6 Case Based on Newly Disclosed Footage, FBI Testimony

Every single J6 political prisoner should be released. The newly released footage is exculpatory evidence.

So I am the lawyer who represents the most January 6th defendants in the USA. Am I missing something, or shouldn’t I get all the time I need to review the new January 6th footage before more trials? And what about the people who have already been convicted or pled guilty?

— John Pierce (@CaliKidJMP) March 7, 2023

JUST IN: Censored video re-emerges of Jacob Chansley reading Trump’s tweet, telling protestors to GO HOME and remain peaceful..

WON’T SEE THIS ON CNN…
pic.twitter.com/L8bLXMGUAs

— Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) March 10, 2023

Last night

QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley had anti-Trump lawyer who made him plead guilty. #TuckerCarlson

Watch Tucker Carlson’s face at end. pic.twitter.com/6x97PyQG9m

— Abraham Stein (@AbrahamStein8) March 10, 2023

FREE ALL J6RS NOW!!!

QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley’s lawyer tells Tucker Carlson his client should be freed from 3.5-year jail sentence after new January 6 footage showed him being ESCORTED into Senate by copshttps://t.co/K7f91xWycT

— YaYa Johnson (@YaYaMagaQueen) March 9, 2023

Defendant Moves to Dismiss Jan. 6 Case Based on Newly Disclosed Footage, FBI Testimony

By: Zachary StieberEpoch Times,

A defendant in the Proud Boys trial over Jan. 6, 2021, charges moved on March 9 to dismiss the case, after some footage from the day of the breach was shown for the first time.

Dominic Pezzola is one of the Proud Boys members on trial for obstruction of an official proceeding and other charges. The newly disclosed footage, shown on Fox News this week, “is plainly exculpatory,” Pezzola’s lawyers said in the new motion.

“It establishes that the Senate chamber was never violently breached, and—in fact—was treated respectfully by January 6 protestors,” the motion reads.

Among the clips Fox’s Tucker Carlson broadcast was one of Jacob Chansley, another defendant who’s serving a jail sentence after pleading guilty, walking around accompanied by police officers. The officers didn’t stop Chansley and even tried to open doors for him. He eventually made it into the Senate chamber, where he and others later knelt and prayed. Chansley, during the prayer, gave thanks to the officers for “letting us into the building.”

Pezzola also entered the Capitol, and prosecutors have argued that he and others being inside forced Congress, which was certifying electoral votes from the 2020 election, to go into recess.

However, the new footage shows that members “could have continued proceedings,” Pezzola’s attorneys said.

“It was not Pezzola or codefendants who caused the Congress to recess,” the attorneys said. “Congress interrupted its own proceedings.”

The lawyers are asking U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee overseeing the case, to dismiss it. He’s asked in the motion to declare a mistrial if he rejects that request.
Epoch Times Photo
Dominic Pezzola in a file image. (DOJ via The Epoch Times)
Brady Violations

Prosecutors must not withhold evidence that can be exculpatory. The rule was crystallized in Brady v. Maryland, a 1963 Supreme Court decision.

“Suppression by the prosecution of evidence favorable to an accused who has requested it violates due process where the evidence is material either to guilt or to punishment, irrespective of the good faith or bad faith of the prosecution,” the decision states.

Zachary Rehl, another Proud Boys defendant, requested all information regarding Congress going into recess on Jan. 6, 2021, in late 2021.

“While Brady obligations do not extend to the entirety of the government, they do include investigative agencies or agencies closely related who knew or should have known that information would be material to a prosecution arising from their direct involvement. Here the U.S. Capitol Police are directly related and fully aware of the events of January 6, 2021,” lawyers for the defendants said.

They cited previous court decisions, including one that found that a prosecutor “has a duty to learn of any favorable evidence known to the others acting on the government’s behalf in the case, including the police.”

“We will respond through the court,” a spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia told The Epoch Times via email.

The U.S. Capitol Police didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Keep reading….