Operation Sandman – Part II

I posted the initial Operation Sandman article based on three sources. The initial source was the Telegram feed from Gen. McInerney. I have found this feed to be questionable in the past so I looked for other sources. A comment on that article said that the information was posted a year ago in the Miami Standard on March 17, 2022 but I cannot verify that after multiple searches including the Miami Standard.

I am writing this article as more information is starting to circulate concerning this operation and the consequences of the collapse of the petrodollar. For today, let’s consider the information that we know:

1. China and Russia are collaborating on the release of a new gold backed currency that will compete with the US dollar.
2. Most central banks are stockpiling gold reserves.
3. The President of Kenya has warned his people to divest any dollars as they will be worthless in a few weeks. Do not discount African countries and what they are saying and doing in conjunction with Russia and China.
4. A former US senator outlined a scenario ten years ago where the Asian markets opened on a Monday morning (Sunday night in the US) and a run on US treasuries started. The European markets opened and the run increased. People in the United States woke up Monday morning to find the dollar decimated.
5. India and China are buying Russian oil bypassing sanctions and the petrodollar.

There are other examples of the death of the petrodollar but the fact is absolute: the petrodollar will be dead in a short period of time. And once “the full faith and credit” of the basis for the value of a dollar is also found to be worthless, our economy will collapse. In a short time frame.

So back to Operation Sandman. Here is the analysis from the burning platform:

Is this feasible? Which 100 nations? Wouldn’t purposely collapsing the USD also destroy their economies? Sounds like BS to me.

Which 100 nations? I agree that getting 100 nations to agree to anything is hard. There are currently 195 countries in the world. There are 54 recognized countries in Africa. The real question is how many countries would be needed to accomplish this goal? My personal opinion is just Russia and China who are already working on a gold backed currency could achieve this goal. I doubt that getting 50 countries together would be a hard task given the transgressions of the United States around the world.

Wouldn’t purposely collapsing the USD also destroy their economies? This is a valid question. Here is some information that people must consider:

The BRICS Has Overtaken The G7 In Global GDP

The India-based Megh Updates platform, one of the world’s largest online informational platforms in terms of views, has stated that BRICS countries have officially overtaken G7 in share of world PPP GDP, and that this trend can be expected to continue.

More…

This means that the Western G7 is no longer the dominant economic force in the world.

The United States made the assumption that they would win the war in Ukraine through economic sanctions against Russia. The US government has been waging proxy wars to deplete the military effectiveness and destroy other nations’ economies for decades. How much of the world would be impacted by the collapse of the the US? Maybe the question that should be asked is what the impact of supporting the US. Western Europe, Canada and Australia have all be negatively impacted by Russian sanctions. Russia would not be impacted. Many countries that would be impacted would adjust their markets and come out better as Saudi Arabia and India are doing.

Sounds like BS to me.

The premise of 100 nations, a two week time frame and a complete collapse of the dollar are components that make Operation Sandman not very credible. The premise of the world waking up to the US dollar being a fiat currency that can never recover from the US debt is very credible. The West’s economies and military assets have been drained by the war in Ukraine. Since the United States started the strategy of economic warfare, is it a bad assumption that other countries would adopt and improve it?

David DeGerolamo